|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 6, 2013 21:04:41 GMT -5
So... Wicket 2? OOC: Sorry I'm a bit lost.  Yeah. Why? And I'd really prefer it if it isn't some "Oh well I was sparking discussion!" thing because that isn't anything helpful unless the object is to get users to possibly appear. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 21:04:57 GMT -5
Do you wanna know who I'm suspicious of? It's that little furry thing that killed Théoden, Wicket. Yet you were backing him up I think that was mostly too see Haradians response. I was looking forward to it myself. In fact Wicket contacted us before he made it. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 6, 2013 21:06:05 GMT -5
Why? And I'd really prefer it if it isn't some "Oh well I was sparking discussion!" thing because that isn't anything helpful unless the object is to get users to possibly appear. Story purposes, roles, him getting a little angry.. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 6, 2013 21:06:52 GMT -5
Yet you were backing him up Minds can change. Evidence came up. What evidence Yet you were backing him up I think that was mostly too see Haradians response. I was looking forward to it myself. In fact Wicket contacted us before he made it. Mm.. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 6, 2013 21:13:12 GMT -5
Map man, what is your opinion right now?
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 6, 2013 21:13:34 GMT -5
Why? And I'd really prefer it if it isn't some "Oh well I was sparking discussion!" thing because that isn't anything helpful unless the object is to get users to possibly appear. Story purposes, roles, him getting a little angry.. 1. Story purposes? Wtf? 2. Roles? Wtf? 3. Getting angry? Could see it. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 6, 2013 21:13:55 GMT -5
Story purposes, roles, him getting a little angry.. 1. Story purposes? Wtf? 2. Roles? Wtf? 3. Getting angry? Could see it. It's been happening in PMs. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2013 21:15:37 GMT -5
Yet you were backing him up I think that was mostly too see Haradians response. I was looking forward to it myself. In fact Wicket contacted us before he made it. I till don't know why you all are band wagoning on me just because of my role-play. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 21:18:19 GMT -5
Minds can change. Evidence came up. What evidence I think that was mostly too see Haradians response. I was looking forward to it myself. In fact Wicket contacted us before he made it. Mm.. Well perhaps I should start by saying that I am the LOYAL LEADER (aka the Inspector this game) I have this rank for my Loyal ness to Revan in the past. Naturally I went to Wicket since he is also a old friend of Revan even if he is a clone... Clones still have the same DNA. But I asked if he also had a loyal night action he declined. I was surprised somewhat but I believe this clone of Wicket could be meant to serve the enemy. I went to our short little friend who was also in Wickets PM earlier and he told me things that suggest he's loyal as well. OCC: Now normally I wouldn't accuse a mod just cause a mod could be scum but in a game of 12 people with 1/3 of the players being a mod and that leaves a 33% chance of a mod being scum which is quite high and not unrealistic at all.'IC: I have reason to believe the Hobbit is loyal for now but Wicket I am not so sure about. OOC: Of course this does not rule out Pinda but by using logic it suggests at least one mod has a HIGH chance of being scum and thst leaves 2 left.. I know this can be considered a cheap way of thinking but should we always let the scum kill us day 1 and do nothing? Why let them have it easy on us? IC: my evidence is based more on the past than anything though? Why does Revan not trust Wicket now? Hmm? Plus his accusation against Haradian can be considered odd even if it was trying to get discussion going. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 6, 2013 21:18:31 GMT -5
1. Story purposes? Wtf? 2. Roles? Wtf? 3. Getting angry? Could see it. It's been happening in PMs. You talk in PMs... act angry/bored when not many are commenting on the game thread... when you haven't shared anything that you've said in those PM(s) until maybe now. Not helpful. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 21:20:36 GMT -5
It's been happening in PMs. You talk in PMs... act angry/bored when not many are commenting on the game thread... when you haven't shared anything that you've said in those PM(s) until maybe now. Not helpful. I just did... And it's better than what Wicket has... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 6, 2013 21:22:16 GMT -5
Well perhaps I should start by saying that I am the LOYAL LEADER (aka the Inspector this game) I have this rank for my Loyal ness to Revan in the past. Naturally I went to Wicket since he is also a old friend of Revan even if he is a clone... Clones still have the same DNA. But I asked if he also had a loyal night action he declined. I was surprised somewhat but I believe this clone of Wicket could be meant to serve the enemy. I went to our short little friend who was also in Wickets PM earlier and he told me things that suggest he's loyal as well. OCC: Now normally I wouldn't accuse a mod just cause a mod could be scum but in a game of 12 people with 1/3 of the players being a mod and that leaves a 33% chance of a mod being scum which is quite high and not unrealistic at all.'IC: I have reason to believe the Hobbit is loyal for now but Wicket I am not so sure about. OOC: Of course this does not rule out Pinda but by using logic it suggests at least one mod has a HIGH chance of being scum and thst leaves 2 left.. I know this can be considered a cheap way of thinking but should we always let the scum kill us day 1 and do nothing? Why let them have it easy on us? IC: my evidence is based more on the past than anything though? Why does Revan not trust Wicket now? Hmm? Plus his accusation against Haradian can be considered odd even if it was trying to get discussion going. Well that's interesting. So Wicket 2, Meriadoc, or Pindus is probably sucm. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2013 21:22:48 GMT -5
Well perhaps I should start by saying that I am the LOYAL LEADER (aka the Inspector this game) I have this rank for my Loyal ness to Revan in the past. Naturally I went to Wicket since he is also a old friend of Revan even if he is a clone... Clones still have the same DNA. But I asked if he also had a loyal night action he declined. I was surprised somewhat but I believe this clone of Wicket could be meant to serve the enemy. I went to our short little friend who was also in Wickets PM earlier and he told me things that suggest he's loyal as well. OCC: Now normally I wouldn't accuse a mod just cause a mod could be scum but in a game of 12 people with 1/3 of the players being a mod and that leaves a 33% chance of a mod being scum which is quite high and not unrealistic at all.'IC: I have reason to believe the Hobbit is loyal for now but Wicket I am not so sure about. OOC: Of course this does not rule out Pinda but by using logic it suggests at least one mod has a HIGH chance of being scum and thst leaves 2 left.. I know this can be considered a cheap way of thinking but should we always let the scum kill us day 1 and do nothing? Why let them have it easy on us? IC: my evidence is based more on the past than anything though? Why does Revan not trust Wicket now? Hmm? Plus his accusation against Haradian can be considered odd even if it was trying to get discussion going. OOC: Oh finally someone agrees on the mod scum thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 6, 2013 21:22:54 GMT -5
You talk in PMs... act angry/bored when not many are commenting on the game thread... when you haven't shared anything that you've said in those PM(s) until maybe now. Not helpful. I just did... And it's better than what Wicket has... I was talking to the hobbit. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 21:25:21 GMT -5
Well perhaps I should start by saying that I am the LOYAL LEADER (aka the Inspector this game) I have this rank for my Loyal ness to Revan in the past. Naturally I went to Wicket since he is also a old friend of Revan even if he is a clone... Clones still have the same DNA. But I asked if he also had a loyal night action he declined. I was surprised somewhat but I believe this clone of Wicket could be meant to serve the enemy. I went to our short little friend who was also in Wickets PM earlier and he told me things that suggest he's loyal as well. OCC: Now normally I wouldn't accuse a mod just cause a mod could be scum but in a game of 12 people with 1/3 of the players being a mod and that leaves a 33% chance of a mod being scum which is quite high and not unrealistic at all.'IC: I have reason to believe the Hobbit is loyal for now but Wicket I am not so sure about. OOC: Of course this does not rule out Pinda but by using logic it suggests at least one mod has a HIGH chance of being scum and thst leaves 2 left.. I know this can be considered a cheap way of thinking but should we always let the scum kill us day 1 and do nothing? Why let them have it easy on us? IC: my evidence is based more on the past than anything though? Why does Revan not trust Wicket now? Hmm? Plus his accusation against Haradian can be considered odd even if it was trying to get discussion going. OOC: Oh finally someone agrees on the mod scum thing. OOC: no I don't really I believe in my own theory in a game of 16-18 people it's actually possible for no mods to be scum... |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 6, 2013 21:26:28 GMT -5
It's been happening in PMs. You talk in PMs... act angry/bored when not many are commenting on the game thread... when you haven't shared anything that you've said in those PM(s) until maybe now. Not helpful. *raises pint of beer with a smile* |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 6, 2013 21:27:27 GMT -5
Wicket also seems to accuse Jodo always. Anywho, I know Grievous' evidence is very OOC but it's our best shot, ya? VOTE: WICKET (POTATO)
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 6, 2013 21:27:36 GMT -5
Well perhaps I should start by saying that I am the LOYAL LEADER (aka the Inspector this game) I have this rank for my Loyal ness to Revan in the past. Naturally I went to Wicket since he is also a old friend of Revan even if he is a clone... Clones still have the same DNA. But I asked if he also had a loyal night action he declined. I was surprised somewhat but I believe this clone of Wicket could be meant to serve the enemy. I went to our short little friend who was also in Wickets PM earlier and he told me things that suggest he's loyal as well. OCC: Now normally I wouldn't accuse a mod just cause a mod could be scum but in a game of 12 people with 1/3 of the players being a mod and that leaves a 33% chance of a mod being scum which is quite high and not unrealistic at all.'IC: I have reason to believe the Hobbit is loyal for now but Wicket I am not so sure about. OOC: Of course this does not rule out Pinda but by using logic it suggests at least one mod has a HIGH chance of being scum and thst leaves 2 left.. I know this can be considered a cheap way of thinking but should we always let the scum kill us day 1 and do nothing? Why let them have it easy on us? IC: my evidence is based more on the past than anything though? Why does Revan not trust Wicket now? Hmm? Plus his accusation against Haradian can be considered odd even if it was trying to get discussion going. YOU MAKE THE ASSUMPTION THAT THERE ARE THREE TRAITORS. WE DO NOT KNOW THIS. YOUR THEORY COULD STILL BE SOLID, BUT WE CANNOT SAY THIS WITH CERTAINTY. DALEKS DO NOT LIKE BEING UNCERTAIN. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 6, 2013 21:28:20 GMT -5
You talk in PMs... act angry/bored when not many are commenting on the game thread... when you haven't shared anything that you've said in those PM(s) until maybe now. Not helpful. *raises pint of beer with a smile* ...great. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2013 21:29:29 GMT -5
OOC: Oh finally someone agrees on the mod scum thing. OOC: no I don't really I believe in my own theory in a game of 16-18 people it's actually possible for no mods to be scum... OOC: We haven't had a big game like that lately. Just because you have this theory doesn't mea I rule you out as scum. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 21:29:38 GMT -5
Well perhaps I should start by saying that I am the LOYAL LEADER (aka the Inspector this game) I have this rank for my Loyal ness to Revan in the past. Naturally I went to Wicket since he is also a old friend of Revan even if he is a clone... Clones still have the same DNA. But I asked if he also had a loyal night action he declined. I was surprised somewhat but I believe this clone of Wicket could be meant to serve the enemy. I went to our short little friend who was also in Wickets PM earlier and he told me things that suggest he's loyal as well. OCC: Now normally I wouldn't accuse a mod just cause a mod could be scum but in a game of 12 people with 1/3 of the players being a mod and that leaves a 33% chance of a mod being scum which is quite high and not unrealistic at all.'IC: I have reason to believe the Hobbit is loyal for now but Wicket I am not so sure about. OOC: Of course this does not rule out Pinda but by using logic it suggests at least one mod has a HIGH chance of being scum and thst leaves 2 left.. I know this can be considered a cheap way of thinking but should we always let the scum kill us day 1 and do nothing? Why let them have it easy on us? IC: my evidence is based more on the past than anything though? Why does Revan not trust Wicket now? Hmm? Plus his accusation against Haradian can be considered odd even if it was trying to get discussion going. YOU MAKE THE ASSUMPTION THAT THERE ARE THREE TRAITORS. WE DO NOT KNOW THIS. YOUR THEORY COULD STILL BE SOLID, BUT WE CANNOT SAY THIS WITH CERTAINTY. DALEKS DO NOT LIKE BEING UNCERTAIN. No I say it with confidence that their is 3 traitors and perhaps a 3rd party. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 21:30:14 GMT -5
OOC: no I don't really I believe in my own theory in a game of 16-18 people it's actually possible for no mods to be scum... OOC: We haven't had a big game like that lately. Just because you have this theory doesn't mea I rule you out as scum. Umm are you talking about this game or in general? I am the inspector |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 6, 2013 21:33:20 GMT -5
OOC: no I don't really I believe in my own theory in a game of 16-18 people it's actually possible for no mods to be scum... OOC: We haven't had a big game like that lately. Just because you have this theory doesn't mea I rule you out as scum. Sometimes trying to look individual should be done with actual fact. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2013 21:33:43 GMT -5
OOC: We haven't had a big game like that lately. Just because you have this theory doesn't mea I rule you out as scum. Umm are you talking about this game or in general? I am the inspector I don't believe you yet. The thing that I don't like about your role claim is that you claim the loyal leader instead of inspector, so if you were scum, than claiming this would not cause an argument over who is real inspector. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 21:34:42 GMT -5
And the little ones vote may have been in haste but he said he wouldn't be here much tomorrow and I have good reason to believe he's loyal. Voting him is foolish.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 6, 2013 21:34:44 GMT -5
Umm are you talking about this game or in general? I am the inspector I don't believe you yet. The thing that I don't like about your role claim is that you claim the loyal leader instead of inspector, so if you were scum, than claiming this would not cause an argument over who is real inspector. .........."Loyal Leader" is the name of the inspector's role in this game...... *Checks longbottom leaf barrel in case you've been smoking* |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 6, 2013 21:35:38 GMT -5
YOU MAKE THE ASSUMPTION THAT THERE ARE THREE TRAITORS. WE DO NOT KNOW THIS. YOUR THEORY COULD STILL BE SOLID, BUT WE CANNOT SAY THIS WITH CERTAINTY. DALEKS DO NOT LIKE BEING UNCERTAIN. No I say it with confidence that their is 3 traitors and perhaps a 3rd party. YES, YOU MAKE THE ASSUMPTION IN YOUR THEORY. THIS ASSUMPTION WOULD HAVE TO BE CORRECT IN ORDER FOR YOUR THEORY TO HOLD ITS INTEGRITY. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 21:36:32 GMT -5
Umm are you talking about this game or in general? I am the inspector I don't believe you yet. The thing that I don't like about your role claim is that you claim the loyal leader instead of inspector, so if you were scum, than claiming this would not cause an argument over who is real inspector. Yeah okay because the Inspector leads the loyals anyways so... And I told it to The hobbit and wicket in separate PMs so believe what you want I'm not making it up. If anything it would make sense for me to have the most loyal role cause I have been here the longest and always been loyal to our leader Revan. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 21:38:58 GMT -5
VOTE: WICKET II (POTATO) reasons I posted earlier they may not be the best but I have confidence in them. And I see no better option. At least I'm getting the game started already...
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 6, 2013 21:40:36 GMT -5
I don't believe you yet. The thing that I don't like about your role claim is that you claim the loyal leader instead of inspector, so if you were scum, than claiming this would not cause an argument over who is real inspector. Yeah okay because the Inspector leads the loyals anyways so... And I told it to The hobbit and wicket in separate PMs so believe what you want I'm not making it up. If anything it would make sense for me to have the most loyal role cause I have been here the longest and always been loyal to our leader Revan. DALEKS DO NOT KNOW IF YOU LIE. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE. THE INSPECTOR WILL BE RECOGNIZED TOMORROW. IF THEIR CLAIMS ARE NOT DISPUTED, DALEKS MUST ASSUME YOU ARE THE INSPECTOR. UNTIL THEN, THEY WILL REMAIN NEUTRAL IN THIS. |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5