|
Post by Newan on Mar 7, 2014 16:50:40 GMT -5
So far I watched 3 of 4 arcs. Not going to watch Yoda arc yet. Order 66 is probably up there with some of the best arcs though
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Mar 7, 2014 16:58:08 GMT -5
Don't you just hate how Episodes 8 and 9 are called "The Disappeared Part 1" and "Part 2" while the Clone Wars never, ever did this with their titles. It's probably due to the cancellation though but i would have called Part 2: "The Ritual"
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Mar 7, 2014 17:04:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Mar 25, 2014 2:22:11 GMT -5
I saw all the episodes. Holy smokes, did it end on a high note! That Yoda story was up to biblical proportions on how special it is.
|
|
|
Post by Echani on Mar 29, 2014 18:44:19 GMT -5
Also, the Kaminoans do seem to know that Palpatine is a bad guy... They seem to work for him. I loved that, i always thought the Kaminoans were the good guys who were helping the Jedi without knowing Order 66 was implanted. But this Arc made me open my eyes on them so much, i loved it! Strange. In BattleFront 2 one of the missions is too kill the kamonians as they create a big rebellion on Kamino, it's probably not canon though.
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Mar 29, 2014 18:45:48 GMT -5
They seem to work for him. I loved that, i always thought the Kaminoans were the good guys who were helping the Jedi without knowing Order 66 was implanted. But this Arc made me open my eyes on them so much, i loved it! Strange. In BattleFront 2 one of the missions is too kill the kamonians as they create a big rebellion on Kamino, it's probably not canon though. Battlefront 2 was never canon.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Apr 26, 2014 17:00:52 GMT -5
Strange. In BattleFront 2 one of the missions is too kill the kamonians as they create a big rebellion on Kamino, it's probably not canon though. Battlefront 2 was never canon. I know this is an old comment but I'd like to say that the parts of the 'Rise of the Empire' campaign that we don't see in the movies are canon, such as the Kamino Uprising and the Battle on Mustafar.
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Apr 26, 2014 18:25:47 GMT -5
Battlefront 2 was never canon. I know this is an old comment but I'd like to say that the parts of the 'Rise of the Empire' campaign that we don't see in the movies are canon, such as the Kamino Uprising and the Battle on Mustafar. What is the Rise of The Empire Campaign?
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Apr 26, 2014 18:33:38 GMT -5
It was just recently made official that only the SW movies, TCW, Rebels, and future SW stuff is canon. So I think it's safe to say BF2 is not canon anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Apr 26, 2014 18:56:33 GMT -5
Really I don't think this changes anything. They are probably not going to rewrite everything in fact it's almost impossible to rewriting everything and expect people to accept it. All I think it changes is the POST ROTJ stuff which is a clusterfuck of shit anyways I'm pretty sure that's all they will do anyways.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 26, 2014 23:20:56 GMT -5
It was just recently made official that only the SW movies, TCW, Rebels, and future SW stuff is canon. So I think it's safe to say BF2 is not canon anymore. Even so, I think, if the story makes sense and fits with the official canon, then it is canon as well.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Apr 27, 2014 5:14:18 GMT -5
It was just recently made official that only the SW movies, TCW, Rebels, and future SW stuff is canon. So I think it's safe to say BF2 is not canon anymore. Good, good, no more Emperor clones
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Apr 27, 2014 5:16:51 GMT -5
It was just recently made official that only the SW movies, TCW, Rebels, and future SW stuff is canon. So I think it's safe to say BF2 is not canon anymore. Even so, I think, if the story makes sense and fits with the official canon, then it is canon as well. Battlefront's story doesn't fit in though. The Battle of Mustafar for example has battledroids in it... while all battledroids were shut down by Anakin before he went to Mustafar. Also, the entire base on Mustafar is somehow rebuild...
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Apr 27, 2014 6:37:03 GMT -5
It was just recently made official that only the SW movies, TCW, Rebels, and future SW stuff is canon. So I think it's safe to say BF2 is not canon anymore. I thought that was commen sense already?
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Apr 27, 2014 10:44:30 GMT -5
It was just recently made official that only the SW movies, TCW, Rebels, and future SW stuff is canon. So I think it's safe to say BF2 is not canon anymore. Even so, I think, if the story makes sense and fits with the official canon, then it is canon as well. So if Darth Sidious decides to join the traveling circus between The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi and then goes back to being a sith at the end of it, it would still be canon since it doesn't interfere with the movies? It was just recently made official that only the SW movies, TCW, Rebels, and future SW stuff is canon. So I think it's safe to say BF2 is not canon anymore. Good, good, no more Emperor clones Yes, it's about time too. It was just recently made official that only the SW movies, TCW, Rebels, and future SW stuff is canon. So I think it's safe to say BF2 is not canon anymore. I thought that was commen sense already? Um, no, it was never officially confirmed. Most people don't consider EU canon, and it had been in the talks for a long time for EU to be officially non canon. The official statement was pretty recently.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 27, 2014 10:56:06 GMT -5
Even so, I think, if the story makes sense and fits with the official canon, then it is canon as well. So if Darth Sidious decides to join the traveling circus between The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi and then goes back to being a sith at the end of it, it would still be canon since it doesn't interfere with the movies? I said, "if the story makes sense."
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Apr 27, 2014 11:12:23 GMT -5
So if Darth Sidious decides to join the traveling circus between The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi and then goes back to being a sith at the end of it, it would still be canon since it doesn't interfere with the movies? I said, "if the story makes sense." Well then you get into the whole argument of if the story makes sense or not, and then it makes everything less official again. Some of the stories do make sense but I don't think they're going to be counted as officially canon.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 27, 2014 11:32:17 GMT -5
I said, "if the story makes sense." Well then you get into the whole argument of if the story makes sense or not, and then it makes everything less official again. Some of the stories do make sense but I don't think they're going to be counted as officially canon. But compare a novel like "Kenobi" or "Darth Plagueis" to Palpatine clones. The clones make no sense, therefore it is fully non-canon. But with Plagueis, things made a lot of sense, and disregarding it would be pointless.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Apr 27, 2014 12:02:30 GMT -5
Well then you get into the whole argument of if the story makes sense or not, and then it makes everything less official again. Some of the stories do make sense but I don't think they're going to be counted as officially canon. But compare a novel like "Kenobi" or "Darth Plagueis" to Palpatine clones. The clones make no sense, therefore it is fully non-canon. But with Plagueis, things made a lot of sense, and disregarding it would be pointless. I agree that the Plagueis novel makes sense, but we don't know whether it is what George Lucas or any other important Star Wars storyteller (like Filoni) had in mind.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Apr 27, 2014 12:10:40 GMT -5
It was just recently made official that only the SW movies, TCW, Rebels, and future SW stuff is canon. So I think it's safe to say BF2 is not canon anymore. BF2 doesn't interfere with Lucasfilms' plans so still remains canon.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Apr 27, 2014 12:21:51 GMT -5
The statement on SW.com only implied that EU that interfered with future plans would be discarded so it is likely much of the EU still remains intact and canon (although it is now a little more insignificant compared to the movies and TCW)
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Apr 27, 2014 12:59:17 GMT -5
But compare a novel like "Kenobi" or "Darth Plagueis" to Palpatine clones. The clones make no sense, therefore it is fully non-canon. But with Plagueis, things made a lot of sense, and disregarding it would be pointless. I agree that the Plagueis novel makes sense, but we don't know whether it is what George Lucas or any other important Star Wars storyteller (like Filoni) had in mind. I think James Luceno did discuss it with George during writing. Many of the "important" stories are discussed with him.
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Apr 27, 2014 14:16:36 GMT -5
The statement on SW.com only implied that EU that interfered with future plans would be discarded so it is likely much of the EU still remains intact and canon (although it is now a little more insignificant compared to the movies and TCW) It was always insignificant compared to the movies and CW and now also Rebels.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Apr 27, 2014 14:48:58 GMT -5
It was just recently made official that only the SW movies, TCW, Rebels, and future SW stuff is canon. So I think it's safe to say BF2 is not canon anymore. BF2 doesn't interfere with Lucasfilms' plans so still remains canon. It can still be considered canon, but officially it's not canon with the movies and shows..
|
|
|
Post by The Jawa Juicer on May 3, 2014 15:23:21 GMT -5
Is Shaak Tii's death by Grievous canon now? Because I just watched "Voices" and when Yoda was getting his horrific visions of the future, we saw Shaak Ti get impaled by a blue lightsaber through the chest, like in the deleted scene from ROTS, instead of falling into a sarlacc thing in TFU, which was canon. So is Ti's death on The Invisible Hand canon now?
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on May 3, 2014 15:43:21 GMT -5
Is Shaak Tii's death by Grievous canon now? Because I just watched "Voices" and when Yoda was getting his horrific visions of the future, we saw Shaak Ti get impaled by a blue lightsaber through the chest, like in the deleted scene from ROTS, instead of falling into a sarlacc thing in TFU, which was canon. So is Ti's death on The Invisible Hand canon now? I suppose it's canon now, yes. And TFU is going to be overwritten by Rebels anyway (this has been confirmed) so it's already non-canon...
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 3, 2014 15:45:12 GMT -5
Is Shaak Tii's death by Grievous canon now? Because I just watched "Voices" and when Yoda was getting his horrific visions of the future, we saw Shaak Ti get impaled by a blue lightsaber through the chest, like in the deleted scene from ROTS, instead of falling into a sarlacc thing in TFU, which was canon. So is Ti's death on The Invisible Hand canon now? No, it's Anakin who kills her.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on May 3, 2014 15:49:35 GMT -5
Is Shaak Tii's death by Grievous canon now? Because I just watched "Voices" and when Yoda was getting his horrific visions of the future, we saw Shaak Ti get impaled by a blue lightsaber through the chest, like in the deleted scene from ROTS, instead of falling into a sarlacc thing in TFU, which was canon. So is Ti's death on The Invisible Hand canon now? No, it's Anakin who kills her. It could be either of those. In both scenes she gets stabbed by a blue lightsaber.
|
|
|
Post by The Jawa Juicer on May 3, 2014 15:50:31 GMT -5
Is Shaak Tii's death by Grievous canon now? Because I just watched "Voices" and when Yoda was getting his horrific visions of the future, we saw Shaak Ti get impaled by a blue lightsaber through the chest, like in the deleted scene from ROTS, instead of falling into a sarlacc thing in TFU, which was canon. So is Ti's death on The Invisible Hand canon now? No, it's Anakin who kills her. Oh. I thought they were different scenes because it showed Palpatine fighting Windu, Kolar, Fisto, and the others, the security tape Yoda and Obi-Wan saw. Plus, Ti was stationed on Kamino, wasn't she? EDIT: I remembered there was another scene where Anakin killed her
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 3, 2014 15:52:22 GMT -5
No, it's Anakin who kills her. It could be either of those. In both scenes she gets stabbed by a blue lightsaber. But Shaak Ti is briefly glimpsed while Yoda is on Kashyyyk.
|
|