|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 13:40:10 GMT -5
But you just said that didn't matter... I'm talking about this game. Uh, what? You said Bane led the vote on a scum and that didn't matter. You said you led the vote on scum once and it didn't matter. So now it suddenly matters despite what you said before? |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 13:40:13 GMT -5
Ben Ben gets a little cuckoo when he doesn't get his tea.... Whatever. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 13:41:35 GMT -5
Who are they going to be? Because you're not the one who voted for a scum yesterday. But I will be the person who votes off a scum today. And who's your second. Do you have other suspicions you'd like to share with the group? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 13:41:56 GMT -5
I'm talking about this game. Uh, what? You said Bane led the vote on a scum and that didn't matter. You said you led the vote on scum once and it didn't matter. So now it suddenly matters despite what you said before? Oh, yeah, I did say that, didn't I? You really don't have to trust me, I don't care what people think of my loyalty, I'm just sure you're scum and will be voting you off. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 13:42:09 GMT -5
But I will be the person who votes off a scum today. And who's your second. Do you have other suspicions you'd like to share with the group? Nope, just you two. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 6, 2013 13:42:29 GMT -5
But I will be the person who votes off a scum today. And who's your second. Do you have other suspicions you'd like to share with the group? He's already shared them I think... You and Varg.. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 13:43:13 GMT -5
Uh, what? You said Bane led the vote on a scum and that didn't matter. You said you led the vote on scum once and it didn't matter. So now it suddenly matters despite what you said before? Oh, yeah, I did say that, didn't I? You really don't have to trust me, I don't care what people think of my loyalty, I'm just sure you're scum and will be voting you off. So because someone sees flaws in your accusations, they're branded a scum? |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 6, 2013 13:44:39 GMT -5
Oh, yeah, I did say that, didn't I? You really don't have to trust me, I don't care what people think of my loyalty, I'm just sure you're scum and will be voting you off. So because someone sees flaws in your accusations, they're branded a scum? Most everyone's voiced suspicions about these "rubies" except you... |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 13:44:45 GMT -5
Uh, what? You said Bane led the vote on a scum and that didn't matter. You said you led the vote on scum once and it didn't matter. So now it suddenly matters despite what you said before? Oh, yeah, I did say that, didn't I? You really don't have to trust me, I don't care what people think of my loyalty, I'm just sure you're scum and will be voting you off. How are you sure I'm scum? I'm pretty sure you thought I was a third party with my role. Other than the role I've claimed I haven't seen any other evidence from you towards me. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 13:45:30 GMT -5
So because someone sees flaws in your accusations, they're branded a scum? Most everyone's voiced suspicions about these "rubies" except you... Wait what? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 13:46:10 GMT -5
Oh, yeah, I did say that, didn't I? You really don't have to trust me, I don't care what people think of my loyalty, I'm just sure you're scum and will be voting you off. How are you sure I'm scum? I'm pretty sure you thought I was a third party with my role. Other than the role I've claimed I haven't seen any other evidence from you towards me. I lied about thinking you were third party so you'd think I trusted you. I never did, I knew you were using that to hide your true affiliation. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 13:46:50 GMT -5
Oh, yeah, I did say that, didn't I? You really don't have to trust me, I don't care what people think of my loyalty, I'm just sure you're scum and will be voting you off. So because someone sees flaws in your accusations, they're branded a scum? Quit twisting my words. I thought he was scum before he saw any "flaws." Don't defend your buddy. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 6, 2013 13:47:13 GMT -5
Most everyone's voiced suspicions about these "rubies" except you... Wait what? Varg claims a "third party role" which involves a role OOC: Potato is very familiar with as he made it up himself. How convenient is that... |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 13:47:43 GMT -5
How are you sure I'm scum? I'm pretty sure you thought I was a third party with my role. Other than the role I've claimed I haven't seen any other evidence from you towards me. I lied about thinking you were third party so you'd think I trusted you. I never did, I knew you were using that to hide your true affiliation. Right... you lied. What's the point in me saying I have a role on Day 1, then? I claimed it for a reason. Your only reason for going after me is because of my role. You're even ignoring all of the people that didn't vote for Jar Jar which we should be using as evidence today. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 13:49:08 GMT -5
So because someone sees flaws in your accusations, they're branded a scum? Quit twisting my words. I thought he was scum before he saw any "flaws." Don't defend your buddy. I'm not "defending" anyone. I'm just noticing a discrepancy. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 13:49:15 GMT -5
So because someone sees flaws in your accusations, they're branded a scum? Quit twisting my words. I thought he was scum before he saw any "flaws." Don't defend your buddy. We have no proof of that though. You can say that all you want but there's no proof. Varg claims a "third party role" which involves a role OOC: Potato is very familiar with as he made it up himself. How convenient is that... There isn't much to be familiar with. It's a role that involves finding rubies. It was publicly announced in the game it was used in. And nobody said it had to be a bad role. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 6, 2013 13:49:24 GMT -5
I lied about thinking you were third party so you'd think I trusted you. I never did, I knew you were using that to hide your true affiliation. Right... you lied. What's the point in me saying I have a role on Day 1, then? I claimed it for a reason. Your only reason for going after me is because of my role. You're even ignoring all of the people that didn't vote for Jar Jar which we should be using as evidence today. Because fake inspectors and rubies are far more interesting and could lead to results than people who didn't vote for scum... |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 13:49:53 GMT -5
I lied about thinking you were third party so you'd think I trusted you. I never did, I knew you were using that to hide your true affiliation. Right... you lied. What's the point in me saying I have a role on Day 1, then? I claimed it for a reason. Your only reason for going after me is because of my role. You're even ignoring all of the people that didn't vote for Jar Jar which we should be using as evidence today. You claimed it because you needed something to keep you looking loyal. And what, I'm going after you because of the rubies? They don't exist, don't pretend they do. Don't make me claim my own role. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 13:50:44 GMT -5
Right... you lied. What's the point in me saying I have a role on Day 1, then? I claimed it for a reason. Your only reason for going after me is because of my role. You're even ignoring all of the people that didn't vote for Jar Jar which we should be using as evidence today. Because fake inspectors and rubies are far more interesting and could lead to results than people who didn't vote for scum... But even before all of this was brought up everyone just ignored it. And we have no idea that any of this is fake yet. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 13:50:47 GMT -5
Quit twisting my words. I thought he was scum before he saw any "flaws." Don't defend your buddy. We have no proof of that though. You can say that all you want but there's no proof. Varg claims a "third party role" which involves a role OOC: Potato is very familiar with as he made it up himself. How convenient is that... There isn't much to be familiar with. It's a role that involves finding rubies. It was publicly announced in the game it was used in. And nobody said it had to be a bad role. There's no proof of your rubies, either. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 13:51:13 GMT -5
Because fake inspectors and rubies are far more interesting and could lead to results than people who didn't vote for scum... But even before all of this was brought up everyone just ignored it. And we have no idea that any of this is fake yet. And how do we know your rubies are real? |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 13:51:15 GMT -5
I lied about thinking you were third party so you'd think I trusted you. I never did, I knew you were using that to hide your true affiliation. Right... you lied. What's the point in me saying I have a role on Day 1, then? I claimed it for a reason. Your only reason for going after me is because of my role. You're even ignoring all of the people that didn't vote for Jar Jar which we should be using as evidence today. The only reason he's not is because that would draw attention to him making a mistake... And we wouldn't want that... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Oct 6, 2013 13:51:18 GMT -5
Quit twisting my words. I thought he was scum before he saw any "flaws." Don't defend your buddy. We have no proof of that though. You can say that all you want but there's no proof. Varg claims a "third party role" which involves a role OOC: Potato is very familiar with as he made it up himself. How convenient is that... There isn't much to be familiar with. It's a role that involves finding rubies. It was publicly announced in the game it was used in. And nobody said it had to be a bad role. But it would be a major coincidence that you, the creator of the role, get the role in someone else's game and claim it when you've also used risky tactics such as this before. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 13:52:22 GMT -5
Right... you lied. What's the point in me saying I have a role on Day 1, then? I claimed it for a reason. Your only reason for going after me is because of my role. You're even ignoring all of the people that didn't vote for Jar Jar which we should be using as evidence today. The only reason he's not is because that would draw attention to him making a mistake... And we wouldn't want that... Funny how you, Fili, "quit" defending yourself, but then Varg comes in and you're suddenly powerful again. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 13:52:23 GMT -5
Right... you lied. What's the point in me saying I have a role on Day 1, then? I claimed it for a reason. Your only reason for going after me is because of my role. You're even ignoring all of the people that didn't vote for Jar Jar which we should be using as evidence today. You claimed it because you needed something to keep you looking loyal. And what, I'm going after you because of the rubies? They don't exist, don't pretend they do. Don't make me claim my own role. Why would I need something to keep me looking loyal when nothing happened yet? It's pointless to do it Day 1. And oh boy, role claiming threats. If you're going to publicly say you have a role and you're actually loyal then you've already painted a giant target on your head, so nice job. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 13:53:20 GMT -5
But even before all of this was brought up everyone just ignored it. And we have no idea that any of this is fake yet. And how do we know your rubies are real? The same way we don't know that I'm an inspector, and Mav's an inspector, and so on. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 13:53:42 GMT -5
You claimed it because you needed something to keep you looking loyal. And what, I'm going after you because of the rubies? They don't exist, don't pretend they do. Don't make me claim my own role. Why would I need something to keep me looking loyal when nothing happened yet? It's pointless to do it Day 1. And oh boy, role claiming threats. If you're going to publicly say you have a role and you're actually loyal then you've already painted a giant target on your head, so nice job. I want to paint a giant target on my head.  And you need something to keep yourself looking loyal because doing so later would look suspicious. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Oct 6, 2013 13:54:01 GMT -5
And how do we know your rubies are real? The same way we don't know that I'm an inspector, and Mav's an inspector, and so on. Mav's claim makes far more sense than yours. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Oct 6, 2013 13:55:17 GMT -5
The only reason he's not is because that would draw attention to him making a mistake... And we wouldn't want that... Funny how you, Fili, "quit" defending yourself, but then Varg comes in and you're suddenly powerful again. Because I'm starting to have a little more faith in the loyals, you'll notice that I left my post open ended, so that I would come back if I felt that it was a good idea. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Oct 6, 2013 13:55:17 GMT -5
But even before all of this was brought up everyone just ignored it. And we have no idea that any of this is fake yet. And how do we know your rubies are real? People here have them. I'm sure they know. One of them's probably loyal too so they'd know I'm telling the truth. The whole point of me trying to get people to say they had them was because there's two out there and I'm pretty sure one scum has one and one loyal has the other. We have no proof of that though. You can say that all you want but there's no proof. There isn't much to be familiar with. It's a role that involves finding rubies. It was publicly announced in the game it was used in. And nobody said it had to be a bad role. But it would be a major coincidence that you, the creator of the role, get the role in someone else's game and claim it when you've also used risky tactics such as this before. So I can't take risks? I can't claim my role? You could also say it's a coincidence I've been the protector before because I used that role in the first game. The only reason he's not is because that would draw attention to him making a mistake... And we wouldn't want that... Funny how you, Fili, "quit" defending yourself, but then Varg comes in and you're suddenly powerful again. Don't ignore whoever Kenobi is, he's on your side here too. |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5