|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 12:07:45 GMT -5
No I want a random vote if it comes to it. I don't even understand what you want anymore. First, you say an inactive vote is a good idea and not supporting it means you're scum ( which totally makes no sense because an inactive vote never works for the loyals, leading the scum to support it). Then you change your mind to voting a 'moderately active' person. & now its becoming clear you vehemently want a random vote ( even worse than an inactive one) if it comes to it, which would almost certainly lose a loyal, so we might as well abstain from voting if we can't bring ourselves to do a sensible vote ( or a inactive vote with some basis to it). Shouldn't we be at least trying to go for a vote that we can be confident on? Instead of a risky vote which would bring us zero leads on the next day anyway? And I find that you have been barking out mindless accusations ever since you associated yourself with the inspector & claimed this unusual role of converting a third party, which is impossible to confirm and until someone can come forward and say they have been converted. Right now, your ambiguous role claim doesn't make you seem any more of a loyal in my eyes, but it doesn't make you seem more like a scum either.
Don't really know what you're getting at unless you want to vote off the loyal doctor... |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 12:11:33 GMT -5
I don't even understand what you want anymore. First, you say an inactive vote is a good idea and not supporting it means you're scum ( which totally makes no sense because an inactive vote never works for the loyals, leading the scum to support it). Then you change your mind to voting a 'moderately active' person. & now its becoming clear you vehemently want a random vote ( even worse than an inactive one) if it comes to it, which would almost certainly lose a loyal, so we might as well abstain from voting if we can't bring ourselves to do a sensible vote ( or a inactive vote with some basis to it). Shouldn't we be at least trying to go for a vote that we can be confident on? Instead of a risky vote which would bring us zero leads on the next day anyway? And I find that you have been barking out mindless accusations ever since you associated yourself with the inspector & claimed this unusual role of converting a third party, which is impossible to confirm and until someone can come forward and say they have been converted. Right now, your ambiguous role claim doesn't make you seem any more of a loyal in my eyes, but it doesn't make you seem more like a scum either.
Don't really know what you're getting at unless you want to vote off the loyal doctor... I don't want to vote off a loyal, but how exactly does an ambiguous claim with no basis give the person freedom to suggest ideas that will only lose us more loyals & get away with it? How do you know he is the loyal doctor? I'll need more than your word and his. Unless the third party confronts us and says he had been converted, then Dean isn't much more than a loyal than many of us here in my eyes. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 12:13:50 GMT -5
Don't really know what you're getting at unless you want to vote off the loyal doctor... I don't want to vote off a loyal, but how exactly does an ambiguous claim with no basis give the person freedom to suggest ideas that will only lose us more loyals & get away with it? How do you know he is the loyal doctor? I'll need more than your word and his. Unless the third party confronts us and says he had been converted, then Dean isn't much more than a loyal than many of us here in my eyes. So just because it's a new role means it's not real? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 12:14:19 GMT -5
Don't really know what you're getting at unless you want to vote off the loyal doctor... I don't want to vote off a loyal, but how exactly does an ambiguous claim with no basis give the person freedom to suggest ideas that will only lose us more loyals & get away with it? How do you know he is the loyal doctor? I'll need more than your word and his. Unless the third party confronts us and says he had been converted, then Dean isn't much more than a loyal than many of us here in my eyes. Not really... It's slot more than you got. |
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 19, 2014 12:16:14 GMT -5
There were 14 players? The force tells me there are probably 4 scum then.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 12:16:44 GMT -5
Don't really know what you're getting at unless you want to vote off the loyal doctor... I don't want to vote off a loyal, but how exactly does an ambiguous claim with no basis give the person freedom to suggest ideas that will only lose us more loyals & get away with it? How do you know he is the loyal doctor? I'll need more than your word and his. Unless the third party confronts us and says he had been converted, then Dean isn't much more than a loyal than many of us here in my eyes. Well, it's weird that the third party guy didn't speak up yet. I'd have revealed myself if I were him. Then I'd be a confirmed loyalist. But maybe he isn't allowed to reveal himself or his goals are really easy to reach? But for now I trust Newan, even if he hadn't claimed his role, he appears to be loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 12:16:52 GMT -5
I don't want to vote off a loyal, but how exactly does an ambiguous claim with no basis give the person freedom to suggest ideas that will only lose us more loyals & get away with it? How do you know he is the loyal doctor? I'll need more than your word and his. Unless the third party confronts us and says he had been converted, then Dean isn't much more than a loyal than many of us here in my eyes. So just because it's a new role means it's not real? No but just because it's a new role doesn't mean it is real. I have every right to be sceptical, although I don't think Dean is scum, I can't fully trust his claim yet. Some people are seeing his claim as a reason to follow his every claim to the letter |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 12:17:45 GMT -5
I don't want to vote off a loyal, but how exactly does an ambiguous claim with no basis give the person freedom to suggest ideas that will only lose us more loyals & get away with it? How do you know he is the loyal doctor? I'll need more than your word and his. Unless the third party confronts us and says he had been converted, then Dean isn't much more than a loyal than many of us here in my eyes. Not really... It's slot more than you got. It's worth as much to me as a loyal helper role claim. You have no proof it exists... |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 12:17:46 GMT -5
There were 14 players? The force tells me there are probably 4 scum then. Yes, 3 or 4 probably. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 12:17:52 GMT -5
So far thought the on so dangerous third party hasn't made much of an impression... I already rules out half the people even more tonight once I cure again and the inspector inspects.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 12:18:25 GMT -5
Not really... It's slot more than you got. It's worth as much to me as a loyal helper role claim. You have no proof it exists... Lol okay... |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 12:19:15 GMT -5
So just because it's a new role means it's not real? No but just because it's a new role doesn't mean it is real. I have every right to be sceptical, although I don't think Dean is scum, I can't fully trust his claim yet. Some people are seeing his claim as a reason to follow his every claim to the letter Okay then buddy. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 12:19:18 GMT -5
It's worth as much to me as a loyal helper role claim. You have no proof it exists... Lol okay... Can you guide me to the third party member that confirmed your role's existence? No? Of course you can't. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 12:20:42 GMT -5
Not really... It's slot more than you got. It's worth as much to me as a loyal helper role claim. You have no proof it exists... And there's no proof I'm the inspector. And there's no proof there's a protector in this game. In fact, there's no proof there's even scum. But ya know we can assume some things.  |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 12:22:44 GMT -5
It's worth as much to me as a loyal helper role claim. You have no proof it exists... And there's no proof I'm the inspector. And there's no proof there's a protector in this game. In fact, there's no proof there's even scum. But ya know we can assume some things. First of all. There is proof you are the inspector: -No one else has claimed, Nam would have claimed if he was. - You have put forward results to us We know there's a protector because it is imperative to have in every game, same with scum. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jun 19, 2014 12:23:01 GMT -5
I don't really appreciate you having to show us Vindi's fall all over again.  |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jun 19, 2014 12:23:22 GMT -5
Even in this alternate timeline Vindi dies.  Not funny.  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 12:23:25 GMT -5
Can you guide me to the third party member that confirmed your role's existence? No? Of course you can't. Well I am assuming it's probably you because you're so hostile towards me... Probably want me dead. But I can tell you a list of people not to ask as they're already ruled out if you want to go asking yourself? |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 12:24:22 GMT -5
I don't really appreciate you having to show us Vindi's fall all over again. Don't worry Nam. I'll include another flashback of Vindi dying in my final game, just for you. |
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 19, 2014 12:24:20 GMT -5
This is a random guess but atleast one of the scum has to be inactive.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 12:24:24 GMT -5
And there's no proof I'm the inspector. And there's no proof there's a protector in this game. In fact, there's no proof there's even scum. But ya know we can assume some things. First of all. There is proof you are the inspector: -No one else has claimed, Nam would have claimed if he was. - You have put forward results to us We know there's a protector because it is imperative to have in every game, same with scum. "You have put forward results?" The fuck does that have to do with anything. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 12:25:13 GMT -5
This is a random guess but atleast one of the scum has to be inactive. Probably... most of the active people appear to be loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jun 19, 2014 12:25:13 GMT -5
I don't really appreciate you having to show us Vindi's fall all over again. Don't worry Nam. I'll include another flashback of Vindi dying in my final game, just for you. Then Soraz will fall as well.  *disperses* |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 12:25:43 GMT -5
Don't worry Nam. I'll include another flashback of Vindi dying in my final game, just for you. Then Soraz will fall as well. *disperses* I was just kidding.  |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 12:26:19 GMT -5
First of all. There is proof you are the inspector: -No one else has claimed, Nam would have claimed if he was. - You have put forward results to us We know there's a protector because it is imperative to have in every game, same with scum. "You have put forward results?" The Potato is Awesome does that have to do with anything. Yes it does, inspectors produce results you know... Disproving yourself as the inspector merely to spite me shows what pathetic lengths you have to go to in order to defend your idea that random votes are okay when all evidence points to the contrary. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 12:28:40 GMT -5
"You have put forward results?" The Potato is Awesome does that have to do with anything. Yes it does, inspectors produce results you know... Disproving yourself as the inspector merely to spite me shows what pathetic lengths you have to go to in order to defend your idea that random votes are okay when all evidence points to the contrary. I honestly have no idea what you're talking about... Kenbo you seem to be on the same page as this guy so can you help translate? |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 12:31:39 GMT -5
Yes it does, inspectors produce results you know... Disproving yourself as the inspector merely to spite me shows what pathetic lengths you have to go to in order to defend your idea that random votes are okay when all evidence points to the contrary. I honestly have no idea what you're talking about... Kenbo you seem to be on the same page as this guy so can you help translate? ... Well you are saying 'there's no way to prove I'm the inspector!' in order to spite me and try to defend the idea that you endorsed : Voting at random. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 12:51:27 GMT -5
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about... Kenbo you seem to be on the same page as this guy so can you help translate? ... Well you are saying 'there's no way to prove I'm the inspector!' in order to spite me and try to defend the idea that you endorsed : Voting at random. Spite you? I'm making the point that nothing is set in stone but that you have to trust people sometimes. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 19, 2014 12:51:48 GMT -5
"You have put forward results?" The Potato is Awesome does that have to do with anything. Yes it does, inspectors produce results you know... Disproving yourself as the inspector merely to spite me shows what pathetic lengths you have to go to in order to defend your idea that random votes are okay when all evidence points to the contrary. What the f*ck? |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 12:54:39 GMT -5
Yes it does, inspectors produce results you know... Disproving yourself as the inspector merely to spite me shows what pathetic lengths you have to go to in order to defend your idea that random votes are okay when all evidence points to the contrary. What the f*ck? I assume you're not illiterate? John was saying that there was no proof he was the inspector when there blatantly is, in order to shoot down my assumption that Dean's role claim may not be true. |
|
Wars Story
*disperses*
