|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 6, 2013 14:09:34 GMT -5
People have not died in the past. The murderer then resumes killing the next night. This has happened before. Let me give you some examples. There are protectors, and their jobs are to protect people from murders. There are blockers, they can block the murderer from killing. There's the scum team not getting their act together and not getting an action in on time. There have been situations in the past where there is no murder one night but there are others the next day. Yeah except this time, a scum was voted off and no one died. More coincidences... |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 14:09:41 GMT -5
Have you considered that that's exactly what they want you it think? According to Nam, the scum are "taking risks in this game." Are you seriously saying the scum purposely chose not to kill someone? Oh. My. Wampa. Are you serious saying that the scum purposely chose to vote off a team mate on day one? Oh. My. Wampa. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 14:10:29 GMT -5
Are you seriously saying the scum purposely chose not to kill someone? Oh. My. Wampa. Are you serious saying that the scum purposely chose to vote off a team mate on day one? Oh. My. Wampa. I've done that before. Sometimes you have to. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 14:10:32 GMT -5
So then you have no reason to say they don't exist because they can. So then you're saying it's not possible for me to have Amnesia in Nat's game after I first used it in my game? Because guess what, it's happened. I'm not hiding anything. I personally believe Fili's claim, and I think that you're so caught up in this that you're not going to do anything else besides wait for us to die. I've made that mistake before, so let me give you some advice. What you're doing, if you're loyal, will get us all killed. If you go after someone and don't give them a chance to breathe or don't even consider letting them defend themselves, then you'll never be able to consider anything else. And the true scum will get away. But I guess I can't convince you at this point because you're so certain someone's scum on Day 2 with barely any proof. They can, but it's been a day and nothing has come up. It did? Ah yes, it did. Even so, why did no one else mention the rubies? You believe Fili's claim? What about Mav's? And what, I'm not letting you defend yourself? Why else would I be discussing this? The people who have the rubies probably don't want me to get them because they think I'm third party or something. But even if I was third party it would still help. The whole reason why I claimed my role in the first place was because I thought we could get something out of the people who have the rubies. And you're not really letting anyone defend them self... you're sort of just dodging questions and making up new random points against the people you're accusing. Really, I could have been inspected loyal by a dozen inspectors and I'm sure you'd still try to find a way to make me look guilty. What you have now is called tunnel vision. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 14:11:20 GMT -5
People have not died in the past. The murderer then resumes killing the next night. This has happened before. Let me give you some examples. There are protectors, and their jobs are to protect people from murders. There are blockers, they can block the murderer from killing. There's the scum team not getting their act together and not getting an action in on time. There have been situations in the past where there is no murder one night but there are others the next day. But it's funny how we voted off a scum, and then there were no murders. So yah, that looks a lot like Jar-Jar was the assassin. Scum have died, there have been no murders in the night, and then murders resume the next day. It's happened. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 14:11:36 GMT -5
Why would a scum team vote one of their own teammates off on day one? To make them look loyal, at least that's exactly what you're doing. Yes, and it's perfectly possible that the scum want us to think we got their murderer. Oh whoops, I shouldn't say we. Because you didn't help in the vote of a scum at all. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 14:12:12 GMT -5
Are you serious saying that the scum purposely chose to vote off a team mate on day one? Oh. My. Wampa. I've done that before. Sometimes you have to. But you seem so sure of all of this. As you've said before, there's no proof. Only the scum know. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 14:12:42 GMT -5
They can, but it's been a day and nothing has come up. It did? Ah yes, it did. Even so, why did no one else mention the rubies? You believe Fili's claim? What about Mav's? And what, I'm not letting you defend yourself? Why else would I be discussing this? The people who have the rubies probably don't want me to get them because they think I'm third party or something. But even if I was third party it would still help. The whole reason why I claimed my role in the first place was because I thought we could get something out of the people who have the rubies. And you're not really letting anyone defend them self... you're sort of just dodging questions and making up new random points against the people you're accusing. Really, I could have been inspected loyal by a dozen inspectors and I'm sure you'd still try to find a way to make me look guilty. What you have now is called tunnel vision. But after your first game, they'd gladly give you the rubies because that's all you need to leave this game. Dodging questions? I'm replying to EVERYTHING that involves me. And random points? Coming from the guy who tried to say that the scum team purposely isn't killing anyone. What you have now is scum panic. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 14:13:19 GMT -5
I've done that before. Sometimes you have to. But you seem so sure of all of this. As you've said before, there's no proof. Only the scum know. I seem so sure, yes, because my guesses are educated. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Oct 6, 2013 14:13:24 GMT -5
Added a poll. Please answer it so I know what I need to attempt to fix. OOC: Maybe an "other" option because I can see them but not in the normal format... Well, if you can still read the text and see the picture, then I think Yes is all you need to answer. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 14:13:35 GMT -5
To make them look loyal, at least that's exactly what you're doing. Yes, and it's perfectly possible that the scum want us to think we got their murderer. Oh whoops, I shouldn't say we. Because you didn't help in the vote of a scum at all. And that's all the evidence you have against me. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 14:13:51 GMT -5
But it's funny how we voted off a scum, and then there were no murders. So yah, that looks a lot like Jar-Jar was the assassin. Scum have died, there have been no murders in the night, and then murders resume the next day. It's happened. What game? |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 14:13:55 GMT -5
Are you serious saying that the scum purposely chose to vote off a team mate on day one? Oh. My. Wampa. I've done that before. Sometimes you have to. When have I done that? I would leave they kind of thing to you. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 14:14:47 GMT -5
I've done that before. Sometimes you have to. When have I done that? I would leave they kind of thing to you. Ooooh, I've been burned. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Oct 6, 2013 14:15:00 GMT -5
So we have a dividing in the group I see. However I don't see this bickering as pointless for once. In my opinion, I do believe Fili's claim of a one time inspection. If it's happened before it can happen again (e.g. Oppression of Omega).
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 14:15:34 GMT -5
But you seem so sure of all of this. As you've said before, there's no proof. Only the scum know. I seem so sure, yes, because my guesses are educated. "Guesses" is the key word here. You don't know anything, but your so sure of yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 6, 2013 14:15:51 GMT -5
OOC: Maybe an "other" option because I can see them but not in the normal format... Well, if you can still read the text and see the picture, then I think Yes is all you need to answer. Yeah I guess. As long as I see the pics and text, I suppose it's fine..  And it could be just a Flickr glitch.. Probably not much you could do about it.. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Oct 6, 2013 14:16:02 GMT -5
The evidence against you looks to be better than your defense... Darling.... WTF Thorin: Calm down, Fili. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 14:16:05 GMT -5
When have I done that? I would leave they kind of thing to you. Ooooh, I've been burned. I hadn't noticed. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 14:16:19 GMT -5
B I seem so sure, yes, because my guesses are educated. "Guesses" is the key word here. You don't know anything, but your so sure of yourself. BECAUSE MY GUESSES ARE EDUCATED. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 6, 2013 14:16:35 GMT -5
Scum have died, there have been no murders in the night, and then murders resume the next day. It's happened. What game? He might be talking about Vanished... I did that because I thought the scum were at a disadvantage.. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 14:17:01 GMT -5
The people who have the rubies probably don't want me to get them because they think I'm third party or something. But even if I was third party it would still help. The whole reason why I claimed my role in the first place was because I thought we could get something out of the people who have the rubies. And you're not really letting anyone defend them self... you're sort of just dodging questions and making up new random points against the people you're accusing. Really, I could have been inspected loyal by a dozen inspectors and I'm sure you'd still try to find a way to make me look guilty. What you have now is called tunnel vision. But after your first game, they'd gladly give you the rubies because that's all you need to leave this game. Dodging questions? I'm replying to EVERYTHING that involves me. And random points? Coming from the guy who tried to say that the scum team purposely isn't killing anyone. What you have now is scum panic. You're still avoiding the point that you aren't giving any considerations otherwise of me being scum. And you replying to every that involves you means nothing, the point I'm making is that whatever gets put out you just ignore it. Just because you think someone's scum doesn't mean they are. That's the warning I'm giving you, and you're still not listening to it. You are not always right. I am not always right. No one is always right. If you go on with this attitude and just ignore all counter evidence then you're going to be setting up your team for a loss. I've been through this before and I've learned my lesson so I would know. You're flying too close to the sun here. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 14:17:13 GMT -5
He might be talking about Vanished... I did that because I thought the scum were at a disadvantage.. Oh, that's different then. The murderer died but you passed the role on. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 14:17:44 GMT -5
B "Guesses" is the key word here. You don't know anything, but your so sure of yourself. BECAUSE MY GUESSES ARE EDUCATED.Yes, your guesses are educated. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 14:18:16 GMT -5
So we have a dividing in the group I see. However I don't see this bickering as pointless for once. In my opinion, I do believe Fili's claim of a one time inspection. If it's happened before it can happen again (e.g. Oppression of Omega). See, why can't we all just consider that both claims are real for once? Apparently one person always has to be lying. For all we know the scum are the ones on right now doing nothing, or the ones that have just been voting. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Oct 6, 2013 14:18:21 GMT -5
B "Guesses" is the key word here. You don't know anything, but your so sure of yourself. BECAUSE MY GUESSES ARE EDUCATED.It is best to remain rational Commander Tano, anger like that can be considered as panic as well just so you know. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 14:19:04 GMT -5
But after your first game, they'd gladly give you the rubies because that's all you need to leave this game. Dodging questions? I'm replying to EVERYTHING that involves me. And random points? Coming from the guy who tried to say that the scum team purposely isn't killing anyone. What you have now is scum panic. You're still avoiding the point that you aren't giving any considerations otherwise of me being scum. And you replying to every that involves you means nothing, the point I'm making is that whatever gets put out you just ignore it. Just because you think someone's scum doesn't mean they are. That's the warning I'm giving you, and you're still not listening to it. You are not always right. I am not always right. No one is always right. If you go on with this attitude and just ignore all counter evidence then you're going to be setting up your team for a loss. I've been through this before and I've learned my lesson so I would know. You're flying too close to the sun here. Ignore what? I haven't ignored anything, you're ignoring that. ...and yes, because I think someone's scum, to me, they are scum, unless they are proven loyal. You haven't been proven loyal so you are not loyal in my eyes. What do you want me to do? Drop all these accusations? Why would I, if I believed them? I shall fly wherever I want. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Oct 6, 2013 14:19:29 GMT -5
Voting will be up in about 20-30 mins. And these pics will show you a little more of what's going on on Trazibar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 14:19:51 GMT -5
B "Guesses" is the key word here. You don't know anything, but your so sure of yourself. BECAUSE MY GUESSES ARE EDUCATED.Mark Hamill is actually a real jedi and flies dragons in his underground lair. This is fact because my guess is educated. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Oct 6, 2013 14:20:30 GMT -5
You're still avoiding the point that you aren't giving any considerations otherwise of me being scum. And you replying to every that involves you means nothing, the point I'm making is that whatever gets put out you just ignore it. Just because you think someone's scum doesn't mean they are. That's the warning I'm giving you, and you're still not listening to it. You are not always right. I am not always right. No one is always right. If you go on with this attitude and just ignore all counter evidence then you're going to be setting up your team for a loss. I've been through this before and I've learned my lesson so I would know. You're flying too close to the sun here. Ignore what? I haven't ignored anything, you're ignoring that. ...and yes, because I think someone's scum, to me, they are scum, unless they are proven loyal. You haven't been proven loyal so you are not loyal in my eyes. What do you want me to do? Drop all these accusations? Why would I, if I believed them? I shall fly wherever I want. Have you thought that my inspection may have not been tampered? |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5