|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 30, 2013 12:03:22 GMT -5
It wasn't an inactive vote. Obviously you don't understand, so I'll use an example. -I would accuse Rush. I would study who defended him, who freaked out, basically any reactions to the decision. -From there, there will be lots of discussion and THEN we would finalize a decision. You see, Rush (example) would NOT have been my vote, merely a trick to see what others think. It was about this part of your comment: "Also, I do not think you understood his strategy: If we voted off someone else (not Cato) he might come up loyal (probably) and we would have lost an active loyal. Voting off Cato (Scruffy) will minimize the loss of loyals that matter." Yes, this had nothing to do with my strategy. I was merely trying to explain Rush's. If we voted off Cato, we would have lost a pointless loyal (probably) but voting off someone else could deal a blow to our little team. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 12:07:42 GMT -5
It was about this part of your comment: "Also, I do not think you understood his strategy: If we voted off someone else (not Cato) he might come up loyal (probably) and we would have lost an active loyal. Voting off Cato (Scruffy) will minimize the loss of loyals that matter." Yes, this had nothing to do with my strategy. I was merely trying to explain Rush's. If we voted off Cato, we would have lost a pointless loyal (probably) but voting off someone else could deal a blow to our little team. I recall you're usually against inactive votes (OOC evidence, I know) maybe I'm wrong... but anyway, I assumed you agree with Rush, because otherwise you were defending him. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 30, 2013 13:31:38 GMT -5
Yes, this had nothing to do with my strategy. I was merely trying to explain Rush's. If we voted off Cato, we would have lost a pointless loyal (probably) but voting off someone else could deal a blow to our little team. I recall you're usually against inactive votes (OOC evidence, I know) maybe I'm wrong... but anyway, I assumed you agree with Rush, because otherwise you were defending him. But this isn't an inactive vote.. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 13:32:02 GMT -5
I recall you're usually against inactive votes (OOC evidence, I know) maybe I'm wrong... but anyway, I assumed you agree with Rush, because otherwise you were defending him. But this isn't an inactive vote.. Then what is it? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 13:39:04 GMT -5
But this isn't an inactive vote.. Then what is it? Do you like Peanut Butter? |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 30, 2013 13:39:36 GMT -5
Voting pictures will be up in a few minutes
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Aug 30, 2013 13:52:52 GMT -5
But this isn't an inactive vote.. Then what is it? Hold on. The reason why Cato was suggested was because he was inactive. Am I right? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 14:05:20 GMT -5
Hold on. The reason why Cato was suggested was because he was inactive. Am I right? Partially. Go read my post on it again.... |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 14:05:50 GMT -5
Do you like Peanut Butter? Yes  OOC: Actually the "Pinda" part in my name came from Peanutbutter. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Aug 30, 2013 14:14:46 GMT -5
Hold on. The reason why Cato was suggested was because he was inactive. Am I right? Partially. Go read my post on it again.... I know what you're saying about the Cato vote, but I'm not sure voting him off to avoid having three loyals killed in one day will make much of a difference. Also, if you think I'm suspicious of you because of my scepticism, then you'll find yourself wrong. It's Shocks' quick agreement to this idea that's got me nervous. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 14:19:06 GMT -5
Partially. Go read my post on it again.... I know what you're saying about the Cato vote, but I'm not sure voting him off to avoid having three loyals killed in one day will make much of a difference. Also, if you think I'm suspicious of you because of my scepticism, then you'll find yourself wrong. It's Shocks' quick agreement to this idea that's got me nervous. Well the reason is suggested it was for a backup plan just in case we could not come to a real conclusion and I also suggested it for Discussion purposes which it seems that worked well enough as we have had meaningful discussion. Right now it does not really matter to me if Cato is voted or not. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Aug 30, 2013 14:27:40 GMT -5
I know what you're saying about the Cato vote, but I'm not sure voting him off to avoid having three loyals killed in one day will make much of a difference. Also, if you think I'm suspicious of you because of my scepticism, then you'll find yourself wrong. It's Shocks' quick agreement to this idea that's got me nervous. Well the reason is suggested it was for a backup plan just in case we could not come to a real conclusion and I also suggested it for Discussion purposes which it seems that worked well enough as we have had meaningful discussion. Right now it does not really matter to me if Cato is voted or not. If more people discussed more, then we'd probably have someone else other than Cato to vote for. But what can you do? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 14:32:07 GMT -5
Well the reason is suggested it was for a backup plan just in case we could not come to a real conclusion and I also suggested it for Discussion purposes which it seems that worked well enough as we have had meaningful discussion. Right now it does not really matter to me if Cato is voted or not. If more people discussed more, then we'd probably have someone else other than Cato to vote for. But what can you do? Well I'm not confident on voting Shocks so I'm uncertain if I will. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Aug 30, 2013 14:35:48 GMT -5
If more people discussed more, then we'd probably have someone else other than Cato to vote for. But what can you do? Well I'm not confident on voting Shocks so I'm uncertain if I will. I don't want to vote him either, despite there being some suspicion against him. If nothing arises and if Shocks doesn't say or do anything else suspicious, then we might as well vote Cato. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 14:37:34 GMT -5
Well I'm not confident on voting Shocks so I'm uncertain if I will. I don't want to vote him either, despite there being some suspicion against him. If nothing arises and if Shocks doesn't say or do anything else suspicious, then we might as well vote Cato. We could vote no one but maybe Cato is scum it's possible unlikely either way between whoever is voted, murder target and inspection we should have something.... |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Aug 30, 2013 14:42:28 GMT -5
I don't want to vote him either, despite there being some suspicion against him. If nothing arises and if Shocks doesn't say or do anything else suspicious, then we might as well vote Cato. We could vote no one but maybe Cato is scum it's possible unlikely either way between whoever is voted, murder target and inspection we should have something.... Everything has a lead to something, but I'd prefer to vote someone who has a stronger possibility of being scum than Cato. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 30, 2013 14:47:40 GMT -5
Voting pictures will be up in a few minutes That was longer than a few minutes.... I got distracted............. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 14:52:00 GMT -5
Voting pictures will be up in a few minutes That was longer than a few minutes.... I got distracted............. *smacks* STAY FOCUSED. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 30, 2013 15:46:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 15:46:37 GMT -5
So, who will you all vote for?
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 15:50:11 GMT -5
So, who will you all vote for? I don't know but the host did not answer my cake and pie question........ Maybe he is on the pie side  |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 30, 2013 15:51:07 GMT -5
I find it odd that anyone would even consider a vote on Cato. Scruffy hasn't been seen in months, so I really doubt he'll be showing up. Therefor, there's really no point in voting for him. Regardless of his affiliation, he'll be killed off or inactivity. I also find it annoying that people like Rush talk about cookies and cake. I know people do this every time, but please keep it to a minimum. I can only be on for a little while, so it'd rather not read thought pointless role play.  |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 30, 2013 15:51:32 GMT -5
So, who will you all vote for? I don't know but the host did not answer my cake and pie question........ Maybe he is on the pie side *Ignites lightsaber and points it at (Kenobi)* You're a pie lord! |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 30, 2013 15:55:16 GMT -5
I don't know but the host did not answer my cake and pie question........ Maybe he is on the pie side *Ignites* lightsaber and points it at (Kenobi* You're a pie lord! Will will bring justice to the cake  |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 30, 2013 16:03:22 GMT -5
So, who will you all vote for? I don't know but the host did not answer my cake and pie question........ Maybe he is on the pie side I don't know but the host did not answer my cake and pie question........ Maybe he is on the pie side *Ignites lightsaber and points it at (Kenobi)* You're a pie lord! Who I am does not matter....... *waves hand*.............. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 30, 2013 16:05:20 GMT -5
Hmm... I don't know who to vote for since its definitely not going to be Cato... That would just be pointless.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 30, 2013 16:05:32 GMT -5
Before we vote, I want to find something out about Cato. OOC: Obi, will Scruffy die if we don't vote him, or is he not one of the players?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 30, 2013 16:07:57 GMT -5
Before we vote, I want to find something out about Cato. OOC: Obi, will Scruffy die if we don't vote him, or is he not one of the players? Well it's kind of complicated... Because I think Ferus is considering replacing Scruffy but if you guys want to vote off *Cato*... But if Ferus doesn't replace him and he isn't voted off, I probably would kill him off myself |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Aug 30, 2013 16:09:42 GMT -5
Before we vote, I want to find something out about Cato. OOC: Obi, will Scruffy die if we don't vote him, or is he not one of the players? Well it's kind of complicated... Because I think Ferus is considering replacing Scruffy but if you guys want to vote off *Cato*... But if Ferus doesn't replace him and he isn't voted off, I probably would kill him off myself Hmm... It obviously would make a big difference if Ferus were playing... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 30, 2013 16:10:54 GMT -5
Well it's kind of complicated... Because I think Ferus is considering replacing Scruffy but if you guys want to vote off *Cato*... But if Ferus doesn't replace him and he isn't voted off, I probably would kill him off myself Hmm... It obviously would make a big difference if Ferus were playing... Yeah... Maybe I should just not let any new players join since the game has started/roles have been sent etc ? |
|
OOC: Actually the "Pinda" part in my name came from Peanutbutter. 
Wars Story
