|
Post by Malgus on Jul 1, 2014 21:14:55 GMT -5
Why do you think he was the leader? I'll share if you have an answer that makes sense so don't Potato is Awesome this up... Just a guess. I mean, I never said I thought he was for sure, but assuming there is 3-4 scum, and the murderer is around (so not Mav) then there's a decent chance he could be te leader. It was really just a thought. You don't have to share if you don't want to, but if you don't share any results with us the inspector is kinda pointless, other than being a confirmed loyal who doesn't do anything. I already shared. You get an A for effort.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 1, 2014 21:15:53 GMT -5
Can you explain more on how I'm following? I didn't realize I was. You tend to agree with most of what we say, which is not always a bad thing and could just be a coincidence. But I do not suspect you right now. Ah, I see. I (and this is just what I think) suppose I'm somewhat agreeing with others a fair amount, but I think a part of that is because I was gone for most of Day 1. So, I kinda would appear to agree with some too quickly cause I have to sum my feelings up in a few pages versus the 30ish most others had.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 1, 2014 21:20:25 GMT -5
What were your results treebeard? Well Potato is Awesome it if you really want to hear then here you go: Both Boba and Star appear to be loyal. Anyone that wants to trust them more because of this will be stabbed. Oh... You shared. I'm not saying this just because you inspected me as loyal, but why do you seem not to trust these inspections at all? I mean, at least 1 (perhaps both) would be most likely accurate. But you don't seem to trust them really to me. Do you suspect one or both of us or something?
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 1, 2014 21:21:27 GMT -5
.ereht krow t'now deveicer i eno eht esuac enohp ym no em rof ti plif lltaht etisbew a gnidnif no gnikrow mI .gniyonna adnik gnitteg stI .niaga sdrawkcab ti epyt neht dna gnihtyreve epyt ot drah tuj tI .noitnetta gniyap ma i ,wonk llay os tsuJ
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 1, 2014 21:24:47 GMT -5
Treebeard - Inspector Mandus Mayfare - Is inactive Rarbar - Has barely even active for the most part could be staying back Nur Fial - I'm actually not sure if I think he's scum now 50/50. DarkofMorgoth - Still uncertain from day 1 Barriss - Uncertain Krell - He's been pretty neutral hard to tell hasn't given much Insight. Deaf Rodian - Also been kinda staying back from commenting. Indiana Jones - It's the professor. Lord Voldemort(ish) - uncertain as well I don't think he's done anything to prove his loyality. You said you thought I looked loyal yesterday and now you start to suspect me? Also, how have I been staying back? I've been fairly active... (OOC: And I can't stay here all day, I have other things to do ) It is rather interesting that Dr. Jones starts voicing his opinions when the accusations come in.. That's actually very true. But wouldn't most of us do the same thing if the pressure was suddenly on us to act like the "leader" everyone thinks you should be?
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 1, 2014 21:25:07 GMT -5
EEEEEENO DNUOF
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 1, 2014 21:27:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 1, 2014 21:28:56 GMT -5
Treebeard - Inspector Mandus Mayfare - Is inactive Rarbar - Has barely even active for the most part could be staying back Nur Fial - I'm actually not sure if I think he's scum now 50/50. DarkofMorgoth - Still uncertain from day 1 Barriss - Uncertain Krell - He's been pretty neutral hard to tell hasn't given much Insight. Deaf Rodian - Also been kinda staying back from commenting. Indiana Jones - It's the professor. Lord Voldemort(ish) - uncertain as well I don't think he's done anything to prove his loyality. You said you thought I looked loyal yesterday and now you start to suspect me? Also, how have I been staying back? I've been fairly active... (OOC: And I can't stay here all day, I have other things to do ) It is rather interesting that Dr. Jones starts voicing his opinions when the accusations come in.. That's actually very true. But wouldn't most of us do the same thing if the pressure was suddenly on us to act like the "leader" everyone thinks you should be? !!!EEEEFIL ON evah I esuaceb yad lla hcum ytterp ereh eb nac I taht yas yltsenoh nac I
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 1, 2014 21:29:18 GMT -5
Well Potato is Awesome it if you really want to hear then here you go: Both Boba and Star appear to be loyal. Anyone that wants to trust them more because of this will be stabbed. Oh... You shared. I'm not saying this just because you inspected me as loyal, but why do you seem not to trust these inspections at all? I mean, at least 1 (perhaps both) would be most likely accurate. But you don't seem to trust them really to me. Do you suspect one or both of us or something? It's not necessarily that I think you're scum, it's just any inspection coming up as loyal can't be trusted...
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 1, 2014 21:30:29 GMT -5
You said you thought I looked loyal yesterday and now you start to suspect me? Also, how have I been staying back? I've been fairly active... (OOC: And I can't stay here all day, I have other things to do ) That's actually very true. But wouldn't most of us do the same thing if the pressure was suddenly on us to act like the "leader" everyone thinks you should be? !!!EEEEFIL ON evah I esuaceb yad lla hcum ytterp ereh eb nac I taht yas yltsenoh nac I OMG someone translate... Something has excited Nic.
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 1, 2014 21:31:14 GMT -5
??yas I tahw ot noitnetta yap eno on seod....etisbeW
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 1, 2014 21:32:03 GMT -5
Oh... You shared. I'm not saying this just because you inspected me as loyal, but why do you seem not to trust these inspections at all? I mean, at least 1 (perhaps both) would be most likely accurate. But you don't seem to trust them really to me. Do you suspect one or both of us or something? It's not necessarily that I think you're scum, it's just any inspection coming up as loyal can't be trusted... But you could also say it can't be disproved either. JK, I get it. I still think we can trust the results, but we shouldn't believe that they're automatically making us complete loyals that shouldn't be under suspicion the rest of the game.
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 1, 2014 21:33:20 GMT -5
!!!EEEEFIL ON evah I esuaceb yad lla hcum ytterp ereh eb nac I taht yas yltsenoh nac I OMG someone translate... Something has excited Nic. \ ...toidi uoy sdrawkcab tsuj stI
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 1, 2014 21:35:38 GMT -5
OMG someone translate... Something has excited Nic. \ ...toidi uoy sdrawkcab tsuj stI LOL (I did it backwards with that comment too )
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 1, 2014 21:36:35 GMT -5
\ ...toidi uoy sdrawkcab tsuj stI LOL (I did it backwards with that comment too ) -_- boj doog
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 1, 2014 21:48:23 GMT -5
LOL (I did it backwards with that comment too ) -_- boj doog Thank you very much!
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 1, 2014 21:52:29 GMT -5
Treebeard - Inspector. Loyal. Mandus Mayfare - Too inactive to tell. Rarbar - Not sure, seems to be following the tide, but I shall lean on loyal for today. Nur Fial - Scum. Defended the Pumpkin yesterday. DarkofMorgoth - A rather loud and foolish loyal. Barriss - Same with the Dark. Krell - Unsure. Deaf Rodian - Also unsure. Indiana Jones - Also unsure, but a little more loyal than yesterday. Lord Voldemort(ish) - Lord Voldemort Can you explain more on how I'm following? I didn't realize I was. Lol well it's true buddy.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 1, 2014 21:55:47 GMT -5
It's not necessarily that I think you're scum, it's just any inspection coming up as loyal can't be trusted... But you could also say it can't be disproved either. JK, I get it. I still think we can trust the results, but we shouldn't believe that they're automatically making us complete loyals that shouldn't be under suspicion the rest of the game. OMG someone translate... Something has excited Nic. \ ...toidi uoy sdrawkcab tsuj stI Ydal gnuoy em htiw enot taht ekat t'nod LOL (I did it backwards with that comment too ) -_- boj doog Thank you I cracked the code. Star helped...
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 1, 2014 22:00:33 GMT -5
All right I'm going to post a defence soon,
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 1, 2014 22:00:54 GMT -5
OOC sorry I've been at work.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 1, 2014 22:11:40 GMT -5
Can you explain more on how I'm following? I didn't realize I was. Lol well it's true buddy. I ain't your buddy...
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 1, 2014 22:20:15 GMT -5
So I'm now under suspicion because Mav's scum. People like Nam and Pinda say I "subtly defended him." They love to use the word "subtle" because it has a bad connotation. But really, there was nothing subtle about what I did. I stood up against people who's minds had already been made up. You say I defended him before the vote, but the vote may as well have started several hours earlier because most of you weren't taking no for an answer in terms of a Mav vote. But anyway, I didn't really defend him. I defended the idea (that WE'VE ALL EXPRESSED ST SOME POINT) that an inactive vote is never a good idea. Because no matter how often you repackage it or how many bow ties you stick on it, that's what it was.
He said something weird about tennis, I don't remember the exactly wording, but is that really enough for a vote? No matter WHAT he meant it certainly didn't seem like he was for sure a scum which is what most of you seemed to think. I was only cautioning against a foolish decision. If you hadn't noticed we'd just lost two loyals and a helpful third party, and I didn't want to do anything rash so soon after that.
I'm not a very good scum, but since Nam has been on my case this whole game and I knew he'd be itching to wipe the doubt from his mind about me being scum, do you REALLY think I'd defend someone who was already so totally fucked if I was scum? No, because that's more of a loyal thing to do for me. That's how I play. Because if I was scum I certainly wouldn't have gone against a possibly inspector on day one... That would just be retarded. But no, I stated my opinions regardless of what everyone thought.
So yeah, no.
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 1, 2014 22:29:28 GMT -5
But you could also say it can't be disproved either. JK, I get it. I still think we can trust the results, but we shouldn't believe that they're automatically making us complete loyals that shouldn't be under suspicion the rest of the game. \ ...toidi uoy sdrawkcab tsuj stI Ydal gnuoy em htiw enot taht ekat t'nod Thank you I cracked the code. Star helped... ??em pots annog s'ohw
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 1, 2014 22:37:03 GMT -5
Ydal gnuoy em htiw enot taht ekat t'nod Thank you I cracked the code. Star helped... ??em pots annog s'ohw ......si suglaM ad
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 1, 2014 22:39:48 GMT -5
So I'm now under suspicion because Mav's scum. People like Nam and Pinda say I "subtly defended him." They love to use the word "subtle" because it has a bad connotation. But really, there was nothing subtle about what I did. I stood up against people who's minds had already been made up. You say I defended him before the vote, but the vote may as well have started several hours earlier because most of you weren't taking no for an answer in terms of a Mav vote. But anyway, I didn't really defend him. I defended the idea (that WE'VE ALL EXPRESSED ST SOME POINT) that an inactive vote is never a good idea. Because no matter how often you repackage it or how many bow ties you stick on it, that's what it was. He said something weird about tennis, I don't remember the exactly wording, but is that really enough for a vote? No matter WHAT he meant it certainly didn't seem like he was for sure a scum which is what most of you seemed to think. I was only cautioning against a foolish decision. If you hadn't noticed we'd just lost two loyals and a helpful third party, and I didn't want to do anything rash so soon after that. I'm not a very good scum, but since Nam has been on my case this whole game and I knew he'd be itching to wipe the doubt from his mind about me being scum, do you REALLY think I'd defend someone who was already so totally Potato is Awesomeed if I was scum? No, because that's more of a loyal thing to do for me. That's how I play. Because if I was scum I certainly wouldn't have gone against a possibly inspector on day one... That would just be retarded. But no, I stated my opinions regardless of what everyone thought. So yeah, no. So who do you wish to vote off?
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 1, 2014 22:39:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 1, 2014 22:44:48 GMT -5
kcuf sa yracs era seert tnaig epoN
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 1, 2014 22:59:05 GMT -5
So I'm now under suspicion because Mav's scum. People like Nam and Pinda say I "subtly defended him." They love to use the word "subtle" because it has a bad connotation. But really, there was nothing subtle about what I did. I stood up against people who's minds had already been made up. You say I defended him before the vote, but the vote may as well have started several hours earlier because most of you weren't taking no for an answer in terms of a Mav vote. But anyway, I didn't really defend him. I defended the idea (that WE'VE ALL EXPRESSED ST SOME POINT) that an inactive vote is never a good idea. Because no matter how often you repackage it or how many bow ties you stick on it, that's what it was. He said something weird about tennis, I don't remember the exactly wording, but is that really enough for a vote? No matter WHAT he meant it certainly didn't seem like he was for sure a scum which is what most of you seemed to think. I was only cautioning against a foolish decision. If you hadn't noticed we'd just lost two loyals and a helpful third party, and I didn't want to do anything rash so soon after that. I'm not a very good scum, but since Nam has been on my case this whole game and I knew he'd be itching to wipe the doubt from his mind about me being scum, do you REALLY think I'd defend someone who was already so totally Potato is Awesomeed if I was scum? No, because that's more of a loyal thing to do for me. That's how I play. Because if I was scum I certainly wouldn't have gone against a possibly inspector on day one... That would just be retarded. But no, I stated my opinions regardless of what everyone thought. So yeah, no. So who do you wish to vote off? Main suspect: Barris. Yesterday she was perfectly happy to defend me from you but today as I've fallen out of everyone's good grace, she wanted to confirm a vote on me even before voting was open or I had even given a defense. And the whole game every time shiz gets real she's been apologizing to you (and Others) and asking their permission for stuff. Too much following and not enough independent thinking. Seems suspicious to me. I'm also suspicious of Rabar. Usually (OOC) Star will at least offer his own opinions in his own words. This game he seems to be agreeing with what people think all to much.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 1, 2014 23:17:37 GMT -5
Treebeard - Inspector Mandus Mayfare - Is inactive Rarbar - Has barely even active for the most part could be staying back Nur Fial - I'm actually not sure if I think he's scum now 50/50. DarkofMorgoth - Still uncertain from day 1 Barriss - Uncertain Krell - He's been pretty neutral hard to tell hasn't given much Insight. Deaf Rodian - Also been kinda staying back from commenting. Indiana Jones - It's the professor. Lord Voldemort(ish) - uncertain as well I don't think he's done anything to prove his loyality. You said you thought I looked loyal yesterday and now you start to suspect me? Also, how have I been staying back? I've been fairly active... (OOC: And I can't stay here all day, I have other things to do ) It is rather interesting that Dr. Jones starts voicing his opinions when the accusations come in.. That's actually very true. But wouldn't most of us do the same thing if the pressure was suddenly on us to act like the "leader" everyone thinks you should be? I don't think by any means you been active not like some of us... Maybe if you're comparing yourself to Ivar.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 2, 2014 0:04:50 GMT -5
So who do you wish to vote off? Main suspect: Barris. Yesterday she was perfectly happy to defend me from you but today as I've fallen out of everyone's good grace, she wanted to confirm a vote on me even before voting was open or I had even given a defense. And the whole game every time shiz gets real she's been apologizing to you (and Others) and asking their permission for stuff. Too much following and not enough independent thinking. Seems suspicious to me. I'm also suspicious of Rabar. Usually (OOC) Star will at least offer his own opinions in his own words. This game he seems to be agreeing with what people think all to much. Hmmm... I am unsure of what to think.
|
|