|
|
Post by Legolas on Mar 11, 2014 19:54:26 GMT -5
So Malgus gave me an interesting idea and I think I will go for it. So voting will be different today. Instead of voting on who you think is scum, you will VOTE FOR WHO YOU THINK HERE IS THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY. Whoever is chosen will than get to kill someone that they think is scum. Voting will begin in a couple of hours. ill I be able to vote tomorrow? because I might not be on in a couple of hours. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Mar 11, 2014 19:54:50 GMT -5
Remind me again of what your suspicions towards him are..? I remember you talking about them but I completely forgot what they were might have to look back...  He defended Evazan more than anyone else yesterday, and he stated several times he thinks we should hold off on him and go for someone else (like the Dug). He said Evazan was too bold to be scum and then said today that he always thought Evazan was scum, and I just got a weird vibe from him all of Day 1. Plus his vote, which may have been to hide behind you since you already voted the Dug. Like I said, no groundbreaking evidence, but it's a strong feeling. Oh yeah... Hmm... It is something to keep in mind but perhaps he just thought Star was loyal, I know I've defended people hardcore before..... But why would he say he thought Evazan was always scum... Silly billy.. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Mar 11, 2014 19:56:05 GMT -5
Yeah Mav would probably be the most logical choice
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 19:56:07 GMT -5
So Malgus gave me an interesting idea and I think I will go for it. So voting will be different today. Instead of voting on who you think is scum, you will VOTE FOR WHO YOU THINK HERE IS THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY. Whoever is chosen will than get to kill someone that they think is scum. Voting will begin in a couple of hours. ill I be able to vote tomorrow? because I might not be on in a couple of hours. You don't have to vote, and yes you will be able to. |
|
|
|
Post by Legolas on Mar 11, 2014 19:58:05 GMT -5
It's good to see that there are more leads besides the Dug. I do agree that Gatar is suspicious. I don't see any solid evidence against others though, besides Latts' excessive friendlyness(although it has subsided). It subsided the most after they said stuff about it... Good point, but I still don't think it's enough evidence to call him scum. |
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Mar 11, 2014 20:00:59 GMT -5
It subsided the most after they said stuff about it... Good point, but I still don't think it's enough evidence to call him scum. I suppose you are right... |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 11, 2014 20:05:03 GMT -5
Yes I will be voting Mav and we should be able to confirm his inspector status with whoever he chooses to kill.
|
|
|
|
Post by Legolas on Mar 11, 2014 20:11:56 GMT -5
Yes I will be voting Mav and we should be able to confirm his inspector status with whoever he chooses to kill. That's an excellent point...I will vote for Mav too. |
|
|
|
Post by red on Mar 11, 2014 20:12:33 GMT -5
Yes I will be voting Mav and we should be able to confirm his inspector status with whoever he chooses to kill. I'm still not sure about Mav. I know he is the inspector but they could have killed The real inspector. I am not so sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 11, 2014 20:20:20 GMT -5
Though I would have probably voted Ponda if no inspector showed up. Just putting that out there.
|
|
|
|
Post by red on Mar 11, 2014 20:21:07 GMT -5
Though I would have probably voted Ponda if no inspector showed up. Just putting that out there. who is ponda again? |
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Mar 11, 2014 20:21:49 GMT -5
Though I would have probably voted Ponda if no inspector showed up. Just putting that out there. who is ponda again? Potato |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Mar 11, 2014 20:29:11 GMT -5
So Malgus gave me an interesting idea and I think I will go for it. So voting will be different today. Instead of voting on who you think is scum, you will VOTE FOR WHO YOU THINK HERE IS THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY. Whoever is chosen will than get to kill someone that they think is scum. Voting will begin in a couple of hours. Yay! *Claps hands* |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 11, 2014 20:35:06 GMT -5
Well Mav is the obvious choice. Let's just hope my theory from earlier is dead wrong.  |
|
|
|
Post by red on Mar 11, 2014 20:42:14 GMT -5
Well Mav is the obvious choice. Let's just hope my theory from earlier is dead wrong. One can only hope... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 21:19:51 GMT -5
You may now vote
|
|
|
|
Post by red on Mar 11, 2014 21:22:54 GMT -5
Well dang i don't really know who to vote for.... How long do we have? |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 11, 2014 21:33:01 GMT -5
Well dang i don't really know who to vote for.... How long do we have? But we were voting for Mav... |
|
|
|
Post by red on Mar 11, 2014 21:45:05 GMT -5
Well dang i don't really know who to vote for.... How long do we have? But we were voting for Mav... I suppose that might work. And what he does might prove if he is truly the inspector. VOTE: MAV |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 11, 2014 22:07:32 GMT -5
VOTE: JAKT (MAV)
Because he claimed inspector. Now we need to decide who he's going to kill.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Mar 11, 2014 22:20:00 GMT -5
VOTE: JAKT (MAV)
I will say though that this should be used as a tool to better determine someone's loyalty. Not just as something that we can get around and have a normal day with. Mav hasn't been very vocal so far, so it might be a good idea for him to voice his suspicions and thoughts first and go off that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 11, 2014 22:37:13 GMT -5
VOTE: MAV
Who else?
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 11, 2014 22:57:25 GMT -5
VOTE: JAKT (MAV) I will say though that this should be used as a tool to better determine someone's loyalty. Not just as something that we can get around and have a normal day with. Mav hasn't been very vocal so far, so it might be a good idea for him to voice his suspicions and thoughts first and go off that. No, that's way too risky. While it could prove someone's allegiance, testing it with random people would be pointless. And besides, even if Jakt is scum (which I doubt) him not killing the person we told him to would automatically mark him as scum. I don't think any scum would do that. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 11, 2014 23:00:16 GMT -5
VOTE: MAV
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Mar 11, 2014 23:14:54 GMT -5
VOTE: JAKT (MAV) I will say though that this should be used as a tool to better determine someone's loyalty. Not just as something that we can get around and have a normal day with. Mav hasn't been very vocal so far, so it might be a good idea for him to voice his suspicions and thoughts first and go off that. No, that's way too risky. While it could prove someone's allegiance, testing it with random people would be pointless. And besides, even if Jakt is scum (which I doubt) him not killing the person we told him to would automatically mark him as scum. I don't think any scum would do that. I don't think this is permanent though.... I want to see what Mav actually thinks anyway. We don't have to go with it or something but it would help me believe him a lot more if he offered some opinions himself. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 11, 2014 23:44:36 GMT -5
VOTE: JAKT (MAV)
Obviously. Now, as for who he should kill, the people that stand out among the crowd, to me, include Todo and Ponda. They are not on the same side, as both seem somewhat suspicious of each other. However, Derrown seems to strongly agree with Ponda, despite it only being Day 2, so that's rather bold of him. Perhaps Derrown is trying to hide behind him, but I just find it rather difficult to think both would be so trusting of each other on Day 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 11, 2014 23:48:08 GMT -5
VOTE: JAKT (MAV) Obviously. Now, as for who he should kill, the people that stand out among the crowd, to me, include Todo and Ponda. They are not on the same side, as both seem somewhat suspicious of each other. However, Derrown seems to strongly agree with Ponda, despite it only being Day 2, so that's rather bold of him. Perhaps Derrown is trying to hide behind him, but I just find it rather difficult to think both would be so trusting of each other on Day 2. I see what you mean about Derrown, but do you have anything new about Ponda? |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 11, 2014 23:49:27 GMT -5
OOC: Does anyone else find it confusing there is a Ponda and a Pinda in this game?  |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 11, 2014 23:50:45 GMT -5
Remind me again of what your suspicions towards him are..? I remember you talking about them but I completely forgot what they were might have to look back... He defended Evazan more than anyone else yesterday, and he stated several times he thinks we should hold off on him and go for someone else (like the Dug). He said Evazan was too bold to be scum and then said today that he always thought Evazan was scum, and I just got a weird vibe from him all of Day 1. Plus his vote, which may have been to hide behind you since you already voted the Dug. Like I said, no groundbreaking evidence, but it's a strong feeling. "Defended"? Please reread the discussion - I called him an idiot more than once and blatantly stated I really did not care for Evazan's fate. I never once stated that we should hold off on Evazan, I just said that I felt the Dug was more suspicious. Why? Because Evazan was more bold than the Dug, he voted first. So stop filtering out what I said to fit your evidence - the essence of this accusation is that you are shocked I chose not to follow you. I didn't, and what did Evazan come up as? Loyal. That's what I meant, too bold to be scum. Not to mention he claimed a freaking role. Yes, I did say he was the second most suspicious, which was true when compared to most if not all other players. And never once did I say I always thought Evazan was scum. Please use truth instead. Instead of using poodoo-quality evidence against me... -You and Derrown seem to have created an alliance right on Day 1. Derrown seems to right away agree with you. It's rather hard to believe. -The essence of your evidence is based on past games - normally you would think I would make my own evidence up. True, that is, but perhaps I am trying to make a more considerate approach in light of how many times I've failed in the past. I'm loyal and you're wasting your time. Please find actual evidence against me and stop with the poodoo. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 11, 2014 23:51:01 GMT -5
VOTE: JAKT (MAV) Obviously. Now, as for who he should kill, the people that stand out among the crowd, to me, include Todo and Ponda. They are not on the same side, as both seem somewhat suspicious of each other. However, Derrown seems to strongly agree with Ponda, despite it only being Day 2, so that's rather bold of him. Perhaps Derrown is trying to hide behind him, but I just find it rather difficult to think both would be so trusting of each other on Day 2. I see what you mean about Derrown, but do you have anything new about Ponda? Look at my reply to Ponda. |
|
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself? 