|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Mar 12, 2014 13:55:37 GMT -5
So, who do all of you suspect? As of now I'm still narrowing my eyes at the Dug. Frodo *cough* Todo seems like you said is a bit of a follower, since he repeated something similar to what I said a few posts ago (granted that's not at all very incriminating evidence. However I'm not too worried about him. The inactives always seem off, but they usually turn out as loyal in the end. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Mar 12, 2014 13:58:51 GMT -5
So, who do all of you suspect? As of now I'm still narrowing my eyes at the Dug. Frodo *cough* Todo seems like you said is a bit of a follower, since he repeated something similar to what I said a few posts ago (granted that's not at all very incriminating evidence. However I'm not too worried about him. The inactives always seem off, but they usually turn out as loyal in the end. The inactives are usually not too dangerous anyway. It would be better to get rid off the active scum first (assuming there are active scum players). But the Dug is still the most suspicious from my point of view... so I guess he might be the best choice unless we see clear proof against somebody else. And Todo did even admit he's following, so I guess that accusation makes sense. While I do understand his reason (he doesn't want to die early again)... it might be an excuse. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 12, 2014 13:59:11 GMT -5
So, who do all of you suspect? Mostly Spider/Todo for now I think Dug too slightly but I think I might be up for a Spider vote more if we had to vote right now (well we already voted mav but you know what I mean..) Dug is probably a back up or something Why again? |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 12, 2014 14:02:29 GMT -5
So, who do all of you suspect? I'm sort of iffy on most people, but if I had to choose, maybe the dug. I still think Potato and Newan are strange though and their team up seems a bit scummy. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Mar 12, 2014 14:03:06 GMT -5
As of now I'm still narrowing my eyes at the Dug. Frodo *cough* Todo seems like you said is a bit of a follower, since he repeated something similar to what I said a few posts ago (granted that's not at all very incriminating evidence. However I'm not too worried about him. The inactives always seem off, but they usually turn out as loyal in the end. The inactives are usually not too dangerous anyway. It would be better to get rid off the active scum first (assuming there are active scum players). But the Dug is still the most suspicious from my point of view... so I guess he might be the best choice unless we see clear proof against somebody else. And Todo did even admit he's following, so I guess that accusation makes sense. While I do understand his reason (he doesn't want to die early again)... it might be an excuse. As of now no one except the Dug has really made move so wrong they put themselves in the firing line. Not yet anyway... |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 12, 2014 14:05:32 GMT -5
The fact that we don't have too many suspects gives me the feeling that we have really good or really powerful scum. I think they're playing us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Mar 12, 2014 14:08:34 GMT -5
The inactives are usually not too dangerous anyway. It would be better to get rid off the active scum first (assuming there are active scum players). But the Dug is still the most suspicious from my point of view... so I guess he might be the best choice unless we see clear proof against somebody else. And Todo did even admit he's following, so I guess that accusation makes sense. While I do understand his reason (he doesn't want to die early again)... it might be an excuse. As of now no one except the Dug has really made move so wrong they put themselves in the firing line. Not yet anyway... So... if things don't change, are you going to kill the Dug? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 12, 2014 14:09:35 GMT -5
Many want the Dug gone despite him being very inactive. The only evidence we have against him is his revenge vote for Evazan - then again, a lot of people voted Evazan.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Mar 12, 2014 14:10:29 GMT -5
As of now no one except the Dug has really made move so wrong they put themselves in the firing line. Not yet anyway... So... if things don't change, are you going to kill the Dug? As long as the group decide that as the course of action. It would be best if we as a group decide, like Ponda had said. However it may indeed come to that regardless. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Mar 12, 2014 14:10:50 GMT -5
Mostly Spider/Todo for now I think Dug too slightly but I think I might be up for a Spider vote more if we had to vote right now (well we already voted mav but you know what I mean..) Dug is probably a back up or something Why again? I'll make a list so it's more organized 1. At first you were awfully quiet, only popping in randomly a couple times and posting something short 2. You've never really stated your suspicions 3. You're following quite a bit and basically restating everything others have said 4. You avoid arguments and hide behind the arguments of others 5. Whenever someone points something suspicious about you, you change that thing or stop it (ie. your quietness) I'm not sure if I want you to be Mav's kill yet because we can't afford to make many more mistakes now but if I had to pick people to be suspects, you'd probably be at the top of the list |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Mar 12, 2014 14:11:57 GMT -5
Many want the Dug gone despite him being very inactive. The only evidence we have against him is his revenge vote for Evazan - then again, a lot of people voted Evazan. That's exactly what makes him suspicious. Many people followed his fast vote against a loyalist. But if you have a better idea, just tell us. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 12, 2014 14:13:09 GMT -5
I'll make a list so it's more organized 1. At first you were awfully quiet, only popping in randomly a couple times and posting something short 2. You've never really stated your suspicions 3. You're following quite a bit and basically restating everything others have said 4. You avoid arguments and hide behind the arguments of others 5. Whenever someone points something suspicious about you, you change that thing or stop it (ie. your quietness) I'm not sure if I want you to be Mav's kill yet because we can't afford to make many more mistakes now but if I had to pick people to be suspects, you'd probably be at the top of the list Hmm... 1. A lot of people here have been quiet. 2. He's stated more than a lot of us. 3. Sadly many of the players are followers. 4. - 5. - What's disappointing is that we only have evidence against active players but the inactives always survive. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 12, 2014 14:13:25 GMT -5
Many want the Dug gone despite him being very inactive. The only evidence we have against him is his revenge vote for Evazan - then again, a lot of people voted Evazan. That's exactly what makes him suspicious. Many people followed his fast vote against a loyalist. But if you have a better idea, just tell us. Sadly I do not. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Mar 12, 2014 14:13:42 GMT -5
I'll make a list so it's more organized 1. At first you were awfully quiet, only popping in randomly a couple times and posting something short 2. You've never really stated your suspicions 3. You're following quite a bit and basically restating everything others have said 4. You avoid arguments and hide behind the arguments of others 5. Whenever someone points something suspicious about you, you change that thing or stop it (ie. your quietness) I'm not sure if I want you to be Mav's kill yet because we can't afford to make many more mistakes now but if I had to pick people to be suspects, you'd probably be at the top of the list Hmm... 1. A lot of people here have been quiet. 2. He's stated more than a lot of us. 3. Sadly many of the players are followers. 4. - 5. - What's disappointing is that we only have evidence against active players but the inactives always survive. I wouldn't say the Dug is very active... |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 12, 2014 14:14:35 GMT -5
Hmm... 1. A lot of people here have been quiet. 2. He's stated more than a lot of us. 3. Sadly many of the players are followers. 4. - 5. - What's disappointing is that we only have evidence against active players but the inactives always survive. I wouldn't say the Dug is very active... Not the Dug, but Sugi and Natalie come to mind. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Mar 12, 2014 14:22:55 GMT -5
I'll make a list so it's more organized 1. At first you were awfully quiet, only popping in randomly a couple times and posting something short 2. You've never really stated your suspicions 3. You're following quite a bit and basically restating everything others have said 4. You avoid arguments and hide behind the arguments of others 5. Whenever someone points something suspicious about you, you change that thing or stop it (ie. your quietness) I'm not sure if I want you to be Mav's kill yet because we can't afford to make many more mistakes now but if I had to pick people to be suspects, you'd probably be at the top of the list Hmm... 1. A lot of people here have been quiet. 2. He's stated more than a lot of us. 3. Sadly many of the players are followers. 4. - 5. - What's disappointing is that we only have evidence against active players but the inactives always survive. 1. This might sound weird but Spider's quietness is different from the other quiet people like idk.... The really inactive people are the noobs and I kind of doubt they're scum.. And Spider seems active enough to be a henchman, have a bit if input but not really have to necessarily do much... Idk... This is like a gut feeling so.. But he is quiet. 2. Not really and it's basically exactly what others have said 3. True dat but it's still something to keep note of |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Mar 12, 2014 14:27:33 GMT -5
I wouldn't say the Dug is very active... Not the Dug, but Sugi and Natalie come to mind. We have no real evidence against any active players. So your statement was wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 12, 2014 14:44:24 GMT -5
I'll make a list so it's more organized 1. At first you were awfully quiet, only popping in randomly a couple times and posting something short 2. You've never really stated your suspicions 3. You're following quite a bit and basically restating everything others have said 4. You avoid arguments and hide behind the arguments of others 5. Whenever someone points something suspicious about you, you change that thing or stop it (ie. your quietness) I'm not sure if I want you to be Mav's kill yet because we can't afford to make many more mistakes now but if I had to pick people to be suspects, you'd probably be at the top of the list But none of that makes me scum. I mean think, if you are a loyal helper and everyone says you are quiet will you: A. Be more quiet B. Do nothing C. Realize you should be more active and comment more If you're saying a loyal should do A or B, you're wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 12, 2014 14:45:20 GMT -5
Hmm... 1. A lot of people here have been quiet. 2. He's stated more than a lot of us. 3. Sadly many of the players are followers. 4. - 5. - What's disappointing is that we only have evidence against active players but the inactives always survive. 1. This might sound weird but Spider's quietness is different from the other quiet people like idk.... The really inactive people are the noobs and I kind of doubt they're scum.. And Spider seems active enough to be a henchman, have a bit if input but not really have to necessarily do much... Idk... This is like a gut feeling so.. But he is quiet. 2. Not really and it's basically exactly what others have said 3. True dat but it's still something to keep note of Well I have gut feelings against people too but I'm not about to call them as scum with no evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Mar 12, 2014 14:49:54 GMT -5
I'll make a list so it's more organized 1. At first you were awfully quiet, only popping in randomly a couple times and posting something short 2. You've never really stated your suspicions 3. You're following quite a bit and basically restating everything others have said 4. You avoid arguments and hide behind the arguments of others 5. Whenever someone points something suspicious about you, you change that thing or stop it (ie. your quietness) I'm not sure if I want you to be Mav's kill yet because we can't afford to make many more mistakes now but if I had to pick people to be suspects, you'd probably be at the top of the list But none of that makes me scum. I mean think, if you are a loyal helper and everyone says you are quiet will you: A. Be more quiet B. Do nothing C. Realize you should be more active and comment more If you're saying a loyal should do A or B, you're wrong. Idk man we have to start somewhere so I think for now most of what I listed is decent enough evidence because no one else really has much else.. 1. This might sound weird but Spider's quietness is different from the other quiet people like idk.... The really inactive people are the noobs and I kind of doubt they're scum.. And Spider seems active enough to be a henchman, have a bit if input but not really have to necessarily do much... Idk... This is like a gut feeling so.. But he is quiet. 2. Not really and it's basically exactly what others have said 3. True dat but it's still something to keep note of Well I have gut feelings against people too but I'm not about to call them as scum with no evidence. I actually tried not to list gut feelings so if you're implying that's what my evidence basically is.. Then I have to say you're wrong |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 12, 2014 14:54:54 GMT -5
But none of that makes me scum. I mean think, if you are a loyal helper and everyone says you are quiet will you: A. Be more quiet B. Do nothing C. Realize you should be more active and comment more If you're saying a loyal should do A or B, you're wrong. Idk man we have to start somewhere so I think for now most of what I listed is decent enough evidence because no one else really has much else.. Well I have gut feelings against people too but I'm not about to call them as scum with no evidence. I actually tried not to list gut feelings so if you're implying that's what my evidence basically is.. Then I have to say you're wrong No, I'm just saying not to use gut feelings in general. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Mar 12, 2014 14:59:23 GMT -5
Idk man we have to start somewhere so I think for now most of what I listed is decent enough evidence because no one else really has much else.. I actually tried not to list gut feelings so if you're implying that's what my evidence basically is.. Then I have to say you're wrong No, I'm just saying not to use gut feelings in general. Agree with you there guess I misinterpreted your post.. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Mar 12, 2014 15:34:22 GMT -5
OOC: Does anyone else find it confusing there is a Ponda and a Pinda in this game?  Well, sometimes I'll type Ponda by mistake instead of Pinda. Other times, autocorrect changes Ponda to Pinda (not really anymore though). So yeah, especially with the spellings being so close, it is definitely confusing. |
|
|
|
Post by red on Mar 12, 2014 16:03:58 GMT -5
I must admit, i have not seen your most recent posts. My suspicions may be based on less recent evidence, it's still evidence though. Potato (I actually forgot to mention him) and Newan would be on the bottom of my list. I don't consider them suspicious at this point. And I guess Malgus and Nam shouldn't really be on the list either. It's mostly Wampa, you and Spider I suspect. Although my suspicion of Spider just dropped a bit. Outdated evidence isn't really good evidence.. Ahem... |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Mar 12, 2014 16:05:34 GMT -5
OOC: Does anyone else find it confusing there is a Ponda and a Pinda in this game? Well, sometimes I'll type Ponda by mistake instead of Pinda. Other times, autocorrect changes Ponda to Pinda (not really anymore though). So yeah, especially with the spellings being so close, it is definitely confusing. It confuses me too. Every time someone says Ponda I think I see my name... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Mar 12, 2014 16:06:18 GMT -5
I see I've jumped on the suspicion list of quite a few.. why may I ask? It seems a lot like many "suspect" me just for the sake of suspecting someone if you know what I mean. I never really like gut feelings and I don't really see much else against me except a bunch of followers after Ponda said I was a wild card or something... Explanation anyone?
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 12, 2014 16:14:13 GMT -5
We're probably going to kill the Dug anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 12, 2014 16:17:23 GMT -5
Highsinger, I don't suspect you a whole lot and I suspected the others on that list more than you, but it's more of process of elimination (which I guess is too early to do at this point) and you haven't had the most loyal actions. You haven't really done anything scummy either so I guess it was wrong for me to accuse you.
Also, I'm more suspicious of Todo now. He's been agreeing with everyone this entire time. In fact, a few hours ago he said he thought Derrown and I were loyal and now he thinks we're scum. He keeps shifting his opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 12, 2014 16:17:47 GMT -5
Let's do a fake vote. Mav will kill whoever has the most fake votes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Mar 12, 2014 16:18:14 GMT -5
I have a feeling that either loyal or scum, Potato and Newan are PMing... A lot...
|
|
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself? 