|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 11:43:24 GMT -5
So, I could tell you about my invitation in PM to proof my loyalty then? Well they could all be the same... And it wasn't word for word just summary... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 11:43:46 GMT -5
I'm starting to think I shouldn't have come here... But I can't resist parties! I only came here fore the dancing although there doesn't seem to be any...
Also this time traveling ship might help me since I uh... Misplaced my tardis...
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 19, 2014 11:44:10 GMT -5
I don't trust Bobby with this weird claim he has apparently made... Loyal Friend? Without a nightaction? That just sounds like he wanted to be trusted and thought up a loyal sounding role...
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 11:44:19 GMT -5
Yeah yeah whatever you feel like saying to not want to trust my oh so scummy role claim.... So far I ruled out that the 3rd party is not the protector, inspector, myself, Pie guy or Revan. I emphasised that I didn't think your claim made you more scummy, but it by no means makes you more of a loyalist. The only confirmed loyalist here is Bane, with Mav being semi confirmed, as we can't put all our trust in inspection results. There's no reason to not believe Newan's claim right now. Of course he could be lying... but he seems to act like a loyalist and his claim is believable so for now I regard him as a (semi) confirmed loyalist. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 11:45:04 GMT -5
Yeah yeah whatever you feel like saying to not want to trust my oh so scummy role claim.... So far I ruled out that the 3rd party is not the protector, inspector, myself, Pie guy or Revan. I emphasised that I didn't think your claim made you more scummy, but it by no means makes you more of a loyalist. The only confirmed loyalist here is Bane, with Mav being semi confirmed, as we can't put all our trust in inspection results. Whatever you want to think. No one will vote me though. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 11:45:43 GMT -5
I emphasised that I didn't think your claim made you more scummy, but it by no means makes you more of a loyalist. The only confirmed loyalist here is Bane, with Mav being semi confirmed, as we can't put all our trust in inspection results. There's no reason to not believe Newan's claim right now. Of course he could be lying... but he seems to act like a loyalist and his claim is believable so for now I regard him as a (semi) confirmed loyalist. Whether he is a loyalist or not he continues to change his mind about what would make someone a scum using vague terms and targeting whole groups of people. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 11:45:55 GMT -5
I don't trust Bobby with this weird claim he has apparently made... Loyal Friend? Without a nightaction? That just sounds like he wanted to be trusted and thought up a loyal sounding role... Maybe he is lying... I don't have a night action because I'm a loyal helper but my role name is just that loyal helper no friend or whatever.... |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 11:47:25 GMT -5
I emphasised that I didn't think your claim made you more scummy, but it by no means makes you more of a loyalist. The only confirmed loyalist here is Bane, with Mav being semi confirmed, as we can't put all our trust in inspection results. Whatever you want to think. No one will vote me though. I have no interest in pushing a vote on you. But many people here seem to roll over and accept your mindless accusations just because of an ambiguous role claim. Your absurd ideas of doing a random or inactive vote will lose us a loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 11:47:39 GMT -5
Basically what I see is Dean coming up with an okay plan, and the rest of you shooting it down without having ANYTHING better to suggest. Or really anything to contribute in the first place...
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 11:48:39 GMT -5
Basically what I see is Dean coming up with an okay plan, and the rest of you shooting it down without having ANYTHING better to suggest. Or really anything to contribute in the first place... "Plan" |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 11:49:16 GMT -5
Basically what I see is Dean coming up with an okay plan, and the rest of you shooting it down without having ANYTHING better to suggest. Or really anything to contribute in the first place... I suggested we actually look into people first before suggesting a inactive or random vote ( which is a terrible plan) and I pointed out that Dean says stuff like 'anyone who doesn't think inactive votes are okay are scum' & people actually seem to be fine with that and I can see a few inactives coming on and going along with it. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 11:49:50 GMT -5
I don't trust Bobby with this weird claim he has apparently made... Loyal Friend? Without a nightaction? That just sounds like he wanted to be trusted and thought up a loyal sounding role... Maybe he is lying... I don't have a night action because I'm a loyal helper but my role name is just that loyal helper no friend or whatever.... Same here. Loyal helper and no nightaction. I think his claim is either false or he's hiding part of his role. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 11:51:30 GMT -5
What if we voted bobby instead of an inactive/random..?
But first I want to hear what he has to say if he comes on...
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 11:52:12 GMT -5
Whatever you want to think. No one will vote me though. I have no interest in pushing a vote on you. But many people here seem to roll over and accept your mindless accusations just because of an ambiguous role claim. Your absurd ideas of doing a random or inactive vote will lose us a loyal. Well that's all we got right? Someone might want to start suggesting something else then, |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 11:52:22 GMT -5
Basically what I see is Dean coming up with an okay plan, and the rest of you shooting it down without having ANYTHING better to suggest. Or really anything to contribute in the first place... I suggested we actually look into people first before suggesting a inactive or random vote ( which is a terrible plan) and I pointed out that Dean says stuff like 'anyone who doesn't think inactive votes are okay are scum' & people actually seem to be fine with that and I can see a few inactives coming on and going along with it. All right then, go ahead and start "looking into people." I'll just be sitting over here ---> watching you get nowhere. Basically it seems like what we have is two confirmed loyals and a bunch of inactives. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 11:53:31 GMT -5
What if we voted bobby instead of an inactive/random..? But first I want to hear what he has to say if he comes on... This is exactly what I would have thought scum would do as well. Maybe he is loyal and scum will al jump on the chance of someone claiming something unusual in his first game (or 2nd) as well. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 11:53:59 GMT -5
I suggested we actually look into people first before suggesting a inactive or random vote ( which is a terrible plan) and I pointed out that Dean says stuff like 'anyone who doesn't think inactive votes are okay are scum' & people actually seem to be fine with that and I can see a few inactives coming on and going along with it. All right then, go ahead and start "looking into people." I'll just be sitting over here ---> watching you get nowhere. Basically it seems like what we have is two confirmed loyals and a bunch of inactives. This is exactly the problem! Slothful loyals like you just sit back, looking on with indifference expecting a handful of loyals to do all the deducting, investigating etc. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 11:54:06 GMT -5
What if we voted bobby instead of an inactive/random..? But first I want to hear what he has to say if he comes on... Pipe dome about all that. I'm asking him first in our PM if that's really his role and we don't want him seeing you guys suggesting a vote on him before he reads the PM or he'll just panicked... |
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 19, 2014 11:54:24 GMT -5
The ironic thing about voting one player that is inactive is that all of a sudden all the other inactives will come online and vote that person.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 19, 2014 11:55:12 GMT -5
All right then, go ahead and start "looking into people." I'll just be sitting over here ---> watching you get nowhere. Basically it seems like what we have is two confirmed loyals and a bunch of inactives. This is exactly the problem! Slothful loyals like you just sit back, looking on with indifference expecting a handful of loyals to do all the deducting, investigating etc. I'm waiting... Start questioning people. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 19, 2014 11:55:27 GMT -5
I don't trust Bobby with this weird claim he has apparently made... Loyal Friend without a nightaction? That just sounds like he wanted to be trusted and thought up a loyal sounding role... Maybe he is lying... I don't have a night action because I'm a loyal helper but my role name is just that loyal helper no friend or whatever.... Exactly.... And apparently he doesn't have a night action with this role so there's no pressure on him to make up results... He could also be kind of a compromise for today. I mean you want a vote with evidence and others want to go for "moderately actives". |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jun 19, 2014 11:55:55 GMT -5
What if we voted bobby instead of an inactive/random..? But first I want to hear what he has to say if he comes on... That sounds like a possibly better idea, but if he coms up with a strong enough defence, then what? |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 19, 2014 11:58:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 11:58:13 GMT -5
This is exactly the problem! Slothful loyals like you just sit back, looking on with indifference expecting a handful of loyals to do all the deducting, investigating etc. I'm waiting... Start questioning people. What did I say? Slothful, lazy loyal....  . You just sit around twiddling your thumbs going "Oh look, someone is suggesting an inactive vote which will get us nowhere!. Meh, " And then shrug your shoulders & go along with such a stupid idea. You expect one loyal to find the scum and you don't even bother to raise a finger yourself and do something. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 11:59:21 GMT -5
Maybe he is lying... I don't have a night action because I'm a loyal helper but my role name is just that loyal helper no friend or whatever.... Exactly.... And apparently he doesn't have a night action with this role so there's no pressure on him to make up results... He could also be kind of a compromise for today. I mean you want a vote with evidence and others want to go for "moderately actives". He also isn't a threat to inactive to do anything... And I'd expect that if he is really loyal all the scum would jump on him cause of this role claim it's an easy vote for them... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 19, 2014 11:59:30 GMT -5
What if we voted bobby instead of an inactive/random..? But first I want to hear what he has to say if he comes on... That sounds like a possibly better idea, but if he coms up with a strong enough defence, then what? I'm not sure what he'd really say... but then one of the other inactives I guess? |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 19, 2014 12:00:23 GMT -5
Just so everyone knows so it's fair (and so people don't use the PMs to their advantage), everyone has the same styled PM no matter what team they're on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 12:02:13 GMT -5
Even in this alternate timeline Vindi dies.  |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jun 19, 2014 12:03:01 GMT -5
OOC: Jeez, I know this story supposed to be kind of silly, but I'm really interested in what's going on  |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 19, 2014 12:03:41 GMT -5
Even in this alternate timeline Vindi dies.  |
|
Wars Story
. You just sit around twiddling your thumbs going "Oh look, someone is suggesting an inactive vote which will get us nowhere!. Meh, " And then shrug your shoulders & go along with such a stupid idea. You expect one loyal to find the scum and you don't even bother to raise a finger yourself and do something.
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5