|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 15:59:23 GMT -5
To see his reaction. And it wasn't just inactivity, he had already actually posted a few times but what he did post didn't help. Quality over quantity. Of course, I should have predicted you'd say that... Then quit asking the same question over and over. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2013 15:59:35 GMT -5
VOTE: BAXTER (potato)
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 18, 2013 16:03:34 GMT -5
Of course, I should have predicted you'd say that... Then quit asking the same question over and over. We last time you said "does it matter"... |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 16:06:47 GMT -5
Well this proves to me Baxter may have his own agenda. We know he's third party. We know it's also likely the murder is already dead. So maybe we should just vote him off it's probably the only person that can still get more votes than the suicider.
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:09:09 GMT -5
Well this proves to me Baxter may have his own agenda. We know he's third party. We know it's also likely the murder is already dead. So maybe we should just vote him off it's probably the only person that can still get more votes than the suicider. It's not confirmed he's the suicider. I'm waiting for him to answer my questions in thread and waiting for someone else to answer some questions to me in a PM. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:10:35 GMT -5
Let's settle this once and for all Baxter. Why did you initially accuse Si of inactivity while at that point there were many people guilty of that very thing? It's important. To see his reaction. And it wasn't just inactivity, he had already actually posted a few times but what he did post didn't help. Quality over quantity. I hate that stupid saying. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 18, 2013 16:11:19 GMT -5
To see his reaction. And it wasn't just inactivity, he had already actually posted a few times but what he did post didn't help. Quality over quantity. I hate that stupid saying. Quality is better than a load of garbage |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:12:27 GMT -5
OOC: I'm sorry Nam but this what Tater did to save himself and you were okay with it so I think I have the right to do the same thing. IC: I'm the suicider. Why would there be a suicider in a game with an inspector, protector, and someone else with two protections? I was told my two protections wouldn't have given the Nami too much of an advantage. Also, you said I was useless with my role because there was no murderer. If there's no murderer as you claim, aren't you useless too? And how were you so sure of there being no murderer earlier? Answer this, please. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:15:00 GMT -5
OOC: I'm sorry Nam but this what Tater did to save himself and you were okay with it so I think I have the right to do the same thing. IC: I'm the suicider. Why would there be a suicider in a game with an inspector, protector, and someone else with two protections? I was told my two protections wouldn't have given the Nami too much of an advantage. Also, you said I was useless with my role because there was no murderer. If there's no murderer as you claim, aren't you useless too? And how were you so sure of there being no murderer earlier? 1. It has a limited use. I get to choose a number of days to be a suicider. 2. I thought so, but since up you all seem to disagree, I revealed my role. 3. Well the chances of Varg being murderer are higher than the protector protecting the right person, it's logic. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:15:54 GMT -5
Why would there be a suicider in a game with an inspector, protector, and someone else with two protections? I was told my two protections wouldn't have given the Nami too much of an advantage. Also, you said I was useless with my role because there was no murderer. If there's no murderer as you claim, aren't you useless too? And how were you so sure of there being no murderer earlier? 1. It has a limited use. I get to choose a number of days to be a suicider. 2. I thought so, but since up you all seem to disagree, I revealed my role. 3. Well the chances of Varg being murderer are higher than the protector protecting the right person, it's logic. How many days can you choose this? Did you choose it last night? |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:16:55 GMT -5
1. It has a limited use. I get to choose a number of days to be a suicider. 2. I thought so, but since up you all seem to disagree, I revealed my role. 3. Well the chances of Varg being murderer are higher than the protector protecting the right person, it's logic. How many days can you choose this? Did you choose it last night? Sadly, I can only do it twice. I did choose last night as I thought you might kill me. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:18:07 GMT -5
Anyone have a vote count?
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:18:36 GMT -5
How many days can you choose this? Did you choose it last night? Sadly, I can only do it twice. I did choose last night as I thought you might kill me. This wasn't listed with the other roles, though.  Third party I can understand because those are usually kept under wraps, but why would a suicider role be kept hidden? |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:18:58 GMT -5
Anyone have a vote count? Baxter- 4 Si- 4 Korshii- 2 |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:19:58 GMT -5
Sadly, I can only do it twice. I did choose last night as I thought you might kill me. This wasn't listed with the other roles, though. Third party I can understand because those are usually kept under wraps, but why would a suicider role be kept hidden? I don't know. I was loyal helper but my role was changed shortly after to limited suicider. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 16:20:27 GMT -5
Sadly, I can only do it twice. I did choose last night as I thought you might kill me. This wasn't listed with the other roles, though. Third party I can understand because those are usually kept under wraps, but why would a suicider role be kept hidden? When I was the suicider and claimed it it wasn't listed either. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 16:21:05 GMT -5
This wasn't listed with the other roles, though. Third party I can understand because those are usually kept under wraps, but why would a suicider role be kept hidden? When I was the suicider and claimed it it wasn't listed either. Speaking of that game... I'm not sure how Nam will like this. I recall he didn't like it a lot when I claimed suicider... |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:22:54 GMT -5
When I was the suicider and claimed it it wasn't listed either. Speaking of that game... I'm not sure how Nam will like this. I recall he didn't like it a lot when I claimed suicider... I didn't have a choice. I was being voted because someone else claimed a role so it was only fair I reveal my role too. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 16:23:46 GMT -5
When I was the suicider and claimed it it wasn't listed either. Speaking of that game... I'm not sure how Nam will like this. I recall he didn't like it a lot when I claimed suicider... Well to answer your question he'll most definitely hate it. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 16:24:02 GMT -5
Speaking of that game... I'm not sure how Nam will like this. I recall he didn't like it a lot when I claimed suicider... I didn't have a choice. I was being voted because someone else claimed a role so it was only fair I reveal my role too. I see your point but I wonder if Nam will see it too... |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:25:01 GMT -5
I didn't have a choice. I was being voted because someone else claimed a role so it was only fair I reveal my role too. I see your point but I wonder if Nam will see it too... So I guess I'm dead either way. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:25:15 GMT -5
Speaking of that game... I'm not sure how Nam will like this. I recall he didn't like it a lot when I claimed suicider... I didn't have a choice. I was being voted because someone else claimed a role so it was only fair I reveal my role too. But you were complaining so much about me revealing my role. Why would anyone complain like you and Jet did if someone claimed to have a role that helps the loyalists? So now suddenly when you claim it's fine. It's obvious this set up is being kept fairly simple, and if the scum didn't get to keep their murderer like you claimed (and seem quite certain of it too) then I doubt the loyals would get this many benefits. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:26:16 GMT -5
I see your point but I wonder if Nam will see it too... So I guess I'm dead either way. He won't care, claiming roles is part of the games.  Just because someone claims a role it doesn't mean they're confirmed as that role. Look at the situation now, there's lots of uncertainty. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 16:26:37 GMT -5
I didn't have a choice. I was being voted because someone else claimed a role so it was only fair I reveal my role too. But you were complaining so much about me revealing my role. Why would anyone complain like you and Jet did if someone claimed to have a role that helps the loyalists? So now suddenly when you claim it's fine. It's obvious this set up is being kept fairly simple, and if the scum didn't get to keep their murderer like you claimed (and seem quite certain of it too) then I doubt the loyals would get this many benefits. Maybe he complained because you were using your revealed role to get him voted off? I'd have done the same thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 16:27:35 GMT -5
I didn't have a choice. I was being voted because someone else claimed a role so it was only fair I reveal my role too. But you were complaining so much about me revealing my role. Why would anyone complain like you and Jet did if someone claimed to have a role that helps the loyalists? So now suddenly when you claim it's fine. It's obvious this set up is being kept fairly simple, and if the scum didn't get to keep their murderer like you claimed (and seem quite certain of it too) then I doubt the loyals would get this many benefits. I was complaining because it meant I would have to reveal my role too, which I never wanted. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 16:28:04 GMT -5
So I guess I'm dead either way. He won't care, claiming roles is part of the games. Just because someone claims a role it doesn't mean they're confirmed as that role. Look at the situation now, there's lots of uncertainty. OOC: I thought we had a rule that only said only the inspector could claim roles (not saying third party couldn't because that's at your own risk in my opinion). I thought that rule was made after the game in which I claimed suicider because it was unfair for the scum? |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 16:28:58 GMT -5
I didn't have a choice. I was being voted because someone else claimed a role so it was only fair I reveal my role too. But you were complaining so much about me revealing my role. Why would anyone complain like you and Jet did if someone claimed to have a role that helps the loyalists? So now suddenly when you claim it's fine. It's obvious this set up is being kept fairly simple, and if the scum didn't get to keep their murderer like you claimed (and seem quite certain of it too) then I doubt the loyals would get this many benefits. OOC: (Potato) One of the fundamental rules of the game is to follow the rules of the host. Did you even read Nam's rules? (Spider) Just because Potato did it doesn't mean you should have done it. Now you'll most likely both be killed. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 18, 2013 16:29:45 GMT -5
But you were complaining so much about me revealing my role. Why would anyone complain like you and Jet did if someone claimed to have a role that helps the loyalists? So now suddenly when you claim it's fine. It's obvious this set up is being kept fairly simple, and if the scum didn't get to keep their murderer like you claimed (and seem quite certain of it too) then I doubt the loyals would get this many benefits. OOC: (Potato) One of the fundamental rules of the game is to follow the rules of the host. Did you even read Nam's rules? (Spider) Just because Potato did it doesn't mean you should have done it. Now you'll most likely both be killed. In most games, the rule is don't COPY/PASTE your role from your guide but you can claim whatever you want |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 16:31:18 GMT -5
He won't care, claiming roles is part of the games. Just because someone claims a role it doesn't mean they're confirmed as that role. Look at the situation now, there's lots of uncertainty. OOC: I thought we had a rule that only said only the inspector could claim roles (not saying third party couldn't because that's at your own risk in my opinion). I thought that rule was made after the game in which I claimed suicider because it was unfair for the scum? OOC: It's up to the host. I claimed my role to Newan in a PM and Nam didn't mind. He's fine with it from what I can tell. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 16:31:38 GMT -5
OOC: (Potato) One of the fundamental rules of the game is to follow the rules of the host. Did you even read Nam's rules? (Spider) Just because Potato did it doesn't mean you should have done it. Now you'll most likely both be killed. In most games, the rule is don't COPY/PASTE your role from your guide but you can claim whatever you want You missed my point. Another rule is to follow the rules of the host. Potato didn't do that. Neither did Spider. |
|
Wars Story
Third party I can understand because those are usually kept under wraps, but why would a suicider role be kept hidden?
Just because someone claims a role it doesn't mean they're confirmed as that role. Look at the situation now, there's lots of uncertainty.
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5