|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:30:42 GMT -5
Aurra is a rather talented fighter and a formidable foe, but I really don't believe she's experienced in the Force enough to fight off an actual Jedi/Sith. She relies on her blasters because she's stronger with them, but that's it. She can't use Force-choke against, say, an actual Force-sensitive and I doubt she's better with a lightsaber than Ventress is. Ventress, on the other hand, has the Force and is quite strong with it. She held off against both Luminara and Aayla AND Anakin and Obi-Wan, and did extremely well against Anakin in "ARC Troopers." Her Force chokes are strong (she did it to both Anakin and Obi-Wan) and I'm sure she could easily pull one off against a person like Aurra, who has no form of defence against them. Not to mention her lightsaber skills are by far better than Aurra's, and her Force sensitivity enhances all her skills. Sorry, but Aurra's blasters are no match for Ventress and the Force. 1. Aurra has sabers and the force 2. Aurra has killed many Masters in her time |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 25, 2014 14:31:19 GMT -5
I feel like someone who's getting their rear handed to them by a 14 year old girl would try to maybe use their lightsabers and force ability against her..
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jan 25, 2014 14:31:58 GMT -5
Yes, because Ventress would win. No, because people don't like Aurra  Well, if Aurra would have been better than Ventress I would have chosen her side. But Ventress is just a better fighter in my opinion. If it had been Jar Jar VS Aurra I would vote for Aurra though, despite liking Jar Jar better. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 25, 2014 14:32:07 GMT -5
Yes, because Ventress would win. No, because people don't like Aurra I actually like Aurra but I still think Ventress would win |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:32:20 GMT -5
1. It's on her back 2. She puts more confidence in her blaster skills, and she does have a saber 3. Invalid argument. Does TCW ever say that Aurra does not have a lightsaber? NO! You seem to misunderstand canon, unless TCW says explicitly that Aurra can't use the force or use a saber, then it's canon. 4. What? Tell that to this Jedi master: 1. What? 2. You can use the force and a blaster combined. 3. I said she never used them in TCW. That might mean she can't use them properly or not at all. 4. In TCW she can't even beat Ahsoka. So that's obviously non-canon. 1. She keeps her weapons on her back 2. But she would concentrate too much on shooting 3. Nope, she defeated many Jedi Masters. 4. LOL what? She was going to kill Ahsoka before Padme stepped in. Does Ahsoka defeating her overwrite the comic in which she defeats the Master? NO! So it is canon |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 25, 2014 14:33:01 GMT -5
Aurra is a rather talented fighter and a formidable foe, but I really don't believe she's experienced in the Force enough to fight off an actual Jedi/Sith. She relies on her blasters because she's stronger with them, but that's it. She can't use Force-choke against, say, an actual Force-sensitive and I doubt she's better with a lightsaber than Ventress is. Ventress, on the other hand, has the Force and is quite strong with it. She held off against both Luminara and Aayla AND Anakin and Obi-Wan, and did extremely well against Anakin in "ARC Troopers." Her Force chokes are strong (she did it to both Anakin and Obi-Wan) and I'm sure she could easily pull one off against a person like Aurra, who has no form of defence against them. Not to mention her lightsaber skills are by far better than Aurra's, and her Force sensitivity enhances all her skills. Sorry, but Aurra's blasters are no match for Ventress and the Force. 1. Aurra has sabers and the force 2. Aurra has killed many Masters in her time The exact same thing could be said for Ventress. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:33:14 GMT -5
I feel like someone who's getting their rear handed to them by a 14 year old girl would try to maybe use their lightsabers and force ability against her.. Aurra would have killed Ahsoka if it weren't for Padme and Plo Koon Plus, Aurra has killed many Knights and Masters |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 25, 2014 14:33:37 GMT -5
Yes, because Ventress would win. No, because people don't like Aurra I like her! But Ventress is better and I love her. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:34:00 GMT -5
1. Aurra has sabers and the force 2. Aurra has killed many Masters in her time The exact same thing could be said for Ventress. No, Ventress has only defeated Master Fay, while his back was turned and he wasn't expecting it. Aurra went head to head with a Master and two knights |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 25, 2014 14:34:06 GMT -5
I feel like someone who's getting their rear handed to them by a 14 year old girl would try to maybe use their lightsabers and force ability against her.. Aurra would have killed Ahsoka if it weren't for Padme and Plo Koon Plus, Aurra has killed many Knights and Masters So has Ventress... not to mention Ventress could easily beat Ahsoka. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 25, 2014 14:34:45 GMT -5
The exact same thing could be said for Ventress. No, Ventress has only defeated Master Fay, while his back was turned and he wasn't expecting it. Aurra went head to head with a Master and two knights Her skills were strong enough for Sidious himself to worry. And Fay is a girl. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 25, 2014 14:35:04 GMT -5
I feel like someone who's getting their rear handed to them by a 14 year old girl would try to maybe use their lightsabers and force ability against her.. Aurra would have killed Ahsoka if it weren't for Padme and Plo Koon Plus, Aurra has killed many Knights and Masters Then why didn't she kill Master Plo Koon and a weak senator and a girl.. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:35:11 GMT -5
Aurra would have killed Ahsoka if it weren't for Padme and Plo Koon Plus, Aurra has killed many Knights and Masters So has Ventress... not to mention Ventress could easily beat Ahsoka. Ventress has only killed a few knights and 1 master, who was no challenge since his back was turned. However, Aurra went head to head with a master ad two or three other knights and defeated them. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jan 25, 2014 14:35:28 GMT -5
I think I'm going to just watch this one play out  And remember its a battle of skills in combat not a battle of what's more canon.... Also crap I forgot to change the location again I always forget that now  I'll try and remember next time I was just going too use a randomizer with a ton of locations and see which one came up. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jan 25, 2014 14:35:48 GMT -5
1. What? 2. You can use the force and a blaster combined. 3. I said she never used them in TCW. That might mean she can't use them properly or not at all. 4. In TCW she can't even beat Ahsoka. So that's obviously non-canon. 1. She keeps her weapons on her back 2. But she would concentrate too much on shooting 3. Nope, she defeated many Jedi Masters. 4. LOL what? She was going to kill Ahsoka before Padme stepped in. Does Ahsoka defeating her overwrite the comic in which she defeats the Master? NO! So it is canon 1. Well that's stupid... she could just put some lightsabers on her belt... 2. Jedi can fight in close combat and still use the force. 3. In comics perhaps. But in TCW she's pretty bad. 4. Still, Ahsoka defeated her on Florum. And Ahsoka had to protect Padme while fighting, which is why she lost, on Alderaan. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:36:34 GMT -5
Aurra would have killed Ahsoka if it weren't for Padme and Plo Koon Plus, Aurra has killed many Knights and Masters Then why didn't she kill Master Plo Koon and a weak senator and a girl.. 1. Aurra had no choice but to run, Plo Koon could have asked for assistance and Aurra didn't have time, especially since she could have been shot while fighting Plo 2. She was going to kill Ahsoka, she wasn't expecting a senator to have a weapon |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 25, 2014 14:37:15 GMT -5
So has Ventress... not to mention Ventress could easily beat Ahsoka. Ventress has only killed a few knights and 1 master, who was no challenge since his back was turned. However, Aurra went head to head with a master ad two or three other knights and defeated them. Who? |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jan 25, 2014 14:37:45 GMT -5
Then why didn't she kill Master Plo Koon and a weak senator and a girl.. 1. Aurra had no choice but to run, Plo Koon could have asked for assistance and Aurra didn't have time, especially since she could have been shot while fighting Plo 2. She was going to kill Ahsoka, she wasn't expecting a senator to have a weapon 1. Why did she have to run? If she's so awesome she could have defeated Plo Koon and Ahsoka. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:38:06 GMT -5
1. She keeps her weapons on her back 2. But she would concentrate too much on shooting 3. Nope, she defeated many Jedi Masters. 4. LOL what? She was going to kill Ahsoka before Padme stepped in. Does Ahsoka defeating her overwrite the comic in which she defeats the Master? NO! So it is canon 1. Well that's stupid... she could just put some lightsabers on her belt... 2. Jedi can fight in close combat and still use the force. 3. In comics perhaps. But in TCW she's pretty bad. 4. Still, Ahsoka defeated her on Florum. And Ahsoka had to protect Padme while fighting, which is why she lost, on Alderaan. 1. She still has them 2. But she did not in that battle, for whatever reason. 3. No she is just unlucky, in TCW the good guys always win 4. Aurra coiuldn't have stopped Ahsoka slicing up the Slave I and she didn't expect Padme to be armed |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 25, 2014 14:38:53 GMT -5
Then why didn't she kill Master Plo Koon and a weak senator and a girl.. 1. Aurra had no choice but to run, Plo Koon could have asked for assistance and Aurra didn't have time, especially since she could have been shot while fighting Plo 2. She was going to kill Ahsoka, she wasn't expecting a senator to have a weapon If Ventress was there, Padme and Ahsoka would've been dead. Just saying. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 25, 2014 14:39:35 GMT -5
Then why didn't she kill Master Plo Koon and a weak senator and a girl.. 1. Aurra had no choice but to run, Plo Koon could have asked for assistance and Aurra didn't have time, especially since she could have been shot while fighting Plo 2. She was going to kill Ahsoka, she wasn't expecting a senator to have a weapon 1. Well I think Ventress could've taken them out... 2. She could've have sensed it with the force |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:39:51 GMT -5
1. Aurra had no choice but to run, Plo Koon could have asked for assistance and Aurra didn't have time, especially since she could have been shot while fighting Plo 2. She was going to kill Ahsoka, she wasn't expecting a senator to have a weapon If Ventress was there, Padme and Ahsoka would've been dead. Just saying. No. Help was coming and Ahsoka has fought Ventress before |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:40:18 GMT -5
1. Aurra had no choice but to run, Plo Koon could have asked for assistance and Aurra didn't have time, especially since she could have been shot while fighting Plo 2. She was going to kill Ahsoka, she wasn't expecting a senator to have a weapon 1. Why did she have to run? If she's so awesome she could have defeated Plo Koon and Ahsoka. For story purposes and in TCW, the Republic always wins. Plus, she would have been shot |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jan 25, 2014 14:40:21 GMT -5
1. Well that's stupid... she could just put some lightsabers on her belt... 2. Jedi can fight in close combat and still use the force. 3. In comics perhaps. But in TCW she's pretty bad. 4. Still, Ahsoka defeated her on Florum. And Ahsoka had to protect Padme while fighting, which is why she lost, on Alderaan. 1. She still has them 2. But she did not in that battle, for whatever reason. 3. No she is just unlucky, in TCW the good guys always win 4. Aurra coiuldn't have stopped Ahsoka slicing up the Slave I and she didn't expect Padme to be armed 1. Well, why wouldn't she use them then? 2. Because she can't (properly) use the force. 3. Say that to Master Di, Satine and 99. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 25, 2014 14:40:30 GMT -5
If Ventress was there, Padme and Ahsoka would've been dead. Just saying. No. Help was coming and Ahsoka has fought Ventress before Ahsoka was an inexperienced 14 year-old... |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jan 25, 2014 14:41:07 GMT -5
1. Why did she have to run? If she's so awesome she could have defeated Plo Koon and Ahsoka. For story purposes and in TCW, the Republic always wins. Plus, she would have been shot By whom? |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:41:11 GMT -5
1. She still has them 2. But she did not in that battle, for whatever reason. 3. No she is just unlucky, in TCW the good guys always win 4. Aurra coiuldn't have stopped Ahsoka slicing up the Slave I and she didn't expect Padme to be armed 1. Well, why wouldn't she use them then? 2. Because she can't (properly) use the force. 3. Say that to Master Di, Satine and 99. 1. Doesn't have the time/can't be bothered 2. She can, she trained up to a padawan 3. Aurra does not know those people |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:41:29 GMT -5
For story purposes and in TCW, the Republic always wins. Plus, she would have been shot By whom? Killian |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 25, 2014 14:42:01 GMT -5
No. Help was coming and Ahsoka has fought Ventress before Ahsoka was an inexperienced 14 year-old... Ventress couldn't overpower her in Cloak of Darkness Also, Aurra was going to kill Ahsoka |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jan 25, 2014 14:42:35 GMT -5
4. Aurra coiuldn't have stopped Ahsoka slicing up the Slave I and she didn't expect Padme to be armed Forgot answering to this. She could have fought Ahsoka instead of trying to escape in the Slave I. Also, she only defeated Ahsoka because she was trying to defend Padme. |
|
I'll try and remember next time I was just going too use a randomizer with a ton of locations and see which one came up.
