|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 8, 2013 12:01:49 GMT -5
Perhaps we should look into Haradian as well? Wicket II was suspicious, somewhat. Haradian's reason for voting wicket was a little silly I think but idk if it's scummy.. At this point I'm suspicious of Pindus but there are others we can discuss with. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 8, 2013 12:04:18 GMT -5
Pindus will need a good defence... He has done nothing to stand out as anything but scummy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 12:05:05 GMT -5
Haradian's reason for voting wicket was a little silly I think but idk if it's scummy.. At this point I'm suspicious of Pindus but there are others we can discuss with. Yes Pindus is odd to me as well. He quickly accepts Grievous' role claim and quickly voted Wicket just because everyone else is. Also the stuff with the role blocking is interesting and brings further evidence against Pindus |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 8, 2013 12:12:07 GMT -5
Oh okay well sometimes scum don't vote for anyone so I thought it might be worth it to check.. Not calling you scum quite yet because loyals have not voted anyone before too My only voting options that had a chance to be voted off were Merry and Wicket. I wasn't sure about either of them, so I decided not to vote either of them. Others had not voted as well, but that may have more to do with their lack of activity. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 12:38:48 GMT -5
Pindus will need a good defence... He has done nothing to stand out as anything but scummy. What makes me look scummy then? |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 12:40:36 GMT -5
At this point I'm suspicious of Pindus but there are others we can discuss with. Yes Pindus is odd to me as well. He quickly accepts Grievous' role claim and quickly voted Wicket just because everyone else is. Also the stuff with the role blocking is interesting and brings further evidence against Pindus I missed 7 pages of discussion during the night and wasn't sure who to vote for, I thought either Newan or Potato would be scum. So when Newan claimed inspector I voted for Potato. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 12:42:51 GMT -5
There were no murders in the night.... that's funny, 'cause I roleblocked Pindus. Interesting, but I can assure you I'm no murderer, I know you probably won't believe me and I've no way to proof I'm speaking the truth. But it is also possible that the protector protected the right person tonight. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 12:57:09 GMT -5
Yes Pindus is odd to me as well. He quickly accepts Grievous' role claim and quickly voted Wicket just because everyone else is. Also the stuff with the role blocking is interesting and brings further evidence against Pindus I missed 7 pages of discussion during the night and wasn't sure who to vote for, I thought either Newan or Potato would be scum. So when Newan claimed inspector I voted for Potato. Well evidence suggests you could be the murderer... |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 8, 2013 13:16:29 GMT -5
Just as I thought someone tried to murder me.... But I have inspected Star and he came up LOYAL. The reason I inspected Star was because he never really believed my role claim and sided with Wicket right away perhaps he is scum that knew Wicket was loyal and planed to kill me? I do not fully believe in these results but ill trust them for now. Well, I am a loyal helper but that doesn't mean much.  But I believed your claim. I just thought your reasons for voting Wicket and sharing your role with Merry so early on to have been kinda suspicous. And why would I kill you if I was scum? The protector would almost undoubtedly protect you. And I believed Wicket was loyal right away because the evidence against him was stupid IMO and it could be used against several others too. Any other things about me you find suspicous? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 8, 2013 13:22:50 GMT -5
Pindus will need a good defence... He has done nothing to stand out as anything but scummy. What makes me look scummy then? - Hardly said anything - Votes with little reason just because a confirmed Loyal did - you where roleblocked and I don't have no confirmation that I was protected which still points to you at the moment. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 13:24:20 GMT -5
I missed 7 pages of discussion during the night and wasn't sure who to vote for, I thought either Newan or Potato would be scum. So when Newan claimed inspector I voted for Potato. Well evidence suggests you could be the murderer... Yes, it suggests I COULD be the murderer. But it could very well be somebody else. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 13:28:21 GMT -5
What makes me look scummy then? - Hardly said anything - Votes with little reason just because a confirmed Loyal did - you where roleblocked and I don't have no confirmation that I was protected which still points to you at the moment. - True, but I'm usually kinda quiet at the start of a game because there isn't usually much to discuss. - I didn't feel like reading through everything. But from the discussion you had with Potato I suspected one of you to be scum. At first I found you most suspicious, until you claimed the inspector role, I still believed one of you was scum so I voted for Potato. - I know I was roleblocked, but I've no role. I guess the scum had some bad luck, although now it turns out to help them as all suspicion is pushed towards me. And why does it matter if you were protected? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 8, 2013 13:35:42 GMT -5
- Hardly said anything - Votes with little reason just because a confirmed Loyal did - you where roleblocked and I don't have no confirmation that I was protected which still points to you at the moment. - True, but I'm usually kinda quiet at the start of a game because there isn't usually much to discuss. - I didn't feel like reading through everything. But from the discussion you had with Potato I suspected one of you to be scum. At first I found you most suspicious, until you claimed the inspector role, I still believed one of you was scum so I voted for Potato. - I know I was roleblocked, but I've no role. I guess the scum had some bad luck, although now it turns out to help them as all suspicion is pushed towards me. And why does it matter if you were protected? Because I was targeted but either the murderer was roleblocked or I was protected |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 8, 2013 13:37:08 GMT -5
Just as I thought someone tried to murder me.... But I have inspected Star and he came up LOYAL. The reason I inspected Star was because he never really believed my role claim and sided with Wicket right away perhaps he is scum that knew Wicket was loyal and planed to kill me? I do not fully believe in these results but ill trust them for now. Well, I am a loyal helper but that doesn't mean much. But I believed your claim. I just thought your reasons for voting Wicket and sharing your role with Merry so early on to have been kinda suspicous. And why would I kill you if I was scum? The protector would almost undoubtedly protect you. And I believed Wicket was loyal right away because the evidence against him was stupid IMO and it could be used against several others too. Any other things about me you find suspicous? You believed his claim? |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 13:40:30 GMT -5
- True, but I'm usually kinda quiet at the start of a game because there isn't usually much to discuss. - I didn't feel like reading through everything. But from the discussion you had with Potato I suspected one of you to be scum. At first I found you most suspicious, until you claimed the inspector role, I still believed one of you was scum so I voted for Potato. - I know I was roleblocked, but I've no role. I guess the scum had some bad luck, although now it turns out to help them as all suspicion is pushed towards me. And why does it matter if you were protected? Because I was targeted but either the murderer was roleblocked or I was protected Are you in contact with the protector? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2013 13:43:44 GMT -5
Well this is not that bad. We lost a loyal but no one died.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Dec 8, 2013 13:44:53 GMT -5
Voting will open tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 8, 2013 13:47:32 GMT -5
Because I was targeted but either the murderer was roleblocked or I was protected Are you in contact with the protector? Why does it matter? |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 13:54:18 GMT -5
Are you in contact with the protector? Why does it matter? Well, if you are you can ask the protector if he protected you. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 8, 2013 14:05:27 GMT -5
Well I'll just say I'm a little suspicious of the Dalek and Jace.. They basically followed on the vote for Wicket and were refusing to admit that Wicket's tactic was used before and they all of a sudden start calling it stupid... Also did Gnost vote for anyone yesterday..? I think he voted Wicket I might have to check again DALEKS DO NOT UNDERSTAND. WOULD YOU RATHER WANT DALEKS TO BE MORE EAGER TO VOTE OFF LOYALS IN THE FUTURE? DALEKS FIND IT ODD THAT JUST BECAUSE A TACTIC HAS BEEN USED IN THE PAST, IT SHOULD NEVER BE QUESTIONED IN THE FUTURE. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 8, 2013 14:06:35 GMT -5
Well I'll just say I'm a little suspicious of the Dalek and Jace.. They basically followed on the vote for Wicket and were refusing to admit that Wicket's tactic was used before and they all of a sudden start calling it stupid... Also did Gnost vote for anyone yesterday..? I think he voted Wicket I might have to check again I didn't say it wasn't used before. Just that it shouldn't be trusted now. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 8, 2013 14:07:10 GMT -5
Pindus might be a traitor who wants to know whether or not Grievous is in contact with the protector as a means of gaining an advantage of some kind.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 8, 2013 14:31:06 GMT -5
Pindus might be a traitor who wants to know whether or not Grievous is in contact with the protector as a means of gaining an advantage of some kind. Yes of course it gains me an advantage. The protector is the only person that can help me proof I'm not a murderer, assuming there are no other roleblockers and the scum did decide to kill someone... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 14:35:58 GMT -5
Well I'll just say I'm a little suspicious of the Dalek and Jace.. They basically followed on the vote for Wicket and were refusing to admit that Wicket's tactic was used before and they all of a sudden start calling it stupid... Also did Gnost vote for anyone yesterday..? I think he voted Wicket I might have to check again DALEKS DO NOT UNDERSTAND. WOULD YOU RATHER WANT DALEKS TO BE MORE EAGER TO VOTE OFF LOYALS IN THE FUTURE? DALEKS FIND IT ODD THAT JUST BECAUSE A TACTIC HAS BEEN USED IN THE PAST, IT SHOULD NEVER BE QUESTIONED IN THE FUTURE. Well I'm saying you kind of followed on the vote. Eagerness has nothing to do with it. And I'm not saying it shouldn't be questioned in the future, it's just that you used it to your benefit to have an excuse to vote off Wicket. Well I'll just say I'm a little suspicious of the Dalek and Jace.. They basically followed on the vote for Wicket and were refusing to admit that Wicket's tactic was used before and they all of a sudden start calling it stupid... Also did Gnost vote for anyone yesterday..? I think he voted Wicket I might have to check again I didn't say it wasn't used before. Just that it shouldn't be trusted now. But you weren't accepting it was used before. And what do you mean it shouldn't be trusted now? Just saying something to start discussion shouldn't be said now? So we shouldn't try starting discussions and RP for the whole day? |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 14:39:38 GMT -5
I feel like the protector would have contacted Grievous but since he didn't, I think it's more likely little kid's roleblock worked..
But then again, maybe the protector had no reason to contact grievous or didn't trust him or is inactive or whatever..
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 8, 2013 14:41:49 GMT -5
I feel like the protector would have contacted Grievous but since he didn't, I think it's more likely little kid's roleblock worked.. But then again, maybe the protector had no reason to contact grievous or didn't trust him or is inactive or whatever.. If my roleblock DID work, that means Pindus is scum. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 14:44:50 GMT -5
I feel like the protector would have contacted Grievous but since he didn't, I think it's more likely little kid's roleblock worked.. But then again, maybe the protector had no reason to contact grievous or didn't trust him or is inactive or whatever.. If my roleblock DID work, that means Pindus is scum. Yah |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 8, 2013 14:51:29 GMT -5
DALEKS DO NOT UNDERSTAND. WOULD YOU RATHER WANT DALEKS TO BE MORE EAGER TO VOTE OFF LOYALS IN THE FUTURE? DALEKS FIND IT ODD THAT JUST BECAUSE A TACTIC HAS BEEN USED IN THE PAST, IT SHOULD NEVER BE QUESTIONED IN THE FUTURE. Well I'm saying you kind of followed on the vote. Eagerness has nothing to do with it. And I'm not saying it shouldn't be questioned in the future, it's just that you used it to your benefit to have an excuse to vote off Wicket. I didn't say it wasn't used before. Just that it shouldn't be trusted now. But you weren't accepting it was used before. And what do you mean it shouldn't be trusted now? Just saying something to start discussion shouldn't be said now? So we shouldn't try starting discussions and RP for the whole day? I think it's better to have the discussion be meaningful. Not based off accusations that aren't meant. It seems to me to be something that a scum would either do to appear to be trying to help, or to actually target a loyal. Then again I'm not at all sure (Jodo) is loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 8, 2013 14:58:02 GMT -5
Well I'm saying you kind of followed on the vote. Eagerness has nothing to do with it. And I'm not saying it shouldn't be questioned in the future, it's just that you used it to your benefit to have an excuse to vote off Wicket. But you weren't accepting it was used before. And what do you mean it shouldn't be trusted now? Just saying something to start discussion shouldn't be said now? So we shouldn't try starting discussions and RP for the whole day? I think it's better to have the discussion be meaningful. Not based off accusations that aren't meant. It seems to me to be something that a scum would either do to appear to be trying to help, or to actually target a loyal. Then again I'm not at all sure (Jodo) is loyal. We wouldn't have had a discussion if he never said that |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 8, 2013 15:10:35 GMT -5
I think it's better to have the discussion be meaningful. Not based off accusations that aren't meant. It seems to me to be something that a scum would either do to appear to be trying to help, or to actually target a loyal. Then again I'm not at all sure (Jodo) is loyal. We wouldn't have had a discussion if he never said that Neither would he have been voted off. |
|
But I believed your claim. I just thought your reasons for voting Wicket and sharing your role with Merry so early on to have been kinda suspicous. And why would I kill you if I was scum? The protector would almost undoubtedly protect you. And I believed Wicket was loyal right away because the evidence against him was stupid IMO and it could be used against several others too. Any other things about me you find suspicous?
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5