|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Dec 8, 2013 21:57:23 GMT -5
So, anybody gonna vote?
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 8, 2013 22:00:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Dec 8, 2013 22:00:41 GMT -5
I meant "Anybody ELSE gonna vote?" |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 8, 2013 22:05:51 GMT -5
I meant "Anybody ELSE gonna vote?" Thank you.  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 8, 2013 22:46:06 GMT -5
I doubt ill even get on tomorrow morning but VOTE: PINDUS (PINDA) whatever he was one of my suspects.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 8, 2013 22:48:50 GMT -5
So no one's going to wait for Pindus' defense... Whatever...
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 8, 2013 22:53:16 GMT -5
So no one's going to wait for Pindus' defense... Whatever... I won't be here cause of time zones.... |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 9, 2013 1:59:06 GMT -5
I will defend myself in a few hours when I get back from school.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 9, 2013 2:15:19 GMT -5
I will defend myself in a few hours when I get back from school. Then I will wait until then to vote. However my mind is now certain you've betrayed this rebellion. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 9, 2013 2:17:13 GMT -5
Just a slight observation, but it seems Whitaker is more interested in arguing with the Dalek and Malcom then talking about Pindus' suspicious behaviour. The same could go for Malcom and the Dalek as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Dec 9, 2013 4:18:32 GMT -5
Just a slight observation, but it seems Whitaker is more interested in arguing with the Dalek and Malcom then talking about Pindus' suspicious behaviour. The same could go for Malcom and the Dalek as well. It is very odd. Are they trying to hide something? Or are they just genuinely displeased of one another? It's worth a look. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Dec 9, 2013 4:18:49 GMT -5
I will defend myself in a few hours when I get back from school. I won't vote until then. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 9, 2013 6:08:39 GMT -5
Just a slight observation, but it seems Whitaker is more interested in arguing with the Dalek and Malcom then talking about Pindus' suspicious behaviour. The same could go for Malcom and the Dalek as well. Well I don't need to talk about Pindus' behavior because it would be redundant. Others including myself have already noted how Pindus quickly accepted Grievous' role claim and then quickly voted Wicket just because Grievous did and the stuff with the roleblockers so there's really no need to keep talking about it. And I know that the argument between Jace, the Dalek and myself is rather pointless but I feel like one of them or both of them is scum.. The argument doesn't prove anything though.. Maybe I'm just annoyed.. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 9, 2013 6:31:16 GMT -5
Just a slight observation, but it seems Whitaker is more interested in arguing with the Dalek and Malcom then talking about Pindus' suspicious behaviour. The same could go for Malcom and the Dalek as well. Well I don't need to talk about Pindus' behavior because it would be redundant. Others including myself have already noted how Pindus quickly accepted Grievous' role claim and then quickly voted Wicket just because Grievous did and the stuff with the roleblockers so there's really no need to keep talking about it. And I know that the argument between Jace, the Dalek and myself is rather pointless but I feel like one of them or both of them is scum.. The argument doesn't prove anything though.. Maybe I'm just annoyed.. I don't assume you're a traitor from this. Other conflicts are bound to break out. I merely pointed something out. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 9, 2013 7:10:30 GMT -5
Okay so the proof against me was at first mainly based on the roleblock thing. But that is no longer proof against me now. The second piece of evidence against me is the fact the "one mod has to be scum" I find this unfair evidence. You'd vote me off because I'm a mod? Roles are random and there's no reason to think I got a scum role because all other mods are most likely loyal. And the final piece of evidence I read was about my fast vote for Potato after Newan revealed his role. I don't see why that was such a problem. If I was scum I could have went with the majority before even knowing Newan's role. Or I could have voted for somebody else because if I had been scum I would have known Potato was loyal and I would have looked better if I didn't vote for him at all. But instead I voted for Potato because after Newan's claim he was the only person I could trust and because of his role claim I could see Potato was pushing for a loyal earlier, so for that reason I voted for him.
My suspect at this point would be Malgus. He voted for me pretty early and he seemed to convince others to vote me off without giving me a chance to defend myself as well. And he also used the "one mod has to be scum" proof. Both against me and Potato. He was obviously wrong when using it against Potato, yet he uses it again against me without any doubts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 9, 2013 7:11:21 GMT -5
Might as well vote... VOTE: MALGUS
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 9, 2013 8:51:12 GMT -5
Okay so the proof against me was at first mainly based on the roleblock thing. But that is no longer proof against me now. The second piece of evidence against me is the fact the "one mod has to be scum" I find this unfair evidence. You'd vote me off because I'm a mod? Roles are random and there's no reason to think I got a scum role because all other mods are most likely loyal. And the final piece of evidence I read was about my fast vote for Potato after Newan revealed his role. I don't see why that was such a problem. If I was scum I could have went with the majority before even knowing Newan's role. Or I could have voted for somebody else because if I had been scum I would have known Potato was loyal and I would have looked better if I didn't vote for him at all. But instead I voted for Potato because after Newan's claim he was the only person I could trust and because of his role claim I could see Potato was pushing for a loyal earlier, so for that reason I voted for him. My suspect at this point would be Malgus. He voted for me pretty early and he seemed to convince others to vote me off without giving me a chance to defend myself as well. And he also used the "one mod has to be scum" proof. Both against me and Potato. He was obviously wrong when using it against Potato, yet he uses it again against me without any doubts. Strong defence, but I still have suspicion towards you. If you're a traitor then you may have planned to vote Wicket and use the excuse that Merry and Grievous were very convincing. However I too have my suspicions against Malcom. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 9, 2013 9:00:35 GMT -5
If Pindus turns up loyal I will give no resistance. But I do really believe in my theory so you can follow it if you want to.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Dec 9, 2013 13:16:29 GMT -5
Okay so the proof against me was at first mainly based on the roleblock thing. But that is no longer proof against me now. The second piece of evidence against me is the fact the "one mod has to be scum" I find this unfair evidence. You'd vote me off because I'm a mod? Roles are random and there's no reason to think I got a scum role because all other mods are most likely loyal. And the final piece of evidence I read was about my fast vote for Potato after Newan revealed his role. I don't see why that was such a problem. If I was scum I could have went with the majority before even knowing Newan's role. Or I could have voted for somebody else because if I had been scum I would have known Potato was loyal and I would have looked better if I didn't vote for him at all. But instead I voted for Potato because after Newan's claim he was the only person I could trust and because of his role claim I could see Potato was pushing for a loyal earlier, so for that reason I voted for him. My suspect at this point would be Malgus. He voted for me pretty early and he seemed to convince others to vote me off without giving me a chance to defend myself as well. And he also used the "one mod has to be scum" proof. Both against me and Potato. He was obviously wrong when using it against Potato, yet he uses it again against me without any doubts. OOC: RP wise there are no mods, so that evidence is already excluded completely. IC: The way it looks to me is that people just vote for you becuase you made a small mistake. That's unfair and i won't be a part of it. Cowards all. This Malgus is troubling me more and more. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 9, 2013 14:39:53 GMT -5
Well I don't need to talk about Pindus' behavior because it would be redundant. Others including myself have already noted how Pindus quickly accepted Grievous' role claim and then quickly voted Wicket just because Grievous did and the stuff with the roleblockers so there's really no need to keep talking about it. And I know that the argument between Jace, the Dalek and myself is rather pointless but I feel like one of them or both of them is scum.. The argument doesn't prove anything though.. Maybe I'm just annoyed.. I don't assume you're a traitor from this. Other conflicts are bound to break out. I merely pointed something out. No that's fine, I was just clarifying I guess |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 9, 2013 14:40:43 GMT -5
Well I was hesitating to vote Pindus before and now I feel more like he's loyal... So..
|
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Dec 9, 2013 14:54:58 GMT -5
VOTE: MALGUS. He doesn't give reasons why Pinda can be Scum and it just feels like he wants him gone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 9, 2013 15:03:48 GMT -5
VOTE: MALGUS. He doesn't give reasons why Pinda can be Scum and it just feels like he wants him gone. After seeing what Pindus told me about his role, my suspicion has shifted. Malcom trusted poor evidence to vote against Pindus. In one scenario it could be that he felt sure everyone was going to vote Pindus and so he voted in haste. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 9, 2013 15:14:02 GMT -5
Well... this is odd. I didn't know you'd be so easily convinced by Pindus' defence.... Go along with whatever you were planning this will merely give us more information in Day 3.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 9, 2013 15:15:26 GMT -5
Just saw his message... hmmm... am I the only one who thought it was rather scripted... hmm...
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 9, 2013 15:15:39 GMT -5
Well... this is odd. I didn't know you'd be so easily convinced by Pindus' defence.... Go along with whatever you were planning this will merely give us more information in Day 3. Did you read the private message I sent to everyone? |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 9, 2013 15:16:47 GMT -5
Just saw his message... hmmm... am I the only one who thought it was rather scripted... hmm... What makes you think it was scripted? I can assure you I never spoke to Maverick in private before. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 9, 2013 15:20:34 GMT -5
Just saw his message... hmmm... am I the only one who thought it was rather scripted... hmm... What makes you think it was scripted? I can assure you I never spoke to Maverick in private before. I can actually believe your claim, since it could easily have something to influence mine. I'll be frank and say I don't know how, but I do think somehow. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 9, 2013 15:26:45 GMT -5
I can give more details on my role if I survive today. Because I haven't been given the full details yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 9, 2013 15:30:31 GMT -5
I can give more details on my role if I survive today. Because I haven't been given the full details yet. The problem you have is that the traitors might not want to see the details for all we know. |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5