|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 29, 2013 17:54:41 GMT -5
Hmm... we must make a random guess as to who is scum and see where it takes us. But no one has spoken yet other than Roleplay and crazy stuff  Exactly why we *must* guess. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 17:57:41 GMT -5
But no one has spoken yet other than Roleplay and crazy stuff Exactly why we *must* guess. Well I did have a fallback plan for voting if we're in this same position and nothing comes up but most won't like it or they will say its bad cause it will cause a death of a loyal and scum will probably say that and try and vote me tomorrow but its not like we're getting anywhere... Still it should minimize loyal casualties... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 29, 2013 18:08:45 GMT -5
I've added rules to the first comment
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 18:19:15 GMT -5
Well I was thinking instead of voting some inactive (kinda) or someone at random that almost NEVER works we could vote Cato (Scruffy) I don't think he will show up and if we vote someone at random today they may come up loyal and whoever dies tonight that's another loyal lost. And Scruffy will probably just be kicked out later anyways which will be a extra person dead I'm not saying Scruffy is for certain Loyal but I think there's a good chance he is considering Kenobi probably does not expect him to show up and he will just let his team down, by voting Scruffy today we likely only lose 2 loyals here (Scruffy and whoever is targeted tonight) where if we vote someone at random and he comes up loyal plus the death tonight plus scruffy getting kicked out we could have 3 loyal deaths so this would minimize or should minimize casualties. I'm only suggesting this if nothing comes up we could always vote no one but that wouldn't help much either and scruffy getting kicked is kinda certain so really it's only delaying his death by not voting him. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 29, 2013 18:46:13 GMT -5
Well I was thinking instead of voting some inactive (kinda) or someone at random that almost NEVER works we could vote Cato (Scruffy) I don't think he will show up and if we vote someone at random today they may come up loyal and whoever dies tonight that's another loyal lost. And Scruffy will probably just be kicked out later anyways which will be a extra person dead I'm not saying Scruffy is for certain Loyal but I think there's a good chance he is considering Kenobi probably does not expect him to show up and he will just let his team down, by voting Scruffy today we likely only lose 2 loyals here (Scruffy and whoever is targeted tonight) where if we vote someone at random and he comes up loyal plus the death tonight plus scruffy getting kicked out we could have 3 loyal deaths so this would minimize or should minimize casualties. I'm only suggesting this if nothing comes up we could always vote no one but that wouldn't help much either and scruffy getting kicked is kinda certain so really it's only delaying his death by not voting him. You know... that kind of works.. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 19:06:30 GMT -5
Well I was thinking instead of voting some inactive (kinda) or someone at random that almost NEVER works we could vote Cato (Scruffy) I don't think he will show up and if we vote someone at random today they may come up loyal and whoever dies tonight that's another loyal lost. And Scruffy will probably just be kicked out later anyways which will be a extra person dead I'm not saying Scruffy is for certain Loyal but I think there's a good chance he is considering Kenobi probably does not expect him to show up and he will just let his team down, by voting Scruffy today we likely only lose 2 loyals here (Scruffy and whoever is targeted tonight) where if we vote someone at random and he comes up loyal plus the death tonight plus scruffy getting kicked out we could have 3 loyal deaths so this would minimize or should minimize casualties. I'm only suggesting this if nothing comes up we could always vote no one but that wouldn't help much either and scruffy getting kicked is kinda certain so really it's only delaying his death by not voting him. You know... that kind of works.. Yes from a certain point of view it does but then there will be the people that will say no we can't do that becuase it will still be a loyal voted though I don't see any leads on scum right now. Those people may even be scum that say that to make them look loyal... |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 29, 2013 19:08:38 GMT -5
You know... that kind of works.. Yes from a certain point of view it does but then there will be the people that will say no we can't do that becuase it will still be a loyal voted though I don't see any leads on scum right now. Those people may even be scum that say that to make them look loyal... Well, even if he comes up loyal, I won't blame you. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 19:12:05 GMT -5
Yes from a certain point of view it does but then there will be the people that will say no we can't do that becuase it will still be a loyal voted though I don't see any leads on scum right now. Those people may even be scum that say that to make them look loyal... Well, even if he comes up loyal, I won't blame you. Well I'm only going to do it if nothing else comes up. Which seems very likely right now that nothing will happen. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 29, 2013 19:29:30 GMT -5
Well, even if he comes up loyal, I won't blame you. Well I'm only going to do it if nothing else comes up. Which seems very likely right now that nothing will happen. But even so, it's good you came up with it. It'll generate some discussion. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 20:16:16 GMT -5
Well I'm only going to do it if nothing else comes up. Which seems very likely right now that nothing will happen. But even so, it's good you came up with it. It'll generate some discussion. Hopefully it will. Now did you have a different idea from before with guessing people as scum? |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 21:06:52 GMT -5
Interesting idea with voting Cato. I'll consider it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 21:12:43 GMT -5
OOC: LOL don't be mean... But I like being mean! :'( |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 29, 2013 21:14:10 GMT -5
But even so, it's good you came up with it. It'll generate some discussion. Hopefully it will. Now did you have a different idea from before with guessing people as scum? My idea was to just randomly accuse one person and then see how the others react to it. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 21:19:55 GMT -5
Hopefully it will. Now did you have a different idea from before with guessing people as scum? My idea was to just randomly accuse one person and then see how the others react to it. But surely it wouldn't be random. Wouldn't you at least try to make sure there was good evidence against them and not just be completely random? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 21:22:39 GMT -5
My idea was to just randomly accuse one person and then see how the others react to it. But surely it wouldn't be random. Wouldn't you at least try to make sure there was good evidence against them and not just be completely random? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of what Shocks wanted to do? |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 21:23:42 GMT -5
But surely it wouldn't be random. Wouldn't you at least try to make sure there was good evidence against them and not just be completely random? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of what Shocks wanted to do? But if there was no evidence against the person than wouldn't the accusation be pointless? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 21:26:31 GMT -5
Doesn't that defeat the purpose of what Shocks wanted to do? But if there was no evidence against the person than wouldn't the accusation be pointless? It's to see other people's reactions.... Like if they panic or freak out or something, |
|
|
|
Post by red on Aug 29, 2013 21:26:36 GMT -5
Well I was thinking instead of voting some inactive (kinda) or someone at random that almost NEVER works we could vote Cato (Scruffy) I don't think he will show up and if we vote someone at random today they may come up loyal and whoever dies tonight that's another loyal lost. And Scruffy will probably just be kicked out later anyways which will be a extra person dead I'm not saying Scruffy is for certain Loyal but I think there's a good chance he is considering Kenobi probably does not expect him to show up and he will just let his team down, by voting Scruffy today we likely only lose 2 loyals here (Scruffy and whoever is targeted tonight) where if we vote someone at random and he comes up loyal plus the death tonight plus scruffy getting kicked out we could have 3 loyal deaths so this would minimize or should minimize casualties. I'm only suggesting this if nothing comes up we could always vote no one but that wouldn't help much either and scruffy getting kicked is kinda certain so really it's only delaying his death by not voting him. Personally i like this idea. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 21:30:39 GMT -5
But if there was no evidence against the person than wouldn't the accusation be pointless? It's to see other people's reactions.... Like if they panic or freak out or something, Yeah, but I would think that since there'd be no evidence, there would be no reaction really. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 21:31:18 GMT -5
Well I was thinking instead of voting some inactive (kinda) or someone at random that almost NEVER works we could vote Cato (Scruffy) I don't think he will show up and if we vote someone at random today they may come up loyal and whoever dies tonight that's another loyal lost. And Scruffy will probably just be kicked out later anyways which will be a extra person dead I'm not saying Scruffy is for certain Loyal but I think there's a good chance he is considering Kenobi probably does not expect him to show up and he will just let his team down, by voting Scruffy today we likely only lose 2 loyals here (Scruffy and whoever is targeted tonight) where if we vote someone at random and he comes up loyal plus the death tonight plus scruffy getting kicked out we could have 3 loyal deaths so this would minimize or should minimize casualties. I'm only suggesting this if nothing comes up we could always vote no one but that wouldn't help much either and scruffy getting kicked is kinda certain so really it's only delaying his death by not voting him. Personally i like this idea. Does this mean you have seen no other suspicious activity yet, General? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 21:36:22 GMT -5
Personally i like this idea. Does this mean you have seen no other suspicious activity yet, General? Have you? |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 21:38:22 GMT -5
Does this mean you have seen no other suspicious activity yet, General? Have you? No. But the Jedi are wise. Perhaps General Windu noticed something the rest of us have not. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 21:41:10 GMT -5
No. But the Jedi are wise. Perhaps General Windu noticed something the rest of us have not. I'm sure they are.... |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 21:47:28 GMT -5
No. But the Jedi are wise. Perhaps General Windu noticed something the rest of us have not. I'm sure they are.... You seem a little eager to go through with this vote on Cato. You're dismissing that anyone else has anything useful to say from what's happened so far and are trying to make it sem like nothing else will happen so the rest of us will follow you on this vote. Does this strike anyone else as odd besides me? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 21:50:38 GMT -5
You seem a little eager to go through with this vote on Cato. You're dismissing that anyone else has anything useful to say from what's happened so far and are trying to make it sem like nothing else will happen so the rest of us will follow you on this vote. Does this strike anyone else as odd besides me? I'm pretty sure nothing else will come up from what already happended because its not like someone that just showed up will point out something that people that been here the entire time like Shocks and myself haven't already pointed out. And I don't care if Cato is voted or not but if nothing happens I am voting himc |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 21:54:42 GMT -5
You seem a little eager to go through with this vote on Cato. You're dismissing that anyone else has anything useful to say from what's happened so far and are trying to make it sem like nothing else will happen so the rest of us will follow you on this vote. Does this strike anyone else as odd besides me? I'm pretty sure nothing else will come up from what already happended because its not like someone that just showed up will point out something that people that been here the entire time like Shocks and myself haven't already pointed out. And I don't care if Cato is voted or not but if nothing happens I am voting himc I understand you're thinking but you do not have to be so hasty. Hopefully something better will present itself. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 29, 2013 21:56:46 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure nothing else will come up from what already happended because its not like someone that just showed up will point out something that people that been here the entire time like Shocks and myself haven't already pointed out. And I don't care if Cato is voted or not but if nothing happens I am voting himc I understand you're thinking but you do not have to be so hasty. Hopefully something better will present itself. Yeah I already said that I would wait and see what comes up thanks for whatever this meant? |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 22:06:33 GMT -5
I understand you're thinking but you do not have to be so hasty. Hopefully something better will present itself. Yeah I already said that I would wait and see what comes up thanks for whatever this meant? Thanks for what? I didn't really compliment you... Did I?  |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 29, 2013 22:20:49 GMT -5
My idea was to just randomly accuse one person and then see how the others react to it. But surely it wouldn't be random. Wouldn't you at least try to make sure there was good evidence against them and not just be completely random? That's the thing - I don't have good evidence. My "idea" would have given me that. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 29, 2013 22:22:01 GMT -5
But surely it wouldn't be random. Wouldn't you at least try to make sure there was good evidence against them and not just be completely random? That's the thing - I don't have good evidence. My "idea" would have given me that. I know it isn't much, but it's more than you've got. What do you think of what I said about Rush? |
|
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5