|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 26, 2013 11:22:49 GMT -5
Inactive votes are risky early on in the game also 6/8 of us are loyal so a incredibly low chance we will kill a scum . I'm warning you, nothing to be suspicious of. You just said that. Would you rather vote off a player that's actually helping, while still maintaining the say probability of said person being scum? This seems foolish to me.......... Not to me. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 26, 2013 11:24:32 GMT -5
You just said that. Would you rather vote off a player that's actually helping, while still maintaining the say probability of said person being scum? This seems foolish to me.......... Not to me. I'm not trying to be condescending, but where do you see the logic in this? I'm actually asking, it's not a rhetorical question. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 26, 2013 11:31:08 GMT -5
I'm not trying to be condescending, but where do you see the logic in this? I'm actually asking, it's not a rhetorical question. I have to admit I am usually vague. However, I just wanted to point out a inactive vote is far more dangerous than an active one. Also, what of the people that helped vote off Nute Gunray yesterday? No suspicion towards them I see. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 11:33:09 GMT -5
I'm not trying to be condescending, but where do you see the logic in this? I'm actually asking, it's not a rhetorical question. I have to admit I am usually vague. However, I just wanted to point out a inactive vote is far more dangerous than an active one. Also, what of the people that helped vote off Nute Gunray yesterday? No suspicion towards them I see. Well, that was most everybody. There are only two scum, though one of them was most likely still following the vote. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2013 11:33:55 GMT -5
I vote Dark actually. I don't know anything could be possible but I say he's a better choice. I'm going to vote for him because he has said less than Goblin as of now and given less of a defence than Goblin and when he posts Dark states the obvious. I could be wrong but I feel as if this is a better prediction. If I'm wrong then I guess I'll be next to target. (Which I shouldn't be if I happen to be wrong because he's been one of our suspicions). But VOTE:DARK. Vote as to whom you feel is the best choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 26, 2013 11:37:35 GMT -5
I'm not trying to be condescending, but where do you see the logic in this? I'm actually asking, it's not a rhetorical question. I have to admit I am usually vague. However, I just wanted to point out a inactive vote is far more dangerous than an active one. Also, what of the people that helped vote off Nute Gunray yesterday? No suspicion towards them I see. That's because he was very suspicious; those of us that were actually there are not to blame. We all agreed that he was acting extremely oddly. OOC: I have to go now. And how is an active vote less dangerous then an inactive vote? I think you got them mixed up or something........  |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jun 26, 2013 11:41:37 GMT -5
I am suspicious of the shark.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 26, 2013 11:43:23 GMT -5
I am suspicious of the shark. Why? |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 26, 2013 11:45:20 GMT -5
I have to admit I am usually vague. However, I just wanted to point out a inactive vote is far more dangerous than an active one. Also, what of the people that helped vote off Nute Gunray yesterday? No suspicion towards them I see. That's because he was very suspicious; those of us that were actually there are not to blame. We all agreed that he was acting extremely oddly. OOC: I have to go now. And how is an active vote less dangerous then an inactive vote? I think you got them mixed up or something........ No, inactive votes are more dangerous because you would have no proof against the inactive player. Voting off an inactive is taking a shot in the dark however an active vote usually has more proof to back it up because the player has been participating more in discussions. But since inactives don't talk much, it's very hard to determine their allegiance. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jun 26, 2013 11:46:40 GMT -5
I am suspicious of the shark. Why? Not sure, but I am. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 26, 2013 11:48:12 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2013 11:48:25 GMT -5
He did kill my cousin SpongeBob. But nothing to me that stands out as of yet. But anything is possible I guess. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jun 26, 2013 12:19:45 GMT -5
I have a strong feeling that Tamson is scum, so he will be my vote. I suggest you all follow me, and if he comes up loyal, vote me off tomorrow. I will not defend myself tomorrow if Tamson comes up loyal. VOTE: RIFF TAMSON (NEWAN)
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 26, 2013 12:23:43 GMT -5
Really? I have not done anything and Nam is about to lead you into voting another loyal I should have suspected this considering he led the vote against Pinda yesterday though I was also wrong to vote Pinda yesterday. He does not even have any evidence as of why he suspects me? VOTE: NAM he's been so inactive I don't even know his character he's playing as....
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jun 26, 2013 12:29:53 GMT -5
Really? I have not done anything and Nam is about to lead you into voting another loyal I should have suspected this considering he led the vote against Pinda yesterday though I was also wrong to vote Pinda yesterday. He does not even have any evidence as of why he suspects me? VOTE: NAM he's been so inactive I don't even know his character he's playing as.... My name is Barriss Offee. Oh yes, a typical scum move of you to vote off those who want to vote you off. I did make a mistake yesterday but all of you followed me. So vote me off and listen to the shark, you'll only kill another loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 26, 2013 12:31:50 GMT -5
VOTE TALLY:
R2-Q5- 1
Riff Tamson- 1
Barriss Offee- 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 26, 2013 12:34:30 GMT -5
Really? I have not done anything and Nam is about to lead you into voting another loyal I should have suspected this considering he led the vote against Pinda yesterday though I was also wrong to vote Pinda yesterday. He does not even have any evidence as of why he suspects me? VOTE: NAM he's been so inactive I don't even know his character he's playing as.... My name is Barriss Offee. Oh yes, a typical scum move of you to vote off those who want to vote you off. I did make a mistake yesterday but all of you followed me. So vote me off and listen to the shark, you'll only kill another loyal. I still don't see any evidence as to why I'm scum? It's also a typical scum move to accuse the person that voted after you of being scum... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 12:41:27 GMT -5
I vote Dark actually. I don't know anything could be possible but I say he's a better choice. I'm going to vote for him because he has said less than Goblin as of now and given less of a defence than Goblin and when he posts Dark states the obvious. I could be wrong but I feel as if this is a better prediction. If I'm wrong then I guess I'll be next to target. (Which I shouldn't be if I happen to be wrong because he's been one of our suspicions). But VOTE:DARK. Vote as to whom you feel is the best choice. Hmmm...... If Dark doesn't show up to make a defence, I might have to agree with you. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 12:44:35 GMT -5
Really? I have not done anything and Nam is about to lead you into voting another loyal I should have suspected this considering he led the vote against Pinda yesterday though I was also wrong to vote Pinda yesterday. He does not even have any evidence as of why he suspects me? VOTE: NAM he's been so inactive I don't even know his character he's playing as.... I mostly agree with you there, except for the somewhat hasty vote. It is quite strange him having no evidence a feeling. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jun 26, 2013 12:49:20 GMT -5
I don't trust Barris Offee, voting so hastingly without any evidence at all. Are there really no good reasons she could think of? Even i had good reasons why i laid siege on Krypton. Whatever action i take, no matter how violent or how cruel, is for the greater good, of my people.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 12:51:22 GMT -5
I don't trust Barris Offee, voting so hastingly without any evidence at all. Are there really no good reasons she could think of? Even i had good reasons why i laid siege on Krypton. Whatever action i take, no matter how violent or how cruel, is for the greater good, of my people. I think she's just trying to eliminate threats right now. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jun 26, 2013 12:55:17 GMT -5
I don't trust Barris Offee, voting so hastingly without any evidence at all. Are there really no good reasons she could think of? Even i had good reasons why i laid siege on Krypton. Whatever action i take, no matter how violent or how cruel, is for the greater good, of my people. I think she's just trying to eliminate threats right now. A just move, but without reason i find it hard to believe these motifs. This random act of nothingness makes it sounds like she was desperate to vote. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 26, 2013 12:56:44 GMT -5
I don't trust Barris Offee, voting so hastingly without any evidence at all. Are there really no good reasons she could think of? Even i had good reasons why i laid siege on Krypton. Whatever action i take, no matter how violent or how cruel, is for the greater good, of my people. I think she's just trying to eliminate threats right now. That's what I think as well and if she is the converter maybe she's doing what Bane suggested and voting of the threats so she has no one to challenge her at voting while converting the inactive people.... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 13:00:03 GMT -5
I think she's just trying to eliminate threats right now. That's what I think as well and if she is the converter maybe she's doing what Bane suggested and voting of the threats so she has no one to challenge her at voting while converting the inactive people...... Yes. That would be a good move, if there was actually any evidence against you...... |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 26, 2013 13:01:23 GMT -5
That's what I think as well and if she is the converter maybe she's doing what Bane suggested and voting of the threats so she has no one to challenge her at voting while converting the inactive people...... Yes. That would be a good move, if there was actually any evidence against you...... Which is what I find odd she only has a feeling? Even though I been one if the more helpful/Active players throughout the entire time. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 13:04:50 GMT -5
Yes. That would be a good move, if there was actually any evidence against you...... Which is what I find odd she only has a feeling? Even though I been one if the more helpful/Active players throughout the entire time. Yes. It's quite odd. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 13:08:01 GMT -5
VOTE: BARRISS OFFEE (NAMIALUS) She voted for Riff Tamson seeming out of the blue, without evidence, just going on a feeling. And that never does it for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jun 26, 2013 13:37:18 GMT -5
For your strange act of evidence-less voting, i hereby declare my decision. VOTE: BARRIS OFFEE (NAMIALUS)
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 26, 2013 13:43:32 GMT -5
VOTE: Barris OFFEE
|
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 26, 2013 13:44:33 GMT -5
I don't know who to vote for... and Squiggy why did you vote me?
|
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5