|
|
Post by Star on Dec 12, 2013 17:23:07 GMT -5
Why me? Since I can't defend myself of unknown reasons, I'll just say this first: I came up loyal from Grievous. Inspection results? I do not care for them. Then you do not care for the inspector which makes him useless to us. I'm sure that if he inspected you as loyal, you wouldn't be saying this. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 12, 2013 17:27:07 GMT -5
Also, why should we think of following Nam? (For those that have and are considering to again). He's lead the vote on a loyal who had no evidence (Wicket) and began to on Pindus til he said Malcom instead (loyal). But at the last moment, he said not to vote him. This means he hasn't the best ideas (and I know I haven't done much either, but you've been here more and should be able to help out more) so why should we follow (if any were considering) him on the Dalek vote? I personally don't find him suspicous, and think that instead we should look into those that quickly voted for Wicket on Day 1 or followed in the day 2 vote. Or even those who were suspected by Wikcet. Just a some food for thought...
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 12, 2013 17:46:28 GMT -5
I still haven't seen any evidence against me... And yet there's been a vote towards me. I just don't understand it.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 12, 2013 17:47:17 GMT -5
I still haven't seen any evidence against me... And yet there's been a vote towards me. I just don't understand it. So let's see... The only evidence I've seen is that I follow or support Pinda or something like that. Nothing else. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 12, 2013 18:11:41 GMT -5
Also Star why would the scum make up evidence to make one of them look like scum... Or do you mean they made up evidence to make a loyal look like scum... And even still how would that even be possible.. What? I didn't say anything relevant to this... Mmhmm.. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 12, 2013 18:12:55 GMT -5
Yeah so little kid has a crap ton of evidence against him but I'm not sure if we should vote him (even though most of us really want to....) because he's claimed roleblocker..
|
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 12, 2013 18:16:01 GMT -5
What? I didn't say anything relevant to this... Mmhmm.. Please explain. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 12, 2013 18:18:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 12, 2013 18:55:48 GMT -5
Hmm Whitaker also told me to inspect Dalek on day 1 perhaps he would come up loyal and be protected after all....? I'm interested in voting Dalek now.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 12, 2013 19:06:23 GMT -5
Hmm Whitaker also told me to inspect Dalek on day 1 perhaps he would come up loyal and be protected after all....? I'm interested in voting Dalek now. I'm a bit confused about what you meant. Are you saying saying that the scum leader protected me or something?  |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 12, 2013 19:07:39 GMT -5
I'm pretty suspicious of Whitaker too, just in case I don't survive today.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 12, 2013 19:11:30 GMT -5
Also, why should we think of following Nam? (For those that have and are considering to again). He's lead the vote on a loyal who had no evidence (Wicket) and began to on Pindus til he said Malcom instead (loyal). But at the last moment, he said not to vote him. This means he hasn't the best ideas (and I know I haven't done much either, but you've been here more and should be able to help out more) so why should we follow (if any were considering) him on the Dalek vote? I personally don't find him suspicous, and think that instead we should look into those that quickly voted for Wicket on Day 1 or followed in the day 2 vote. Or even those who were suspected by Wikcet. Just a some food for thought... A) I accused Wicket, but if you had reread everything both me and Grievous suggested it. And then others. So don't use me as your scapegoat in an attempt to vote me off. B) I didn't vote Malcolm because Malcolm had a role, fool. Did you not get the message? C) I don't have the best of ideas? And what the heck does "(and I know I haven't done much either, but you've been here more and should be able to help out more)" mean? Just because I'm more experienced, it means I should do more in the group? D) You should follow me on the Dalek vote because unlike you, I get longbottom done. My suspicions have been confirmed. Star is defending the Dalek by using EASY evidence against me, because yes, I have made mistakes here and some of you might think that those mistakes are a good basis on which to vote me off. And yes, they are good, but they are untrue. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 12, 2013 19:12:25 GMT -5
I'm pretty suspicious of Whitaker too, just in case I don't survive today. Guessing you're not going to post evidence for that either .. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 12, 2013 19:14:30 GMT -5
Thoughts on the scum team:
Dalek: He's tied to Whitaker and Star.
Star: Defends the Dalek and makes small attempts to alter your minds against me.
Whitaker: I now understand why he defended Wicket so strongly on Day 1.... he knew Wicket was loyal, because Whitaker knows the scum team, because Whitaker is scum. He defends anyone I accuse, specifically the Dalek. Also tries to do it subtly, although that doesn't work. Sorry.
Mandus: Yeah, why Mandus? Read his comments and tell me they don't scream "SCUM."
Originally I was going to place Haradian but all he does is come in and blurt out random piles of crap.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 12, 2013 19:14:52 GMT -5
I'm pretty suspicious of Whitaker too, just in case I don't survive today. Guessing you're not going to post evidence for that either .. Oh, well, keep on readin'. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 12, 2013 19:16:47 GMT -5
So if y'all intend to vote me off, take note that from all of you, I have been one of the most active, one of the loudest, one with the most accusations (no, my dears, scum don't accuse randomly as I do), and... oh yes, I claimed roleblocker.
So go ahead and vote off the only one who's not going around wasting time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 12, 2013 19:28:57 GMT -5
Little kid also needs to take a chill pill...
No I won't be voting off our roleblocker but hardly anything he says makes sense...
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 12, 2013 19:34:08 GMT -5
THE HOBBIT SEEMS TO BE PANICKING. IS THIS BECAUSE HE CANNOT SUPPORT HIS ACCUSATION OF ME, OR IS HE JUST ON EDGE?
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 12, 2013 19:35:05 GMT -5
THE HOBBIT SEEMS TO BE PANICKING. IS THIS BECAUSE HE CANNOT SUPPORT HIS ACCUSATION OF ME, OR IS HE JUST ON EDGE? HIS SUDDEN ACCUSATION OF (Kenobi) IS COMPLETELY OUT OF THE BLUE, AS WELL. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 12, 2013 19:35:45 GMT -5
Thoughts on the scum team: Dalek: He's tied to Whitaker and Star. Star: Defends the Dalek and makes small attempts to alter your minds against me. Whitaker: I now understand why he defended Wicket so strongly on Day 1.... he knew Wicket was loyal, because Whitaker knows the scum team, because Whitaker is scum. He defends anyone I accuse, specifically the Dalek. Also tries to do it subtly, although that doesn't work. Sorry. Mandus: Yeah, why Mandus? Read his comments and tell me they don't scream "SCUM." Originally I was going to place Haradian but all he does is come in and blurt out random piles of crap. Aight let's break this down.. So I'm obviously tied to the Dalek who I've been strongly going against since the beginning... Seems legit Uh, yeah I'm going to defend someone who's going to be voted off because of crappy evidence... If I were scum, I think I would've just followed and voted him off... I defend anyone I accuse especially the dalek? Lololol little kid what are you doing... And subtly? Oh little kid.... |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 12, 2013 19:39:09 GMT -5
DALEKS CONCLUDE THAT THE ONLY THING KEEPING THE HOBBIT FROM BEING VOTED IS HIS ROLE CLAIM. WE HAVE NO IDEA IF THIS IS LEGITIMATE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 12, 2013 19:41:41 GMT -5
Well this is what I think..
Bane: Dalek - I've been suspicious of him from the very beginning and I know others have as well however I don't think it's fair to vote him off with no actual put in words evidence... That would make me a hypocrite
Boba: Gorkill - kinda inactive.. Although some of his thoughts he shared, I agreed with
Dark: A blonde guy - who dis? Too inactive to say anything about and probably not scum..
Ivar: Mandus Mayfare - uh... Well his posts seem... Forced...? Something's not right here but he's also kinda inactive so idk..
Jodo: Dsak Joto (Haradian) - hasn't made sense since he voted off Wicket for voting for him... Yah... Don't know what else to think
Kenobi: Whitaker Atlas - hello, I think I'm loyal
Nam: Meriadoc Brandybuck - also does not make any sense and is overconfident about everything and his overconfidence has led to quite a few loyals going down.. However he's claimed roleblocker so can't vote him
Newan: Grievous - inspector and I believe his claim, nuff said
Star: Rarbar - some of his posts have stood out to me but he came up loyal when inspected so I have to give him the benefit of the doubt
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 12, 2013 19:56:48 GMT -5
THE HOBBIT SEEMS TO BE PANICKING. IS THIS BECAUSE HE CANNOT SUPPORT HIS ACCUSATION OF ME, OR IS HE JUST ON EDGE? THE HOBBIT IS NOT PANICKING. THE HOBBIT BELIEVES HE WILL NOT SURVIVE AND HAS THUS DECIDED TO SHARE EVERYTHING. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 12, 2013 19:58:47 GMT -5
Thoughts on the scum team: Dalek: He's tied to Whitaker and Star. Star: Defends the Dalek and makes small attempts to alter your minds against me. Whitaker: I now understand why he defended Wicket so strongly on Day 1.... he knew Wicket was loyal, because Whitaker knows the scum team, because Whitaker is scum. He defends anyone I accuse, specifically the Dalek. Also tries to do it subtly, although that doesn't work. Sorry. Mandus: Yeah, why Mandus? Read his comments and tell me they don't scream "SCUM." Originally I was going to place Haradian but all he does is come in and blurt out random piles of crap. Aight let's break this down.. So I'm obviously tied to the Dalek who I've been strongly going against since the beginning... Seems legit Uh, yeah I'm going to defend someone who's going to be voted off because of crappy evidence... If I were scum, I think I would've just followed and voted him off... I defend anyone I accuse especially the dalek? Lololol little kid what are you doing... And subtly? Oh little kid.... If you've been against him, why not vote him off? Oh that's right, because your conflict with him was staged. You staged it as a defense in case something like this happened. Basically your whole defense against me is "oh lol little kid wut r u doing" |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 12, 2013 20:03:15 GMT -5
Aight let's break this down.. So I'm obviously tied to the Dalek who I've been strongly going against since the beginning... Seems legit Uh, yeah I'm going to defend someone who's going to be voted off because of crappy evidence... If I were scum, I think I would've just followed and voted him off... I defend anyone I accuse especially the dalek? Lololol little kid what are you doing... And subtly? Oh little kid.... If you've been against him, why not vote him off? Oh that's right, because your conflict with him was staged. You staged it as a defense in case something like this happened. Basically your whole defense against me is "oh lol little kid wut r u doing" I had a feeling you'd say that... I think I wouldn't vote him off because I prefer to make votes that actually make sense and have evidence to back them up.... Not over confidently be like "this guy is obviously scum. I'm going to vote for him" Also one does not simply stage an argument like that.. And yes, basically this is my defense but it should be enough because the smart loyals will see that you don't have enough evidence to vote m off and the ones who side with you on voting me off are scum |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2013 20:10:50 GMT -5
So if y'all intend to vote me off, take note that from all of you, I have been one of the most active, one of the loudest, one with the most accusations (no, my dears, scum don't accuse randomly as I do), and... oh yes, I claimed roleblocker. So go ahead and vote off the only one who's not going around wasting time. I intend to not vote off the role blocker (You) |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 12, 2013 20:23:36 GMT -5
VOTE: DALEK (BANE) I found that he's stood out compared to the others his vote for Wicket was following if anything. I still believe Whitaker Loyal for when he came to me on day 1 and I'm not voting Merry. So I'm fine with this vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 12, 2013 20:25:57 GMT -5
If you've been against him, why not vote him off? Oh that's right, because your conflict with him was staged. You staged it as a defense in case something like this happened. Basically your whole defense against me is "oh lol little kid wut r u doing" I had a feeling you'd say that... I think I wouldn't vote him off because I prefer to make votes that actually make sense and have evidence to back them up.... Not over confidently be like "this guy is obviously scum. I'm going to vote for him" Also one does not simply stage an argument like that.. And yes, basically this is my defense but it should be enough because the smart loyals will see that you don't have enough evidence to vote m off and the ones who side with you on voting me off are scum You'd prefer to make no votes at all judging by your rate! Oh look, I have never seen you make such a generalization. "those who side with me are scum" Wow, it is not like the map man to say such a thing. Hmm. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 12, 2013 20:27:26 GMT -5
I had a feeling you'd say that... I think I wouldn't vote him off because I prefer to make votes that actually make sense and have evidence to back them up.... Not over confidently be like "this guy is obviously scum. I'm going to vote for him" Also one does not simply stage an argument like that.. And yes, basically this is my defense but it should be enough because the smart loyals will see that you don't have enough evidence to vote m off and the ones who side with you on voting me off are scum You'd prefer to make no votes at all judging by your rate! Oh look, I have never seen you make such a generalization. "those who side with me are scum" Wow, it is not like the map man to say such a thing. Hmm. Uh, not voting anyone won't get us any where so.. And fighting fire with fire buh |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 12, 2013 21:26:37 GMT -5
The hobbit has been getting weirder and weirder lately. First, he accuses me, but doesn't provide any evidence. He then votes for me. How am I supposed to defend myself if there was no evidence to defend from? Oh, wait, I'm not. That was his plan. Also, he's been the first voters of several loyals. He votes for me, and then, when his voted gets no traction with anyone else, he starts blurting out accusations left and right, saying that me, star, and Kenobi are somehow all related because we don't follow him. And anyway, who says his role claim is legit? Oh, that's right: there's no way of telling. VOTE: NAM
|
|
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5