|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 7, 2013 10:24:30 GMT -5
So can anyone list the proof against Potato and Nam?
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 7, 2013 10:35:13 GMT -5
So can anyone list the proof against Potato and Nam? From what I can gather, Wicket (Potato) expressed a bad feeling about Haradian's behaviour (Jodo). At first Merry (Nam) slightly agreed, but when others disagreed with this feeling, they began to suspect Wicket. Grievous then privately discussed with Merry, apparently revealing his role to him and later to all of us as well. He then expressed his suspicion on Wicket and Merry very quickly agreed (according to him there was more evidence against Wicket in the private discussion). This has led others like me to suspect Merry following. It could be that he's wanting to cling to those who are likely to have an influence when voting. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Dec 7, 2013 11:16:49 GMT -5
This seems right:
Wicket II - 5 votes
Merry - 2 votes
Jace Malcolm - 1 vote
There's still like five people who haven't voted, so anything could happen!
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 7, 2013 11:27:03 GMT -5
That's unwise, trusting so early on. And it's unknown to all until you state it here, so it can make you seem more suspicous. What I'd be interested to know of, is if Grievous told Merry his role claim as soon as they privately spoke to each other. Why wouldn't I inspector can reveal his role actually anyone can reveal their role this game but Roleblockers are out there... |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 7, 2013 11:28:52 GMT -5
I suppose I shall voice my complete thoughts. I am coming to believe Grievous and his claim and I see Wicket's evidence against Haradian wasn't of a strong mould, but Merry seemed to me as though he switched sides due to the circumstances changing. He was coming to agree with Wicket about his suspicion, but then when Grievous told us his theory, he suddenly became absolutely assured Wicket was a traitor. For now I don't want to vote either of them, because both hand out evidence that holds water (this is excluding Wicket's evidence against Haradian). I won't vote till later, but if I may be blunt, I don't think I'll vote at all. Think of it what you will. OOC: Newan, am I really that predictable as scum?  You didn't read it did you... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 7, 2013 11:29:01 GMT -5
I don't see how merry and grievous can be so completely sure of things... They know Wicket is scum. They know there are role blockers. How?
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 7, 2013 11:33:49 GMT -5
I don't see how merry and grievous can be so completely sure of things... They know Wicket is scum. They know there are role blockers. How? Well Merry can tell you if he wants..... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 7, 2013 11:47:47 GMT -5
I don't see how merry and grievous can be so completely sure of things... They know Wicket is scum. They know there are role blockers. How? Well Merry can tell you if he wants..... Well you're awfully sure about the role blockers as well.... |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 7, 2013 11:48:33 GMT -5
So can anyone list the proof against Potato and Nam? From what I can gather, Wicket (Potato) expressed a bad feeling about Haradian's behaviour (Jodo). At first Merry (Nam) slightly agreed, but when others disagreed with this feeling, they began to suspect Wicket. Grievous then privately discussed with Merry, apparently revealing his role to him and later to all of us as well. He then expressed his suspicion on Wicket and Merry very quickly agreed (according to him there was more evidence against Wicket in the private discussion). This has led others like me to suspect Merry following. It could be that he's wanting to cling to those who are likely to have an influence when voting. DALEKS VOTED FOR WICKET DUE TO THE PREMATURE ACCUSATION OF DSAK WITHOUT SUFFICIENT PROOF. OOC: IMO I think he tried to cover it up with the old "since nothing's happening I'll just say something stupid to get discussion going." |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 7, 2013 11:50:47 GMT -5
Well Merry can tell you if he wants..... Well you're awfully sure about the role blockers as well.... DALEKS GATHER THAT THE HOBBIT MUST HAVE SOME SORT OF ROLE DEVISED TO LEARN MORE OF THE TRAITORS. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 7, 2013 11:51:13 GMT -5
Well Merry can tell you if he wants..... Well you're awfully sure about the role blockers as well.... 3. You may reveal roles if you want as long as it is not copied and pasted, but just saying its not in your best interest. And I have further proof that this is Roleblockers in PMs... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 7, 2013 12:03:13 GMT -5
From what I can gather, Wicket (Potato) expressed a bad feeling about Haradian's behaviour (Jodo). At first Merry (Nam) slightly agreed, but when others disagreed with this feeling, they began to suspect Wicket. Grievous then privately discussed with Merry, apparently revealing his role to him and later to all of us as well. He then expressed his suspicion on Wicket and Merry very quickly agreed (according to him there was more evidence against Wicket in the private discussion). This has led others like me to suspect Merry following. It could be that he's wanting to cling to those who are likely to have an influence when voting. DALEKS VOTED FOR WICKET DUE TO THE PREMATURE ACCUSATION OF DSAK WITHOUT SUFFICIENT PROOF. OOC: IMO I think he tried to cover it up with the old "since nothing's happening I'll just say something stupid to get discussion going." Or we could have just RPd for the rest of the day... Besides, people say stuff like that to start discussion in a lot of games. Why call it stupid now Well you're awfully sure about the role blockers as well.... 3. You may reveal roles if you want as long as it is not copied and pasted, but just saying its not in your best interest. And I have further proof that this is Roleblockers in PMs... Are you implying someone claimed the role blocker role in these PMs.. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 7, 2013 12:19:49 GMT -5
DALEKS VOTED FOR WICKET DUE TO THE PREMATURE ACCUSATION OF DSAK WITHOUT SUFFICIENT PROOF. OOC: IMO I think he tried to cover it up with the old "since nothing's happening I'll just say something stupid to get discussion going." Or we could have just RPd for the rest of the day... Besides, people say stuff like that to start discussion in a lot of games. Why call it stupid now 3. You may reveal roles if you want as long as it is not copied and pasted, but just saying its not in your best interest. And I have further proof that this is Roleblockers in PMs... Are you implying someone claimed the role blocker role in these PMs.. DALEKS HAVE BEEN CALLING IT "STUPID FOR A LONG TIME NOW. DALEKS DO NOT THINK THIS STRATEGY IS WEAK, ONLY THAT WICKET MIGHT HAVE BEEN TRYING TO USE IT AS AN EXCUSE. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 7, 2013 12:33:11 GMT -5
I suppose I shall voice my complete thoughts. I am coming to believe Grievous and his claim and I see Wicket's evidence against Haradian wasn't of a strong mould, but Merry seemed to me as though he switched sides due to the circumstances changing. He was coming to agree with Wicket about his suspicion, but then when Grievous told us his theory, he suddenly became absolutely assured Wicket was a traitor. For now I don't want to vote either of them, because both hand out evidence that holds water (this is excluding Wicket's evidence against Haradian). I won't vote till later, but if I may be blunt, I don't think I'll vote at all. Think of it what you will. OOC: Newan, am I really that predictable as scum? You didn't read it did you... If there is something I overlooked, then please say. On another note, you and Merry have constantly said there is more proof in the private discussions, but you do not reveal any of it. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 7, 2013 12:35:10 GMT -5
What I'd be interested to know of, is if Grievous told Merry his role claim as soon as they privately spoke to each other. Why wouldn't I inspector can reveal his role actually anyone can reveal their role this game but Roleblockers are out there... If Merry is a traitor, then you gave them important information regarding roles and have become a target of manipulation. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 7, 2013 12:59:53 GMT -5
I'd be too. And even if he didn't, why would they trust so early on? My thoughts exactly. I can believe the claim Grievous made, but Merry seems to be clinging to the suspicions of influential people. Merry does seem to be doing this. His opinion swayed swiftly: |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 7, 2013 13:02:44 GMT -5
If Grievous revealed his role immediately to Merry, than why did he trust him. And it's pretty obvious that Grevious is hinting at Merry being a Roleblocker...
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 7, 2013 13:19:37 GMT -5
If Grievous revealed his role immediately to Merry, than why did he trust him. And it's pretty obvious that Grevious is hinting at Merry being a Roleblocker... Grievous revealed his role? I must have missed that.... what role did he claim? |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 7, 2013 13:20:58 GMT -5
If Grievous revealed his role immediately to Merry, than why did he trust him. And it's pretty obvious that Grevious is hinting at Merry being a Roleblocker... Grievous revealed his role? I must have missed that.... what role did he claim? OOC: Loyal leader/inspector. I guess they're the same. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 7, 2013 13:22:17 GMT -5
You didn't read it did you... If there is something I overlooked, then please say. On another note, you and Merry have constantly said there is more proof in the private discussions, but you do not reveal any of it. DALEKS AGREE. IF YOU HAVE MORE INFORMATION, SHARE IT. OTHERWISE IT IS VOID. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 7, 2013 13:26:09 GMT -5
Grievous revealed his role? I must have missed that.... what role did he claim? OOC: Loyal leader/inspector. I guess they're the same. Interesting. I guess I'm going to trust him on this vote then. VOTE: WICKET (POTATO) |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 7, 2013 13:37:22 GMT -5
Or we could have just RPd for the rest of the day... Besides, people say stuff like that to start discussion in a lot of games. Why call it stupid now Are you implying someone claimed the role blocker role in these PMs.. DALEKS HAVE BEEN CALLING IT "STUPID FOR A LONG TIME NOW. DALEKS DO NOT THINK THIS STRATEGY IS WEAK, ONLY THAT WICKET MIGHT HAVE BEEN TRYING TO USE IT AS AN EXCUSE. Other people have done it before and it wasn't regarded as an excuse |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 7, 2013 13:44:14 GMT -5
DALEKS HAVE BEEN CALLING IT "STUPID FOR A LONG TIME NOW. DALEKS DO NOT THINK THIS STRATEGY IS WEAK, ONLY THAT WICKET MIGHT HAVE BEEN TRYING TO USE IT AS AN EXCUSE. Other people have done it before and it wasn't regarded as an excuse THAT IS BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T USING IT TO ACCUSE SOMEONE. OOC: I don't think they were. I don't like it coming from anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 7, 2013 13:48:24 GMT -5
If Grievous revealed his role immediately to Merry, than why did he trust him. And it's pretty obvious that Grevious is hinting at Merry being a Roleblocker... I'm taking his hints with a touch of doubt. Merry could be lying if he said this to Grievous and I have evidence to suggest he might actually be doing so OOC: But it's OOC evidence and I don't want to further myself in the game through that. Call me old fashioned, but I prefer to win by the book. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 7, 2013 13:49:09 GMT -5
Other people have done it before and it wasn't regarded as an excuse THAT IS BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T USING IT TO ACCUSE SOMEONE. OOC: I don't think they were. I don't like it coming from anyone. Yes they were |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 7, 2013 13:51:18 GMT -5
THAT IS BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T USING IT TO ACCUSE SOMEONE. OOC: I don't think they were. I don't like it coming from anyone. Yes they were OOC: When? Do you remember a page or a post? I don't remember that. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 7, 2013 13:53:52 GMT -5
OOC: When? Do you remember a page or a post? I don't remember that. Do you want me to look through all the pages and posts from all the games because I'm not doing that.... |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 7, 2013 13:55:50 GMT -5
OOC: When? Do you remember a page or a post? I don't remember that. Do you want me to look through all the pages and posts from all the games because I'm not doing that.... OOC: I usually have a good memory, but it's failed this time to remember anything like that in the past  |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Dec 7, 2013 13:56:14 GMT -5
OOC: When? Do you remember a page or a post? I don't remember that. Do you want me to look through all the pages and posts from all the games because I'm not doing that.... Calm yourself... I was just asking if you remembered something. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 7, 2013 13:59:13 GMT -5
OOC: When? Do you remember a page or a post? I don't remember that. Do you want me to look through all the pages and posts from all the games because I'm not doing that.... Well I mean when you post something like "Oh others have done it to!" and then decide it isn't a good time to back it up with anything concrete then it's a little weird... |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5