|
Post by Namialus on Dec 15, 2013 18:21:49 GMT -5
I think I'll vote Mandus.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Dec 15, 2013 19:10:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 15, 2013 19:41:20 GMT -5
VOTE: MANDUS MAYFARE (IVAR)
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 15, 2013 21:58:34 GMT -5
My opinion on your proof is written in red. What I think: Boba: Gorkill - possibly scum 1. No explanationIvar: Mandus Mayfare - quiet. Might be scum Jodo: Dsak Joto (Haradian) - maybe scum. Maybe loyal 2. Uhm... yeah I guess this is probably true.Kenobi: Whitaker Atlas - not sure. Did side with Dalek but so did I and I'm loyal so... Nam: Meriadoc Brandybuck - loyal Roleblocker Pinda: Pindus Zwervus - quite possibly scum Star: Rarbar - loyal helper 3. Proof it...If there were originally 4 scum we are now down to 3 and the murderer is one of them. I'm loyal (inspection results said so too) but none y'all wanna believe that. Nam (as much as I don't like it right now) is loyal. That leaves Kenobi, Haradian, Pindus, Gorkill, and Ivar. My top suspects would have to be: Pindus: Logical guess for the murderer. When he was roleblocked, there was no murder. And the odds of a successful protection are low especially on night 1. 4. Outdated. We now know Newan was attacked and protected.And for those with the mod being scum theory (as cheap as it is) Pindus being scum makes perfect sense. 5. That's unfair proof based on the fact that roles are not random, while they are supposed to be random. You cannot vote people off because of their forum powers.Mandus: Is quiet 6. So are you. and compared to others I think he's just kinda suspicous with how he can't ever seem to make up his mind on things. (Granted he's quiet so that makes it harder, but so am I and I've managed to come up with some things 7. Examples? Except for this post you didn't do a thing.). Merry also said everything he (Mandus) said was scummy yesterday, so he shouldn't disagree with me on this. 8. How is this proof? He also said you could be scum... that doesn't mean it has to be true.Haradian: I guess I'd choose him being a more likely scum over the other two 9. yet you plan to vote for me just because Tater was suspicious of him. 10.Potato died on day 1. Although I wouldn't count out Whitaker and Gorkill being scum just yet. 11. A moment ago you said both of them could be scum.With these ideas, I think my vote will be Pindus. 12. Why? Jodo was your main suspect. There is just too much evidence against him. 13. Like outdated and bad OOC evidence? And a lot of you should agree because on Day 2 all of you were wanting to/did vote him. 14. We're on day 4 now so that doesn't mean anything. We got new proof. But if you wanna vote me, whatever. Just give the scum an even better chance for victory. 15. Making it look like you don't care and the scum will win when you die is a well known scum tactic. 1. I can't really explain this. Just using a process of elimination. 3. I can't really besides saying I came up as loyal from Newan. Besides, anyone would list themselves as loyal if they did this. The only other thing I could do to prove it would be copy and paste my role here (which I won't do). 4. Okay, sorry, I didn't know. I'm not as active as I usually am and I must've missed this. 5. That's what I think. But a lot of others thought it was amazing evidence on Day 1. You were one of them. So you must've thought it was good evidence when voting Tater. But now you realize how bad it is when used against you. 6. I know, I've stated this several times. But I'm trying my best to put my input into discussion. I've dont things such as think that Dalek was loyal, this, think Malgus was scum on Day 1, etc. not an overwhelming amount, but definitely more than Mayfare. 7. Answered above. 8. ? 9. I was referring to Whitaker and Gorkill. Not Ivar and you. 10. And? He was loyal and sometimes they have good insights. I personally know from experience (Nami 2). Although I'm aware they can be just as blind as everyone else also. 11. What do you mean? I was saying I find them least suspicous, but I wouldn't count them out as scum yet. 12. No, you were in this post. 13. At the time I was unaware. But still... You could very well be scum. 15. Or a loyal who is just completely annoyed at the blindness of others.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 15, 2013 21:59:34 GMT -5
VOTE: MANDUS MAYFARE (IVAR) O.O I'm surprised you didn't vote me. What made you change your mind so quickly?
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 16, 2013 6:04:03 GMT -5
Star seems to be implying he has a role.... Well what is it then
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 16, 2013 7:53:55 GMT -5
Star seems to be implying he has a role.... Well what is it then Where did he imply that?
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 16, 2013 14:30:22 GMT -5
Star seems to be implying he has a role.... Well what is it then Where did he imply that? Point 3 in his comment above
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 16, 2013 14:45:09 GMT -5
Point 3 in his comment above I think he meant to say the only way to proof he's loyal is to reveal his role (which could be scum or just loyal helper too).
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 16, 2013 14:45:37 GMT -5
Like he'd have to copy and paste his role here.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 16, 2013 14:55:35 GMT -5
My opinion on your proof is written in red. 1. I can't really explain this. Just using a process of elimination. 3. I can't really besides saying I came up as loyal from Newan. Besides, anyone would list themselves as loyal if they did this. The only other thing I could do to prove it would be copy and paste my role here (which I won't do). 4. Okay, sorry, I didn't know. I'm not as active as I usually am and I must've missed this. 5. That's what I think. But a lot of others thought it was amazing evidence on Day 1. You were one of them. So you must've thought it was good evidence when voting Tater. But now you realize how bad it is when used against you. 6. I know, I've stated this several times. But I'm trying my best to put my input into discussion. I've dont things such as think that Dalek was loyal, this, think Malgus was scum on Day 1, etc. not an overwhelming amount, but definitely more than Mayfare. 7. Answered above. 8. ? 9. I was referring to Whitaker and Gorkill. Not Ivar and you. 10. And? He was loyal and sometimes they have good insights. I personally know from experience (Nami 2). Although I'm aware they can be just as blind as everyone else also. 11. What do you mean? I was saying I find them least suspicous, but I wouldn't count them out as scum yet. 12. No, you were in this post. 13. At the time I was unaware. But still... You could very well be scum. 15. Or a loyal who is just completely annoyed at the blindness of others. 1. OK. 3. Inspection results are easy to mess up. And you were the one making a problem about me listing myself as loyal before... 5. I've been saying this "one mod has to be scum" proof is nonsense since the beginning. I voted Potato because of his sudden accusation of Jodo. And if you think it's bad proof why do you use it? 8. Never mind. 9. Okay. That wasn't clear to me. 10. Yes Potato was loyal, but on day 1 everyone is just guessing. There's no real proof, while there is proof now. So let's not base our decisions on the suspicions someone had on day 1. 11. OK. 12. You made it look like it was Jodo. But you explained this at number 9. 13. If you're too inactive to be aware of major things that happened on day 2 means you shouldn't randomly accuse people... 15. Or a scum trying to look like a loyal who is just completely annoyed at the blindness of others. Also, you're the blind one here as you're using outdated proof.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 16, 2013 15:13:57 GMT -5
VOTE: MANDUS MAYFARE (IVAR) O.O I'm surprised you didn't vote me. What made you change your mind so quickly? I'm more sure of him than I am of you.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 16, 2013 15:31:19 GMT -5
Point 3 in his comment above I think he meant to say the only way to proof he's loyal is to reveal his role (which could be scum or just loyal helper too). Oh right that might be it..
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 16, 2013 16:25:39 GMT -5
Star is my main suspect... but since I'm also Suspicious of Ivar I guess I'll go with Nam's vote today, we can't risk ending up with no conclusion. VOTE: IVAR
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Dec 16, 2013 16:32:20 GMT -5
With a total of TWO votes and zero opposition, Mandus Mayfare will be convicted.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 16, 2013 16:33:01 GMT -5
With a total of TWO votes and zero opposition, Mandus Mayfare will be convicted. Good thing I didn't vote Star then... or we'd have had a tied vote...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2013 17:37:45 GMT -5
Point 3 in his comment above I think he meant to say the only way to proof he's loyal is to reveal his role (which could be scum or just loyal helper too). I don think he is implying he has a role if he had a role he would of told us by now instead of making mass posts of defense when he could of just reavled a role.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 16, 2013 18:49:10 GMT -5
I think he meant to say the only way to proof he's loyal is to reveal his role (which could be scum or just loyal helper too). I don think he is implying he has a role if he had a role he would of told us by now instead of making mass posts of defense when he could of just reavled a role. Yeah but then again he waited til the last second last game..
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 16, 2013 21:47:24 GMT -5
Yeah, I don't have a role. I'm a loyal helper. I would've said something by now like Haradian said. And let's see if Mandus was the right choice. I suspected him, but I felt that if I voted him, I'd be accused of following. I'll also be curious to see if there will be a kill tonight.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Dec 16, 2013 22:44:02 GMT -5
|
|