Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2014 18:16:30 GMT -5
Herro, thanks for playing Bane.
Alive
Spider:Todo 360
Nam: Gatar Carnac
Pinda: Taklar Sark
Malgus:Highsinger
Newan:Derrown
Potato:Ponda Baba
Mav: Jakt Talko
Kenobi: Latts Razzi
Nikkie:Sugi
Legolas: Natalie Dracen
Wampa: Sanqualar Bolkf (Dug bounty hunter)
Deceased
Star: Evazan Loyal Beheaded by angry mob
Bane: Embo Loyal Murdered
Ivar: Mika Loyal Burned to death for inactivity
So Malgus gave me an interesting idea and I think I will go for it. So voting will be different today. Instead of voting on who you think is scum, you will VOTE FOR WHO YOU THINK HERE IS THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY. Whoever is chosen will than get to kill someone that they think is scum. Voting will begin in a couple of hours.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Mar 10, 2014 18:17:43 GMT -5
Damn it!
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 10, 2014 18:20:32 GMT -5
The fellowship is breaking....
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Mar 10, 2014 18:21:56 GMT -5
Well... time to question the Dug.
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 10, 2014 18:23:24 GMT -5
Darn.
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 10, 2014 18:23:56 GMT -5
Well... time to question the Dug. You didn't do much yesterday either... |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 10, 2014 18:24:32 GMT -5
And I'm still suspicious of Gatar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Mar 10, 2014 18:25:22 GMT -5
Well... time to question the Dug. You didn't do much yesterday either... Well, most of the discussion happened when I was gone. But the Dug voted for Star for very bad reasons. That's some to look at. OOC: I have a test week coming up so I won't be as active as usual. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 10, 2014 18:25:32 GMT -5
And I'm still suspicious of Gatar. I'm a bit more suspicious of Todo. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 10, 2014 18:27:21 GMT -5
And I'm still suspicious of Gatar. I'm a bit more suspicious of Todo. Yeah, he has been quiet... but I thought you said you got a loyal feeling from him yesterday. I think Gatar's been acting more strange but it'd be nice to see more of Todo too. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 10, 2014 18:30:39 GMT -5
Looking back, Embo's death was weird. Evazan kept saying how he thought Embo was scum and that we should look into his suspects, so the scum killing him was sort of stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 10, 2014 18:31:26 GMT -5
I'm a bit more suspicious of Todo. Yeah, he has been quiet... but I thought you said you got a loyal feeling from him yesterday. I think Gatar's been acting more strange but it'd be nice to see more of Todo too. When was that? I feel Jakt seems kinda loyal. But Todo has been staying quiet and kinda following. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 10, 2014 18:32:05 GMT -5
Looking back, Embo's death was weird. Evazan kept saying how he thought Embo was scum and that we should look into his suspects, so the scum killing him was sort of stupid. Unless they're trying to force us into voting the dug. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 10, 2014 18:33:57 GMT -5
Yeah, he has been quiet... but I thought you said you got a loyal feeling from him yesterday. I think Gatar's been acting more strange but it'd be nice to see more of Todo too. When was that? I feel Jakt seems kinda loyal. But Todo has been staying quiet and kinda following. You said it in our PM I think. Looking back, Embo's death was weird. Evazan kept saying how he thought Embo was scum and that we should look into his suspects, so the scum killing him was sort of stupid. Unless they're trying to force us into voting the dug. Yeah, that's a good point, but it seems a bit too obvious. But let's not accuse the dug just because Evazan told us to. Evazan obviously wasn't 100% right. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 10, 2014 18:34:19 GMT -5
And I can speak basic now because Aqualish sucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 10, 2014 18:34:38 GMT -5
@jodo so umm was Ivar janitored or something? He doesn't have a allegiance and with no pictures or story we can't really tell...
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 10, 2014 18:36:34 GMT -5
When was that? I feel Jakt seems kinda loyal. But Todo has been staying quiet and kinda following. You said it in our PM I think. Unless they're trying to force us into voting the dug. Yeah, that's a good point, but it seems a bit too obvious. But let's not accuse the dug just because Evazan told us to. Evazan obviously wasn't 100% right. I wasn't planning on doing something so short sighted as just accusing the dug it's what the scum obviously want which is why I believe he could be loyal I would rather look at the people that hardly accused the dug at all though. And did I? Or was it before he voted and stuff. My opinions have generally changed for some people but I am starting to believe you're more loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 10, 2014 18:36:51 GMT -5
And I'm still suspicious of Gatar. May I ask why? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2014 18:38:07 GMT -5
@jodo so umm was Ivar janitored or something? He doesn't have a allegiance and with no pictures or story we can't really tell... No, I leave the inactives as no allegiance is revealed. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 10, 2014 18:38:50 GMT -5
And I'm still suspicious of Gatar. May I ask why? You didn't really do a whole lot yesterday and sort of flew under the radar. You mostly just played with your tooth pick and repeated stuff that was already said. You sided with Evazan, although that doesn't really mean anything yet, and then later said you were fine with Evazan being voted. You sort of seemed like you were just along for the ride yesterday. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 10, 2014 18:39:16 GMT -5
@jodo so umm was Ivar janitored or something? He doesn't have a allegiance and with no pictures or story we can't really tell... No, I leave the inactives as no allegiance is revealed. Then what's the point of even killing them off? It does not change anything at all. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Mar 10, 2014 18:40:07 GMT -5
No, I leave the inactives as no allegiance is revealed. Then what's the point of even killing them off? It does not change anything at all. I think that's the point. They're just out of the game. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 10, 2014 18:40:21 GMT -5
You didn't really do a whole lot yesterday and sort of flew under the radar. You mostly just played with your tooth pick and repeated stuff that was already said. You sided with Evazan, although that doesn't really mean anything yet, and then later said you were fine with Evazan being voted. You sort of seemed like you were just along for the ride yesterday. Is that not allowed? Am I the only one "along the ride?" Or is this evidence based on previous games? And, if you hadn't noticed, Evazan was my second suspect. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Mar 10, 2014 18:41:01 GMT -5
Then what's the point of even killing them off? It does not change anything at all. I think that's the point. They're just out of the game. It doesn't change anything in terms of gameplay if they're here or not and we don't see the allegiance it just gives the scum advantages. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 10, 2014 18:41:37 GMT -5
Well... time to question the Dug. You didn't do much yesterday either... Does everyone who's not extremely active seem suspicious to you? |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 10, 2014 18:41:46 GMT -5
You didn't really do a whole lot yesterday and sort of flew under the radar. You mostly just played with your tooth pick and repeated stuff that was already said. You sided with Evazan, although that doesn't really mean anything yet, and then later said you were fine with Evazan being voted. You sort of seemed like you were just along for the ride yesterday. Is that not allowed? Am I the only one "along the ride?" Or is this evidence based on previous games? And, if you hadn't noticed, Evazan was my second suspect. Not previous games, you just posted a fair amount but didn't add anything new. And if Evazan was your second suspect then why did you basically side with him? |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Mar 10, 2014 18:41:56 GMT -5
I think that's the point. They're just out of the game. It doesn't change anything in terms of gameplay if they're here or not and we don't see the allegiance it just gives the scum advantages. Yeah, I see what you're saying. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Mar 10, 2014 18:42:02 GMT -5
I think that's the point. They're just out of the game. It doesn't change anything in terms of gameplay if they're here or not and we don't see the allegiance it just gives the scum advantages. Inactive scum can be killed too, I'm sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Mar 10, 2014 18:42:10 GMT -5
You didn't do much yesterday either... Does everyone who's not extremely active seem suspicious to you? Is there a problem with that? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2014 18:42:15 GMT -5
No, I leave the inactives as no allegiance is revealed. Then what's the point of even killing them off? It does not change anything at all. I killed him off because he didn't vote, I don't want inactives in my game. But I suppose you are right, he was loyal. |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself? 
