|
|
Post by Potato on Aug 13, 2014 21:42:59 GMT -5
Because I thought HK was not a good choice, and neither was Anakin. So what if I voted Kenobi? He was who I was suspicious of. I don't have to follow you guys just because you think they are scum. I openly stated that he was who I was suspicious of, and Kenobi and I discussed about it. I still am suspicious of him, and so are you guys. I'm just ahead of the game. But you said in that same post you were purposely voting just to be different... which is not a good reason. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 13, 2014 21:43:12 GMT -5
Guys the scummies are laughing at you
like this if you're a scummy
shout out to all my scummies
|
|
|
|
Post by Commander Slime on Aug 13, 2014 21:43:34 GMT -5
Did you see a better option other than HK? No, but you were completely against HK from the beginning. I do not recall being completely against HK at the beginning. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 13, 2014 21:44:52 GMT -5
Because I thought HK was not a good choice, and neither was Anakin. So what if I voted Kenobi? He was who I was suspicious of. I don't have to follow you guys just because you think they are scum. I openly stated that he was who I was suspicious of, and Kenobi and I discussed about it. I still am suspicious of him, and so are you guys. I'm just ahead of the game. Exactly my logic.. |
|
|
|
Post by ?6 (CBK) on Aug 13, 2014 21:45:01 GMT -5
Because I thought HK was not a good choice, and neither was Anakin. So what if I voted Kenobi? He was who I was suspicious of. I don't have to follow you guys just because you think they are scum. I openly stated that he was who I was suspicious of, and Kenobi and I discussed about it. I still am suspicious of him, and so are you guys. I'm just ahead of the game. But you said in that same post you were purposely voting just to be different... which is not a good reason. Why? did you want me to vote HK? He was not a good candidate. He had dumb reasons. If I voted him I would be a suspect for voting him or following Loki. If I voted for Anakin it would be a dumb move because he didn't have much evidence against him. Kenobi was my best candidate and he was who I was suspicious of. Who cares if I chose someone different. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 13, 2014 21:45:18 GMT -5
Guys the scummies are laughing at you like this if you're a scummy shout out to all my scummies I'm scum!!!! Lol your avatar |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 13, 2014 21:45:52 GMT -5
Guys the scummies are laughing at you like this if you're a scummy shout out to all my scummies Oops I liked well you caught me guys  |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 13, 2014 21:45:49 GMT -5
In reply to Potato's post... I believe Skirata (Rex) voiced wanting to vote either HK or Kenobi several times yesterday. That point about scum being iffy and so was Obi makes me a little worried, but I'm still leaning on loyal for him at the moment. The comment about Revan trying to stick out is interesting... Yes, that part about Nam's comment was most interesting. I was thinking the same thing. And OOC: Doesn't nam always act unsure of things when he's scum? IC: he's seemed a little off to me, I made a small note of that on a previous post I think. If not, I was thinking it (you'll have to take my word on that  ). |
|
|
|
Post by ?6 (CBK) on Aug 13, 2014 21:46:07 GMT -5
Because I thought HK was not a good choice, and neither was Anakin. So what if I voted Kenobi? He was who I was suspicious of. I don't have to follow you guys just because you think they are scum. I openly stated that he was who I was suspicious of, and Kenobi and I discussed about it. I still am suspicious of him, and so are you guys. I'm just ahead of the game. Exactly my logic.. If you don't follow you're accused for being scum. If you're accused of following them you're accused of being scum. This does not make sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 13, 2014 21:46:43 GMT -5
But Revan. You didn't vote for HK for the same reasons I didn't. So why am I suspicious in your eyes?
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Aug 13, 2014 21:47:12 GMT -5
But you said in that same post you were purposely voting just to be different... which is not a good reason. Why? did you want me to vote HK? He was not a good candidate. He had dumb reasons. If I voted him I would be a suspect for voting him or following Loki. If I voted for Anakin it would be a dumb move because he didn't have much evidence against him. Kenobi was my best candidate and he was who I was suspicious of. Who cares if I chose someone different. The reason I responded to that post was because you said you were voting just to be different and that's not a good reason. I'm not questioning the reasons you just mentioned but at the beginning of the post you said that's why you voted for Kenobi. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 13, 2014 21:47:57 GMT -5
I think that out of the three people that got votes yesterday (HK, Kenobi, Anakin), one of them's scum. I think one of the reasons why everyone quickly joined the HK vote was to not vote for Kenobi or Skywalker. If one of them's scum, then one or two of the people who voted HK are scum as well. Yes, I suggested the same thig about HK voters (Nam, Spider, Mav, Skirata) being possible scum candidates. I think Mav and Nam are most likely out of those four IMO. But the point about perhaps Kenobi or Anakin being scum is interesting. Not sure if I agree, but I'll keep it in mind. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 13, 2014 21:48:01 GMT -5
Guys the scummies are laughing at you like this if you're a scummy shout out to all my scummies I'm scum!!!! Lol your avatar I like my avatar too Newan I'm glad you asked.  |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Aug 13, 2014 21:48:23 GMT -5
If you don't follow you're accused for being scum. If you're accused of following them you're accused of being scum. This does not make sense. I never accused you of being scum... I'm saying the first part of your post had bad logic. |
|
|
|
Post by ?6 (CBK) on Aug 13, 2014 21:48:34 GMT -5
But Revan. You didn't vote for HK for the same reasons I didn't. So why am I suspicious in your eyes? I'm suspicious of you voting Anakin with limited evidence, but you then accused people for having limited evidence against HK. It's just odd to me. You've done more accusing and suspecting everyone really. You're just really open with everything. It's hard to explain. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 13, 2014 21:48:44 GMT -5
Why? did you want me to vote HK? He was not a good candidate. He had dumb reasons. If I voted him I would be a suspect for voting him or following Loki. If I voted for Anakin it would be a dumb move because he didn't have much evidence against him. Kenobi was my best candidate and he was who I was suspicious of. Who cares if I chose someone different. The reason I responded to that post was because you said you were voting just to be different and that's not a good reason. I'm not questioning the reasons you just mentioned but at the beginning of the post you said that's why you voted for Kenobi.  |
|
|
|
Post by ?6 (CBK) on Aug 13, 2014 21:50:24 GMT -5
Why? did you want me to vote HK? He was not a good candidate. He had dumb reasons. If I voted him I would be a suspect for voting him or following Loki. If I voted for Anakin it would be a dumb move because he didn't have much evidence against him. Kenobi was my best candidate and he was who I was suspicious of. Who cares if I chose someone different. The reason I responded to that post was because you said you were voting just to be different and that's not a good reason. I'm not questioning the reasons you just mentioned but at the beginning of the post you said that's why you voted for Kenobi. I never said that was why I suspected him. I said this - " think I'm purposely trying to vote someone different" I said how you guys will most likely think I'm trying to purposely vote someone different. But that's not why I voted him. |
|
|
|
Post by ?6 (CBK) on Aug 13, 2014 21:50:55 GMT -5
If you don't follow you're accused for being scum. If you're accused of following them you're accused of being scum. This does not make sense. I never accused you of being scum... I'm saying the first part of your post had bad logic. That wasn't directed at you. It was in general. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 13, 2014 21:51:31 GMT -5
The reason I responded to that post was because you said you were voting just to be different and that's not a good reason. I'm not questioning the reasons you just mentioned but at the beginning of the post you said that's why you voted for Kenobi. I never said that was why I suspected him. I said this - " think I'm purposely trying to vote someone different" I said how you guys will most likely think I'm trying to purposely vote someone different. But that's not why I voted him.  |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 13, 2014 21:52:33 GMT -5
I never said that was why I suspected him. I said this - " think I'm purposely trying to vote someone different" I said how you guys will most likely think I'm trying to purposely vote someone different. But that's not why I voted him. In a POTC mood tonight, are we?  |
|
|
|
Post by ?6 (CBK) on Aug 13, 2014 21:52:37 GMT -5
I never said that was why I suspected him. I said this - " think I'm purposely trying to vote someone different" I said how you guys will most likely think I'm trying to purposely vote someone different. But that's not why I voted him. OOC: I Love POTC keep them coming Bane <333 |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 13, 2014 21:53:31 GMT -5
In a POTC mood tonight, are we? You know daz right. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 13, 2014 21:53:35 GMT -5
But Revan. You didn't vote for HK for the same reasons I didn't. So why am I suspicious in your eyes? (1) I'm suspicious of you voting Anakin with limited evidence, but you then accused people for having limited evidence against HK. It's just odd to me. (2) You've done more accusing and suspecting everyone really. You're just really open with everything. It's hard to explain. 1. Okay let's get this straight. Limited and weak evidence is different. I said HK had weak evidence. I admitted I had limited evidence. In my book limited > weak so I voted Anakin. Now you voted me for the same reason I voted Anakin. That's not suspicious? Well I don't expect you to call yourself out but still... 2. Everyone is a strong term... I only accused Anakin really. I briefly accused Maul but quickly dropped it. You accused him as well if you remember... So basically you've done what I've done.... |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 13, 2014 21:53:46 GMT -5
OOC: If only all the living players could as active as dead Bane |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 13, 2014 21:53:46 GMT -5
OOC: I Love POTC keep them coming Bane <333  |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 13, 2014 21:54:27 GMT -5
OOC: If only all the living players could as active as dead Bane Dead Bane is happy to help with activity. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 13, 2014 21:54:55 GMT -5
(1) I'm suspicious of you voting Anakin with limited evidence, but you then accused people for having limited evidence against HK. It's just odd to me. (2) You've done more accusing and suspecting everyone really. You're just really open with everything. It's hard to explain. 1. Okay let's get this straight. Limited and weak evidence is different. I said HK had weak evidence. I admitted I had limited evidence. In my book limited > weak so I voted Anakin. Now you voted me for the same reason I voted Anakin. That's not suspicious? Well I don't expect you to call yourself out but still... 2. Everyone is a strong term... I only accused Anakin really. I briefly accused Maul but quickly dropped it. You accused him as well if you remember... So basically you've done what I've done....  |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 13, 2014 21:55:51 GMT -5
1. Okay let's get this straight. Limited and weak evidence is different. I said HK had weak evidence. I admitted I had limited evidence. In my book limited > weak so I voted Anakin. Now you voted me for the same reason I voted Anakin. That's not suspicious? Well I don't expect you to call yourself out but still... 2. Everyone is a strong term... I only accused Anakin really. I briefly accused Maul but quickly dropped it. You accused him as well if you remember... So basically you've done what I've done.... You talkin shit about me, bitch? Don't make me come over there and slap you |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 13, 2014 21:55:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ?6 (CBK) on Aug 13, 2014 21:56:32 GMT -5
(1) I'm suspicious of you voting Anakin with limited evidence, but you then accused people for having limited evidence against HK. It's just odd to me. (2) You've done more accusing and suspecting everyone really. You're just really open with everything. It's hard to explain. 1. Okay let's get this straight. Limited and weak evidence is different. I said HK had weak evidence. I admitted I had limited evidence. In my book limited > weak so I voted Anakin. Now you voted me for the same reason I voted Anakin. That's not suspicious? Well I don't expect you to call yourself out but still... 2. Everyone is a strong term... I only accused Anakin really. I briefly accused Maul but quickly dropped it. You accused him as well if you remember... So basically you've done what I've done.... I didn't vote you for the same reasons as Anakin. You gave wayyy weaker/limited evidence then my suspicion of you. "Briefly" accused Maul. Why did you suddenly switch? You changed your side on Maul way too quickly. I didn't because I HAD to know if he was the real inspector. I didn't want to claim my role to a scum faking inspector. You on the other hand had no reason to change so quickly. |
|
Wars Story
). 
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5