|
|
Post by Star on Dec 6, 2013 22:51:48 GMT -5
Malgus seems suspicous to me. He voted Wicket with weaker reasons than Merry's and Grievous. All he said is that he (Wicket) accused Hardian of... He didn't even know! And then he said that the probability thing made sense. That isn't evidence! That's just simple arithmetic! I find Grievous, Merry, and Malgus most suspicous (least to greatest). Grievous for his out of the blue claim and strange evidence (it's just OOC math skills), Merry for being so sure. You should never be so sure on Day 1. And there's other things like saying how all the stuff Grievous said makes perfect sense. It's not evidence. That's math! You know, why don't we just vote people out based on probability. And if you wanna go there, Wicket has been scum the past two games so chances are he is almost most certainly not scum this time (son!). And Malgus, he was... Idk... But with his sudden decision to vote Wicket and lack of reasons, even when he was around so long to talk is unusual. I would've expected more. So with that:
VOTE: MALGUS
OOC: Sorry, I don't know who he is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 6, 2013 22:53:06 GMT -5
Guys Wicket for sure will come up unknown unless his allies being "Maverick and Kenobi" save him oh and their wonder boy. Star that's apparently 3rd party and will join the scum team... All according to Wicket... But I am certain each has a Roleblocker so his team must be flawed... I am sure it was some last ditch effort to save himself and make me believe he's loyal or he really is loyal. One of the two I want to see what to see his allegiance... Are you accusing me of being scum or third party...? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 22:53:41 GMT -5
Malgus seems suspicous to me. He voted Wicket with weaker reasons than Merry's and Grievous. All he said is that he (Wicket) accused Hardian of... He didn't even know! And then he said that the probability thing made sense. That isn't evidence! That's just simple arithmetic! I find Grievous, Merry, and Malgus most suspicous (least to greatest). Grievous for his out of the blue claim and strange evidence (it's just OOC math skills), Merry for being so sure. You should never be so sure on Day 1. And there's other things like saying how all the stuff Grievous said makes perfect sense. It's not evidence. That's math! You know, why don't we just vote people out based on probability. And if you wanna go there, Wicket has been scum the past two games so chances are he is almost most certainly not scum this time (son!). And Malgus, he was... Idk... But with his sudden decision to vote Wicket and lack of reasons, even when he was around so long to talk is unusual. I would've expected more. So with that: VOTE: MALGUS OOC: Sorry, I don't know who he is. Okay well I am the Loyal leader  |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 6, 2013 22:53:52 GMT -5
What's happening right now because a lot of people are saying random stuff and I'm not sure how much of it is sarcasm and I feel like a fool.... again..........
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Dec 6, 2013 22:54:15 GMT -5
Malgus seems suspicous to me. He voted Wicket with weaker reasons than Merry's and Grievous. All he said is that he (Wicket) accused Hardian of... He didn't even know! And then he said that the probability thing made sense. That isn't evidence! That's just simple arithmetic! I find Grievous, Merry, and Malgus most suspicous (least to greatest). Grievous for his out of the blue claim and strange evidence (it's just OOC math skills), Merry for being so sure. You should never be so sure on Day 1. And there's other things like saying how all the stuff Grievous said makes perfect sense. It's not evidence. That's math! You know, why don't we just vote people out based on probability. And if you wanna go there, Wicket has been scum the past two games so chances are he is almost most certainly not scum this time (son!). And Malgus, he was... Idk... But with his sudden decision to vote Wicket and lack of reasons, even when he was around so long to talk is unusual. I would've expected more. So with that: VOTE: MALGUS OOC: Sorry, I don't know who he is. Okay well I am the Loyal leader Hopefully Spider will give us extra murders so my team can kill you. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 22:55:08 GMT -5
Okay well I am the Loyal leader Hopefully Spider will give us extra murders so my team can kill you. But I am also SUPER-MAN I can't die.,. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Dec 6, 2013 22:55:41 GMT -5
Hopefully Spider will give us extra murders so my team can kill you. But I am also SUPER-MAN I can't die.,. Well will see. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 6, 2013 22:56:03 GMT -5
Malgus seems suspicous to me. He voted Wicket with weaker reasons than Merry's and Grievous. All he said is that he (Wicket) accused Hardian of... He didn't even know! And then he said that the probability thing made sense. That isn't evidence! That's just simple arithmetic! I find Grievous, Merry, and Malgus most suspicous (least to greatest). Grievous for his out of the blue claim and strange evidence (it's just OOC math skills), Merry for being so sure. You should never be so sure on Day 1. And there's other things like saying how all the stuff Grievous said makes perfect sense. It's not evidence. That's math! You know, why don't we just vote people out based on probability. And if you wanna go there, Wicket has been scum the past two games so chances are he is almost most certainly not scum this time (son!). And Malgus, he was... Idk... But with his sudden decision to vote Wicket and lack of reasons, even when he was around so long to talk is unusual. I would've expected more. So with that: VOTE: MALGUS OOC: Sorry, I don't know who he is. Okay well I am the Loyal leader Are you trying to be sarcastic? I knew that. I thought it was *slightly* strange how you claimed it suddenly. But you're "evidence" is what made me suspect you more (if you can even call it that). But don't worry, I'm trusting you for the time being. Your "evidence" just... |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 6, 2013 22:57:19 GMT -5
Who are your suspects Wicket? I wish to know before you are gone from the group.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 22:57:31 GMT -5
Okay well I am the Loyal leader Are you trying to be sarcastic? I knew that. I thought it was *slightly* strange how you claimed it suddenly. But you're "evidence" is what made me suspect you more (if you can even call it that). But don't worry, I'm trusting you for the time being. Your "evidence" just... And you trust the barking fool more? Whatever. No one else will come claim the inspector so believe what you wish, |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 6, 2013 22:58:52 GMT -5
Are you trying to be sarcastic? I knew that. I thought it was *slightly* strange how you claimed it suddenly. But you're "evidence" is what made me suspect you more (if you can even call it that). But don't worry, I'm trusting you for the time being. Your "evidence" just... And you trust the barking fool more? Whatever. No one else will come claim the inspector so believe what you wish, I don't see how he is a fool. And I'd counter that statement but... OOC: According to Nam, my long posts make me seem more suspicous... |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 6, 2013 23:00:56 GMT -5
And you trust the barking fool more? Whatever. No one else will come claim the inspector so believe what you wish, I don't see how he is a fool. And I'd counter that statement but... OOC: According to Nam, my long posts make me seem more suspicous... depends on the content.. when it's an eager accusation, yes, but when it's a valid explanation... no. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Dec 6, 2013 23:01:38 GMT -5
Whatever does not matter at this point I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 6, 2013 23:06:16 GMT -5
Malgus seems suspicous to me. He voted Wicket with weaker reasons than Merry's and Grievous. All he said is that he (Wicket) accused Hardian of... He didn't even know! And then he said that the probability thing made sense. That isn't evidence! That's just simple arithmetic! I find Grievous, Merry, and Malgus most suspicous (least to greatest). Grievous for his out of the blue claim and strange evidence (it's just OOC math skills), Merry for being so sure. You should never be so sure on Day 1. And there's other things like saying how all the stuff Grievous said makes perfect sense. It's not evidence. That's math! You know, why don't we just vote people out based on probability. And if you wanna go there, Wicket has been scum the past two games so chances are he is almost most certainly not scum this time (son!). And Malgus, he was... Idk... But with his sudden decision to vote Wicket and lack of reasons, even when he was around so long to talk is unusual. I would've expected more. So with that: VOTE: MALGUS OOC: Sorry, I don't know who he is. In meant that Potato's reasons were obviously weak and his feeling wasn't good evidence for an accusation. Not that I actually didn't know. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 6, 2013 23:08:33 GMT -5
Malgus seems suspicous to me. He voted Wicket with weaker reasons than Merry's and Grievous. All he said is that he (Wicket) accused Hardian of... He didn't even know! And then he said that the probability thing made sense. That isn't evidence! That's just simple arithmetic! I find Grievous, Merry, and Malgus most suspicous (least to greatest). Grievous for his out of the blue claim and strange evidence (it's just OOC math skills), Merry for being so sure. You should never be so sure on Day 1. And there's other things like saying how all the stuff Grievous said makes perfect sense. It's not evidence. That's math! You know, why don't we just vote people out based on probability. And if you wanna go there, Wicket has been scum the past two games so chances are he is almost most certainly not scum this time (son!). And Malgus, he was... Idk... But with his sudden decision to vote Wicket and lack of reasons, even when he was around so long to talk is unusual. I would've expected more. So with that: VOTE: MALGUS OOC: Sorry, I don't know who he is. In meant that Potato's reasons were obviously weak and his feeling wasn't good evidence for an accusation. Not that I actually didn't know. My vote stands |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 6, 2013 23:11:22 GMT -5
In meant that Potato's reasons were obviously weak and his feeling wasn't good evidence for an accusation. Not that I actually didn't know. My vote stands Yes to bad you can't take it back huh? |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Dec 6, 2013 23:43:37 GMT -5
Malgus seems suspicous to me. He voted Wicket with weaker reasons than Merry's and Grievous. All he said is that he (Wicket) accused Hardian of... He didn't even know! And then he said that the probability thing made sense. That isn't evidence! That's just simple arithmetic! I find Grievous, Merry, and Malgus most suspicous (least to greatest). Grievous for his out of the blue claim and strange evidence (it's just OOC math skills), Merry for being so sure. You should never be so sure on Day 1. And there's other things like saying how all the stuff Grievous said makes perfect sense. It's not evidence. That's math! You know, why don't we just vote people out based on probability. And if you wanna go there, Wicket has been scum the past two games so chances are he is almost most certainly not scum this time (son!). And Malgus, he was... Idk... But with his sudden decision to vote Wicket and lack of reasons, even when he was around so long to talk is unusual. I would've expected more. So with that: VOTE: MALGUS OOC: Sorry, I don't know who he is. In meant that Potato's reasons were obviously weak and his feeling wasn't good evidence for an accusation. Not that I actually didn't know. Your reasons are pretty weak too. Voting someone off randomly makes no sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 7, 2013 0:03:01 GMT -5
In meant that Potato's reasons were obviously weak and his feeling wasn't good evidence for an accusation. Not that I actually didn't know. Your reasons are pretty weak too. Voting someone off randomly makes no sense. I gave evidence that supported my opinion. I'm sorry if it wasn't really extensive. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 7, 2013 0:04:28 GMT -5
Your reasons are pretty weak too. Voting someone off randomly makes no sense. I gave evidence that supported my opinion. I'm sorry if it wasn't really extensive. Probability is not evidence. It is math. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Dec 7, 2013 0:45:27 GMT -5
I gave evidence that supported my opinion. I'm sorry if it wasn't really extensive. Probability is not evidence. It is math. It's hardly probability... it's just logic. Every game I've played here has had at least one mod being Scum in it. So I can only assume that this one will to. I'm I someone you have to kill with your 3rd party role or something? |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 7, 2013 2:32:18 GMT -5
I suppose I shall voice my complete thoughts. I am coming to believe Grievous and his claim and I see Wicket's evidence against Haradian wasn't of a strong mould, but Merry seemed to me as though he switched sides due to the circumstances changing. He was coming to agree with Wicket about his suspicion, but then when Grievous told us his theory, he suddenly became absolutely assured Wicket was a traitor. For now I don't want to vote either of them, because both hand out evidence that holds water (this is excluding Wicket's evidence against Haradian). I won't vote till later, but if I may be blunt, I don't think I'll vote at all. Think of it what you will. OOC: Newan, am I really that predictable as scum?  |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Dec 7, 2013 5:58:24 GMT -5
Lots of intense discussions i see. Too bad i missed them.
OOC: I won't be on this weekend.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Dec 7, 2013 6:47:24 GMT -5
So, people are voting for Potato because he's a mod? That isn't evidence at all to vote for him... but I quickly read through the pages I missed so maybe there's other proof I didn't see.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Dec 7, 2013 7:41:58 GMT -5
I suppose I shall voice my complete thoughts. I am coming to believe Grievous and his claim and I see Wicket's evidence against Haradian wasn't of a strong mould, but Merry seemed to me as though he switched sides due to the circumstances changing. He was coming to agree with Wicket about his suspicion, but then when Grievous told us his theory, he suddenly became absolutely assured Wicket was a traitor. For now I don't want to vote either of them, because both hand out evidence that holds water (this is excluding Wicket's evidence against Haradian). I won't vote till later, but if I may be blunt, I don't think I'll vote at all. Think of it what you will. OOC: Newan, am I really that predictable as scum? Please note that Grievous and I discussed this in PMs and I wasn't thoroughly convinced JUST by the evidence he posted here. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 7, 2013 8:01:57 GMT -5
I suppose I shall voice my complete thoughts. I am coming to believe Grievous and his claim and I see Wicket's evidence against Haradian wasn't of a strong mould, but Merry seemed to me as though he switched sides due to the circumstances changing. He was coming to agree with Wicket about his suspicion, but then when Grievous told us his theory, he suddenly became absolutely assured Wicket was a traitor. For now I don't want to vote either of them, because both hand out evidence that holds water (this is excluding Wicket's evidence against Haradian). I won't vote till later, but if I may be blunt, I don't think I'll vote at all. Think of it what you will. OOC: Newan, am I really that predictable as scum? Please note that Grievous and I discussed this in PMs and I wasn't thoroughly convinced JUST by the evidence he posted here. Very well then. But I won't lie. Your complete conviction in thinking Wicket a traitor is something I'd call arrogance. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Dec 7, 2013 9:34:49 GMT -5
Well you see little kid, most of us don't know exactly what happened in the PMs..
|
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 7, 2013 9:48:06 GMT -5
I suppose I shall voice my complete thoughts. I am coming to believe Grievous and his claim and I see Wicket's evidence against Haradian wasn't of a strong mould, but Merry seemed to me as though he switched sides due to the circumstances changing. He was coming to agree with Wicket about his suspicion, but then when Grievous told us his theory, he suddenly became absolutely assured Wicket was a traitor. For now I don't want to vote either of them, because both hand out evidence that holds water (this is excluding Wicket's evidence against Haradian). I won't vote till later, but if I may be blunt, I don't think I'll vote at all. Think of it what you will. OOC: Newan, am I really that predictable as scum? Please note that Grievous and I discussed this in PMs and I wasn't thoroughly convinced JUST by the evidence he posted here. That's unwise, trusting so early on. And it's unknown to all until you state it here, so it can make you seem more suspicous. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 7, 2013 10:04:10 GMT -5
Please note that Grievous and I discussed this in PMs and I wasn't thoroughly convinced JUST by the evidence he posted here. That's unwise, trusting so early on. And it's unknown to all until you state it here, so it can make you seem more suspicous. What I'd be interested to know of, is if Grievous told Merry his role claim as soon as they privately spoke to each other. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Dec 7, 2013 10:12:12 GMT -5
That's unwise, trusting so early on. And it's unknown to all until you state it here, so it can make you seem more suspicous. What I'd be interested to know of, is if Grievous told Merry his role claim as soon as they privately spoke to each other. I'd be too. And even if he didn't, why would they trust so early on? |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Dec 7, 2013 10:20:39 GMT -5
What I'd be interested to know of, is if Grievous told Merry his role claim as soon as they privately spoke to each other. I'd be too. And even if he didn't, why would they trust so early on? My thoughts exactly. I can believe the claim Grievous made, but Merry seems to be clinging to the suspicions of influential people. |
|
