|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 18, 2014 16:47:16 GMT -5
If Obi-Wan sucks so much, how come he survived everything and Anakin was the one to die first... 1. Because of the Prophecy 2. Obi Wan doesn't suck, but Anakin is better. 3. Anakin has accomplished much more than Obi Wan Anakin is better in the force and with a saber. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 18, 2014 16:48:22 GMT -5
If Obi-Wan sucks so much, how come he survived everything and Anakin was the one to die first... 1. Because of the Prophecy 2. Obi Wan doesn't suck, but Anakin is better. 3. Anakin has accomplished much more than Obi Wan Anakin is better in the force and with a saber. 1. Omg 2. Lol 3. xD Arguable |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 18, 2014 16:49:19 GMT -5
Leland Chee has stated it is G-canon. G-canon is anything created by George himself. Therefore, it is G-canon. So is ROTS, but not as much, since it's not fully like the movie. T-canon would be video games and the old CW series. No, Leland Chee created T-Canon because he felt that he needed things that were lower than G-Canon but higher than C-Canon. TCW is T-Canon starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon#Canon_in_the_Holocron_continuity_databaseLOL Wookieepedia says Asajj Ventress' Nightsisters backstory was inconsistent and therefore non-canon so hahahaha. Do you follow Leland's twitter? |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 18, 2014 16:53:12 GMT -5
1. Because of the Prophecy 2. Obi Wan doesn't suck, but Anakin is better. 3. Anakin has accomplished much more than Obi Wan Anakin is better in the force and with a saber. 1. Omg 2. Lol 3. xD Arguable 1. ... 2. Um, something about Anakin being the best practitioner of Shien ever comes into mind. Oh, and being more powerful in the force 3. What? Obi Wan defeated Maul and Grievous by the skin of his teeth. He was WTFpwned by Dooku, whereas Anakin defeated Dooku with ease, keep in mind Dooku is the best Makashi practitioner of all time. Anakin fought and defeated Cin Drallig and his apprentice, Obi Wan had trouble against Ventress. Not arguable. Fact. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 18, 2014 16:53:47 GMT -5
LOL Wookieepedia says Asajj Ventress' Nightsisters backstory was inconsistent and therefore non-canon so hahahaha. Do you follow Leland's twitter? Wookiepedia is accurate. Saying otherwise is ignorant, as moderators constantly monitor the site. Somewhat |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 18, 2014 16:59:08 GMT -5
LOL Wookieepedia says Asajj Ventress' Nightsisters backstory was inconsistent and therefore non-canon so hahahaha. Do you follow Leland's twitter? Wookiepedia is accurate. Saying otherwise is ignorant, as moderators constantly monitor the site. Somewhat Moderators = EU-lovers who can't stand George Lucas. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 18, 2014 17:00:05 GMT -5
Wookiepedia is accurate. Saying otherwise is ignorant, as moderators constantly monitor the site. Somewhat Moderators = EU-lovers who can't stand George Lucas. Completely baseless |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 18, 2014 17:03:07 GMT -5
1. Omg 2. Lol 3. xD Arguable 1. ... 2. Um, something about Anakin being the best practitioner of Shien ever comes into mind. Oh, and being more powerful in the force 3. What? Obi Wan defeated Maul and Grievous by the skin of his teeth. He was WTFpwned by Dooku, whereas Anakin defeated Dooku with ease, keep in mind Dooku is the best Makashi practitioner of all time. Anakin fought and defeated Cin Drallig and his apprentice, Obi Wan had trouble against Ventress. Not arguable. Fact. 1. Saying he automatically wins because of a prophecy is ridiculous 2. They are equal in the force. Remember how they were both pushed back in ROTS when they tried to force push each other 3. It was luck that Anakin was able to cut off Dooku's hands and then cut his head off.. And is the Cin Drallig battle from some video game because it didn't happen in the movies the highest level of canon It's arguable because it's an opinion LOL Wookieepedia says Asajj Ventress' Nightsisters backstory was inconsistent and therefore non-canon so hahahaha. Do you follow Leland's twitter? Wookiepedia is accurate. Saying otherwise is ignorant, as moderators constantly monitor the site Yes, the moderators know everything about Star Wars and everything they wrote is 100% legit... |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 18, 2014 17:06:23 GMT -5
1. ... 2. Um, something about Anakin being the best practitioner of Shien ever comes into mind. Oh, and being more powerful in the force 3. What? Obi Wan defeated Maul and Grievous by the skin of his teeth. He was WTFpwned by Dooku, whereas Anakin defeated Dooku with ease, keep in mind Dooku is the best Makashi practitioner of all time. Anakin fought and defeated Cin Drallig and his apprentice, Obi Wan had trouble against Ventress. Not arguable. Fact. 1. Saying he automatically wins because of a prophecy is ridiculous 2. They are equal in the force. Remember how they were both pushed back in ROTS when they tried to force push each other 3. It was luck that Anakin was able to cut off Dooku's hands and then cut his head off.. And is the Cin Drallig battle from some video game because it didn't happen in the movies the highest level of canon It's arguable because it's an opinion Wookiepedia is accurate. Saying otherwise is ignorant, as moderators constantly monitor the site Yes, the moderators know everything about Star Wars and everything they wrote is 100% legit... 1. No 2. No they are not, Anakin recovered very quickly after the push and almost choked Obi Wan to death 3. It was not luck, he overpowered Dooku, something that Obi Wan could have never done. Cin Drallig battle is Still canon and you see it in the hologram in the ROTS film It is not arguable because there is overwhelming evidence that Anakin would win The moderators know a lot about Star Wars and do check information and verify it, it is a myth that Wiki sites are inaccurate. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 18, 2014 17:13:50 GMT -5
1. Saying he automatically wins because of a prophecy is ridiculous 2. They are equal in the force. Remember how they were both pushed back in ROTS when they tried to force push each other 3. It was luck that Anakin was able to cut off Dooku's hands and then cut his head off.. And is the Cin Drallig battle from some video game because it didn't happen in the movies the highest level of canon It's arguable because it's an opinion Yes, the moderators know everything about Star Wars and everything they wrote is 100% legit... 1. No 2. No they are not, Anakin recovered very quickly after the push and almost choked Obi Wan to death 3. It was not luck, he overpowered Dooku, something that Obi Wan could have never done. Cin Drallig battle is Still canon and you see it in the hologram in the ROTS film It is not arguable because there is overwhelming evidence that Anakin would win The moderators know a lot about Star Wars and do check information and verify it, it is a myth that Wiki sites are inaccurate. 1. Um yes... Let's try to use real stuff for this.. 2. They both recovered quickly and so what if Anakin choked Obi-Wan to death? Obi-Wan could've done that too but he's a Jedi and they don't really choke people.. 3. It was a plot device to push Anakin closer to the Darkside Oh yeah I remember that now... Well alright but I feel like Cin is a little overrated.. Your "overwhelming evidence" comprises of opinions |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 18, 2014 17:15:28 GMT -5
1. No 2. No they are not, Anakin recovered very quickly after the push and almost choked Obi Wan to death 3. It was not luck, he overpowered Dooku, something that Obi Wan could have never done. Cin Drallig battle is Still canon and you see it in the hologram in the ROTS film It is not arguable because there is overwhelming evidence that Anakin would win The moderators know a lot about Star Wars and do check information and verify it, it is a myth that Wiki sites are inaccurate. 1. Um yes... Let's try to use real stuff for this.. 2. They both recovered quickly and so what if Anakin choked Obi-Wan to death? Obi-Wan could've done that too but he's a Jedi and they don't really choke people.. 3. It was a plot device to push Anakin closer to the Darkside Oh yeah I remember that now... Well alright but I feel like Cin is a little overrated.. Your "overwhelming evidence" comprises of opinions 1. Okay 2. Anakin recovered quicker 3. Anakin still beat him My overwhelming evidence is that Anakin is proven to be many levels above Kenobi in saber and force combat and has accomplished far more. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 18, 2014 17:20:26 GMT -5
1. Um yes... Let's try to use real stuff for this.. 2. They both recovered quickly and so what if Anakin choked Obi-Wan to death? Obi-Wan could've done that too but he's a Jedi and they don't really choke people.. 3. It was a plot device to push Anakin closer to the Darkside Oh yeah I remember that now... Well alright but I feel like Cin is a little overrated.. Your "overwhelming evidence" comprises of opinions 1. Okay 2. Anakin recovered quicker 3. Anakin still beat him My overwhelming evidence is that Anakin is proven to be many levels above Kenobi in saber and force combat and has accomplished far more. 2. Well I don't really think so but even if he did, I don't see how that's exactly relevant.. 3. Well I think it's possible someone else could have too because all Anakin did was twist his lightsaber to cut off Dooku's hands so I think a lot of people could've done that How has Anakin accomplished more? Lets look at Kenobi's victories.. - Maul - Savage - Grievous - Vizsla - some other decently skilled people Anakin's only major victory was kind of just Dooku |
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jan 18, 2014 17:22:36 GMT -5
Dooku could have easily knocked out Anakin as he did with Obi-Wan, but Sidious' orders were to kill Kenobi and lure Skywalker to the Darkside.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 18, 2014 17:26:51 GMT -5
1. Okay 2. Anakin recovered quicker 3. Anakin still beat him My overwhelming evidence is that Anakin is proven to be many levels above Kenobi in saber and force combat and has accomplished far more. 2. Well I don't really think so but even if he did, I don't see how that's exactly relevant.. 3. Well I think it's possible someone else could have too because all Anakin did was twist his lightsaber to cut off Dooku's hands so I think a lot of people could've done that How has Anakin accomplished more? Lets look at Kenobi's victories.. - Maul - Savage - Grievous - Vizsla - some other decently skilled people Anakin's only major victory was kind of just Dooku 2. It's relevant because it shows that Obi Wan's push was weaker 3. No, Anakin overpowered Dooku. First of all the victory of Maul was a fluke (TPM) . Savage is unskilled, that can hardly be considered a accomplishment. Grievous is clumsy but still overpowered Kenobi. And Vizsla does not know how to use a lightsaber. Victory against Dooku is far better accomplishment than defeating Savage or Maul Anakin's Victories- Dooku, Greatest Practitioner of Makashi ever - Cin Drallig, one of the greatest blademasters of the Jedi Order - Dozens of Masters, Knights and Padawans - Could have defeated Ventress as a Padawan. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 18, 2014 17:27:58 GMT -5
Dooku could have easily knocked out Anakin as he did with Obi-Wan, but Sidious' orders were to kill Kenobi and lure Skywalker to the Darkside. No, Dooku lost because his Dun Moch backfired which caused Anakin to become uber-powerful |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 18, 2014 17:41:41 GMT -5
2. Well I don't really think so but even if he did, I don't see how that's exactly relevant.. 3. Well I think it's possible someone else could have too because all Anakin did was twist his lightsaber to cut off Dooku's hands so I think a lot of people could've done that How has Anakin accomplished more? Lets look at Kenobi's victories.. - Maul - Savage - Grievous - Vizsla - some other decently skilled people Anakin's only major victory was kind of just Dooku 2. It's relevant because it shows that Obi Wan's push was weaker 3. No, Anakin overpowered Dooku. First of all the victory of Maul was a fluke (TPM) . Savage is unskilled, that can hardly be considered a accomplishment. Grievous is clumsy but still overpowered Kenobi. And Vizsla does not know how to use a lightsaber. Victory against Dooku is far better accomplishment than defeating Savage or Maul Anakin's Victories- Dooku, Greatest Practitioner of Makashi ever - Cin Drallig, one of the greatest blademasters of the Jedi Order - Dozens of Masters, Knights and Padawans - Could have defeated Ventress as a Padawan. 2. Really, it was equal. That was the whole point to show they were equal 3. Ermahgerd lots of people could have done that Dooku was a fluke because Anakin might not have overpowered him. Savage is still better than some random unskilled Padawan.. Also Grievous might be clumsy but he's a good opponent and Vizsla is pretty good too Dozens of random Padawans are nothing because one it was a surprise attack, two they are unskilled, three he had an army of clones to do most of the work |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 18, 2014 17:45:36 GMT -5
2. It's relevant because it shows that Obi Wan's push was weaker 3. No, Anakin overpowered Dooku. First of all the victory of Maul was a fluke (TPM) . Savage is unskilled, that can hardly be considered a accomplishment. Grievous is clumsy but still overpowered Kenobi. And Vizsla does not know how to use a lightsaber. Victory against Dooku is far better accomplishment than defeating Savage or Maul Anakin's Victories- Dooku, Greatest Practitioner of Makashi ever - Cin Drallig, one of the greatest blademasters of the Jedi Order - Dozens of Masters, Knights and Padawans - Could have defeated Ventress as a Padawan. 2. Really, it was equal. That was the whole point to show they were equal 3. Ermahgerd lots of people could have done that Dooku was a fluke because Anakin might not have overpowered him. Savage is still better than some random unskilled Padawan.. Also Grievous might be clumsy but he's a good opponent and Vizsla is pretty good too Dozens of random Padawans are nothing because one it was a surprise attack, two they are unskilled, three he had an army of clones to do most of the work 2. Maybe 3. Only Yoda could... Dooku was second only to him. However when Anakin tapped into his hate, he finally had the power to overpower Dooku Dooku was by no means a fluke, it was a result of Anakin's skill and Anakin tapping into his anger. Grievous and Vizsla wouldn't last 5 seconds against Anakin plus Savage is still unskilled when compared to Jedi Masters and Knights 1. When he defeated Cin Drallig (Probably the most skilled Jedi in the temple in terms of Saber fighting) without clones. In fact, he killed dozens without clones |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 18, 2014 17:48:28 GMT -5
2. Really, it was equal. That was the whole point to show they were equal 3. Ermahgerd lots of people could have done that Dooku was a fluke because Anakin might not have overpowered him. Savage is still better than some random unskilled Padawan.. Also Grievous might be clumsy but he's a good opponent and Vizsla is pretty good too Dozens of random Padawans are nothing because one it was a surprise attack, two they are unskilled, three he had an army of clones to do most of the work 2. Maybe 3. Only Yoda could... Dooku was second only to him. However when Anakin tapped into his hate, he finally had the power to overpower Dooku Dooku was by no means a fluke, it was a result of Anakin's skill and Anakin tapping into his anger. Grievous and Vizsla wouldn't last 5 seconds against Anakin plus Savage is still unskilled when compared to Jedi Masters and Knights 1. When he defeated Cin Drallig (Probably the most skilled Jedi in the temple in terms of Saber fighting) without clones. In fact, he killed dozens without clones Anyone Jedi can defeat whoever they want if they tap into their hate.. And still, those random Jedi are nothing.... |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jan 18, 2014 17:50:58 GMT -5
LOL Wookieepedia says Asajj Ventress' Nightsisters backstory was inconsistent and therefore non-canon so hahahaha. Do you follow Leland's twitter? That actually makes sense it was inconsistent and it's not like anyone ever mentions her as a Jedi before... |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jan 18, 2014 17:52:54 GMT -5
Yeah, Anakin really did kill dozens of jedi without the help of clones.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 18, 2014 17:57:43 GMT -5
Yeah, Anakin really did kill dozens of jedi without the help of clones. wow such skill many tough guys very impressive wow |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jan 18, 2014 18:58:39 GMT -5
Oh. It doesn't look like I've left my opinion for this one yet.... but it goes to Obi. Creamed Anakin then... Creamed him now.  |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 18, 2014 20:10:48 GMT -5
LOL Wookieepedia says Asajj Ventress' Nightsisters backstory was inconsistent and therefore non-canon so hahahaha. Do you follow Leland's twitter? That actually makes sense it was inconsistent and it's not like anyone ever mentions her as a Jedi before... OMG. Just. George said so. That's it. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jan 18, 2014 20:16:05 GMT -5
I actually think the backstory of Ventress as a Nightsister fits in with her old backstory... so if you really want her old backstory to still be canon I'm pretty sure it works with the Nightsister one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jan 18, 2014 20:17:56 GMT -5
That actually makes sense it was inconsistent and it's not like anyone ever mentions her as a Jedi before... OMG. Just. George said so. That's it. Yup yup I'm sure he said everything and takes a great interest in the subject of Ventress back story NOT. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 18, 2014 20:19:08 GMT -5
OMG. Just. George said so. That's it. Yup yup I'm sure he said everything and takes a great interest in the subject of Ventress back story NOT. Have you even seen the behind the scenes videos? It was George's idea, he wanted to focus on Ventress for once, and he was interested in the Nightsisters too. Just because you don't like her and you seem to hate George doesn't mean he doesn't care about the story. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jan 18, 2014 20:26:08 GMT -5
Yup yup I'm sure he said everything and takes a great interest in the subject of Ventress back story NOT. Have you even seen the behind the scenes videos? It was George's idea, he wanted to focus on Ventress for once, and he was interested in the Nightsisters too. Just because you don't like her and you seem to hate George doesn't mean he doesn't care about the story. I never said I hated George but he seems to make some questionable decisions.... |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 18, 2014 20:27:21 GMT -5
Have you even seen the behind the scenes videos? It was George's idea, he wanted to focus on Ventress for once, and he was interested in the Nightsisters too. Just because you don't like her and you seem to hate George doesn't mean he doesn't care about the story. I never said I hated George but he seems to make some questionable decisions.... Well, Ventress' backstory wasn't one of them, so. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 19, 2014 6:37:35 GMT -5
Yeah, Anakin really did kill dozens of jedi without the help of clones.  The novel tells us that Anakin did kill many jedi without the help of clones... |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 19, 2014 6:38:09 GMT -5
Yeah, Anakin really did kill dozens of jedi without the help of clones. wow such skill many tough guys very impressive wow Just read the novel |
|
The novel tells us that Anakin did kill many jedi without the help of clones... 
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5