|
Post by Pinda on Jun 21, 2014 10:17:19 GMT -5
I just PMed everyone but the "supernatural" people... but why is this PM still important. It happened early on day 1, it's sort of irrelevant now. Well it's not a big deal but if you suspected us than why let the scum know everything? I didn't suspect you. And I didn't really put any secrets in that PM or anything... it's not like the scum would have used the PM to their advantage.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 21, 2014 10:53:40 GMT -5
Well it's not a big deal but if you suspected us than why let the scum know everything? I didn't suspect you. And I didn't really put any secrets in that PM or anything... it's not like the scum would have used the PM to their advantage. Then why did you make a team against the Winchesters?
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 21, 2014 10:59:19 GMT -5
I didn't suspect you. And I didn't really put any secrets in that PM or anything... it's not like the scum would have used the PM to their advantage. Then why did you make a team against the Winchesters? I think I explained that many times before. I was afraid you'd team-up on day one and thus be able to decide the vote without opposition. If only one of you was scum that person could have used that power to his advantage.
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 21, 2014 11:06:43 GMT -5
I had an idea of who the scum team is but now I'm not sure as I listed 4 people when I personally think there are 3 scum.
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 21, 2014 11:23:48 GMT -5
Didn't he just reveal he had a role or something like that? Yes... isn't that a reason to believe he's loyal? True. But why didn't he reveal it on Day 1? Did he have something to hide? I'm probably not going to vote for him. I'm not exactly sold on him be being scum.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 21, 2014 11:26:50 GMT -5
Yes... isn't that a reason to believe he's loyal? True. But why didn't he reveal it on Day 1? Did he have something to hide? I'm probably not going to vote for him. I'm not exactly sold on him be being scum. But it's a protection ability....
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 21, 2014 11:30:37 GMT -5
True. But why didn't he reveal it on Day 1? Did he have something to hide? I'm probably not going to vote for him. I'm not exactly sold on him be being scum. But it's a protection ability.... It could have been made up. But OOC reasons are making me believe you're telling the truth.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jun 21, 2014 11:32:55 GMT -5
Yes... isn't that a reason to believe he's loyal? True. But why didn't he reveal it on Day 1? Did he have something to hide? I'm probably not going to vote for him. I'm not exactly sold on him be being scum. Why would I let the scum know that it wouldn't work if they tried to kill me?
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 21, 2014 11:37:50 GMT -5
But it's a protection ability.... It could have been made up. But OOC reasons are making me believe you're telling the truth. Yes but then say the claim is suspicious not the role itself... and what OOC reason could make you believe me? It's not even me that you'd be believing... it's Spider.
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 21, 2014 11:49:29 GMT -5
It could have been made up. But OOC reasons are making me believe you're telling the truth. Yes but then say the claim is suspicious not the role itself... and what OOC reason could make you believe me? It's not even me that you'd be believing... it's Spider. Well, two protectors in a game would be kind of odd... and the OOC reason is the Potato usually makes up new roles in one of his games. OOC: Ruby jewel, third party, amnesia, etc.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jun 21, 2014 11:51:35 GMT -5
Yes... isn't that a reason to believe he's loyal? True. But why didn't he reveal it on Day 1? Did he have something to hide? I'm probably not going to vote for him. I'm not exactly sold on him be being scum. Lol...
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jun 21, 2014 11:52:39 GMT -5
Pictures: www.flickr.com/photos/74732238@N08/14287080910/YOU MAY NOW VOTE! Voting will last 24 hours and the person with the most votes will be convicted. Good luck! ALSO: Today, everyone must vote. If you do not, you may find things... a little more difficult tomorrow. The only two players this does not apply to are Legolas and Levron since they said they would be gone the next few days.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 21, 2014 11:54:50 GMT -5
Yes but then say the claim is suspicious not the role itself... and what OOC reason could make you believe me? It's not even me that you'd be believing... it's Spider. Well, two protectors in a game would be kind of odd... and the OOC reason is the Potato usually makes up new roles in one of his games. OOC: Ruby jewel, third party, amnesia, etc. How would you know if there are two protectors? A one time protection isn't a new role.
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 21, 2014 11:56:22 GMT -5
Well, two protectors in a game would be kind of odd... and the OOC reason is the Potato usually makes up new roles in one of his games. OOC: Ruby jewel, third party, amnesia, etc. How would you know if there are two protectors? A one time protection isn't a new role. It isn't? Well, I must have a bad memory or I never played that game(s).
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 21, 2014 11:56:52 GMT -5
Yes... isn't that a reason to believe he's loyal? True. But why didn't he reveal it on Day 1? Did he have something to hide? I'm probably not going to vote for him. I'm not exactly sold on him be being scum. Seriously? The scum would have tried killed him if he had done that... I wouldn't even have claimed that role at all if I had it... it's dangerous.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 21, 2014 12:01:05 GMT -5
I find Plo Koon very suspicious... then again he might just be confused. But I'll either vote for him or Legolas I think.
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 21, 2014 12:01:40 GMT -5
My scum picks: 1. Ravi 2. Bobby 3. ?
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jun 21, 2014 12:04:46 GMT -5
Also, I'd like for someone to respond to me on what they think of Levron. Loyal? Scum? I can't tell.
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jun 21, 2014 12:05:37 GMT -5
Right now I'm either voting for Plo or Wyrm. Although Plo could just be some very confused loyal, but I'm getting convinced more and more that Wyrm is a third party. I think it was the scum that killed Dean so to frame Wyrm as a way to avoid getting one of their own voted off the next day, which does put me off slightly on voting him.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 21, 2014 12:07:43 GMT -5
I just realized something. If Wyrm was third party shouldn't he be cured now? Newan said he was going to cure him tonight... so assuming his nightaction worked despite the fact that he died Wyrm should be loyal now (if he was indeed third party).
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jun 21, 2014 12:08:53 GMT -5
I just realized something. If Wyrm was third party shouldn't he be cured now? Newan said he was going to cure him tonight... so assuming his nightaction worked despite the fact that he died Wyrm should be loyal now (if he was indeed third party). If that's so, then Wyrm should have no problem admitting he was third party.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 21, 2014 12:09:45 GMT -5
I just realized something. If Wyrm was third party shouldn't he be cured now? Newan said he was going to cure him tonight... so assuming his nightaction worked despite the fact that he died Wyrm should be loyal now (if he was indeed third party). If that's so, then Wyrm should have no problem admitting he was third party. That's true... unless he wasn't third party...
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jun 21, 2014 12:12:59 GMT -5
If that's so, then Wyrm should have no problem admitting he was third party. That's true... unless he wasn't third party... From what he's said it's difficult for me to see him as a confused loyal. He kept trying to get people to try other ideas in voting besides a random or inactive vote, but never used them himself. Something isn't right.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 21, 2014 12:14:26 GMT -5
That's true... unless he wasn't third party... From what he's said it's difficult for me to see him as a confused loyal. He kept trying to get people to try other ideas in voting besides a random or inactive vote, but never used them himself. Something isn't right. I couldn't use them myself because everyone else wasn't therefore it would be pointless to do so
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jun 21, 2014 12:16:08 GMT -5
From what he's said it's difficult for me to see him as a confused loyal. He kept trying to get people to try other ideas in voting besides a random or inactive vote, but never used them himself. Something isn't right. I couldn't use them myself because everyone else wasn't therefore it would be pointless to do so You still could have tried. You talked about looking into other people and I know it only takes one person to do that.
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jun 21, 2014 12:16:43 GMT -5
And since you're here Wyrm, would you like to answer the question on your affiliation these past couple days?
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 21, 2014 12:17:34 GMT -5
I couldn't use them myself because everyone else wasn't therefore it would be pointless to do so You still could have tried. You talked about looking into other people and I know it only takes one person to do that. No one was prepared to listen and without the help of the others it would be doomed to fail because my thoughts would be ignored in favour of voting randomly.
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jun 21, 2014 12:21:41 GMT -5
You still could have tried. You talked about looking into other people and I know it only takes one person to do that. No one was prepared to listen and without the help of the others it would be doomed to fail because my thoughts would be ignored in favour of voting randomly. If that's what you thought, then why did you bother suggesting this to us?
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 21, 2014 12:24:44 GMT -5
No one was prepared to listen and without the help of the others it would be doomed to fail because my thoughts would be ignored in favour of voting randomly. If that's what you thought, then why did you bother suggesting this to us? To attempt to change your minds and for you to see that random votes are stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jun 21, 2014 12:27:47 GMT -5
If that's what you thought, then why did you bother suggesting this to us? To attempt to change your minds and for you to see that random votes are stupid. Then it's good that we didn't technically. Ironic that we ended up voting for someone who didn't like the idea either. And you still haven't answered my question: are, or were you third party?
|
|