|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 19:52:44 GMT -5
I'm not sure i don't have and leads as no one has been talking at all today. But I don't like the idea of taking a shot in the dark and having some one possibly come up Loyal. At the moment since no scum would be killed I believe it's a 2/8 that's means voting off someone at random has 25% chance of working. Yeah, I know.  Who would you go for next, without using my strategy? I honestly don't know no one really seems too scummy or I have not talk to very many people. Though people do seem to be really quiet even though I have seem most people online. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2013 19:53:50 GMT -5
Hmm well it could be risky voting off an inactive person but then again it might not be. No matter who we vote for it will still be a 2/8 chance of that person being scum or not. So it's either take the chance and vote of an active player or take the chance and vote off an inactive player. I think it's only fair that the active people get more leeway. So I say go for an inactive. Cause again no matter who we vote for it will still be a 2/8 chance. But it can be risky as well so...
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 25, 2013 19:56:03 GMT -5
Yeah, I know. Who would you go for next, without using my strategy? I honestly don't know no one really seems too scummy or I have not talk to very many people. Though people do seem to be really quiet even though I have seem most people online. IKR? But I think it counts you as "online" even when all you have is a tab open. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 25, 2013 20:00:22 GMT -5
Indeed if we can hopefully take out the converter today then we will be in good shape we need to at least take out a scum now or we will put ourselves in a bad hole on day 3. Problem is people have not been very active which it makes it hard to find leads on people. Well, if I were to scum (converter) I would just sit back, and convert someone new each night. No point in risking your neck if you can just build an army of supporters until you're ready. It sounds a little weird, but I think it might be a good idea to go for the inactive people. I agree. We may not have another choice, but who then? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 20:01:07 GMT -5
Hmm well it could be risky voting off an inactive person but then again it might not be. No matter who we vote for it will still be a 2/8 chance of that person being scum or not. So it's either take the chance and vote of an active player or take the chance and vote off an inactive player. I think it's only fair that the active people get more leeway. So I say go for an inactive. Cause again no matter who we vote for it will still be a 2/8 chance. But it can be risky as well so... So your saying we should just ignore all the active players by basically rewarding them for being active by not voting them off? An active player has just as much chance of being scum as a inactive player. Again we should make a good decision here so Im curious who do you guys actually plan to vote off if you do vote a inactive and how do you know they won't have a important role? |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 25, 2013 20:01:45 GMT -5
I honestly don't know no one really seems too scummy or I have not talk to very many people. Though people do seem to be really quiet even though I have seem most people online. IKR? But I think it counts you as "online" even when all you have is a tab open. Sorry for cutting in, but yes, it does. It probably says I'm always online because I never close the tab on my phone. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 20:04:21 GMT -5
IKR? But I think it counts you as "online" even when all you have is a tab open. Sorry for cutting in, but yes, it does. It probably says I'm always online because I never close the tab on my phone. Yeah I always have the tab open on my Ipad usually. The other day I woke up at 4AM and I was messing around on my Ipad and it said you and Spider where online... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 25, 2013 20:05:56 GMT -5
Yeah, I know. Who would you go for next, without using my strategy? I honestly don't know no one really seems too scummy or I have not talk to very many people. Though people do seem to be really quiet even though I have seem most people online. OOC: Sorry I just have the tab open.  Now I'm here, but I was making a video. I might post it if I think it's good enough.  IC: I suppose we'll just have to take a guess when voting comes along unless something comes up. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2013 20:06:06 GMT -5
Hmm well it could be risky voting off an inactive person but then again it might not be. No matter who we vote for it will still be a 2/8 chance of that person being scum or not. So it's either take the chance and vote of an active player or take the chance and vote off an inactive player. I think it's only fair that the active people get more leeway. So I say go for an inactive. Cause again no matter who we vote for it will still be a 2/8 chance. But it can be risky as well so... So your saying we should just ignore all the active players by basically rewarding them for being active by not voting them off? An active player has just as much chance of being scum as a inactive player. Again we should make a good decision here so Im curious who do you guys actually plan to vote off if you do vote a inactive and how do you know they won't have a important role? I'm just it's more of a fair way. Were active and there not. So why should they just get to sit back and not kick in. It's still a 2/8 chance no matter if it's an inactive or active. I say inactive. But if anything arises by any of the active player's then I will take notice and maybe vote for one of them. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 25, 2013 20:12:17 GMT -5
Hmm well it could be risky voting off an inactive person but then again it might not be. No matter who we vote for it will still be a 2/8 chance of that person being scum or not. So it's either take the chance and vote of an active player or take the chance and vote off an inactive player. I think it's only fair that the active people get more leeway. So I say go for an inactive. Cause again no matter who we vote for it will still be a 2/8 chance. But it can be risky as well so... So your saying we should just ignore all the active players by basically rewarding them for being active by not voting them off? An active player has just as much chance of being scum as a inactive player. Again we should make a good decision here so Im curious who do you guys actually plan to vote off if you do vote a inactive and how do you know they won't have a important role? If I had to vote off an inactive right now, I would choose the random goblin. Not very helpful, hasn't posted very much, etc., etc. But that's only if I had to. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 20:12:23 GMT -5
I would like to wait and here more from everyone else Or mostly the more inactive people I have not heard anything from Dark and The random Goblin has not said much.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2013 20:20:28 GMT -5
I would like to wait and here more from everyone else Or mostly the more inactive people I have not heard anything from Dark and The random Goblin has not said much. Dark has said something at least where as the random Goblin has said nothing at all. But either one could be possible scum so that doesn't mean anything. Who would be your choice of the two if you had to pick? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 20:23:41 GMT -5
I would like to wait and here more from everyone else Or mostly the more inactive people I have not heard anything from Dark and The random Goblin has not said much. Dark has said something at least where as the random Goblin has said nothing at all. But either one could be possible scum so that doesn't mean anything. Who would be your choice of the two if you had to pick? Not sure what I would do I would like to hear from both of them actually I would like for everyone to be more active than we could get more done. Dark has not said anything of importance or helpfulness he asked why was Spider killed what kind of answer was he expecting was he hoping the killer would reveal himself and tell him... |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 25, 2013 20:24:15 GMT -5
Sorry for cutting in, but yes, it does. It probably says I'm always online because I never close the tab on my phone. Yeah I always have the tab open on my Ipad usually. The other day I woke up at 4AM and I was messing around on my Ipad and it said you and Spider where online... Oh, I actually was online |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 25, 2013 20:25:40 GMT -5
Yeah I always have the tab open on my Ipad usually. The other day I woke up at 4AM and I was messing around on my Ipad and it said you and Spider where online... Oh, I actually was online Didnt think you where I guess I was wrong |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2013 20:43:19 GMT -5
Dark has said something at least where as the random Goblin has said nothing at all. But either one could be possible scum so that doesn't mean anything. Who would be your choice of the two if you had to pick? Not sure what I would do I would like to hear from both of them actually I would like for everyone to be more active than we could get more done. Dark has not said anything of importance or helpfulness he asked why was Spider killed what kind of answer was he expecting was he hoping the killer would reveal himself and tell him... Maybe. I don't see the need to tell us that Lurtz was killed because we all knew that already. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 26, 2013 9:41:30 GMT -5
Hello there! I hope we won't forget who voted off a loyal. Any suspicions at the moment?
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 26, 2013 9:50:18 GMT -5
I also have this to say. I strongly advise we do not resort to Inactive votes true there is a 2/8 chance of that person being scum but that leaves us with a 6/8 chance of voting off a loyal, inactive votes are too risky, especially this early on in the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 10:23:06 GMT -5
I also have this to say. I strongly advise we do not resort to Inactive votes true there is a 2/8 chance of that person being scum but that leaves us with a 6/8 chance of voting off a loyal, inactive votes are too risky, especially this early on in the game. Yeah well, do you just want us to vote off an active person then? No one is suspicious yet. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 26, 2013 10:43:31 GMT -5
YOU MAY NOW VOTE! Voting will end in 24 hours or when a conviction has been reached. Good luck!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2013 10:49:26 GMT -5
Who do you all adivse we vote? If you had to choose.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 10:58:59 GMT -5
Who do you all adivse we vote? If you had to choose. I think right now I'm between the R2 unit and the random goblin. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 26, 2013 11:02:56 GMT -5
Who do you all adivse we vote? If you had to choose. I think right now I'm between the R2 unit and the random goblin. If the only reason you have to possibly vote me off is because of inactivity, I strongly advise you reconsider. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 11:06:40 GMT -5
I think right now I'm between the R2 unit and the random goblin. If the only reason you have to possibly vote me off is because of inactivity, I strongly advise you reconsider. Well, you're inactive and the only posts you have are telling us to not vote an inactive, as if there were a better option at this point. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 26, 2013 11:14:42 GMT -5
Hmm...... Random Goblin seems to be defending the inactive players. We have a 2/8 chance of getting a scum, and since we really have no suspicions at all, better to get rid of an inactive player then an active one.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 26, 2013 11:15:04 GMT -5
If the only reason you have to possibly vote me off is because of inactivity, I strongly advise you reconsider. Well, you're inactive and the only posts you have are telling us to not vote an inactive, as if there were a better option at this point. Inactive votes are risky early on in the game also 6/8 of us are loyal so a incredibly low chance we will kill a scum . I'm warning you, nothing to be suspicious of. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 26, 2013 11:18:28 GMT -5
Well, you're inactive and the only posts you have are telling us to not vote an inactive, as if there were a better option at this point. Inactive votes are risky early on in the game also 6/8 of us are loyal so a incredibly low chance we will kill a scum . I'm warning you, nothing to be suspicious of. You just said that. Would you rather vote off a player that's actually helping, while still maintaining the say probability of said person being scum? This seems foolish to me.......... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 26, 2013 11:18:42 GMT -5
Well, you're inactive and the only posts you have are telling us to not vote an inactive, as if there were a better option at this point. Inactive votes are risky early on in the game also 6/8 of us are loyal so a incredibly low chance we will kill a scum . I'm warning you, nothing to be suspicious of. So you would rather a most likely active loyal go down then a most likely inactive one. Strange. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 26, 2013 11:21:09 GMT -5
Inactive votes are risky early on in the game also 6/8 of us are loyal so a incredibly low chance we will kill a scum . I'm warning you, nothing to be suspicious of. So you would rather a most likely active loyal go down then a most likely inactive one. Strange. Of course not. But I would like a active scum down. You're putting words into my mouth. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 26, 2013 11:21:30 GMT -5
Inactive votes are risky early on in the game also 6/8 of us are loyal so a incredibly low chance we will kill a scum . I'm warning you, nothing to be suspicious of. So you would rather a most likely active loyal go down then a most likely inactive one. Strange. strange. He'll be my vote if nothing else comes up. |
|
Who would you go for next, without using my strategy?
Wars Story
Now I'm here, but I was making a video. I might post it if I think it's good enough. 
IC: I suppose we'll just have to take a guess when voting comes along unless something comes up. 
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself? 