|
|
Post by bane on Jul 14, 2014 3:05:45 GMT -5
What on earth? You voted for Pinda too. You're just jumping on the bandwagon because now I'm an easy target. Don't deny it. But did my vote ultimately decide who was convicted? No. Lek's vote did and you encouraged it because you are scum. Wtf? Because you didn't vote last NO BLAME is on you? Well let me remind you that I voted before you... |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 14, 2014 3:11:23 GMT -5
But did my vote ultimately decide who was convicted? No. Lek's vote did and you encouraged it because you are scum. Wtf? Because you didn't vote last NO BLAME is on you? Well let me remind you that I voted before you... I gather that Nic's unwavering support of you means you really do have a role. And so I won't be voting for you. But remember that you played a part in this too. The order in which we voted doesn't matter in the least. We all made the same decision in the end. You're trying so hard to dodge out from under that fact, but it's still true. I made a mistake, yes, but at least I'm sorry for it and am trying to move on and find more scum. You're in denial. You're grasping at straws. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 14, 2014 3:12:55 GMT -5
Is annnnyyyooonneee seeing this? Someone take a screen cap this is priceless.
|
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 14, 2014 4:30:33 GMT -5
I'm thinking we ahould take a better look at wampa. I mean he did go for a double convoction. Plus a lot of the loyals who died suspected him....
|
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 14, 2014 4:33:39 GMT -5
Well I'm probably going to either vote for Boba or Apostron. Thoughts? Go ahead and vote Boba. That'll just screw ME over more than I already am. But not my problem if we all die cause you're an idiot  Unless youre scum and that's what you want of course. That would make perfect sense  |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 14, 2014 9:07:42 GMT -5
Is annnnyyyooonneee seeing this? Someone take a screen cap this is priceless. Priceless? I don't see what's funny really,  |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 14, 2014 9:11:08 GMT -5
What on earth? You voted for Pinda too. You're just jumping on the bandwagon because now I'm an easy target. Don't deny it. Mhh no response. Have you heard of timezones? I was asleep then.... |
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 14, 2014 9:32:37 GMT -5
I'm thinking we ahould take a better look at wampa. I mean he did go for a double convoction. Plus a lot of the loyals who died suspected him.... First of all, I went for the double conviction because it was the less risky choice. In hindsight, it is obvious that it was unnecessary. I made a mistake. Sorry. Secondly, you need to realize that just because someone is loyal it doesn't mean they are 100% correct about everything. I would think that you of all people would know that. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 14, 2014 9:37:02 GMT -5
Hello everybody, I'm here to dispel some assumptions made about me. First of all, I'm not the protector, but I have a role which is rather valuable and by revealing it , my role is literally useless so I'm not going to. Secondly, if I were indeed scum, why has the protector been so successful? If I were scum I surely would have reported whoever the protector was going to protect to my scum friends. So, you can either follow Lek and vote off a loyal or either vote him off, an obvious scum.
I've made my decision already. VOTE: LEK CORO (WAMPA)
Lek was a follower who yesterday voted Sidus. Of course you could point out I voted Sidus, but my vote had little effect. Lek, despite being advised against going for a double conviction, did so anyway. This was no mere mistake, as he wants to try it again. And yes, I do acknowledge my mistake, voting Sidus was stupid, however, Lek has not learnt from yesterday and decides to yet again put the loyals in danger. (although he hasn't confirmed he will do it, he is still considering it)
I decided against voting Conjurer for a number of reasons. One of them is that he comes across as rather short tempered as a result of being (possibly) falsely accused. . Although I do not put much trust in inspection results, him coming up loyal somewhat shifted my suspicion away from him and onto Lek.
If Lek is loyal: Vote off Kyronn
If Lek is scum: Vote off The Conjurer
There's probably only 2 scum left now which should make our job easier.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jul 14, 2014 10:32:50 GMT -5
Well this turned out better than I hoped, although we unnecessarily lost a loyal, we killed a scum too plus the protector was successful yet again it seems. RIP Sidus we shall avenge you. Also, Lek or The Conjurer die today. Lek, for voting Sidus and ultimately losing us a loyal & The Conjurer for encouraging something so foolhardy (double conviction). What on earth? You voted for Pinda too. You're just jumping on the bandwagon because now I'm an easy target. Don't deny it. Hmmmm... this may make me re-consider my vote. |
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 14, 2014 11:25:17 GMT -5
I'm thinking we ahould take a better look at wampa. I mean he did go for a double convoction. Plus a lot of the loyals who died suspected him.... First of all, I went for the double conviction because it was the less risky choice. In hindsight, it is obvious that it was unnecessary. I made a mistake. Sorry. Secondly, you need to realize that just because someone is loyal it doesn't mean they are 100% correct about everything. I would think that you of all people would know that. I pretty positive youre scum Wamps. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 14, 2014 11:27:25 GMT -5
VOTE: WAMPA
|
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 14, 2014 11:37:28 GMT -5
Well, claiming this will probably null my role, but my role is the LOYAL SUICIDER. If I am murdered, I take the murderer with me.
|
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 14, 2014 12:20:42 GMT -5
Hello everybody, I'm here to dispel some assumptions made about me. First of all, I'm not the protector, but I have a role which is rather valuable and by revealing it , my role is literally useless so I'm not going to. Secondly, if I were indeed scum, why has the protector been so successful? If I were scum I surely would have reported whoever the protector was going to protect to my scum friends. That's not really true. It would be pretty stupid to kill the protector as soon as you get into a PM with them. You would be voted off the next day, and same with your fellow scum. So, you can either follow Lek and vote off a loyal or either vote him off, an obvious scum. I've made my decision already. VOTE: LEK CORO (WAMPA)Lek was a follower who yesterday voted Sidus. Wouldn't I be a follower no matter which person I voted for? Of course you could point out I voted Sidus, but my vote had little effect. Your vote had EXACTLY the same effect as mine did. It may seem like I was the decider, but if you actually put a little effort into your accusation you may realize that if you hadn't of voted for Pinda then my vote wouldn't have mattered. The only way my vote could have more of an effect than yours is if I had some ability that gave me double votes. Lek, despite being advised against going for a double conviction, did so anyway. Yes, and I was also advised to do the opposite. I don't see how making the safest decision makes me scum. This was no mere mistake, as he wants to try it again. Umm... No... I stated that I thought it MIGHT be an option, and then rejected it after. And yes, I do acknowledge my mistake, voting Sidus was stupid, however, Lek has not learnt from yesterday and decides to yet again put the loyals in danger. (although he hasn't confirmed he will do it, he is still considering it) So you choose to only consider one option? that doesn't seem too productive.I decided against voting Conjurer for a number of reasons. One of them is that he comes across as rather short tempered as a result of being (possibly) falsely accused. . Although I do not put much trust in inspection results, him coming up loyal somewhat shifted my suspicion away from him and onto Lek. If Lek is loyal: Vote off Davell or Kyronn If Lek is scum: Vote off Davell or The Conjurer There's probably only 2 scum left now which should make our job easier. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 14, 2014 12:33:08 GMT -5
Hello everybody, I'm here to dispel some assumptions made about me. First of all, I'm not the protector, but I have a role which is rather valuable and by revealing it , my role is literally useless so I'm not going to. Secondly, if I were indeed scum, why has the protector been so successful? If I were scum I surely would have reported whoever the protector was going to protect to my scum friends. That's not really true. It would be pretty stupid to kill the protector as soon as you get into a PM with them. You would be voted off the next day, and same with your fellow scum. So, you can either follow Lek and vote off a loyal or either vote him off, an obvious scum. I've made my decision already. VOTE: LEK CORO (WAMPA)Lek was a follower who yesterday voted Sidus. Wouldn't I be a follower no matter which person I voted for? Of course you could point out I voted Sidus, but my vote had little effect. Your vote had EXACTLY the same effect as mine did. It may seem like I was the decider, but if you actually put a little effort into your accusation you may realize that if you hadn't of voted for Pinda then my vote wouldn't have mattered. The only way my vote could have more of an effect than yours is if I had some ability that gave me double votes. Lek, despite being advised against going for a double conviction, did so anyway. Yes, and I was also advised to do the opposite. I don't see how making the safest decision makes me scum. This was no mere mistake, as he wants to try it again. Umm... No... I stated that I thought it MIGHT be an option, and then rejected it after. And yes, I do acknowledge my mistake, voting Sidus was stupid, however, Lek has not learnt from yesterday and decides to yet again put the loyals in danger. (although he hasn't confirmed he will do it, he is still considering it) So you choose to only consider one option? that doesn't seem too productive.I decided against voting Conjurer for a number of reasons. One of them is that he comes across as rather short tempered as a result of being (possibly) falsely accused. . Although I do not put much trust in inspection results, him coming up loyal somewhat shifted my suspicion away from him and onto Lek. If Lek is loyal: Vote off Davell or Kyronn If Lek is scum: Vote off Davell or The Conjurer There's probably only 2 scum left now which should make our job easier. 1. I was added to their PM on Day 2. But on Night 3 the scum could have killed the protector and I would most likely not look suspicious (scum usually murder randomly), if I were scum of course. And also I wasn't' really saying that, what I was saying is that if I were scum I would inform my scum friends about who was being protected and tell them to murder someone else. 2. No, because your votes were done without much thought. The Conjurer told you to arrange a double conviction and you did it, no questions asked. 3. If you didn't just allow yourself to be influenced by the opinions of others so easily, we would have 1 extra loyal in our ranks. 4. But you didn't really seem to consider any alternatives to a double conviction 5. You were trying to push for it yet again. You did it yesterday because you wanted to bring down a loyal after your scum buddy was doomed to be voted off 6. Well you're obviously scum.. I don't have any doubts about that |
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 14, 2014 12:39:52 GMT -5
1. I was added to their PM on Day 2. But on Night 3 the scum could have killed the protector and I would most likely not look suspicious (scum usually murder randomly), if I were scum of course. And also I wasn't' really saying that, what I was saying is that if I were scum I would inform my scum friends about who was being protected and tell them to murder someone else. 2. No, because your votes were done without much thought. The Conjurer told you to arrange a double conviction and you did it, no questions asked. 3. If you didn't just allow yourself to be influenced by the opinions of others so easily, we would have 1 extra loyal in our ranks. 4. But you didn't really seem to consider any alternatives to a double conviction 5. You were trying to push for it yet again. You did it yesterday because you wanted to bring down a loyal after your scum buddy was doomed to be voted off 6. Well you're obviously scum.. I don't have any doubts about that You must not have seen my amazing graphic I used to explained my thought processes yesterday. I don't know about you but it seems pretty exhausting to me. I didn't take the vote lightly. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 14, 2014 12:50:22 GMT -5
1. I was added to their PM on Day 2. But on Night 3 the scum could have killed the protector and I would most likely not look suspicious (scum usually murder randomly), if I were scum of course. And also I wasn't' really saying that, what I was saying is that if I were scum I would inform my scum friends about who was being protected and tell them to murder someone else. 2. No, because your votes were done without much thought. The Conjurer told you to arrange a double conviction and you did it, no questions asked. 3. If you didn't just allow yourself to be influenced by the opinions of others so easily, we would have 1 extra loyal in our ranks. 4. But you didn't really seem to consider any alternatives to a double conviction 5. You were trying to push for it yet again. You did it yesterday because you wanted to bring down a loyal after your scum buddy was doomed to be voted off 6. Well you're obviously scum.. I don't have any doubts about that You must not have seen my amazing graphic I used to explained my thought processes yesterday. I don't know about you but it seems pretty exhausting to me. I didn't take the vote lightly. But of course, you could have just voted Sidus to take down a loyal (as well as the team's leadership). But as either of our points can't exactly be proven, I guess there isn't much more to say in the matter. I still don't regret voting for you today in any case though. |
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 14, 2014 13:08:02 GMT -5
Well, claiming this will probably null my role, but my role is the LOYAL SUICIDER. If I am murdered, I take the murderer with me. sorry wampa but now i know youre lying. Ive already been contacted by the suicider on day 1 |
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 14, 2014 13:08:54 GMT -5
Well, claiming this will probably null my role, but my role is the LOYAL SUICIDER. If I am murdered, I take the murderer with me. sorry wampa but now i know youre lying. Ive already been contacted by the suicider on day 1 Is that what Boba is? |
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 14, 2014 13:10:55 GMT -5
sorry wampa but now i know youre lying. Ive already been contacted by the suicider on day 1 Is that what Boba is? I'm not saying any names. But you basically just proved yourself guilty. Good job wamps. |
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 14, 2014 13:12:38 GMT -5
I'm not saying any names. But you basically just probed yourself guilty. Good job wamps. Well if he did claim suicider then he's lying. This is a bit of a risk on my part, but VOTE: BOBA |
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 14, 2014 13:13:23 GMT -5
I'm not saying any names. But you basically just probed yourself guilty. Good job wamps. Well if he did claim suicider then he's lying. This is a bit of a risk on my part, but VOTE: BOBA It wasn't even Boba. But nice try |
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 14, 2014 13:13:42 GMT -5
TALLY:
WAMPA(ME): 2 VOTES
BOBA: 1 VOTE
|
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 14, 2014 13:14:33 GMT -5
Well if he did claim suicider then he's lying. This is a bit of a risk on my part, but VOTE: BOBA It wasn't even Boba. But nice try Well then why didn't you tell me if he wasn't? |
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 14, 2014 13:16:13 GMT -5
It wasn't even Boba. But nice try Well then why didn't you tell me if he wasn't? because i didn't think youd be stupid enough to keep rushing into votes like a fool you retard |
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 14, 2014 13:17:41 GMT -5
Well then why didn't you tell me if he wasn't? because i didn't think youd be stupid enough to keep rushing into votes like a fool you retard Jeez.... |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 14, 2014 13:18:49 GMT -5
because i didn't think youd be stupid enough to keep rushing into votes like a fool you retard Jeez.... I can see why they call her Jennell Fury |
|
|
|
Post by padmenic on Jul 14, 2014 13:19:43 GMT -5
because i didn't think youd be stupid enough to keep rushing into votes like a fool you retard Jeez.... youre just hrabbing for anyone you can go for right? Good job |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 14, 2014 13:19:56 GMT -5
VOTE TALLY:
Lek Coro - 2
Chodo Wertka - 1
Voting will close this evening or tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 14, 2014 13:21:23 GMT -5
youre just hrabbing for anyone you can go for right? Good job You know if you hadn't claimed inspector you would have been voted off a LONG time ago right? |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5