|
Post by Spidyyr on Nov 15, 2013 16:30:51 GMT -5
I voted Soria because of his erratic behavior and desperation to push attention onto others. I did not vote Soria just because others were.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 15, 2013 16:37:37 GMT -5
I voted Soria because of his erratic behavior and desperation to push attention onto others. I did not vote Soria just because others were. Well alright but you didn't initially say that.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 15, 2013 16:51:15 GMT -5
Vane seems interesting too me does not say much and may have not voted just too not draw attention too himself. I didn't vote because I honestly didn't really find anyone suspicious enough to vote for. Also, When I got back from school it was too late to vote.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 15, 2013 16:52:47 GMT -5
I still think looking into Vane and Neo (Malgus and Bane) is wise they just seem too stay quiet and try too avoid and confrontations, Hmm I guess I see what your saying but I didn't vote because I was a swim practice, and I haven't confronted anyone because I wouldn't have enough evidence to back it up. The best we can say right now is that 2 loyals are dead, and the only people that voted off Star and aren't trusted were pretty much just following to my knowledge.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 15, 2013 16:54:31 GMT -5
Wait... The inspector hasn't revealed themselves have they?
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 15, 2013 16:55:15 GMT -5
Wait... The inspector hasn't revealed themselves have they? Nope. We fear that Soria was the inspector...
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 15, 2013 16:56:46 GMT -5
Why? Usually inactive votes don't work... And I could think of a bit more evidence for some people... Like Strom who didn't post any evidence for his suspicions and basically followed. (As an example of anyone wanted one) Also, there's a chance the inspector is someone inactive.. Or they're trying to keep a low profile.. OOC: Bane has been scum and has kep a low profile before IC: And I really don't see you coming up with much you were also again Rodal yesterday where you not? And I've been loyal and voted off just for not voting myself. And anyway, active votes almost NEVER work, even though you're accusing me of not saying much. Also, if you need to take out 2 scum in 3 days, don't you want to base your votes on more solid evidence? This would be more of a last resort plan, but it's only day two.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 15, 2013 16:57:10 GMT -5
Wait... The inspector hasn't revealed themselves have they? Nope. We fear that Soria was the inspector... Oh dear.... Who is everyone suspicious of?
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 15, 2013 16:57:33 GMT -5
Wait... The inspector hasn't revealed themselves have they? Nope. We fear that Soria was the inspector... That whole "I hope we have a good protector" thing supports that theory.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 15, 2013 16:58:07 GMT -5
Nope. We fear that Soria was the inspector... Oh dear.... Who is everyone suspicious of? No one can agree on exactly who might be scum.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 15, 2013 16:58:58 GMT -5
Oh dear.... Who is everyone suspicious of? No one can agree on exactly who might be scum. Well duh...
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 15, 2013 16:59:28 GMT -5
Oh dear.... Who is everyone suspicious of? No one can agree on exactly who might be scum. Hmm..... What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Nov 15, 2013 17:00:55 GMT -5
OOC: Bane has been scum and has kep a low profile before IC: And I really don't see you coming up with much you were also again Rodal yesterday where you not? And I've been loyal and voted off just for not voting myself. And anyway, active votes almost NEVER work, even though you're accusing me of not saying much. Also, if you need to take out 2 scum in 3 days, don't you want to base your votes on more solid evidence? This would be more of a last resort plan, but it's only day two. I don't care about taking out the 2 scum thing that's a bonus but I would rather take out all the scum in as much time as we need.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 15, 2013 17:01:03 GMT -5
No one can agree on exactly who might be scum. Well duh... No need to be so rude, now is dere?
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 15, 2013 17:03:28 GMT -5
No one can agree on exactly who might be scum. Hmm..... What do you think? I don't know, but Fluorine or Tareth are worth considering.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 15, 2013 17:05:42 GMT -5
And I've been loyal and voted off just for not voting myself. And anyway, active votes almost NEVER work, even though you're accusing me of not saying much. Also, if you need to take out 2 scum in 3 days, don't you want to base your votes on more solid evidence? This would be more of a last resort plan, but it's only day two. I don't care about taking out the 2 scum thing that's a bonus but I would rather take out all the scum in as much time as we need. Okay then. But since when have inactive votes been very successful? That's right, never. It should be a last resort, not something to do at the beginning of the game. Anyway, you're just taking Star being loyal (let me remind you that you voted him first) in stride. Isn't not voting better then voting for a loyal. As for Potato and Jodo, I don't find either of them very suspicious. Is there anything wrong with that?
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 15, 2013 17:06:51 GMT -5
Hmm..... What do you think? I don't know, but Fluorine or Tareth are worth considering. *Tarth. And what do you have against me, in your own words?
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 15, 2013 17:08:42 GMT -5
I don't know, but Fluorine or Tareth are worth considering. *Tarth. And what do you have against me, in your own words? Quiet, not voicing opinions a lot etc.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Nov 15, 2013 17:09:25 GMT -5
I don't care about taking out the 2 scum thing that's a bonus but I would rather take out all the scum in as much time as we need. Okay then. But since when have inactive votes been very successful? That's right, never. It should be a last resort, not something to do at the beginning of the game. Anyway, you're just taking Star being loyal (let me remind you that you voted him first) in stride. Isn't not voting better then voting for a loyal. As for Potato and Jodo, I don't find either of them very suspicious. Is there anything wrong with that? No him being voted is better because we would have been in the same place today as we were yesterday. Then who do you find suspicious it's far enough that you can't say nobody as an acceptable answer?
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 15, 2013 17:09:40 GMT -5
*Tarth. And what do you have against me, in your own words? Quiet, not voicing opinions a lot etc. Then what are your opinions? You seem to be implying that every single person should have many...
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 15, 2013 17:11:02 GMT -5
Okay then. But since when have inactive votes been very successful? That's right, never. It should be a last resort, not something to do at the beginning of the game. Anyway, you're just taking Star being loyal (let me remind you that you voted him first) in stride. Isn't not voting better then voting for a loyal. As for Potato and Jodo, I don't find either of them very suspicious. Is there anything wrong with that? No him being voted is better because we would have been in the same place today as we were yesterday. Then who do you find suspicious it's far enough that you can't say nobody as an acceptable answer? What do you mean, "it's far enough"?
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Nov 15, 2013 17:11:34 GMT -5
Quiet, not voicing opinions a lot etc. Then what are your opinions? You seem to be implying that every single person should have many... That either you or Fluorine could be scum.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Nov 15, 2013 17:12:21 GMT -5
I really think we should be looking at the people that didn't vote along with the voters of Soria. Scum don't vote a lot (I didn't vote for the first couple days last game) and it really just makes people forget about them.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 15, 2013 17:13:58 GMT -5
I really think we should be looking at the people that didn't vote along with the voters of Soria. Scum don't vote a lot (I didn't vote for the first couple days last game) and it really just makes people forget about them. As I've said before I couldn't vote. I have swimming on every Monday and Thursday after school.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 15, 2013 17:15:06 GMT -5
I really think we should be looking at the people that didn't vote along with the voters of Soria. Scum don't vote a lot (I didn't vote for the first couple days last game) and it really just makes people forget about them. One of the reasons I didn't vote was because there was little discussion at night, and then a flurry of votes BEFORE I got home from school. Voting was closed before I got home. And gtg.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Nov 15, 2013 17:15:43 GMT -5
No him being voted is better because we would have been in the same place today as we were yesterday. Then who do you find suspicious it's far enough that you can't say nobody as an acceptable answer? What do you mean, "it's far enough"? Far enough into the game..,
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Nov 15, 2013 17:22:07 GMT -5
And it seems the people that didnt vote is their defence consists of "well I'm inactive and inactive votes don't work" seriously your using that too defend yourself?'Does not mean it can't work this time and the only person I think that has been really inactive is (OOC: RSM).
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Nov 15, 2013 17:27:14 GMT -5
And yet the ones that come and say they been "inactive" still don't contribute too the discussion when they get here.
OOC: Will be back later got too go Shovel snow. Their is a storm now and we got about 15cm already. On top of the 10 last week.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2013 17:50:51 GMT -5
For those of you suspicious of me has evidence that is totally irrelevant and weak. I already explained the whole sith thing and if I was scum would I really just randomly accuse someone of being scum?
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Nov 15, 2013 18:03:31 GMT -5
The Seven Tombs have opened.
|
|