Traitors of the Republic Day 3

So, this is dumb...?

• called you out for saying you're loyal but then saying that you're still suspicous
• noting how you're the only one that knew Nam was inspector on day 1
• continuously stating how scum would always take the chance and vote off a power player (nam)
• let's say that our spots were reversed for this PM with Nam. You wouldn't be stressing that the scum always take out power players first, would you? You'd be accusing me of being scum since I knew that nam was inspector and he died.
• you are also defending yourself with the scum taking out big players theory too
• I say that the lack of discussion is sad. So then you say "start some."
• I start discussion. I have to make accusations, since all other forms of starting it have failed. I happen to accuse you and them you say that this isn't the way to start discussion(yet you told me to).
• then you accuse me of diverting attention from Plo when I didn't even know why I was suspicous. Well, that same argument can be made against you. You're stating that to divert attention from yourself. Not to mention I also suspected you slightly yesterday, so it's not like I accused you out of nowhere.
• you then claim Plo and I are scum. This makes no sense. I didn't know why he was suspicous. I even asked it several times yesterday and today! And when I finally knew I thought it was a little suspicous but nothing serious.
• you also then abandon that idea to say that you're voting me. Before you had no intention of doing so. But when I happen to accuse you, you suddenly want to vote me. You're obviously hoping others will agree with you but notice how no one has openly agreed with you yet?
• if I had done these accusations to someone else, you wouldn't have jumped to voting me so quickly.
• and even though I did suspect you, you could've done more to defend yourself then just decide to vote me. This just shows that you're nervous and hope others will follow you.

So, is all of this dumb? If anything, your ONE reason against me is. I have MANY reasons. I'd like to hear you say this is dumb.

It's your fault if you can't control your temper, anyway, I followed the command of someone I trusted who was also a powerful player.

1. Anyone can do that.
2. It's been proven that Ventress doesn't have the best judgement.
3. Good reason.
4. Good reason.
5. PM sending doesn't really have anything to do with loyalty.
6. You have allies.

Well good job. You fucked us all over. We don't have an inspector. Thanks

Thank you, I pride myself in my work, now if you're through with your whining, we need to decide who we will vote for and only sensible discussion will help us find scum.

Number your points next time, makes it easier for me to reply.
1. I already told you plenty of times I said I didn't suspect myself, but I didn't say you can't suspect me.
2. Okay, that's true. But I didn't know Wolffe would protect himself.
3. It's true, it happens in a lot of games. Namialus is a good loyalist, he proofed this last game.
4. I would have looked at both possibilities, but as long as you didn't do anything suspicious I'd not accuse you of being scum.
5. Yes I use that theory, among others. Why wouldn't I?
6. Well, you were complaining about the lack of discussion but you could have started one instead of just complaining about it. But you've been inactive for most of the game.
7. What other forms? Saying there's no discussing going on? And I told you your evidence was horribly bad, which by the way made you look like scum to me because no smart loyalists would use proof that bad. I told you it was a bad way to start a discussion because you said you only used it to start a discussion.
8. Diverting attention from yourself is something any player would do. And Potato was also on my suspect list, so it was suspicious to me how you defended him.
9. Well, that's your opinion. I think it's one of the most convincing pieces of evidence... mainly because hardly anything happened during day 1 and 2 because most people are inactive and I was the only one to vote on day 2, and most people didn't vote on day 1 either.
10. Because your accusation made no sense, you kept using the same evidence against me, but it didn't make much sense and I already told you many times why I listed myself as loyal, yet you kept ignoring that, you didn't even reply to it. That seems scummy to me. And the fact that no one agrees with me makes me look more loyal, not more scummy.
11. Actually I would, they didn't make sense.
12. Of course I'm nervous, 4-5 loyalists died, we can't afford many more mistakes and you're pushing a vote for me, and I know I'm loyal.

3. Why? I'll forward you the PM I had with Nam and you'll see that I had to be certain he was being protected... why would I risk killing him if he was almost certainly protected? If I was scum I would have killed Wolffe.
4. I voted about 2-3 hours before voting would end. I hoped to encourage other people to vote, it wasn't my fault no one did.
6. But they do have allies, no one is really connected to me...

Well probably not a powerful player because they would be protected from inspection by their leader, so he probably went for a weaker player who could be scum and someone the leader wouldn't protect from inspection.

2. Certainly true
6. Who would that be?

To me, Pinda/Even could easily be scum as he was in that PM and could have told his scum teammates that Nam was inspector...
But on the other hand, the scum could've just randomly killed Nam, a powerful player best to get out of the way..
EDIT: OOC sorry if I say some crazy stuff... I had to read through a few pages and might've missed things..

But Wolffe is the protector, and Gree didn't even do anything...

VOTING IS OPEN for 24 hours

Soooo, who will vote first?

You forgot the part about Ahsoka agreeing with everything that comes out of your mouth.