|
Politics
Jan 5, 2014 14:44:39 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Spidyyr on Jan 5, 2014 14:44:39 GMT -5
There should be NO ONE LEADER. So you are an anarchist? anarchist: a person who believes that government and laws are not necessary Umm nope, not really.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jan 5, 2014 14:46:20 GMT -5
Well, I'd rather have a robot leader than a human leader. There should be NO ONE LEADER. I agree, there shouldn't be at this point. But democracy isn't perfect either, people without any idea about politics will still vote. Many politicians have gained power by manipulating these people, including Hitler. While I doubt someone like Hitler would gain power at this time, they can still be manipulated.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 5, 2014 14:46:24 GMT -5
And no offense, but a soulless, emotionless object making world decisions is ridiculous. Why? Robots can already calculate events with decent accuracy, when they surpass human intelligence they will be able to predict many things correctly.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 5, 2014 14:47:26 GMT -5
anarchist: a person who believes that government and laws are not necessary Umm nope, not really. But your statement "NO ONE LEADER" , is saying that you wish no one to be leader. Therefore, no real government
|
|
|
Politics
Jan 5, 2014 14:50:16 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Spidyyr on Jan 5, 2014 14:50:16 GMT -5
anarchist: a person who believes that government and laws are not necessary Umm nope, not really. But your statement "NO ONE LEADER" , is saying that you wish no one to be leader. Therefore, no real government Incorrect, I said there should no ONE leader. As in no single person that leads the world. Try to stay with me here.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jan 5, 2014 15:08:12 GMT -5
anarchist: a person who believes that government and laws are not necessary Umm nope, not really. But your statement "NO ONE LEADER" , is saying that you wish no one to be leader. Therefore, no real government I think Spider means that no one person should rule the world, not that there should be no leader.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 15:31:09 GMT -5
Everyone is assuming we humans don't destroy ourselves in the future...
I believe it's inevitable. Humanity will kill itself.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jan 5, 2014 15:33:08 GMT -5
Everyone is assuming we humans don't destroy ourselves in the future... I believe it's inevitable. Humanity will kill itself. I think humans will become extinct very soon, due to war and other problems such as overpopulation
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 15:48:46 GMT -5
Everyone is assuming we humans don't destroy ourselves in the future... I believe it's inevitable. Humanity will kill itself. I think humans will become extinct very soon, due to war and other problems such as overpopulation Me too.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jan 5, 2014 16:13:58 GMT -5
Everyone is assuming we humans don't destroy ourselves in the future... I believe it's inevitable. Humanity will kill itself. I agree, humans are likely to kill themselves eventually. Unless we colonize other planets or machines replace us in time. And a World government could help to prevent our extinction.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 5, 2014 16:27:18 GMT -5
I feel like Jango's gadgets armor etc would be pretty useful/helpful but I also feel like Bane is more skilled..
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jan 5, 2014 16:34:10 GMT -5
I feel like Jango's gadgets armor etc would be pretty useful/helpful but I also feel like Bane is more skilled.. Uhm... wrong thread?
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jan 5, 2014 16:41:12 GMT -5
I feel like Jango's gadgets armor etc would be pretty useful/helpful but I also feel like Bane is more skilled.. Uhm... wrong thread? ........... So it is.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 17:27:30 GMT -5
I personally believe
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jan 5, 2014 17:45:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jan 5, 2014 18:19:03 GMT -5
LOL
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 5, 2014 18:26:32 GMT -5
We don't need a one world government, just have all nations be on "good terms" with one another. But of course, that can't exist with things like racism, war, terrorism, Israel, etc..
|
|
|
Politics
Jan 5, 2014 19:08:13 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Spidyyr on Jan 5, 2014 19:08:13 GMT -5
We don't need a one world government, just have all nations be on "good terms" with one another. But of course, that can't exist with things like racism, war, terrorism, Israel, etc.. Thank You.
|
|
|
Post by Echani on Jan 5, 2014 20:52:12 GMT -5
My views: A one world govt would be a somewhat good idea, but if it were to fall, that would be a terrible thing. Plus with everything set up already with world governments, seems pretty impossible. I know it sounds weird, but I would be in favor of some countries having a dictatorship, but not the way you think. A dictatorship where a good man leads, a example with Kemal Atturk, he was the first president of Turkey, a dictator, and made it to where it was more westernized. This way, many countries were more accepting of it. He also made it to where women didn't have to wear hijabs, which was previously a requirement and many similar things. Countries with corrupt govts could use someone to put order and help fix a country. I also believe no government should have religion put into it, separation from church and state is a good thing. Why I think this is because it seems to me to borderline theocracy, and that is a terrible govt type. It places many restrictions, and we are in 2013, where there are a diverse of people. I believe that all politicians are mostly liars, the U.S govt is a lie, and that U.S should stick to its own affairs (problems) before trying to go in and solve others. The U.S govt also has a agenda for more than "good" in my opinion, and is a very greedy place.
I am a democrat, but I love to know everyone's side and try to understand how they think about things. On that note, I personally believe that Obama is trying his hardest in the U.S, he hasn't made a lot of his promises (Which does bug me.) and Obamacare seemed to mess a lot things up but he is dealing with the most debt of any president. My thought on republicans is that many can be smart, but greedy and tend to put religion in their political beliefs. I believe democrats care more for the people of poverty and don't really care for the rich. I also want to know how a republican would classify the characteristics of a republican. I have grown up in a democrat household, (aside from my dad) and I do get a lot of things from my mom, but I like to research them and form my own conclusion on all subjects.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jan 5, 2014 21:04:15 GMT -5
My views: A one world govt would be a somewhat good idea, but if it were to fall, that would be a terrible thing. Plus with everything set up already with world governments, seems pretty impossible. I know it sounds weird, but I would be in favor of some countries having a dictatorship, but not the way you think. A dictatorship where a good man leads, a example with Kemal Atturk, he was the first president of Turkey, a dictator, and made it to where it was more westernized. This way, many countries were more accepting of it. He also made it to where women didn't have to wear hijabs, which was previously a requirement and many similar things. Countries with corrupt govts could use someone to put order and help fix a country. I also believe no government should have religion put into it, separation from church and state is a good thing. Why I think this is because it seems to me to borderline theocracy, and that is a terrible govt type. It places many restrictions, and we are in 2013, where there are a diverse of people. I believe that all politicians are mostly liars, the U.S govt is a lie, and that U.S should stick to its own affairs (problems) before trying to go in and solve others. The U.S govt also has a agenda for more than "good" in my opinion, and is a very greedy place. I am a democrat, but I love to know everyone's side and try to understand how they think about things. On that note, I personally believe that Obama is trying his hardest in the U.S, he hasn't made a lot of his promises (Which does bug me.) and Obamacare seemed to mess a lot things up but he is dealing with the most debt of any president. My thought on republicans is that many can be smart, but greedy and tend to put religion in their political beliefs. I believe democrats care more for the people of poverty and don't really care for the rich. I also want to know how a republican would classify the characteristics of a republican. I have grown up in a democrat household, (aside from my dad) and I do get a lot of things from my mom, but I like to research them and form my own conclusion on all subjects. I don't really have a strong political standing right now... Reasons for this is that I don't really like Obama not doing so well with so many of his promises... But I really don't like how a fair few Republicans like to act like playground bullies when then don't get there way. The last government shutdown was proof enough of that.... I'd like to see someone try to say that they weren't trying there hardest to stall. And on a more personnel note I almost had to miss the sights in DC because of it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 21:41:25 GMT -5
We don't need a one world government, just have all nations be on "good terms" with one another. But of course, that can't exist with things like racism, war, terrorism, Israel, etc.. Israel... Is a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jan 5, 2014 21:54:36 GMT -5
I also want to know how a republican would classify the characteristics of a republican. I have grown up in a democrat household, (aside from my dad) and I do get a lot of things from my mom, but I like to research them and form my own conclusion on all subjects. Here you go: -Believe in free-market capitalism -Does not believe in giving money to the lazy; does think you should have to work hard for your money, and then keep a fair amount -Wants small, transparent government -Defends the constitution, and follows it -No abortion or gay marriage -No unfair taxes -Help small businesses -Allow immigrants only through legal processes -NO SOCIALISM
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 5, 2014 22:05:04 GMT -5
We don't need a one world government, just have all nations be on "good terms" with one another. But of course, that can't exist with things like racism, war, terrorism, Israel, etc.. Israel... Is a good thing. Please explain to me how such a racist nation is a "good" thing. Right now they're persecuting African migrants. Saying Israel is a good thing is saying racism and apartheid are good things too. Not to mention that at one point they wanted to introduce racially-segregated schools. Very good, yes.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 5, 2014 22:09:22 GMT -5
I also want to know how a republican would classify the characteristics of a republican. I have grown up in a democrat household, (aside from my dad) and I do get a lot of things from my mom, but I like to research them and form my own conclusion on all subjects. Here you go: -Believe in free-market capitalism -Does not believe in giving money to the lazy; does think you should have to work hard for your money, and then keep a fair amount -Wants small, transparent government -Defends the constitution, and follows it -No abortion or gay marriage -No unfair taxes -Help small businesses -Allow immigrants only through legal processes -NO SOCIALISM Helps small businesses? Republicans seem to like corporations a whole awful lot. Also, no abortion or gay marriage? I can't seem to understand how either of those would affect anyone other than those going through them. Being homophobic is like being angry that a guy is ordering lettuce on his sandwich at Subway - it doesn't affect you. And abortion should totally be up to women. And what's wrong with socialism? Just curious.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jan 5, 2014 22:12:52 GMT -5
I don't like being considered as either left or right wing because both have flaws.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jan 5, 2014 22:14:08 GMT -5
I don't like being considered as either left or right wing because both have flaws. Me either. If I had to choose it would probably be democrat, but they have to start delivering.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jan 5, 2014 22:54:28 GMT -5
Here you go: -Believe in free-market capitalism -Does not believe in giving money to the lazy; does think you should have to work hard for your money, and then keep a fair amount -Wants small, transparent government -Defends the constitution, and follows it -No abortion or gay marriage -No unfair taxes -Help small businesses -Allow immigrants only through legal processes -NO SOCIALISM Helps small businesses? Republicans seem to like corporations a whole awful lot. Also, no abortion or gay marriage? I can't seem to understand how either of those would affect anyone other than those going through them. Being homophobic is like being angry that a guy is ordering lettuce on his sandwich at Subway - it doesn't affect you. And abortion should totally be up to women. And what's wrong with socialism? Just curious. Republicans like businesses. We like the economy going. And lettuce isn't shoved in our face everywhere as to where we're forced to like it or we're evil. The child's soul doesn't belong to the woman. It goes against god-given and constitutional rights to let them kill it.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jan 5, 2014 22:57:21 GMT -5
Oh, and socialism.
If you work hard, and succeed in life, I think you should be allowed to keep most of your money. If you depend on the government and receive unemployment checks just because you do not want to get a job, I don't think you should anywhere near as much money.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 22:58:00 GMT -5
Israel... Is a good thing. Please explain to me how such a racist nation is a "good" thing. Right now they're persecuting African migrants. Saying Israel is a good thing is saying racism and apartheid are good things too. Not to mention that at one point they wanted to introduce racially-segregated schools. Very good, yes.
My religious beliefs.... I don't agree with the things they do, but in the end....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 23:01:40 GMT -5
Oh, and socialism. If you work hard, and succeed in life, I think you should be allowed to keep most of your money. If you depend on the government and receive unemployment checks just because you do not want to get a job, I don't think you should anywhere near as much money. But then ethics get involved, like who is actually "lazy" and who really can't work...and in this economy, its extremely hard to find a job. My dad has been looking for a job for a LONG time. Same for a lot of my friends. my own family relied on government aid for awhile. But we actually did need it.
|
|