Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 15:51:50 GMT -5
If I was scum would I really just randomly accuse him of being a scum? Yes to divert attention. There was no attention on me in the first place. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Nov 16, 2013 15:53:08 GMT -5
1. He pretty much followed in voting 2. and quickly agreed with the suspicion against Neo and Vane 3. his following is the key to his guilt here. 1. I was the first to suspect Soria. Not real following there. 2. Did I? Because last time I checked it took me an entire day to decide. 3. Yep. Agreeing = Scum. Because we all know the loyalist would do so much better if they all voted different people. You could have pointed out Soria's behaviour and implicate her as scum. In short, you planted the seed to grow into her conviction. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 15:56:00 GMT -5
VOTE: TARTH VANE (BANE)
I was going to vote Strom but he put up a decent defence so I'm going to go to the next most suspicious person which is Vane. Strange discussion with Razmus,was quite aggressive and was quiet a lot and took a long time to voice his suspicions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 15:57:28 GMT -5
There was no attention on me in the first place. It could have been an attempt to confuse us and there was attention on others so you could have been helping your team out. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 15:58:37 GMT -5
VOTE: TARTH VANE (BANE) I was going to vote Strom but he put up a decent defence so I'm going to go to the next most suspicious person which is Vane. Strange discussion with Razmus,was quite aggressive and was quiet a lot and took a long time to voice his suspicions. How can he be aggressive yet quiet but takes long time to voice suspicions at the same time? |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 16, 2013 15:58:40 GMT -5
VOTE TALLY:
Tarth Vane (Bane): 1
Strom How (Spider) : 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 16:00:35 GMT -5
VOTE: TARTH VANE (BANE) I was going to vote Strom but he put up a decent defence so I'm going to go to the next most suspicious person which is Vane. Strange discussion with Razmus,was quite aggressive and was quiet a lot and took a long time to voice his suspicions. How can he be aggressive yet quiet but takes long time to voice suspicions at the same time? There is a difference between quiet and silence. He spoke little but in his discussion with Razmus he was quite aggressive and when Razmus asked him who he thought was suspicious he took a long time to answer. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 16, 2013 16:02:18 GMT -5
I'm going to wait before voting, I'll probably vote Strom but I want to see if anything else pops up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 16:02:28 GMT -5
How can he be aggressive yet quiet but takes long time to voice suspicions at the same time? There is a difference between quiet and silence. He spoke little but in his discussion with Razmus he was quite aggressive and when Razmus asked him who he thought was suspicious he took a long time to answer. If vane was suspicious of razmus I don't think he would be all yippy of telling him who he was suspicious of. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 16:03:27 GMT -5
There is a difference between quiet and silence. He spoke little but in his discussion with Razmus he was quite aggressive and when Razmus asked him who he thought was suspicious he took a long time to answer. If vane was suspicious of razmus I don't think he would be all yippy of telling him who he was suspicious of. I still think he is scum. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 16:04:39 GMT -5
How can he be aggressive yet quiet but takes long time to voice suspicions at the same time? There is a difference between quiet and silence. He spoke little but in his discussion with Razmus he was quite aggressive and when Razmus asked him who he thought was suspicious he took a long time to answer. Are you really telling me there is a difference between quiet and silence when this is your first game? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 16:06:54 GMT -5
There is a difference between quiet and silence. He spoke little but in his discussion with Razmus he was quite aggressive and when Razmus asked him who he thought was suspicious he took a long time to answer. Are you really telling me there is a difference between quiet and silence when this is your first game? Of course, you don't need to play a game to find out the difference between silence and quiet.  . |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 16:11:07 GMT -5
Are you really telling me there is a difference between quiet and silence when this is your first game? Of course, you don't need to play a game to find out the difference between silence and quiet. . So do you find me suspicious? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 16:12:52 GMT -5
Of course, you don't need to play a game to find out the difference between silence and quiet. . So do you find me suspicious? Not really, but I was pointing out your behaviour earlier was strange. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 16:25:37 GMT -5
Okay I found something interesting. RSM on page 5 said he would vote for either vane or strom. Than a little later he voted vane saying that strom put up a decent defense. Now in all the post between those 2 posts of his strom didn't put up a defense. He did put a defense before that but it was 20min before RSM said he would vote for either of them. So because it is 20min before that it means that RSM saw his defense but wasn't convinced. So why did he just vote for vane? Strom just left when he was being interrogated by others...So.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 16:30:53 GMT -5
Okay I found something interesting. RSM on page 5 said he would vote for either vane or strom. Than a little later he voted vane saying that strom put up a decent defense. Now in all the post between those 2 posts of his strom didn't put up a defense. He did put a defense before that but it was 20min before RSM said he would vote for either of them. So because it is 20min before that it means that RSM saw his defense but wasn't convinced. So why did he just vote for vane? Strom just left when he was being interrogated by others...So. I think strom and RSM could be allies. So VOTE RSM. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 16, 2013 16:32:40 GMT -5
Okay I found something interesting. RSM on page 5 said he would vote for either vane or strom. Than a little later he voted vane saying that strom put up a decent defense. Now in all the post between those 2 posts of his strom didn't put up a defense. He did put a defense before that but it was 20min before RSM said he would vote for either of them. So because it is 20min before that it means that RSM saw his defense but wasn't convinced. So why did he just vote for vane? Strom just left when he was being interrogated by others...So. It's strange that after you being quiet all the way through you come on now to defend Vane immediately. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 16, 2013 16:33:58 GMT -5
VOTE TALLY:
Strom How (Spider): 1
Tarth Vane (Bane): 1
Kota Shelkar (RSM):1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2013 16:37:06 GMT -5
Okay I found something interesting. RSM on page 5 said he would vote for either vane or strom. Than a little later he voted vane saying that strom put up a decent defense. Now in all the post between those 2 posts of his strom didn't put up a defense. He did put a defense before that but it was 20min before RSM said he would vote for either of them. So because it is 20min before that it means that RSM saw his defense but wasn't convinced. So why did he just vote for vane? Strom just left when he was being interrogated by others...So. It's strange that after you being quiet all the way through you come on now to defend Vane immediately. I am not really defending vane. I am accusing RSM of being scum. Open your eyes. I have been on, talking to RSM. And I find it strange you just worry about me being quiet when you don't even consider my evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 16, 2013 16:39:17 GMT -5
It's strange that after you being quiet all the way through you come on now to defend Vane immediately. I am not really defending vane. I am accusing RSM of being scum. Open your eyes. I have been on, talking to RSM. And I find it strange you just worry about me being quiet when you don't even consider my evidence. I do, I have seen your discussion with RSM and seen the evidence provided by both sides and considered it. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Nov 16, 2013 17:04:50 GMT -5
I wouldn't bother voting RSM he's still quite inactive and their is probably more active scum if he is scum. Though Strom and Vane seem like more logical choices.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 16, 2013 17:06:45 GMT -5
So people are voting me for voting someone two confirmed loyals also votied for? Totally makes sense. Thanks guys.  I'm suspicious of Alistair and (Mav) as they always seem to be teaming up and never questioning one another. I don't think we're "teaming up", at least that's not my intention. And I haven't questioned a lot of people.. 1. He pretty much followed in voting 2. and quickly agreed with the suspicion against Neo and Vane 3. his following is the key to his guilt here. 1. I was the first to suspect Soria. Not real following there. 2. Did I? Because last time I checked it took me an entire day to decide. 3. Yep. Agreeing = Scum. Because we all know the loyalist would do so much better if they all voted different people. You were the first to suspect Soria? You said "Soria is strange. IDK" and posted no evidence. Also there's a difference between agreeing and following. You followed because you just voted for Soria without posting any evidence and didn't exactly agree with anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Nov 16, 2013 17:11:51 GMT -5
Inactivity. Inactivity. Inactivity. Inactive. Inactives. Inactivity. In Act Ivi Ty. Inactivity. Inactivity. Inactivity is a great tool to hide, don't you think? The first scum strategy! The first game! You don't have any friends but you ain't gotta worry about enemies. No one notices. You don't gotta vote, you don't gotta talk. Nobody votes you! It's great! If the whole scum team is inactive, you win right? Oh wait, sorry. You need a couple active scum, don't ya? A few to hide ya. A few to throw 'em off if they get smart! You need one or say, two active scum. They'd have to be a TEAM to keep everyone against voting for ya. A team like Alistair and Jalonya have been! Fantastic! And you can just log out and not vote. Nice win, I say. But who to be active? Not the murderer, no! Not the leader! The two scum without roles of course! They should be the ones to stick out their necks. We've seen last game as inactive scum worked. Why not bring it about again? Some scum will hide with the inactives. And some to defend them.
Anyways, VOTE: VANE.
Seems more likely than Flourine or Neo to be a hiding scum with an important role.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 16, 2013 17:14:31 GMT -5
Inactivity. Inactivity. Inactivity. Inactive. Inactives. Inactivity. In Act Ivi Ty. Inactivity. Inactivity. Inactivity is a great tool to hide, don't you think? The first scum strategy! The first game! You don't have any friends but you ain't gotta worry about enemies. No one notices. You don't gotta vote, you don't gotta talk. Nobody votes you! It's great! If the whole scum team is inactive, you win right? Oh wait, sorry. You need a couple active scum, don't ya? A few to hide ya. A few to throw 'em off if they get smart! You need one or say, two active scum. They'd have to be a TEAM to keep everyone against voting for ya. A team like Alistair and Jalonya have been! Fantastic! And you can just log out and not vote. Nice win, I say. But who to be active? Not the murderer, no! Not the leader! The two scum without roles of course! They should be the ones to stick out their necks. We've seen last game as inactive scum worked. Why not bring it about again? Some scum will hide with the inactives. And some to defend them. Anyways, VOTE: VANE. Seems more likely than Flourine or Neo to be a hiding scum with an important role. ... Well. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 16, 2013 17:15:11 GMT -5
Well anyways, I might vote Kota/RSM because I don't really find anyone else suspicious at the moment..
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Nov 16, 2013 17:16:51 GMT -5
I think I'm also going too vote Vane for many reasons I said earlier and I was the first too accuse him so I am not following one bit. Stroms suspicions are interesting but it seems Lopak wants too vote someone Strom too so my earlier team may be wrong. Though it's possible Flourine, RSM and Strom are scum. Still I like the evidence on Vane better he just runs in talks about his inactivity and leaves every time. VOTE: VANE
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 16, 2013 17:20:49 GMT -5
VOTE TALLY:
Tarth Vane (Bane): 3
Kota Shelkar (RSM): 1
Strom How (Spider) : 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 16, 2013 17:20:53 GMT -5
Well I don't think RSM will get convicted but I will vote him anyway because I think it's better than voting Vane for inactivity.
So VOTE: KOTA (RSM)
And btw, I'm not voting for Strom like I considered before because now, I don't really feel like he's scum but if he's loyal, he's certainly an odd one...
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Nov 16, 2013 17:21:35 GMT -5
Well I don't think RSM will get convicted but I will vote him anyway because I think it's better than voting Vane for inactivity. So VOTE: KOTA (RSM) And btw, I'm not voting for Strom like I considered before because now, I don't really feel like he's scum but if he's loyal, he's certainly an odd one... But aren't you voting Kota for inactivity....? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Nov 16, 2013 17:23:14 GMT -5
Theirs too many people against Strom is seems too put together a logical scum team.
|
|
. 
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5