|
Post by Potato on May 14, 2014 18:57:05 GMT -5
Why? (other than Star coming up as Unknown) Because it is a risk that I am not willing to take. I don't necessarily believe that you are scum but if you make one wrong move I may reconsider, especially because your claim has not been confirmed. Well, we should focus more on getting the scum. I know there's no certainty to my role, but I do need to kill all of the scum in order to win.
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 14, 2014 19:46:27 GMT -5
And now it seems things will be split again with some people thinking this was an attempt to frame me and others thinking I did it. If anything, this confirms to me Star was scum. Ivar was third party with me, so there was no reason to janitor Star. Plus, I know I'm third party, and the only real reason to janitor Star would be to make me look like scum. I think it's safe to say Star was scum. Well it shouldn't be news to you but scum janitor loyals all the time.
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 14, 2014 19:47:38 GMT -5
And now it seems things will be split again with some people thinking this was an attempt to frame me and others thinking I did it. If anything, this confirms to me Star was scum. Ivar was third party with me, so there was no reason to janitor Star. Plus, I know I'm third party, and the only real reason to janitor Star would be to make me look like scum. I think it's safe to say Star was scum. Well it shouldn't be news to you but scum janitor loyals all the time. We've all been in games where loyals are janitored, so it seems like you're just ignoring that.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 14, 2014 19:52:13 GMT -5
...
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on May 14, 2014 20:02:35 GMT -5
Potato's logic about the unknown parties makes some sense... I don't know about the "Star is practically confirmed scum" but he probably is if Potato dies and comes up unknown also. That part makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on May 14, 2014 20:06:40 GMT -5
Well it shouldn't be news to you but scum janitor loyals all the time. We've all been in games where loyals are janitored, so it seems like you're just ignoring that. Maybe you just haven't been playing long enough to see that scum are janitored too. It seems like you're just ignoring that.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on May 14, 2014 20:07:53 GMT -5
Scum can be janitored just as well as loyals can. Janitors are used to cause confusion, and whatever Star was, this janitor succeeded. Whatever your opinion on it is, it makes it more obvious to me that Star was scum.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on May 14, 2014 20:11:26 GMT -5
Scum can be janitored just as well as loyals can. Janitors are used to cause confusion, and whatever Star was, this janitor succeeded. Whatever your opinion on it is, it makes it more obvious to me that Star was scum. Aren't you going against your own logic? You're saying that both scum and loyals are often janitored, and that's right, but how with that thinking would a janitor on Star make him necessarily scummy? I think I'm missing something....
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 14, 2014 20:12:25 GMT -5
We've all been in games where loyals are janitored, so it seems like you're just ignoring that. Maybe you just haven't been playing long enough to see that scum are janitored too. It seems like you're just ignoring that. Yes, both scum and loyals are janitored. In your post it seemed a lot like you were saying that Star being janitored is some sort of proof of him being scum and/or you being trustable. Scum can be janitored just as well as loyals can. Janitors are used to cause confusion, and whatever Star was, this janitor succeeded. Whatever your opinion on it is, it makes it more obvious to me that Star was scum. What's that supposed to mean? Because I think something that somehow means you're automatically right?
|
|
|
Post by Commander Slime on May 14, 2014 20:41:22 GMT -5
Scum can be janitored just as well as loyals can. Janitors are used to cause confusion, and whatever Star was, this janitor succeeded. Whatever your opinion on it is, it makes it more obvious to me that Star was scum. There could also be a fourth party I suppose, that seems a bit unlikely though.
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 14, 2014 20:41:50 GMT -5
Scum can be janitored just as well as loyals can. Janitors are used to cause confusion, and whatever Star was, this janitor succeeded. Whatever your opinion on it is, it makes it more obvious to me that Star was scum. There could also be a fourth party I suppose, that seems a bit unlikely though.
|
|
|
Post by Commander Slime on May 14, 2014 20:47:54 GMT -5
There could also be a fourth party I suppose, that seems a bit unlikely though. What does " " suppose to mean?
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 14, 2014 21:28:06 GMT -5
What does " " suppose to mean? It means " "
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2014 21:55:49 GMT -5
Scum can be janitored just as well as loyals can. Janitors are used to cause confusion, and whatever Star was, this janitor succeeded. Whatever your opinion on it is, it makes it more obvious to me that Star was scum. There could also be a fourth party I suppose, that seems a bit unlikely though. I'm pretty sure there are only third parties.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on May 14, 2014 22:07:10 GMT -5
Scum can be janitored just as well as loyals can. Janitors are used to cause confusion, and whatever Star was, this janitor succeeded. Whatever your opinion on it is, it makes it more obvious to me that Star was scum. Aren't you going against your own logic? You're saying that both scum and loyals are often janitored, and that's right, but how with that thinking would a janitor on Star make him necessarily scummy? I think I'm missing something.... No, the janitor isn't the sole reason why I think Star was scum. The situation I'm in with the janitor makes me a lot more confident in him being scum though. I know I'm third party, I know Ivar was, and I know Ivar had no night action. Which means Star forgot to send in his murder. The part about the janitor is coming from my point of view of things, although some people are refusing to except that no matter what evidence supports it. Scum can be janitored just as well as loyals can. Janitors are used to cause confusion, and whatever Star was, this janitor succeeded. Whatever your opinion on it is, it makes it more obvious to me that Star was scum. There could also be a fourth party I suppose, that seems a bit unlikely though. I wouldn't count on that.
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 14, 2014 22:15:48 GMT -5
Aren't you going against your own logic? You're saying that both scum and loyals are often janitored, and that's right, but how with that thinking would a janitor on Star make him necessarily scummy? I think I'm missing something.... No, the janitor isn't the sole reason why I think Star was scum. The situation I'm in with the janitor makes me a lot more confident in him being scum though. I know I'm third party, I know Ivar was, and I know Ivar had no night action. Which means Star forgot to send in his murder. The part about the janitor is coming from my point of view of things, although some people are refusing to except that no matter what evidence supports it. There could also be a fourth party I suppose, that seems a bit unlikely though. I wouldn't count on that. What do you mean, "from my point of view"? And I still don't really understand how me having an option makes your evidence stronger.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on May 14, 2014 22:30:02 GMT -5
Aren't you going against your own logic? You're saying that both scum and loyals are often janitored, and that's right, but how with that thinking would a janitor on Star make him necessarily scummy? I think I'm missing something.... No, the janitor isn't the sole reason why I think Star was scum. The situation I'm in with the janitor makes me a lot more confident in him being scum though. I know I'm third party, I know Ivar was, and I know Ivar had no night action. Which means Star forgot to send in his murder. The part about the janitor is coming from my point of view of things, although some people are refusing to except that no matter what evidence supports it. There could also be a fourth party I suppose, that seems a bit unlikely though. I wouldn't count on that. I see. It just sounded like all you were saying was that the janitor made him look scummy.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on May 14, 2014 23:28:58 GMT -5
No, the janitor isn't the sole reason why I think Star was scum. The situation I'm in with the janitor makes me a lot more confident in him being scum though. I know I'm third party, I know Ivar was, and I know Ivar had no night action. Which means Star forgot to send in his murder. The part about the janitor is coming from my point of view of things, although some people are refusing to except that no matter what evidence supports it. I wouldn't count on that. What do you mean, "from my point of view"? And I still don't really understand how me having an option makes your evidence stronger. My point of view of everything is different from everyone else's because I know about my role and Ivar's as a fact. And what do you mean?
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on May 15, 2014 1:10:57 GMT -5
I don't know about this. On one hand Star might have been janitored as a way to throw suspicion towards Potato, but on another hand he could be scum trying to make everyone think Star was as a way to save himself. The thing is though, I'm actually becoming more convinced at his third party claim.
|
|
|
Post by Commander Slime on May 15, 2014 5:40:31 GMT -5
What does " " suppose to mean? It means " " I am not here to screw around and make face, if you screw off once while on duty for the majesty you may as well fire yourself. Now stop screwing around and let's catch these "Zealots" that are determined to destroy each of our home universes.
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 15, 2014 15:56:49 GMT -5
Scum can be janitored just as well as loyals can. Janitors are used to cause confusion, and whatever Star was, this janitor succeeded. Whatever your opinion on it is, it makes it more obvious to me that Star was scum. This is what I mean... It seems like you were saying that I was scum, because my opinion only made you more sure of yourself. Is that what you meant? What do you mean, "from my point of view"? And I still don't really understand how me having an option makes your evidence stronger. My point of view of everything is different from everyone else's because I know about my role and Ivar's as a fact. And what do you mean?
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on May 15, 2014 16:55:36 GMT -5
Guys remember.
Stay Gucci.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on May 15, 2014 17:30:57 GMT -5
Scum can be janitored just as well as loyals can. Janitors are used to cause confusion, and whatever Star was, this janitor succeeded. Whatever your opinion on it is, it makes it more obvious to me that Star was scum. This is what I mean... It seems like you were saying that I was scum, because my opinion only made you more sure of yourself. Is that what you meant? My point of view of everything is different from everyone else's because I know about my role and Ivar's as a fact. And what do you mean? No, I said that it doesn't matter what everyone else's opinions were, because to me it made it more obvious Star was scum.
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 15, 2014 20:17:04 GMT -5
This is what I mean... It seems like you were saying that I was scum, because my opinion only made you more sure of yourself. Is that what you meant? No, I said that it doesn't matter what everyone else's opinions were, because to me it made it more obvious Star was scum. But WHY does it make it more obvious? You know whatever I guess you're just gong to keep dodging around my question...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2014 22:07:38 GMT -5
My suspicions lay on Pinda. He never gives a reason for his votes and suspicions. I also don't know if I should trust Potato or not...Star coming up unknown makes it hard to know what to believe. I have also seen no sign of Wampa on here.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on May 15, 2014 22:40:54 GMT -5
My brother would have gotten very bored by now. But not me cause I have even less emotions.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on May 15, 2014 22:51:50 GMT -5
No, I said that it doesn't matter what everyone else's opinions were, because to me it made it more obvious Star was scum. But WHY does it make it more obvious? You know whatever I guess you're just gong to keep dodging around my question... Your question makes no sense. Just calm down and quit picking apart everything I say. I already explained that part. It's sort of common sense too... but you can't understand it so whatever.
|
|
|
Post by bane on May 16, 2014 0:13:18 GMT -5
But WHY does it make it more obvious? You know whatever I guess you're just gong to keep dodging around my question... Your question makes no sense. Just calm down and quit picking apart everything I say. I already explained that part. It's sort of common sense too... but you can't understand it so whatever. Picking apart what people say is how you play the game bro and it's not like anything else is getting done...
|
|
|
Post by Potato on May 16, 2014 16:23:51 GMT -5
Your question makes no sense. Just calm down and quit picking apart everything I say. I already explained that part. It's sort of common sense too... but you can't understand it so whatever. Picking apart what people say is how you play the game bro and it's not like anything else is getting done... Yes, it is, but not when you're trying to make someone look like scum... And there's other things to be doing, there's been a bunch of quiet people and people that have been staying neutral. Your crusade against me's allowing everyone else to hide and say nothing.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on May 16, 2014 16:37:47 GMT -5
Picking apart what people say is how you play the game bro and it's not like anything else is getting done... Yes, it is, but not when you're trying to make someone look like scum... And there's other things to be doing, there's been a bunch of quiet people and people that have been staying neutral. Your crusade against me's allowing everyone else to hide and say nothing. I'm finding it difficult to choose a side, and if you think this argument is preventing loyals from concentrating on looking for scum players than why are you accusing us of "being neutral"? Should we, what, put more fuel on a fire that we don't need, so to speak? Or are you just talking about being neutral in general? A good example of that is Slime...
|
|