|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:31:54 GMT -5
OOC: (Potato) One of the fundamental rules of the game is to follow the rules of the host. Did you even read Nam's rules? (Spider) Just because Potato did it doesn't mean you should have done it. Now you'll most likely both be killed. In most games, the rule is don't COPY/PASTE your role from your guide but you can claim whatever you want Exactly, we made that after The Tale of Omega. You can claim whatever you want. It confirms nothing.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:32:44 GMT -5
In most games, the rule is don't COPY/PASTE your role from your guide but you can claim whatever you want You missed my point. Another rule is to follow the rules of the host. Potato didn't do that. Neither did Spider. So I was supposed to let Tater kill me because he revealed his role?
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:32:47 GMT -5
In most games, the rule is don't COPY/PASTE your role from your guide but you can claim whatever you want You missed my point. Another rule is to follow the rules of the host. Potato didn't do that. Neither did Spider. Like I said, he knew I claimed my role yesterday and he didn't seem to mind then. I think you're overreacting a little, a claim is not concrete proof.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 18, 2013 16:33:48 GMT -5
OOC: Well technically in TRM there was NO rule saying you couldn't reveal roles though here there was a rule saying that though Nam didnt say anything last night to Potato.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:35:36 GMT -5
Since people seem to be freaking out about a role I claimed (and by the reactions, I'd say the people that are saying we should be killed off are scum) that probably means they believe the claim. Listen, people, you don't have to believe everything you here. A claim is not proof. But by the reaction it's getting I'm guessing some people are scum and don't want me to claim the role.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 16:36:17 GMT -5
OOC: I thought we had a rule that only said only the inspector could claim roles (not saying third party couldn't because that's at your own risk in my opinion). I thought that rule was made after the game in which I claimed suicider because it was unfair for the scum? OOC: It's up to the host. I claimed my role to Newan in a PM and Nam didn't mind. He's fine with it from what I can tell. OOC: I think third party is a different thing. It's kinda your own risk. If people don't trust you you'll get voted of, if people think they can team-up with you they might let you live. It's riskier.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:37:28 GMT -5
OOC: It's up to the host. I claimed my role to Newan in a PM and Nam didn't mind. He's fine with it from what I can tell. OOC: I think third party is a different thing. It's kinda your own risk. If people don't trust you you'll get voted of, if people think they can team-up with you they might let you live. It's riskier. OOC: Yeah, exactly. Half the people here didn't believe my claim, so what does it matter? Claiming is a risk in itself.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:38:17 GMT -5
Moving on, I still don't believe Si's claim... I don't believe there is a suicider, especially one like that, so if he was loyal then why would he lie?
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 16:38:47 GMT -5
OOC: I think third party is a different thing. It's kinda your own risk. If people don't trust you you'll get voted of, if people think they can team-up with you they might let you live. It's riskier. OOC: Yeah, exactly. Half the people here didn't believe my claim, so what does it matter? Claiming is a risk in itself. Well not when claiming roles that are confirmed to be in the game.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:39:23 GMT -5
OOC: Yeah, exactly. Half the people here didn't believe my claim, so what does it matter? Claiming is a risk in itself. Well not when claiming roles that are confirmed to be in the game. But in this case they aren't.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:40:11 GMT -5
Moving on, I still don't believe Si's claim... I don't believe there is a suicider, especially one like that, so if he was loyal then why would he lie? IF I was lying, it would probably be because I thought it was cheap that you revealed a role so I made one up.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 16:40:18 GMT -5
Well not when claiming roles that are confirmed to be in the game. But in this case they aren't. I know. Just discussing this so I can use it to my advantage in future game...
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 16:40:36 GMT -5
You missed my point. Another rule is to follow the rules of the host. Potato didn't do that. Neither did Spider. Like I said, he knew I claimed my role yesterday and he didn't seem to mind then. I think you're overreacting a little, a claim is not concrete proof. Whatever. I didn't know that he didn't care. Sorry....
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:42:03 GMT -5
Moving on, I still don't believe Si's claim... I don't believe there is a suicider, especially one like that, so if he was loyal then why would he lie? IF I was lying, it would probably be because I thought it was cheap that you revealed a role so I made one up. What do you mean by that? No one has to believe my role claim. I'm not copy/pasting my role, it's for everyone to decide whether true or not on their own. Claiming's a normal part of everything and some people are acting like it's a crime all of a sudden... the role I claimed wasn't even confirmed and it's pretty obscure.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:42:47 GMT -5
Moving on, I still don't believe Si's claim... I don't believe there is a suicider, especially one like that, so if he was loyal then why would he lie? And If you say it like that, it sounds kinda weird that there is a protector like that doesn't it?
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:44:39 GMT -5
Moving on, I still don't believe Si's claim... I don't believe there is a suicider, especially one like that, so if he was loyal then why would he lie? And If you say it like that, it sounds kinda weird that there is a protector like that doesn't it? Well, from my point of view it makes sense. I'm third party so I have some advantage to help me out, and then I don't get full protections every night because there's already a protector and that would be a disadvantage to the scum.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 18, 2013 16:44:43 GMT -5
Are all the roles on the wiki page because Suicider isn't.... (sorry if this was already said...)
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:45:38 GMT -5
Are all the roles on the wiki page because Suicider isn't.... (sorry if this was already said...) Apparently not.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:46:30 GMT -5
I have a proposal... no one else votes. We keep the votes where they are. Since Si and I both have the most, we'll (maybe) both be convicted. I'm still confident he's scum and I'm pretty sure he still doesn't completely buy my claim. This way, we both go down and prevent further confusion. Because let's face it, we've basically been the two highlights of today.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 18, 2013 16:47:52 GMT -5
I have a proposal... no one else votes. We keep the votes where they are. Since Si and I both have the most, we'll (maybe) both be convicted. I'm still confident he's scum and I'm pretty sure he still doesn't completely buy my claim. This way, we both go down and prevent further confusion. Because let's face it, we've basically been the two highlights of today. I probably wasn't going to vote today anyhow but if I did, it would be for Korshii...
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 16:48:05 GMT -5
I think neither of you'd be convicted. I'd rather have you convicted than no one.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 17:19:53 GMT -5
I have a proposal... no one else votes. We keep the votes where they are. Since Si and I both have the most, we'll (maybe) both be convicted. I'm still confident he's scum and I'm pretty sure he still doesn't completely buy my claim. This way, we both go down and prevent further confusion. Because let's face it, we've basically been the two highlights of today. I'm okay with that.... If you both get convicted. But If you don't then that will just be a waste.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 17:21:18 GMT -5
I have a proposal... no one else votes. We keep the votes where they are. Since Si and I both have the most, we'll (maybe) both be convicted. I'm still confident he's scum and I'm pretty sure he still doesn't completely buy my claim. This way, we both go down and prevent further confusion. Because let's face it, we've basically been the two highlights of today. I probably wasn't going to vote today anyhow but if I did, it would be for Korshii... Korshii could be the compromise. I think he's either a very confused loyal, or a scum.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 17:28:05 GMT -5
1. Korschii need 3 votes to reach majority. Ten people already voted... I doubt we'll make that. 2. In most games a tied vote meant no conviction. 3. Chance of letting suicider live > Letting third party member that might have lied about his goals live
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 17:35:52 GMT -5
1. Korschii need 3 votes to reach majority. Ten people already voted... I doubt we'll make that. 2. In most games a tied vote meant no conviction. 3. Chance of letting suicider live > Letting third party member that might have lied about his goals live I guess so.... But I can't decide who to vote for.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 18, 2013 17:51:33 GMT -5
I take a walk for a couple of hours and I return to all of this commotion.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 18:01:22 GMT -5
I take a walk for a couple of hours and I return to all of this commotion. What will happen if the votes are tied Master?
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 18, 2013 18:03:12 GMT -5
I take a walk for a couple of hours and I return to all of this commotion. What will happen if the votes are tied Master? I shall discuss that with Lu.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 18:03:49 GMT -5
What will happen if the votes are tied Master? I shall discuss that with Lu. Alright.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2013 18:13:17 GMT -5
What's the vote tally so far?
|
|