|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 25, 2013 13:38:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jun 25, 2013 13:59:53 GMT -5
This is a bad start. If only my commanding officers were here to prevent such bloodshed.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 25, 2013 14:02:24 GMT -5
Uh oh...
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 14:18:05 GMT -5
This does not look good seems Spider was wrong about Pinda though......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2013 14:21:22 GMT -5
Hmm not good indeed. Two Loyals down and nothing to show for. Not good at all. We must hear from the other's who have not spoken as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 15:17:35 GMT -5
How about we don't kill experienced players unless they're actually suspicious, murderer.  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 15:24:10 GMT -5
How about we don't kill experienced players unless they're actually suspicious, murderer. True I think the "Murderer" just helped the scum more than they helped the loyals here and the murderer is loyal as well I mean he could have killed someone more suspicious and then waited to hear Spiders defence today and vote him off if necessary. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jun 25, 2013 15:25:22 GMT -5
Hmm not good indeed. Two Loyals down and nothing to show for. Not good at all. We must hear from the other's who have not spoken as well. I wish others would speak up instead of coward to background. Every voice must be heard! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2013 16:47:10 GMT -5
Hmm not good indeed. Two Loyals down and nothing to show for. Not good at all. We must hear from the other's who have not spoken as well. I wish others would speak up instead of coward to background. Every voice must be heard! Indeed the more the easier it will be to find these scum. |
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 25, 2013 16:50:24 GMT -5
Oh no! *beep boop* We have lost two loyals!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2013 16:51:08 GMT -5
Oh no! *beep boop* We have lost two loyals! Good eye sir. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 16:53:25 GMT -5
Oh no! *beep boop* We have lost two loyals! Good eye sir. That was priceless.  |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 25, 2013 17:47:38 GMT -5
This is bad. Two loyals down. Both good people to have alive. Our numbers grow thin to quickly!
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 25, 2013 17:56:19 GMT -5
Why would anyone kill me? I was being a complete idiot.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 17:59:27 GMT -5
Why would anyone kill me? I was being a complete idiot. Yeah sorry about that the murderer got a little trigger happy.  |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jun 25, 2013 19:02:03 GMT -5
Oh my. I voted off a loyal.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 19:10:07 GMT -5
Oh my. I voted off a loyal. A good one too.  He was suspicious, though, jumping on Lurtz like that. It seemed to me like he just saw an opportunity to get rid of a strong player. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jun 25, 2013 19:12:42 GMT -5
Oh my. I voted off a loyal. A good one too. He was suspicious, though, jumping on Lurtz like that. It seemed to me like he just say an opportunity to get rid of a strong player. Exactly why I voted him off. Now we're in the same situation as yesterday, but worse. Far worse. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jun 25, 2013 19:13:21 GMT -5
At least now we have a 2/8 chance to vote off scum.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 19:14:29 GMT -5
At least now we have a 2/8 chance to vote off scum. OOC: Better then in normal games!  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 19:22:15 GMT -5
At least now we have a 2/8 chance to vote off scum. Indeed if we can hopefully take out the converter today then we will be in good shape we need to at least take out a scum now or we will put ourselves in a bad hole on day 3. Problem is people have not been very active which it makes it hard to find leads on people. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 19:27:14 GMT -5
At least now we have a 2/8 chance to vote off scum. Indeed if we can hopefully take out the converter today then we will be in good shape we need to at least take out a scum now or we will put ourselves in a bad hole on day 3. Problem is people have not been very active which it makes it hard to find leads on people. Well, if I were to scum (converter) I would just sit back, and convert someone new each night. No point in risking your neck if you can just build an army of supporters until you're ready. It sounds a little weird, but I think it might be a good idea to go for the inactive people. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 19:30:02 GMT -5
Indeed if we can hopefully take out the converter today then we will be in good shape we need to at least take out a scum now or we will put ourselves in a bad hole on day 3. Problem is people have not been very active which it makes it hard to find leads on people. Well, if I were to scum (converter) I would just sit back, and convert someone new each night. No point in risking your neck if you can just build an army of supporters until you're ready. It sounds a little weird, but I think it might be a good idea to go for the inactive people. Inactive people is extremely risky business alot of time it does not work but it is a interesting thought it would make sense to convert the more under the radar players because if you convert a active player they have a more Likley chance of being voted off so I see where your coming from here. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 19:36:48 GMT -5
Well, if I were to scum (converter) I would just sit back, and convert someone new each night. No point in risking your neck if you can just build an army of supporters until you're ready. It sounds a little weird, but I think it might be a good idea to go for the inactive people. Inactive people is extremely risky business alot of time it does not work but it is a interesting thought it would make sense to convert the more under the radar players because if you convert a active player they have a more Likley chance of being voted off so I see where your coming from here. Yeah, risky, I know. But it might work. Anyway, they're not exactly helping.......... |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 19:40:41 GMT -5
Inactive people is extremely risky business alot of time it does not work but it is a interesting thought it would make sense to convert the more under the radar players because if you convert a active player they have a more Likley chance of being voted off so I see where your coming from here. Yeah, risky, I know. But it might work. Anyway, they're not exactly helping.......... Helping or not if we vote of a loyal then it will put us in a bad position for tomorrow. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 19:42:04 GMT -5
Yeah, risky, I know. But it might work. Anyway, they're not exactly helping.......... Helping or not if we vote of a loyal then it will put us in a bad position for tomorrow. I know, but what other strategy should we employ? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 19:44:58 GMT -5
Helping or not if we vote of a loyal then it will put us in a bad position for tomorrow. I know, but what other strategy should we employ? I'm not sure i don't have and leads as no one has been talking at all today. But I don't like the idea of taking a shot in the dark and having some one possibly come up Loyal. At the moment since no scum would be killed I believe it's a 2/8 that's means voting off someone at random has 25% chance of working. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 19:47:58 GMT -5
I know, but what other strategy should we employ? I'm not sure i don't have and leads as no one has been talking at all today. But I don't like the idea of taking a shot in the dark and having some one possibly come up Loyal. At the moment since no scum would be killed I believe it's a 2/8 that's means voting off someone at random has 25% chance of working. Yeah, I know.  Who would you go for next, without using my strategy? |
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 25, 2013 19:50:02 GMT -5
Why would the murderer target Lurtz!?!?
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 19:52:16 GMT -5
Why would the murderer target Lurtz!?!? Because he's a good player, why else? No I guess just because he seemed suspicious from a...... certain........ point of view. |
|
Wars Story
He was suspicious, though, jumping on Lurtz like that. It seemed to me like he just saw an opportunity to get rid of a strong player. 
Who would you go for next, without using my strategy?
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself? 