|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 20, 2014 5:34:25 GMT -5
I was just going to say Mav or Legolas I think adding a 3rd is stretching it. Exactly I'm not scum... I'm still sketchy about why I'm suspicious to you Kenbo... For accusing Legolas? What I didn't accuse legolas |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 20, 2014 5:37:29 GMT -5
Well... Mav getting convicted is kind of useless since it doesn't give us much info
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Oct 20, 2014 8:51:28 GMT -5
Yeah if Mav is telling the truth it doesn't help us much and he seems to be helping the loyals.
But I think the vote is still tied like 3-3 if Mavs vote counts as two.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Oct 20, 2014 11:23:05 GMT -5
Yeah if Mav is telling the truth it doesn't help us much and he seems to be helping the loyals. But I think the vote is still tied like 3-3 if Mavs vote counts as two. And sadly for me, I don't think a tie means no conviction... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Oct 20, 2014 12:27:19 GMT -5
Exactly I'm not scum... I'm still sketchy about why I'm suspicious to you Kenbo... For accusing Legolas? What I didn't accuse legolas No reread the post. I'm asking you if you find me suspicious because I accused Legolas. |
|
|
|
Post by Legolas on Oct 20, 2014 14:10:12 GMT -5
The accusations against me are understandable, but truth is I've been really busy and have only had time to pop in here and there and make a post or two. I haven't had time to explain myself, so me being a scum trying to fly under the radar is out of the question.
It seems like a couple of people automatically thought I was scum just because I said I was suspicious of Newan. I guess I can kind of understand that, but even though he was vote blocked doesn't mean that he is loyal. A third party could have done that or maybe one of the top voters could have had an ability to vote-block. Also, when I was a role-blocker a few games back, I had the ability to vote-block as well. So there is a couple of possibilities.
|
|
|
|
Post by Legolas on Oct 20, 2014 14:19:19 GMT -5
Well I will VOTE: LEGOLAS He came on and accused Newan with no evidence. He then vanished. This could be why: -Newan can't vote. This means that if Legolas (or one of his scum buddies) were to vote for Newan or push suspicion onto him, he'd only be able to urge the rest of the (inactive) players in this game to save him. Sounds like a scum plan? Well I think so to. -He likely didn't expect too much pushback. Inactive player naming a seemingly random suspicion with not too much to back it up? Not too out of the ordinary. People do it all the time to act like they're contributing. But others did notice, and he's conveniently went under cover now. Oh and I don't really understand the evidence against me... If I was scum why would I draw attention to myself by accusing the person who is vote-blocked? I could have just stayed inactive and survived in the background till the end of the game. I also don't understand why you would vote someone who came up as loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Oct 20, 2014 14:24:05 GMT -5
Well I will VOTE: LEGOLAS He came on and accused Newan with no evidence. He then vanished. This could be why: -Newan can't vote. This means that if Legolas (or one of his scum buddies) were to vote for Newan or push suspicion onto him, he'd only be able to urge the rest of the (inactive) players in this game to save him. Sounds like a scum plan? Well I think so to. -He likely didn't expect too much pushback. Inactive player naming a seemingly random suspicion with not too much to back it up? Not too out of the ordinary. People do it all the time to act like they're contributing. But others did notice, and he's conveniently went under cover now. Oh and I don't really understand the evidence against me... If I was scum why would I draw attention to myself by accusing the person who is vote-blocked? I could have just stayed inactive and survived in the background till the end of the game. I also don't understand why you would vote someone who came up as loyal. You are staying inactive... And I don't really care if you came up as loyal or not. Someone coming up as loyal means very little as far as proving they're actually loyal. I voted you because I thought you were the most suspicious, and I stand by it. |
|
|
|
Post by Legolas on Oct 20, 2014 14:27:11 GMT -5
If I was scum why would I draw attention to myself by accusing the person who is vote-blocked? I could have just stayed inactive and survived in the background till the end of the game. I also don't understand why you would vote someone who came up as loyal. You are staying inactive... And I don't really care if you came up as loyal or not. Someone coming up as loyal means very little as far as proving they're actually loyal. I voted you because I thought you were the most suspicious, and I stand by it.The inactivity is due to OOC reasons. So I'm suspicious because I tried to generate some much needed discussion. You won't stand by it tomorrow when I turn up as loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Legolas on Oct 20, 2014 14:31:50 GMT -5
Well... Mav getting convicted is kind of useless since it doesn't give us much info ? |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Oct 20, 2014 14:36:14 GMT -5
Well... Mav getting convicted is kind of useless since it doesn't give us much info Then why did you vote me then? |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 20, 2014 15:46:56 GMT -5
What I didn't accuse legolas No reread the post. I'm asking you if you find me suspicious because I accused Legolas. Oh I thought you were suspicious of me.. Nvm...  Well sort of because of that I just thought the whole thing with you and Mav saying legolas was scum was sort of odd like typically inspection results are accurate and people typically trust them as well except now... It's sort of easy for scum to take something that stands out like inspection results to accuse someone and make them look suspicious But I was more suspicious of Mav than you but since he's most likely 3rd party.. Well... Mav getting convicted is kind of useless since it doesn't give us much info ? He's third party Well... Mav getting convicted is kind of useless since it doesn't give us much info Then why did you vote me then? That was before you revealed your role |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Oct 20, 2014 16:49:28 GMT -5
You are staying inactive... And I don't really care if you came up as loyal or not. Someone coming up as loyal means very little as far as proving they're actually loyal. I voted you because I thought you were the most suspicious, and I stand by it.The inactivity is due to OOC reasons. So I'm suspicious because I tried to generate some much needed discussion. You won't stand by it tomorrow when I turn up as loyal. You don't really generate discussion by accusing someone with no reason/evidence. All you generate is a vote on yourself. Yes I will stand by it... I'll have to for one, and I still think you're the best vote. You also may not be voted off. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Oct 20, 2014 17:19:41 GMT -5
There's really no evidence on me except that the one accusing me is scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find something
|
|
|
|
Post by Legolas on Oct 20, 2014 18:03:19 GMT -5
There's really no evidence on me except that the one accusing me is scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find something I still think that your scum. |
|
|
|
Post by Legolas on Oct 20, 2014 18:06:09 GMT -5
The inactivity is due to OOC reasons. So I'm suspicious because I tried to generate some much needed discussion. You won't stand by it tomorrow when I turn up as loyal. You don't really generate discussion by accusing someone with no reason/evidence. All you generate is a vote on yourself. Yes I will stand by it... I'll have to for one, and I still think you're the best vote. You also may not be voted off. whatevs |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Oct 20, 2014 18:26:15 GMT -5
There's really no evidence on me except that the one accusing me is scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find something I still think that your scum. Eye think you're grammar is bad. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Oct 20, 2014 18:33:25 GMT -5
Voting will close in 2-4 hours.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Oct 20, 2014 18:44:14 GMT -5
There's really no evidence on me except that the one accusing me is scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find something I still think that your scum. Well whatever you want to think I guess... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 20, 2014 18:44:56 GMT -5
Voting will close in 2-4 hours. I'm batman |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 20, 2014 18:45:51 GMT -5
Well today will sort of be like no concoction except we lose more people...
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 20, 2014 18:49:10 GMT -5
But another thing... How many third parties are there.... We've already had Pinda and CBK.. Unless it's like a whole other third party team (they might not have a base and stuff though)
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Oct 20, 2014 18:54:44 GMT -5
But another thing... How many third parties are there.... We've already had Pinda and CBK.. Unless it's like a whole other third party team (they might not have a base and stuff though) Well that's why I think there's not many scum. But the scum are probably the ones behind the killings. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 20, 2014 18:59:35 GMT -5
But another thing... How many third parties are there.... We've already had Pinda and CBK.. Unless it's like a whole other third party team (they might not have a base and stuff though) Well that's why I think there's not many scum. But the scum are probably the ones behind the killings. Hmm we had like 15 players right I think that's not enough to have two scum and 3rd party teams of 3 |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 20, 2014 19:01:25 GMT -5
Tomorrow is very not good we'll have nine players with Mav, nic, and another person gone... At least 2 or 3 are scum
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Oct 20, 2014 19:03:27 GMT -5
Tomorrow is very not good we'll have nine players with Mav, nic, and another person gone... At least 2 or 3 are scum Is Mav leading the tally? |
|
|
|
Post by Legolas on Oct 20, 2014 19:04:54 GMT -5
I still think that your scum. Eye think you're grammar is bad. Nonsense |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 20, 2014 19:07:54 GMT -5
Tomorrow is very not good we'll have nine players with Mav, nic, and another person gone... At least 2 or 3 are scum Is Mav leading the tally? I think so But wait he has an extra vote so he could just tie it couldn't he.. Eye think you're grammar is bad. Nonsense Stfu pointy |
|
|
|
Post by Legolas on Oct 20, 2014 19:09:37 GMT -5
Tomorrow is very not good we'll have nine players with Mav, nic, and another person gone... At least 2 or 3 are scum Is Mav leading the tally? He is now.  VOTE: MAV He seems more off than Malgus. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 20, 2014 19:13:02 GMT -5
Is Mav leading the tally? He is now. VOTE: MAV He seems more off than Malgus. He's 3rd party but ok |
|
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5