|
|
Post by Star on Aug 30, 2013 10:10:53 GMT -5
Voting for Scruffy will not work, if he will be kicked anyway. We'll not get any hints for voting him off, it will only give the assassin a chance to murder someone, and then we'll be in the same situation tomorrow. Exactly. It's basically giving the scum a chance to murder someone easily since there would be no leads from today. If there was good discussion and someone instead of Cato was voted it would make it at least a little more difficult for the scum to get an easy kill. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 10:14:37 GMT -5
Voting for Scruffy will not work, if he will be kicked anyway. We'll not get any hints for voting him off, it will only give the assassin a chance to murder someone, and then we'll be in the same situation tomorrow. Exactly. It's basically giving the scum a chance to murder someone easily since there would be no leads from today. If there was good discussion and someone instead of Cato was voted it would make it at least a little more difficult for the scum to get an easy kill. Indeed. And we know Cato will be inactive, if he's scum the scum could just sacrifice him now and use it to look loyal. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 10:18:31 GMT -5
So whats everyone else ideas for a vote today?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 10:19:50 GMT -5
So whats everyone else ideas for a vote today? I don't know. Maybe you... you suggested a vote for Cato. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 30, 2013 10:20:05 GMT -5
Exactly. It's basically giving the scum a chance to murder someone easily since there would be no leads from today. If there was good discussion and someone instead of Cato was voted it would make it at least a little more difficult for the scum to get an easy kill. Indeed. And we know Cato will be inactive, if he's scum the scum could just sacrifice him now and use it to look loyal. Very true. Which is making a certain somebody look even more suspicious... I'm going to post a comment about what I think of everyone.  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 10:23:17 GMT -5
So whats everyone else ideas for a vote today? I don't know. Maybe you... you suggested a vote for Cato. Voting me is stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 10:23:58 GMT -5
I don't know. Maybe you... you suggested a vote for Cato. Voting me is stupid. Well, I'm not saying I'll vote for you, but I haven't really seen anything suspicious besides that yet. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 30, 2013 10:24:13 GMT -5
Here's what I think of everyone:
Shocks - agrees a little too much with everyone. Changed his opinion a couple times- one of which was a pretty big switch. However he does seem like he's trying his best to help.
Hammer - has said little
Cato - has said nothing
Zip - has talked some. Not sure what to think of him yet.
Jag - has said little
Edge - has talked a fair amount and seems to be trying to help.
Fisto - said little so far
Windu - has said nothing
Tiin - has spoken some. When he has though, he's not been serious except for one post (If I remember correctly) Has accused 4 people of being scum. Seems to not be completely serious.
Obi-Wan - has said nothing
Anakin - has talked a lot. Jokes around at first but is now serious. Nothing suspicious abut him yet.
Rush - suggested a vote on Cato who will most likely be kicked out. It is pointless and will allow the scum an easy kill. We will also be in the same situation as today, except with the loss of a loyal or two. Even if he implied it as a last resort, he seems to be possibly messing with our minds making us think that this is a good idea, and not making us yet as hard. Just seems like he's trying to get rid of a loyal a day or two before Kenobi will. And even if Cato is scum, he may try to push a vote like this to make him look loyal. He seems suspicious to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 10:24:20 GMT -5
If nothing else comes up I might vote for you though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 30, 2013 10:24:36 GMT -5
I don't know. Maybe you... you suggested a vote for Cato. Voting me is stupid. And why is that?  |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Aug 30, 2013 10:28:40 GMT -5
I am Obi Wan Kenobi. A Jedi. The Jedi use the force. The Force is what gives a Jedi his power. It's an energy field created by all living things. It surrounds us and penetrates us. It binds the galaxy together.
You can't win, Scum. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
Oh and don't worry. For over a thousand generations, the Jedi knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the old Republic. So you can trust me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 30, 2013 10:28:45 GMT -5
This is my suspicion list.
1. Rush - all the stuff I've posted in my last post and the previous pages.
2. Tiin - isn't being serious and accused four people at once for no reason. Doesn't seem to care too much about our situation right now.
3. Shocks - not that suspicious. Just the fact that he changed his opinion a couple times and agrees a lot makes a him stand out as more strange than the rest.
I don't think that any of these three are definately scum or anything, but they stand out as most suspicious to me. Rush more so than the other two.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 10:30:18 GMT -5
And why is that? I guess there is no harm in saying this and no one will claim this role later if I'm killed tonight so ill just say this right now I am the INSPECTOR. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 30, 2013 10:32:52 GMT -5
And why is that? I guess there is no harm in saying this and no one will claim this role later if I'm killed tonight so ill just say this right now I am the INSPECTOR. If you say so. I don't entirely believe you though... |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 10:33:44 GMT -5
I guess there is no harm in saying this and no one will claim this role later if I'm killed tonight so ill just say this right now I am the INSPECTOR. If you say so. I don't entirely believe you though... Well it's true and if someone else has the guts to claim it then go right ahead.... |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Aug 30, 2013 10:58:05 GMT -5
And why is that? I guess there is no harm in saying this and no one will claim this role later if I'm killed tonight so ill just say this right now I am the INSPECTOR. I think I'll wait until most people have seen that claim, just to make sure you're not trying to pull any fast ones. Though that now seems unlikely. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 30, 2013 10:59:13 GMT -5
If you say so. I don't entirely believe you though... Well it's true and if someone else has the guts to claim it then go right ahead.... Exactly. Key word. *guts* You could be bluffing in hopes of no one else having the guts to claim it or it they do, no one will believe that person because they claimed it later. Of course you could very well be telling the truth... |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 11:13:39 GMT -5
So Rush is the inspector? In that case I think Shocks is the most suspicious, he suggested a random vote in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 11:17:23 GMT -5
Well it's true and if someone else has the guts to claim it then go right ahead.... Exactly. Key word. *guts* You could be bluffing in hopes of no one else having the guts to claim it or it they do, no one will believe that person because they claimed it later. Of course you could very well be telling the truth... And I am telling the truth. And no one would make a claim like this unless they where telling the truth.,., |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 30, 2013 11:28:34 GMT -5
So Rush claimed inspector.
And to the suspicions against me: I do see where you are coming from, and I do admit with agreeing with others, but I only agreed with Rush.
Also, I do not think you understood his strategy: If we voted off someone else (not Cato) he might come up loyal (probably) and we would have lost an active loyal. Voting off Cato (Scruffy) will minimize the loss of loyals that matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 30, 2013 11:29:49 GMT -5
So Rush is the inspector? In that case I think Shocks is the most suspicious, he suggested a random vote in the first place. Obviously you didn't look through all the conversations, Skywalker. I said my strategy would be to suggest a random vote to see what others think of it. I wanted to see their reactions, who would freak out, who would agree.. My random vote was exactly that - a random decision to get us a final decision. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 11:34:43 GMT -5
So Rush is the inspector? In that case I think Shocks is the most suspicious, he suggested a random vote in the first place. Obviously you didn't look through all the conversations, Skywalker. I said my strategy would be to suggest a random vote to see what others think of it. I wanted to see their reactions, who would freak out, who would agree.. My random vote was exactly that - a random decision to get us a final decision. An interesting strategy... but that leaves me clueless. So right now it seems like you're my main suspect. Oh and it's GENERAL Skywalker for you! |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 30, 2013 11:37:28 GMT -5
Obviously you didn't look through all the conversations, Skywalker. I said my strategy would be to suggest a random vote to see what others think of it. I wanted to see their reactions, who would freak out, who would agree.. My random vote was exactly that - a random decision to get us a final decision. An interesting strategy... but that leaves me clueless. So right now it seems like you're my main suspect. Oh and it's GENERAL Skywalker for you! Leaves you clueless in what way? And I am? Oh. Well then, General Skywalker. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 11:39:42 GMT -5
An interesting strategy... but that leaves me clueless. So right now it seems like you're my main suspect. Oh and it's GENERAL Skywalker for you! Leaves you clueless in what way? And I am? Oh. Well then, General Skywalker. I'd be clueless if I had to believe you... so for now you are the only person that acted a bit suspicious to me (next to Rush but he claimed inspector) so if nothing else comes up I'll go for you probably. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 30, 2013 11:44:31 GMT -5
Leaves you clueless in what way? And I am? Oh. Well then, General Skywalker. I'd be clueless if I had to believe you... so for now you are the only person that acted a bit suspicious to me (next to Rush but he claimed inspector) so if nothing else comes up I'll go for you probably. I can't change your mind then, General. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 11:53:13 GMT -5
So Rush claimed inspector. And to the suspicions against me: I do see where you are coming from, and I do admit with agreeing with others, but I only agreed with Rush. Also, I do not think you understood his strategy: If we voted off someone else (not Cato) he might come up loyal (probably) and we would have lost an active loyal. Voting off Cato (Scruffy) will minimize the loss of loyals that matter. I still don't think people understood the plan I suggested but I'm open to new ideas now. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 30, 2013 11:55:58 GMT -5
So Rush claimed inspector. And to the suspicions against me: I do see where you are coming from, and I do admit with agreeing with others, but I only agreed with Rush. Also, I do not think you understood his strategy: If we voted off someone else (not Cato) he might come up loyal (probably) and we would have lost an active loyal. Voting off Cato (Scruffy) will minimize the loss of loyals that matter. I still don't think people understood the plan I suggested but I'm open to new ideas now. They didn't really understand mine, either. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 11:56:32 GMT -5
So Rush claimed inspector. And to the suspicions against me: I do see where you are coming from, and I do admit with agreeing with others, but I only agreed with Rush. Also, I do not think you understood his strategy: If we voted off someone else (not Cato) he might come up loyal (probably) and we would have lost an active loyal. Voting off Cato (Scruffy) will minimize the loss of loyals that matter. When other people said that in previous games they were accused for it. We hardly do inactive votes these days because they don't work, why would you suggest one now? Voting off Cato will leave us clueless, we'll have no idea what to do tomorrow and the assassin can kill somebody tonight. That would be like start with 1-2 dead loyalists... |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 30, 2013 11:59:24 GMT -5
So Rush claimed inspector. And to the suspicions against me: I do see where you are coming from, and I do admit with agreeing with others, but I only agreed with Rush. Also, I do not think you understood his strategy: If we voted off someone else (not Cato) he might come up loyal (probably) and we would have lost an active loyal. Voting off Cato (Scruffy) will minimize the loss of loyals that matter. When other people said that in previous games they were accused for it. We hardly do inactive votes these days because they don't work, why would you suggest one now? Voting off Cato will leave us clueless, we'll have no idea what to do tomorrow and the assassin can kill somebody tonight. That would be like start with 1-2 dead loyalists... It wasn't an inactive vote. Obviously you don't understand, so I'll use an example. -I would accuse Rush. I would study who defended him, who freaked out, basically any reactions to the decision. -From there, there will be lots of discussion and THEN we would finalize a decision. You see, Rush (example) would NOT have been my vote, merely a trick to see what others think. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 12:01:58 GMT -5
When other people said that in previous games they were accused for it. We hardly do inactive votes these days because they don't work, why would you suggest one now? Voting off Cato will leave us clueless, we'll have no idea what to do tomorrow and the assassin can kill somebody tonight. That would be like start with 1-2 dead loyalists... It wasn't an inactive vote. Obviously you don't understand, so I'll use an example. -I would accuse Rush. I would study who defended him, who freaked out, basically any reactions to the decision. -From there, there will be lots of discussion and THEN we would finalize a decision. You see, Rush (example) would NOT have been my vote, merely a trick to see what others think. It was about this part of your comment: "Also, I do not think you understood his strategy: If we voted off someone else (not Cato) he might come up loyal (probably) and we would have lost an active loyal. Voting off Cato (Scruffy) will minimize the loss of loyals that matter." |
|
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself? 