|
Post by Namialus on Jul 2, 2014 12:56:00 GMT -5
Then tell us what we should consider. It seems that all you do is tell us what we should do, not what to do. I don't see what you're getting at since they seem the same to me. And I'm talking about people like Star I mean I still think I had a valid point about him but the only person that replied to my post about him was Star himself. And then there goes your friend Barris saying that I don't try and discuss enough but I can't if Others won't respond to me. If I were to consider Rarbar (which I have), what then? Who do we vote - you, Rarbar, or Dr. Jones? What do you think, Malgus?
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 2, 2014 13:00:12 GMT -5
I don't see what you're getting at since they seem the same to me. And I'm talking about people like Star I mean I still think I had a valid point about him but the only person that replied to my post about him was Star himself. And then there goes your friend Barris saying that I don't try and discuss enough but I can't if Others won't respond to me. If I were to consider Rarbar (which I have), what then? Who do we vote - you, Rarbar, or Dr. Jones? What do you think, Malgus? I suspect them all about the same maybe Star a little less... we'd also get the most info out of a vote for the other 2.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 2, 2014 13:00:42 GMT -5
I don't see what you're getting at since they seem the same to me. And I'm talking about people like Star I mean I still think I had a valid point about him but the only person that replied to my post about him was Star himself. And then there goes your friend Barris saying that I don't try and discuss enough but I can't if Others won't respond to me. If I were to consider Rarbar (which I have), what then? Who do we vote - you, Rarbar, or Dr. Jones? What do you think, Malgus? Yup, I would suggest a vote on me. ... But honestly I would rather vote for Barris than either of those two. But if I had to pick it would probably be Star.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 2, 2014 13:07:28 GMT -5
If I were to consider Rarbar (which I have), what then? Who do we vote - you, Rarbar, or Dr. Jones? What do you think, Malgus? I suspect them all about the same maybe Star a little less... we'd also get the most info out of a vote for the other 2. That is what I was thinking, but their defenses seem to be solid.. hmm
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 2, 2014 13:12:38 GMT -5
If I were to consider Rarbar (which I have), what then? Who do we vote - you, Rarbar, or Dr. Jones? What do you think, Malgus? Yup, I would suggest a vote on me. ... But honestly I would rather vote for Barris than either of those two. But if I had to pick it would probably be Star. Why do you want to vote me so badly? All you have it one small piece of OOC evidence. Hardly enough to justify your wanting to vote me so much.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 2, 2014 13:14:56 GMT -5
Bane seems to be defending Newan too. He keeps pushing attention to me and Barris and away from him AND Newan. I understand pushing it away from himself, but why Newan? It seems like he's subtly defending him. And the funny thing is, he made a post earlier about how the way Newan is acting is: "like scum Newan IMO". So that post made it seem like he suspected Newan. Now he doesn't seem to suspect him at all and instead wants me or Barris gone very badly.
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jul 2, 2014 13:15:53 GMT -5
What did i miss?
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 2, 2014 13:20:53 GMT -5
And let me point out a flaw in Bane's one piece of evidence against me. He says: I'm following more than normal and am not posting my own thoughts in my personal opinion (which is a bunch of crap. I've been doing it this whole game. Besides, when you miss almost all of day 1, it'll seem like you're following cause you've missed so much, when in reality, you really aren't). But let me say this. If I really seem to be acting so differently, don't you think Newan is too? He's got OOC evidence similar to mine against him as well as IC evidence. But yet you only seem to notice this OOC observation, that you call evidence, against me and not Newan. Something seems off to me here...
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jul 2, 2014 13:21:59 GMT -5
And let me point out a flaw in Bane's one piece of evidence against me. He says: I'm following more than normal and am not posting my own thoughts in my personal opinion (which is a bunch of crap. I've been doing it this whole game. Besides, when you miss almost all of day 1, it'll seem like you're following cause you've missed so much, when in reality, you really aren't). But let me say this. If I really seem to be acting so differently, don't you think Newan is too? He's got OOC evidence similar to mine against him as well as IC evidence. But yet you only seem to notice this OOC observation, that you call evidence, against me and not Newan. Something seems off to me here... The best part is: OOC is not evidence at all.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 2, 2014 13:22:42 GMT -5
Quite a bit. Basically, Jones (Newan) and Nur (Bane) are the main suspects for today. Barris (CBK) is one as well, but not quite as large. And then Nur is trying to accuse me of being scum. I'd suggest reading the pages for they'll tell you the details of evidence. I'd rather not type it all, cause it would take awhile.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 2, 2014 13:24:31 GMT -5
And let me point out a flaw in Bane's one piece of evidence against me. He says: I'm following more than normal and am not posting my own thoughts in my personal opinion (which is a bunch of crap. I've been doing it this whole game. Besides, when you miss almost all of day 1, it'll seem like you're following cause you've missed so much, when in reality, you really aren't). But let me say this. If I really seem to be acting so differently, don't you think Newan is too? He's got OOC evidence similar to mine against him as well as IC evidence. But yet you only seem to notice this OOC observation, that you call evidence, against me and not Newan. Something seems off to me here... The best part is: OOC is not evidence at all. That's quite true. But OOC: Spider never said yes or not to it, so some people are using it. (Bane... ). IC: So really, it almost wipes out all evidence Bane had against me and a little of Newan's. (he still has some though)
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jul 2, 2014 13:25:12 GMT -5
Quite a bit. Basically, Jones (Newan) and Nur (Bane) are the main suspects for today. Barris (CBK) is one as well, but not quite as large. And then Nur is trying to accuse me of being scum. I'd suggest reading the pages for they'll tell you the details of evidence. I'd rather not type it all, cause it would take awhile. OOC: Reading takes a while as well IC: Honestly i can't say who is wrong and who might be right, i haven't really spoken with this platoon that much for personal reasons.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 2, 2014 13:26:59 GMT -5
Quite a bit. Basically, Jones (Newan) and Nur (Bane) are the main suspects for today. Barris (CBK) is one as well, but not quite as large. And then Nur is trying to accuse me of being scum. I'd suggest reading the pages for they'll tell you the details of evidence. I'd rather not type it all, cause it would take awhile. OOC: Reading takes a while as well IC: Honestly i can't say who is wrong and who might be right, i haven't really spoken with this platoon that much for personal reasons. OOC: True... I think pages 5-10 are most important, so you can read around those pages. Shouldn't take too long. That's also why I'd like you to read the comments yourself. You may or may not find what I or others have to say is biased
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 2, 2014 13:31:17 GMT -5
And let me point out a flaw in Bane's one piece of evidence against me. He says: I'm following more than normal and am not posting my own thoughts in my personal opinion (which is a bunch of crap. I've been doing it this whole game. Besides, when you miss almost all of day 1, it'll seem like you're following cause you've missed so much, when in reality, you really aren't). But let me say this. If I really seem to be acting so differently, don't you think Newan is too? He's got OOC evidence similar to mine against him as well as IC evidence. But yet you only seem to notice this OOC observation, that you call evidence, against me and not Newan. Something seems off to me here... The best part is: OOC is not evidence at all. Yes it is.
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jul 2, 2014 13:33:53 GMT -5
The best part is: OOC is not evidence at all. Yes it is. OOC: Since when?
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 2, 2014 13:37:05 GMT -5
Since always. It can be good evidence and has been used in many games. Although in some games it wasn't allowed before... it appears to be now.
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jul 2, 2014 13:40:19 GMT -5
Since always. It can be good evidence and has been used in many games. Although in some games it wasn't allowed before... it appears to be now. OOC: Still seems very odd and flimsy to me. OOC means Out of Character, thus when someone is OOC he is not in character, thus not in the game.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 2, 2014 14:16:13 GMT -5
After reading through the last through pages. Nur and/or Indiana is definitely scum, I'm fine with voting off either of them today.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 2, 2014 14:49:07 GMT -5
Yup, I would suggest a vote on me. ... But honestly I would rather vote for Barris than either of those two. But if I had to pick it would probably be Star. Why do you want to vote me so badly? All you have it one small piece of OOC evidence. Hardly enough to justify your wanting to vote me so much. Yeah, but the thing is I don't really want to vote you at the moment. Nam made me pick between two unlikely choices for me to vote for. Stop over reacting.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 2, 2014 14:49:47 GMT -5
After reading through the last through pages. Nur and/or Indiana is definitely scum, I'm fine with voting off either of them today. -Copied almost word for word from many other's posts
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 2, 2014 14:51:36 GMT -5
Why do you want to vote me so badly? All you have it one small piece of OOC evidence. Hardly enough to justify your wanting to vote me so much. Yeah, but the thing is I don't really want to vote you at the moment. Nam made me pick between two unlikely choices for me to vote for. Stop over reacting. I did not "make" you do anything.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 2, 2014 14:51:48 GMT -5
This is troubling. Nur or Dr. Jones.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 2, 2014 14:56:10 GMT -5
After reading through the last through pages. Nur and/or Indiana is definitely scum, I'm fine with voting off either of them today. -Copied almost word for word from many other's posts I have no evidence towards anyone else being scum apart from you or Indiana.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 2, 2014 14:56:40 GMT -5
Bane seems to be defending Newan too. He keeps pushing attention to me and Barris and away from him AND Newan. I understand pushing it away from himself, but why Newan? It seems like he's subtly defending him. And the funny thing is, he made a post earlier about how the way Newan is acting is: "like scum Newan IMO". So that post made it seem like he suspected Newan. Now he doesn't seem to suspect him at all and instead wants me or Barris gone very badly. It's not like I trust him, but his accusation post made some sense to me. Particularly how it's weird how if one of us comes up loyal you guys plan to vote the other off without a second thought. Maybe you should rethink your ideas before going back to business as usual if you get It wrong with one of us. If you were wrong the first time, when you're so sure you'd be right, why would you want to rush into another vote? And stop twisting my words. You love the use the phrase "very badly" but really I don't know where you're trying to get with it. Yes, I do want scum gone very badly. You seem to think me putting any conviction in my voice when I give an opinion is bad. Nam seems to want me to tell you guys what to do, (at least I think that's what he meant) so that's exactly what I'm trying to do. So stop trying to assuming you know everything I think and start trying to find some scum.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 2, 2014 14:57:07 GMT -5
Why do you want to vote me so badly? All you have it one small piece of OOC evidence. Hardly enough to justify your wanting to vote me so much. Yeah, but the thing is I don't really want to vote you at the moment. Nam made me pick between two unlikely choices for me to vote for. Stop over reacting. What do you mean, "made you pick"? All he did was ask and you answered without a complaint. You could've not answered or something else. And lol, don't say you don't wanna vote me. You do, I can tell. But no one else agrees with you so that's why you claim you don't. I also fail to see how I'm overreacting. If anything, you are. I'm merely asking questions of your suspicions of me and trying to explain what you suspect me of is foolish.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 2, 2014 14:58:29 GMT -5
Yeah, but the thing is I don't really want to vote you at the moment. Nam made me pick between two unlikely choices for me to vote for. Stop over reacting. I did not "make" you do anything. You asked my opinion. There's not a whole lot of difference when you're the one in control and I'm battling for my life. If I didn't respond at all you'd probably manage to accuse me of avoiding making an accusation of something.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 2, 2014 15:00:07 GMT -5
I did not "make" you do anything. You asked my opinion. There's not a whole lot of difference when you're the one in control and I'm battling for my life. If I didn't respond at all you'd probably manage to accuse me of avoiding making an accusation of something. ...How am I in control? I am active. I discuss. And I, unlike you or Dr. Jones, make sense. In no way am I controlling anyone.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 2, 2014 15:00:06 GMT -5
Yeah, but the thing is I don't really want to vote you at the moment. Nam made me pick between two unlikely choices for me to vote for. Stop over reacting. What do you mean, "made you pick"? All he did was ask and you answered without a complaint. You could've not answered or something else. And lol, don't say you don't wanna vote me. You do, I can tell. But no one else agrees with you so that's why you claim you don't. I also fail to see how I'm overreacting. If anything, you are. I'm merely asking questions of your suspicions of me and trying to explain what you suspect me of is foolish. Read my most recent post. And I'm more inclined to vote Barris, thank you very much. Neither is a popular vote choice, thank you very much.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 2, 2014 15:03:16 GMT -5
You asked my opinion. There's not a whole lot of difference when you're the one in control and I'm battling for my life. If I didn't respond at all you'd probably manage to accuse me of avoiding making an accusation of something. ...How am I in control? I am active. I discuss. And I, unlike you or Dr. Jones, make sense. In no way am I controlling anyone. -Barris sucks up to you. Please don't deny that. -Many/most other agree with what you're saying. -Pinda, Star, Boba. You are not in control, I phrased that wrong, but you are expressing very popular believes. Those can be one in the same thing sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 2, 2014 15:04:25 GMT -5
Bane seems to be defending Newan too. He keeps pushing attention to me and Barris and away from him AND Newan. I understand pushing it away from himself, but why Newan? It seems like he's subtly defending him. And the funny thing is, he made a post earlier about how the way Newan is acting is: "like scum Newan IMO". So that post made it seem like he suspected Newan. Now he doesn't seem to suspect him at all and instead wants me or Barris gone very badly. It's not like I trust him, but his accusation post made some sense to me. Particularly how it's weird how if one of us comes up loyal you guys plan to vote the other off without a second thought. Maybe you should rethink your ideas before going back to business as usual if you get It wrong with one of us. If you were wrong the first time, when you're so sure you'd be right, why would you want to rush into another vote? And stop twisting my words. You love the use the phrase "very badly" but really I don't know where you're trying to get with it. Yes, I do want scum gone very badly. You seem to think me putting any conviction in my voice when I give an opinion is bad. Nam seems to want me to tell you guys what to do, (at least I think that's what he meant) so that's exactly what I'm trying to do. So stop trying to assuming you know everything I think and start trying to find some scum. You two are acting sorta chummy... That's kinda suspicous. And don't you respond saying how scum wouldn't do that. We don't know. They very well could. You said the same thing to Nam or somebody about the word "subtle". But what the heck? How do you not understand that phrase? Are you am idiot? (Oh yeah, you are. That makes sense...) I think no such thing when you voice your suspicions. If I did, I wouldn't bother to respond to them or if I did, I'd call them stupid. But I don't, so I at least respect them. Nam doesn't want you to tell us what to do. He wants you to do what you think we should do. Cause I've noticed how sometimes you'll just say we should be doing something, and you yourself aren't even doin it either. It's annoying sometimes. I don't even know what that last part even means. You just seem to be overreacting to me actually going against your suspicions (that's almost funny) which is stupid. And as for finding scum, I think I've quite possibly found one right here.
|
|