|
|
Post by Malgus on Jun 18, 2014 23:43:04 GMT -5
Well I looked at the post count for day 1 and I'd consider everyone on the second page inactive. That's KenboLegolasLevronIvar-JediCad Bane (Dark)For what good it will do. I guess that would be our main suspect pool unless anything else comes up. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 18, 2014 23:54:55 GMT -5
Well we could pick a name at random that does not involve... Dad or me and I guess Revan. That's if it stays at this rate...
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 18, 2014 23:56:23 GMT -5
Well I looked at the post count for day 1 and I'd consider everyone on the second page inactive. That's KenboLegolasLevronIvar-JediCad Bane (Dark)For what good it will do. I guess that would be our main suspect pool unless anything else comes up. Pie guy remains on the suspect pool for now as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 0:42:59 GMT -5
Well I looked at the post count for day 1 and I'd consider everyone on the second page inactive. That's KenboLegolasLevronIvar-JediCad Bane (Dark)For what good it will do. I guess that would be our main suspect pool unless anything else comes up. Pie guy remains on the suspect pool for now as well. Why?  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 0:54:42 GMT -5
Pie guy remains on the suspect pool for now as well. Why? Why shouldn't you? |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 0:56:19 GMT -5
Why? Why shouldn't you? Wait, do you mean I'm still on the list of possible suspects or that I'm one of your main suspects? |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jun 19, 2014 1:04:30 GMT -5
Pie guy remains on the suspect pool for now as well. Why? Perhaps some are still uneasy about your attempt at an alliance? Even if it were under good intentions, it does have a bit of suspicion about it. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 1:06:31 GMT -5
Wait, do you mean I'm still on the list of possible suspects or that I'm one of your main suspects? Possible. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 1:12:18 GMT -5
Wait, do you mean I'm still on the list of possible suspects or that I'm one of your main suspects? Possible. Alright. Then I can see why. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 5:12:49 GMT -5
Well this is just brilliant isn't it People that go around complaining after a loyal dies usually are the most likely scum trying to act loyal. I was just trying to RP Well I looked at the post count for day 1 and I'd consider everyone on the second page inactive. That's KenboLegolasLevronIvar-JediCad Bane (Dark)For what good it will do. I guess that would be our main suspect pool unless anything else comes up. Well I'm trying to be as active as I can.. But why are we looking at inactives? I mean I'm not saying I have anything better but I thought we decided this never works |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 9:05:22 GMT -5
People that go around complaining after a loyal dies usually are the most likely scum trying to act loyal. I was just trying to RP Well I looked at the post count for day 1 and I'd consider everyone on the second page inactive. That's KenboLegolasLevronIvar-JediCad Bane (Dark)For what good it will do. I guess that would be our main suspect pool unless anything else comes up. Well I'm trying to be as active as I can.. But why are we looking at inactives? I mean I'm not saying I have anything better but I thought we decided this never works And what's your better plan? |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 9:28:10 GMT -5
I was just trying to RP Well I'm trying to be as active as I can.. But why are we looking at inactives? I mean I'm not saying I have anything better but I thought we decided this never works And what's your better plan? I did say I didn't have one.. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 9:47:54 GMT -5
Voting inactives or at random would be reckless. Maybe we could find scum by seeing if people fit certain criteria like:
Is the person active, but sometimes aloof?
Did the person follow a vote that was led by strong loyal players with little evidence?
Does the person state or suggest things that would distract us from finding the scum ?
Does the person subtly follow by saying one liners like : "Yeah he does seem suspicious I agree with player 'X'"?
In what way does the person react to accusations against them, are they passive, defensive, overly aggressive or react erratically ?
I don't know really but this is something we could try. ( Btw, these criteria would only be relevant if they are done excessively, it is natural for people to do things like one liners & reacting defensively aren't necessarily bad things but if people are going crazy over one vague accusations it is rather strange. Most of these things are only worth looking into when done excessively)
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 9:50:19 GMT -5
Voting inactives or at random would be reckless. Maybe we could find scum by seeing if people fit certain criteria like: Is the person active, but sometimes aloof?Did the person follow a vote that was led by strong loyal players with little evidence?Does the person state or suggest things that would distract us from finding the scum ?Does the person subtly follow by saying one liners like : "Yeah he does seem suspicious I agree with player 'X'"?In what way does the person react to accusations against them, are they passive, defensive, overly aggressive or react erratically ?I don't know really but this is something you could try. Typically this means they're loyal because I've done these things a lot as a loyal...  But we shall see |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 9:51:15 GMT -5
Voting inactives or at random would be reckless. Maybe we could find scum by seeing if people fit certain criteria like: Is the person active, but sometimes aloof?Did the person follow a vote that was led by strong loyal players with little evidence?Does the person state or suggest things that would distract us from finding the scum ?Does the person subtly follow by saying one liners like : "Yeah he does seem suspicious I agree with player 'X'"?In what way does the person react to accusations against them, are they passive, defensive, overly aggressive or react erratically ?I don't know really but this is something you could try. Typically this means they're loyal because I've done these things a lot as a loyal... But we shall see I really mean if people do these things excessively. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 9:52:24 GMT -5
Voting inactives or at random would be reckless. Maybe we could find scum by seeing if people fit certain criteria like: Is the person active, but sometimes aloof?Did the person follow a vote that was led by strong loyal players with little evidence?Does the person state or suggest things that would distract us from finding the scum ?Does the person subtly follow by saying one liners like : "Yeah he does seem suspicious I agree with player 'X'"?In what way does the person react to accusations against them, are they passive, defensive, overly aggressive or react erratically ?I don't know really but this is something we could try. I think loyalists would do some of these things too. Especially the second one. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 9:53:27 GMT -5
An inactive vote isn't a good idea... but I can't really come up with an alternative either.  |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 9:53:54 GMT -5
Voting inactives or at random would be reckless. Maybe we could find scum by seeing if people fit certain criteria like: Is the person active, but sometimes aloof?Did the person follow a vote that was led by strong loyal players with little evidence?Does the person state or suggest things that would distract us from finding the scum ?Does the person subtly follow by saying one liners like : "Yeah he does seem suspicious I agree with player 'X'"?In what way does the person react to accusations against them, are they passive, defensive, overly aggressive or react erratically ?I don't know really but this is something we could try. I think loyalists would do some of these things too. Especially the second one. Read my reply to Kenobi. I think if these things are done excessively then they are worth looking into |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 9:54:42 GMT -5
Scum sometimes suggest inactive votes right... Malgus ...? |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jun 19, 2014 9:56:17 GMT -5
Scum sometimes suggest inactive votes right.... @malgus....... They sometimes do... but then again... so do loyalists. I don't really get why you tried to tag Malgus though. I think Maverick brought up the inactive vote idea. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 9:58:17 GMT -5
Scum sometimes suggest inactive votes right.... @malgus....... They sometimes do... but then again... so do loyalists. I don't really get why you tried to tag Malgus though. I think Maverick brought up the inactive vote idea. Oh... Maverick-Jedi-Valen ............. But yeah loyalists also do that sometimes... I was just throwing out ideas.. Into the trashcan....  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 10:04:40 GMT -5
So I believe the inactive votes have been supported by Revan (came up loyal), John (inspector) and me. So more likely than not one of you defending not doing a inactive vote is scum.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jun 19, 2014 10:11:50 GMT -5
So I believe the inactive votes have been supported by Revan (came up loyal), John (inspector) and me. So more likely than not one of you defending not doing a inactive vote is scum. Sensible Vote>Inactive Vote> Random Vote Although I can see the need for an inactive vote, due to little evidence against anyone. I think we are rushing into things here. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 10:14:24 GMT -5
So I believe the inactive votes have been supported by Revan (came up loyal), John (inspector) and me. So more likely than not one of you defending not doing a inactive vote is scum. Sensible Vote>Inactive Vote> Random Vote Although I can see the need for an inactive vote, due to little evidence against anyone. I think we are rushing into things here. Well there isn't going to be a sensible vote today. So lets vote someone... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 10:17:50 GMT -5
So I believe the inactive votes have been supported by Revan (came up loyal), John (inspector) and me. So more likely than not one of you defending not doing a inactive vote is scum. Oh yeah Revan came up loyal... But juanestly it doesn't necessarily mean he is.. And why do people against an inactive vote have to be scum.. Btw I'm not completely against it but I think it should be a last resort |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 10:20:39 GMT -5
So I believe the inactive votes have been supported by Revan (came up loyal), John (inspector) and me. So more likely than not one of you defending not doing a inactive vote is scum. Oh yeah Revan came up loyal... But juanestly it doesn't necessarily mean he is.. And why do people against an inactive vote have to be scum.. Btw I'm not completely against it but I think it should be a last resort What's more likely the loyals suggesting one? Or probably scum opposing it. Not everyone can be loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 10:32:11 GMT -5
Oh yeah Revan came up loyal... But juanestly it doesn't necessarily mean he is.. And why do people against an inactive vote have to be scum.. Btw I'm not completely against it but I think it should be a last resort What's more likely the loyals suggesting one? Or probably scum opposing it. Not everyone can be loyal. I think both are equally possible.. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 10:40:47 GMT -5
What's more likely the loyals suggesting one? Or probably scum opposing it. Not everyone can be loyal. I think both are equally possible.. Well we know that the loyals are the one suggesting it (well maybe not Mav but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt). Now You, Wyrm and Pie guy oppose. It so all 6 of us must be loyal now? Has to be a scum in there some where. Maybe majority of the scum are inactive or one of you don't want to do a random vote in fear of a scum dying. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jun 19, 2014 10:42:44 GMT -5
I think both are equally possible.. Well we know that the loyals are the one suggesting it (well maybe not Mav but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt). Now You, Wyrm and Pie guy oppose. It so all 6 of us must be loyal now? Has to be a scum in there some where. Maybe majority of the scum are inactive or one of you don't want to do a random vote in fear of a scum dying. Honestly I don't really care what we do (as long as I'm not voted of course..) all I'm saying is the inactive vote should be a last resort One that we might have to use seeing as nothing else has come up yet.. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jun 19, 2014 10:44:38 GMT -5
Well we know that the loyals are the one suggesting it (well maybe not Mav but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt). Now You, Wyrm and Pie guy oppose. It so all 6 of us must be loyal now? Has to be a scum in there some where. Maybe majority of the scum are inactive or one of you don't want to do a random vote in fear of a scum dying. Honestly I don't really care what we do (as long as I'm not voted of course..) all I'm saying is the inactive vote should be a last resort One that we might have to use seeing as nothing else has come up yet.. I think we should rule out the people we shouldn't vote and the people that have been too severely inactive. Oh well there was one weird claim of "Loyal friend" by Bobby but maybe he's a helper idk. |
|
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself? 