|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 15:13:09 GMT -5
We wouldn't have had a discussion if he never said that Neither would he have been voted off. He wouldn't have been voted off of people didn't follow others on ridiculous evidence... He's a mod so he must be scum? Ha ha no... He tried to start discussion so he must be scum? LOL... |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Dec 8, 2013 15:14:47 GMT -5
Oh my.... what were you thinking....?
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 8, 2013 15:26:27 GMT -5
Neither would he have been voted off. He wouldn't have been voted off of people didn't follow others on ridiculous evidence... He's a mod so he must be scum? Ha ha no... He tried to start discussion so he must be scum? LOL... 1. It's only ridiculous in your opinion 2. There was a very good chance since it probably isn't Newan or Nam 3. He tried to start discussion with an accusation. As I've said before, an easy thing to bend to your will either way when it's the way he stated it. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 15:35:33 GMT -5
Dear protector,
Please contact Newan and tell him I don't have to be the assassin because you protected him.
Thank you,
Pindus Zwervus
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 15:37:47 GMT -5
He wouldn't have been voted off of people didn't follow others on ridiculous evidence... He's a mod so he must be scum? Ha ha no... He tried to start discussion so he must be scum? LOL... 1. It's only ridiculous in your opinion 2. There was a very good chance since it probably isn't Newan or Nam 3. He tried to start discussion with an accusation. As I've said before, an easy thing to bend to your will either way when it's the way he stated it. It's ridiculous in my opinion... You can't be serious.... The evidence against him couldn't have made less sense... Well no, it'a not going to be the inspector or the roleblocker but again, it's stupid to think that because someone's a mod, he's scum... So? You can beat a lot of things to your will |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 8, 2013 15:50:44 GMT -5
1. It's only ridiculous in your opinion 2. There was a very good chance since it probably isn't Newan or Nam 3. He tried to start discussion with an accusation. As I've said before, an easy thing to bend to your will either way when it's the way he stated it. It's ridiculous in my opinion... You can't be serious.... The evidence against him couldn't have made less sense... Well no, it'a not going to be the inspector or the roleblocker but again, it's stupid to think that because someone's a mod, he's scum... So? You can beat a lot of things to your will 1. You just managed to say the same thing. 2. Every game on this forum has had a mod being scum. It's foolish to think that's going to change now. 3. Exactly. Like a accusation that can either hold water or not depending on weather it's convenient. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 15:55:34 GMT -5
It's ridiculous in my opinion... You can't be serious.... The evidence against him couldn't have made less sense... Well no, it'a not going to be the inspector or the roleblocker but again, it's stupid to think that because someone's a mod, he's scum... So? You can beat a lot of things to your will 1. You just managed to say the same thing. 2. Every game on this forum has had a mod being scum. It's foolish to think that's going to change now. 3. Exactly. Like a accusation that can either hold water or not depending on weather it's convenient. 1. Well I guess I won't be able to change your mind on the first thing.....  2. Coincidence. 3. Opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 8, 2013 16:04:18 GMT -5
1. You just managed to say the same thing. 2. Every game on this forum has had a mod being scum. It's foolish to think that's going to change now. 3. Exactly. Like a accusation that can either hold water or not depending on weather it's convenient. 1. Well I guess I won't be able to change your mind on the first thing..... 2. Coincidence. 3. Opinion. 2. I think not. 3. No. If it wasn't believed by others, then the excuse "I was just trying to start people talking" could and would be used. If people looked like they were believing it, it would be perused with ease. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 8, 2013 16:06:05 GMT -5
Oh my.... what were you thinking....? OOC: Yeah, we really should have listened to you. Oh wait, you weren't even there. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 8, 2013 16:09:59 GMT -5
DALEKS DO NOT UNDERSTAND. WOULD YOU RATHER WANT DALEKS TO BE MORE EAGER TO VOTE OFF LOYALS IN THE FUTURE? DALEKS FIND IT ODD THAT JUST BECAUSE A TACTIC HAS BEEN USED IN THE PAST, IT SHOULD NEVER BE QUESTIONED IN THE FUTURE. Well I'm saying you kind of followed on the vote. Eagerness has nothing to do with it. And I'm not saying it shouldn't be questioned in the future, it's just that you used it to your benefit to have an excuse to vote off Wicket. I didn't say it wasn't used before. Just that it shouldn't be trusted now. But you weren't accepting it was used before. And what do you mean it shouldn't be trusted now? Just saying something to start discussion shouldn't be said now? So we shouldn't try starting discussions and RP for the whole day? I don't think I followed at all. I used evidence that no one else had used when voting. Also, I was in no way the last person to vote, or anywhere close to that. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 16:13:39 GMT -5
1. Well I guess I won't be able to change your mind on the first thing..... 2. Coincidence. 3. Opinion. 2. I think not. 3. No. If it wasn't believed by others, then the excuse "I was just trying to start people talking" could and would be used. If people looked like they were believing it, it would be perused with ease. It's not a coincidence? So you think hosts pick specific players to be scum? That wouldn't be fair. Most hosts randomly choose scum players and because there are five mods, there's a higher likelihood that at least one ends up scum. That's not much to go on though and I think we've also had a couple games with no mod scum teams Um yes it is an opinion. Pretty much only you and the dalek thought that Potato's tactic was stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 16:14:52 GMT -5
Well I'm saying you kind of followed on the vote. Eagerness has nothing to do with it. And I'm not saying it shouldn't be questioned in the future, it's just that you used it to your benefit to have an excuse to vote off Wicket. But you weren't accepting it was used before. And what do you mean it shouldn't be trusted now? Just saying something to start discussion shouldn't be said now? So we shouldn't try starting discussions and RP for the whole day? I don't think I followed at all. I used evidence that no one else had used when voting. Also, I was in no way the last person to vote, or anywhere close to that. Maybe it was Jace... I don't remember all too well but I felt like one of you followed.. And still your evidence was weak |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 8, 2013 16:16:34 GMT -5
I don't think I followed at all. I used evidence that no one else had used when voting. Also, I was in no way the last person to vote, or anywhere close to that. Maybe it was Jace... I don't remember all too well but I felt like one of you followed.. And still your evidence was weak Well it wasn't the best evidence, but it was still a lot better then some people's that voted for Wicket... |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 8, 2013 16:17:17 GMT -5
OOC: I've been forgetting to role play...   |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Dec 8, 2013 16:17:54 GMT -5
Oh my.... what were you thinking....? OOC: Yeah, we really should have listened to you. Oh wait, you weren't even there. The vote on Wicket was stupid, no one would need to tell you that, it's just common sense. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 8, 2013 16:20:13 GMT -5
OOC: Yeah, we really should have listened to you. Oh wait, you weren't even there. The vote on Wicket was stupid, no one would need to tell you that, it's just common sense. OOC: Should've been there to... Save Wicket from him evil fate then. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 8, 2013 16:20:27 GMT -5
Let's see.. if we're going to reuse the "mod is scum" thing, we've got three mods in the game and two are loyal.. That leaves Pindus.
Take note that this is part of a much larger piece of evidence.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 16:21:48 GMT -5
Maybe it was Jace... I don't remember all too well but I felt like one of you followed.. And still your evidence was weak Well it wasn't the best evidence, but it was still a lot better then some people's that voted for Wicket... I think "he's a mod so he's scum", "he started discussion so he's scum", and "he voted for me so he's scum" are all equally weak.. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 8, 2013 16:22:08 GMT -5
Let's see.. if we're going to reuse the "mod is scum" thing, we've got three mods in the game and two are loyal.. That leaves Pindus. Take note that this is part of a much larger piece of evidence. DALEKS SURMISE YOU HAVE CLAIMED THE ROLE OF ROLEBLOCKER? |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 16:22:20 GMT -5
The vote on Wicket was stupid, no one would need to tell you that, it's just common sense. OOC: Should've been there to... Save Wicket from him evil fate then. He can't change the minds of stubborn fools |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Dec 8, 2013 16:22:46 GMT -5
The vote on Wicket was stupid, no one would need to tell you that, it's just common sense. OOC: Should've been there to... Save Wicket from him evil fate then. I am Chief Gorkil! I don't save people, I sit around getting my slaves to do my dirty work. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 16:23:28 GMT -5
Let's see.. if we're going to reuse the "mod is scum" thing, we've got three mods in the game and two are loyal.. That leaves Pindus. Take note that this is part of a much larger piece of evidence. Uh no, don't even repeat the mod is scum. Just use the real evidence |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 8, 2013 16:25:20 GMT -5
Well it wasn't the best evidence, but it was still a lot better then some people's that voted for Wicket... I think "he's a mod so he's scum", "he started discussion so he's scum", and "he voted for me so he's scum" are all equally weak.. DALEKS WERE SUSPICIOUS BECAUSE WICKET APPEARED TO BE TRYING TO EXCUSE HIS EVIDENCE (which was pretty much "he's acting weird) ON GETTING DISCUSSION GOING. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 8, 2013 16:25:40 GMT -5
2. I think not. 3. No. If it wasn't believed by others, then the excuse "I was just trying to start people talking" could and would be used. If people looked like they were believing it, it would be perused with ease. It's not a coincidence? So you think hosts pick specific players to be scum? That wouldn't be fair. Most hosts randomly choose scum players and because there are five mods, there's a higher likelihood that at least one ends up scum. That's not much to go on though and I think we've also had a couple games with no mod scum teams Um yes it is an opinion. Pretty much only you and the dalek thought that Potato's tactic was stupid. I think that if one team had all the mods on it one would probably be switched up a little bit. And if no switching is every necessary then it's pretty safe to assume that there is a mod that is scum. Why are you so against going with what I consider a rather safe assumption based on the past, while you strive to win the argument about if what Wicket did was has been attempted/has worked? (Both things have to do past evidence....) |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Dec 8, 2013 16:25:50 GMT -5
We know that voting a mod for being a mod doesn't work, it's just as effective as a random vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 8, 2013 16:26:32 GMT -5
Dear protector, Please contact Newan and tell him I don't have to be the assassin because you protected him. Thank you, Pindus Zwervus Oh I been in contact with him for quite some time now.... He said he protected me and Nam. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 8, 2013 16:27:39 GMT -5
I think "he's a mod so he's scum", "he started discussion so he's scum", and "he voted for me so he's scum" are all equally weak.. DALEKS WERE SUSPICIOUS BECAUSE WICKET APPEARED TO BE TRYING TO EXCUSE HIS EVIDENCE (which was pretty much "he's acting weird) ON GETTING DISCUSSION GOING. THIS IS BETTER EVIDENCE THAN "He's scum because he's a mod." |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 16:28:40 GMT -5
Dear protector, Please contact Newan and tell him I don't have to be the assassin because you protected him. Thank you, Pindus Zwervus Oh I been in contact with him for quite some time now.... He said he protected me and Nam. So... doesn't that mean it's unlikely I'm the assassin? |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 16:29:34 GMT -5
I think "he's a mod so he's scum", "he started discussion so he's scum", and "he voted for me so he's scum" are all equally weak.. DALEKS WERE SUSPICIOUS BECAUSE WICKET APPEARED TO BE TRYING TO EXCUSE HIS EVIDENCE (which was pretty much "he's acting weird) ON GETTING DISCUSSION GOING. But it wasn't an excuse It's not a coincidence? So you think hosts pick specific players to be scum? That wouldn't be fair. Most hosts randomly choose scum players and because there are five mods, there's a higher likelihood that at least one ends up scum. That's not much to go on though and I think we've also had a couple games with no mod scum teams Um yes it is an opinion. Pretty much only you and the dalek thought that Potato's tactic was stupid. I think that if one team had all the mods on it one would probably be switched up a little bit. And if no switching is every necessary then it's pretty safe to assume that there is a mod that is scum. Why are you so against going with what I consider a rather safe assumption based on the past, while you strive to win the argument about if what Wicket did was has been attempted/has worked? (Both things have to do past evidence....) I'm against going with what you consider because it's ridiculous... |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 16:29:39 GMT -5
DALEKS WERE SUSPICIOUS BECAUSE WICKET APPEARED TO BE TRYING TO EXCUSE HIS EVIDENCE (which was pretty much "he's acting weird) ON GETTING DISCUSSION GOING. THIS IS BETTER EVIDENCE THAN "He's scum because he's a mod." Hello, Could you please turn off your Caps lock? Thank you, Pindus Zwervus |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5