|
|
Post by bane on Nov 8, 2013 18:31:33 GMT -5
A cowardly strategy that involves no skill whatsoever... Too bad.  I agree, it is to bad. But unlike some people, I actually want to address the problem. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Nov 8, 2013 18:32:39 GMT -5
We should just make sure hosts punish inactive players... Yes, depending on the degree of inactivity. Indeed. As for people not voting, during the first games people that didn't vote (Panda was the only one that didn't back then) would automatically get 2 votes during the next day. I think something like that should be used again for future games. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 8, 2013 18:33:33 GMT -5
Yes, depending on the degree of inactivity. Indeed. As for people not voting, during the first games people that didn't vote (Panda was the only one that didn't back then) would automatically get 2 votes during the next day. I think something like that should be used again for future games. When I make a game, which I will this summer, I will use rules like that. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 8, 2013 18:33:46 GMT -5
Too bad. I agree, it is to bad. But unlike some people, I actually want to address the problem. Well some people have reasons to be inactive and also, hosts can punish inactives, like Pinda said. It's not a big deal. Also if you have a huge problem with it, maybe next game suggest an inactive vote... see where that goes... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 8, 2013 18:34:27 GMT -5
Yes, depending on the degree of inactivity. Indeed. As for people not voting, during the first games people that didn't vote (Panda was the only one that didn't back then) would automatically get 2 votes during the next day. I think something like that should be used again for future games. Oh yeah I forgot about that rule. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Nov 8, 2013 18:34:30 GMT -5
The problem is that some hosts are too nice, or don't want their game to end earlier (which I fully understand).
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 8, 2013 18:36:13 GMT -5
I agree, it is to bad. But unlike some people, I actually want to address the problem. Well some people have reasons to be inactive and also, hosts can punish inactives, like Pinda said. It's not a big deal. Also if you have a huge problem with it, maybe next game suggest an inactive vote... see where that goes... It goes nowhere, that's my point. Inactives drag down the entire game. And I understand that inactives can be dealt with by hosts, but they rarely are. (at least in my experience) |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 8, 2013 18:37:25 GMT -5
Well some people have reasons to be inactive and also, hosts can punish inactives, like Pinda said. It's not a big deal. Also if you have a huge problem with it, maybe next game suggest an inactive vote... see where that goes... It goes nowhere, that's my point. Inactives drag down the entire game. And I understand that inactives can be dealt with by hosts, but they rarely are. (at least in my experience) Then make it go somewhere or remind the host. Whatever. We've all been inactive at some point.. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 8, 2013 18:38:15 GMT -5
It goes nowhere, that's my point. Inactives drag down the entire game. And I understand that inactives can be dealt with by hosts, but they rarely are. (at least in my experience) Then make it go somewhere or remind the host. Whatever. We've all been inactive at some point.. I will tell the host. I just hope that it does anything... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 8, 2013 18:38:49 GMT -5
Then make it go somewhere or remind the host. Whatever. We've all been inactive at some point.. I will tell the host. I just hope that it does anything... Cool beans bro |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2013 18:39:35 GMT -5
Inactive loyalist equal inactive scum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 8, 2013 18:39:57 GMT -5
Inactive loyalist equal inactive scum. whut |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2013 18:42:51 GMT -5
Inactive loyalist equal inactive scum. whut If the loyals are inactive than how would or why would the scum be active . |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Nov 8, 2013 19:06:03 GMT -5
Yes, because I think people are forgetting that players on both sides were inactive last game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 8, 2013 19:09:40 GMT -5
If the loyals are inactive than how would or why would the scum be active . Trying not to continue this argument but the scum should be active regardless of how active the loyals are. Since the scum being inactive benefits them, you can't really compare the 2. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 8, 2013 19:10:49 GMT -5
If the loyals are inactive than how would or why would the scum be active . Trying not to continue this argument but the scum should be active regardless of how active the loyals are. Since the scum being inactive benefits them, you can't really compare the 2. Well why would a scum not want benefits.. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 8, 2013 19:20:54 GMT -5
Trying not to continue this argument but the scum should be active regardless of how active the loyals are. Since the scum being inactive benefits them, you can't really compare the 2. Well why would a scum not want benefits.. .... They would. But not unfair benefits. And don't say that "Oh, it's not the scum's fault the loyals can't find us" Because if you are too inactive, there ISN'T a way to. Not saying all scum need to be active at all times, but it makes it a whole lot more interesting if they are. I also realize that since 3 of your most recent team were borderline inactive, that you are probably taking this pretty personally, but I can't stress enough that I'm annoyed with ALL inactives; not just scum inactives. In fact I'm probably more annoyed when loyals are inactive because I prefer to be loyal, and it irritates me that some loyals sign up and then can't find the time to hardly play. I mean this excluding unplanned absences. ...Now inactive loyals will be mad at me.... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 8, 2013 19:25:16 GMT -5
Well why would a scum not want benefits.. .... They would. But not unfair benefits. And don't say that "Oh, it's not the scum's fault the loyals can't find us" Because if you are too inactive, there ISN'T a way to. Not saying all scum need to be active at all times, but it makes it a whole lot more interesting if they are. I also realize that since 3 of your most recent team were borderline inactive, that you are probably taking this pretty personally, but I can't stress enough that I'm annoyed with ALL inactives; not just scum inactives. In fact I'm probably more annoyed when loyals are inactive because I prefer to be loyal, and it annoys me the most when loyals sign up and then can't find the time to hardly play. I mean this excluding unplanned absences. You could say to vote an inactive... No one's stopping you... And nah, I don't care. I know I was a little more inactive than usual this game and I could see it being annoying to some at times but what I find/found annoying was the constant complaining going on during and still after the game... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 8, 2013 19:33:18 GMT -5
.... They would. But not unfair benefits. And don't say that "Oh, it's not the scum's fault the loyals can't find us" Because if you are too inactive, there ISN'T a way to. Not saying all scum need to be active at all times, but it makes it a whole lot more interesting if they are. I also realize that since 3 of your most recent team were borderline inactive, that you are probably taking this pretty personally, but I can't stress enough that I'm annoyed with ALL inactives; not just scum inactives. In fact I'm probably more annoyed when loyals are inactive because I prefer to be loyal, and it annoys me the most when loyals sign up and then can't find the time to hardly play. I mean this excluding unplanned absences. You could say to vote an inactive... No one's stopping you... And nah, I don't care. I know I was a little more inactive than usual this game and I could see it being annoying to some at times but what I find/found annoying was the constant complaining going on during and still after the game... I probably will randomly vote an inactive some game. And then you can watch me get voted off for it. And I don't really see a point in putting it off. Should we argue about it for a couple more phases or something? |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 8, 2013 19:35:07 GMT -5
You could say to vote an inactive... No one's stopping you... And nah, I don't care. I know I was a little more inactive than usual this game and I could see it being annoying to some at times but what I find/found annoying was the constant complaining going on during and still after the game... I probably will randomly vote an inactive some game. And then you can watch me get voted off for it. And I don't really see a point in putting it off. Should we argue about it for a couple more phases or something? Not my problem... And putting the argument off... LOL... I don't think it should be happening. Some people should just suck it up..... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 8, 2013 19:42:01 GMT -5
I probably will randomly vote an inactive some game. And then you can watch me get voted off for it. And I don't really see a point in putting it off. Should we argue about it for a couple more phases or something? Not my problem... And putting the argument off... LOL... I don't think it should be happening. Some people should just suck it up..... How can you say it's not your problem? You think it's okay to suggest but don't think it matters that it wouldn't even work? And yes that's great for you to say. It's ironic how all the scum in TOTR only seem to care marginally about this. Coincidence? I think not. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Nov 8, 2013 19:44:29 GMT -5
If the loyals are inactive than how would or why would the scum be active . Trying not to continue this argument but the scum should be active regardless of how active the loyals are. Since the scum being inactive benefits them, you can't really compare the 2. So you're saying scum can't be inactive but loyalists can? The scum last game weren't inactive. Yes, they could have posted more, but everyone that game could have. People can use laying low as a tactic to avoid being scrutinized for posting so much and giving so much away. If loyalists vote you off for proposing an inactive vote then that's too bad for the loyalists team. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Nov 8, 2013 19:45:20 GMT -5
Not my problem... And putting the argument off... LOL... I don't think it should be happening. Some people should just suck it up..... How can you say it's not your problem? You think it's okay to suggest but don't think it matters that it wouldn't even work? And yes that's great for you to say. It's ironic how all the scum in TOTR only seem to care marginally about this. Coincidence? I think not. Well it can work if you try... Come up with good defenses or whatever.. You won't get voted off if that's what you're worried about.. And I don't think anyone really cares about it that much.... |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 8, 2013 19:48:23 GMT -5
Trying not to continue this argument but the scum should be active regardless of how active the loyals are. Since the scum being inactive benefits them, you can't really compare the 2. So you're saying scum can't be inactive but loyalists can? The scum last game weren't inactive. Yes, they could have posted more, but everyone that game could have. People can use laying low as a tactic to avoid being scrutinized for posting so much and giving so much away. If loyalists vote you off for proposing an inactive vote then that's too bad for the loyalists team. No. Jodo was saying that if the loyals are inactive then why shouldn't the scum be, but I'm saying that the 2 aren't comparable. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Nov 8, 2013 19:48:57 GMT -5
All right guys, I think this argument has gone a bit too far. I know I've been complaining, but it's time to stop this. Anyway, this a thread for Nami 2, remember?
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 8, 2013 19:49:39 GMT -5
How can you say it's not your problem? You think it's okay to suggest but don't think it matters that it wouldn't even work? And yes that's great for you to say. It's ironic how all the scum in TOTR only seem to care marginally about this. Coincidence? I think not. Well it can work if you try... Come up with good defenses or whatever.. You won't get voted off if that's what you're worried about.. And I don't think anyone really cares about it that much.... I see. I'll keep my views TO MY SELF in the future. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2013 21:01:12 GMT -5
So you're saying scum can't be inactive but loyalists can? The scum last game weren't inactive. Yes, they could have posted more, but everyone that game could have. People can use laying low as a tactic to avoid being scrutinized for posting so much and giving so much away. If loyalists vote you off for proposing an inactive vote then that's too bad for the loyalists team. No. Jodo was saying that if the loyals are inactive then why shouldn't the scum be, but I'm saying that the 2 aren't comparable. No if the loayls are inactive then the scum doesn't have much to discuss to the loyals because they ae inactive. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2013 21:02:37 GMT -5
Well why would a scum not want benefits.. .... They would. But not unfair benefits. And don't say that "Oh, it's not the scum's fault the loyals can't find us" Because if you are too inactive, there ISN'T a way to. Not saying all scum need to be active at all times, but it makes it a whole lot more interesting if they are. I also realize that since 3 of your most recent team were borderline inactive, that you are probably taking this pretty personally, but I can't stress enough that I'm annoyed with ALL inactives; not just scum inactives. In fact I'm probably more annoyed when loyals are inactive because I prefer to be loyal, and it irritates me that some loyals sign up and then can't find the time to hardly play. I mean this excluding unplanned absences. ...Now inactive loyals will be mad at me.... 3? I don't remember any of you guys accusing me of inactive during the game. But when the scum win I am the target? |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 8, 2013 21:29:23 GMT -5
.... They would. But not unfair benefits. And don't say that "Oh, it's not the scum's fault the loyals can't find us" Because if you are too inactive, there ISN'T a way to. Not saying all scum need to be active at all times, but it makes it a whole lot more interesting if they are. I also realize that since 3 of your most recent team were borderline inactive, that you are probably taking this pretty personally, but I can't stress enough that I'm annoyed with ALL inactives; not just scum inactives. In fact I'm probably more annoyed when loyals are inactive because I prefer to be loyal, and it irritates me that some loyals sign up and then can't find the time to hardly play. I mean this excluding unplanned absences. ...Now inactive loyals will be mad at me.... 3? I don't remember any of you guys accusing me of inactive during the game. But when the scum win I am the target? I said bordering on inactive. Am I wrong? I didn't pay so much attention after I died.  |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Nov 8, 2013 21:29:45 GMT -5
No. Jodo was saying that if the loyals are inactive then why shouldn't the scum be, but I'm saying that the 2 aren't comparable. No if the loayls are inactive then the scum doesn't have much to discuss to the loyals because they ae inactive. Ah. |
|
Wars Story
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5