|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 8, 2013 15:15:16 GMT -5
OOC: I have to go now. IC: I hope you see the truth, Galen, because Ram and Sebulba don't.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Aug 8, 2013 15:16:35 GMT -5
You're so pathetic, putting words into my mouth. My reasons (take them as you wish): - She hesitated voting off Savage on Day 2 - On to Jar Jar. She convinced everyone Jar Jar was scum, but then changed her mind and said he was loyal. The next day we found out Jar Jar was unknown. Ventress used this as an excuse to lead a vote on Bossk (a loyal) and she claimed to have been attacked in the night (no evidence to this claim). - I don't buy her late protector claim -Not a valid reason. I VOTED. -I don't even get it... You all followed with voting off Jar-Jar. -Why not? - It is, you were trying to stop a scum being voted off and only voted him under pressure and lots of persuasion - What I'm saying is that you used Jar Jar coming up Unknown as an excuse to vote off a loyal. - Because it's late and the protector could already be dead |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Aug 8, 2013 15:18:00 GMT -5
Oh my dear, i have been listening. It just didn't make any sense. I'm sorry, now, don't you have some magic to do somewhere *waves hand at her* Didn't make any sense? That's because you refuse to get it. Nope, i haven't refused anything *waves finger infront of you* Nonono. I even trusted you this whole game until the Bossk accident, when you, without reason, evidence or proof, called me his Scum ally. Why did you say i defended him while i clearly never did? That move was so odd, just like you witches. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Aug 8, 2013 15:19:54 GMT -5
OOC: I have to go now. IC: I hope you see the truth, Galen, because Ram and Sebulba don't. OOC: Bye! |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 8, 2013 15:40:00 GMT -5
Do we know Jar Jar was loyal?
And people mess up... We may lose loyals in the process but is it our fault they make themselves look scummy? Is it Asajj's fault all of you followed her? The answer to both those questions is no. You lot *chose* to trust and follow the one person that tried to take risks and get things done. Now they have made a few mistakes so you turn on them when half of it is your own fault.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Aug 8, 2013 15:43:19 GMT -5
Do we know Jar Jar was loyal? And people mess up... We may lose loyals in the process but is it our fault they make themselves look scummy? Is it Asajj's fault all of you followed her? The answer to both those questions is no. You lot *chose* to trust and follow the one person that tried to take risks and get things done. Now they have made a few mistakes so you turn on them when half of it is your own fault. What I find strange is that Ventress is pretty much accusing everyone. She just voted for me with no evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 8, 2013 15:48:34 GMT -5
Do we know Jar Jar was loyal? And people mess up... We may lose loyals in the process but is it our fault they make themselves look scummy? Is it Asajj's fault all of you followed her? The answer to both those questions is no. You lot *chose* to trust and follow the one person that tried to take risks and get things done. Now they have made a few mistakes so you turn on them when half of it is your own fault. What I find strange is that Ventress is pretty much accusing everyone. She just voted for me with no evidence. Process of elimination I guess. She picked people she thought were trustworthy. The ones that weren't.... And also I think she had something at the beginning of the game but I forget what it was..... |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Aug 8, 2013 15:53:45 GMT -5
What I find strange is that Ventress is pretty much accusing everyone. She just voted for me with no evidence. Process of elimination I guess. She picked people she thought were trustworthy. The ones that weren't.... And also I think she had something at the beginning of the game but I forget what it was..... What I mean is that she changes between opinions very fast. At the start of the day she said you'd be her vote, about a minute later her opinion is completely different. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 8, 2013 15:55:11 GMT -5
Process of elimination I guess. She picked people she thought were trustworthy. The ones that weren't.... And also I think she had something at the beginning of the game but I forget what it was..... What I mean is that she changes between opinions very fast. At the start of the day she said you'd be her vote, about a minute later her opinion is completely different. Because I trust Xen. I've trusted him since the game first started. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 8, 2013 15:56:20 GMT -5
-Not a valid reason. I VOTED. -I don't even get it... You all followed with voting off Jar-Jar. -Why not? - It is, you were trying to stop a scum being voted off and only voted him under pressure and lots of persuasion - What I'm saying is that you used Jar Jar coming up Unknown as an excuse to vote off a loyal. - Because it's late and the protector could already be dead -I make my own decisions. No pressure. I've been leading you, I made all the decisions. -Are you seriously saying that Bossk wasn't suspicious? -How would I know that, if I were scum? It would be an awful risk. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 8, 2013 15:56:48 GMT -5
Didn't make any sense? That's because you refuse to get it. Nope, i haven't refused anything *waves finger infront of you* Nonono. I even trusted you this whole game until the Bossk accident, when you, without reason, evidence or proof, called me his Scum ally. Why did you say i defended him while i clearly never did? That move was so odd, just like you witches. You DID defend him. You began to accuse me as I accused him. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 8, 2013 15:57:47 GMT -5
Do we know Jar Jar was loyal? And people mess up... We may lose loyals in the process but is it our fault they make themselves look scummy? Is it Asajj's fault all of you followed her? The answer to both those questions is no. You lot *chose* to trust and follow the one person that tried to take risks and get things done. Now they have made a few mistakes so you turn on them when half of it is your own fault. What I find strange is that Ventress is pretty much accusing everyone. She just voted for me with no evidence. I accuse everyone I don't trust. And no, not "everyone", only you and Ram right now. I'm leading and you're voting me off for that. You're voting me off for doing what other loyals can't. I took the risks, and I guess I'll die for them. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Aug 8, 2013 16:00:14 GMT -5
Nevertheless, I have valid reasons IMO. Valid enough to vote for her. If she didn't going around accusing almost everyone and making accusations with no evidence I would have a reason to trust her.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 8, 2013 16:03:55 GMT -5
Nevertheless, I have valid reasons IMO. Valid enough to vote for her. If she didn't going around accusing almost everyone and making accusations with no evidence I would have a reason to trust her. Whatever. You're going to see me come up loyal, and the Imperials will win. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 8, 2013 16:04:25 GMT -5
Note how Sebulba doesn't reply to my defense. He justs says "Nevertheless".
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 8, 2013 16:04:34 GMT -5
bye.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Aug 8, 2013 16:06:20 GMT -5
Note how Sebulba doesn't reply to my defense. He justs says "Nevertheless". That Nevertheless post was the reply to your defence. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Aug 8, 2013 16:19:06 GMT -5
I'd like to believe that Nam is the inspector. But he doesn't state any proof for his vote. And it's a fact he did vote off some loyalists. He didn't claim his role until day 4 or 5, which I find very odd. I found Selbulba's proof more convincing than yours. And I don't want to risk being manipulated by you once again. OOC: I doubt you'd ever just claim a role because you hated it so much when I did that. So I think there's something odd about your claim. IC: For those reason I'm going to vote for you. I'm not at all certain about this. But then again, I don't want to risk being manipulated by a fake protector, I know it's quite easy to fake a role if the person that actually had it died. VOTE: VENTRESS (NAM). I'm very uncertain about this vote but I hope I'm right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 8, 2013 16:21:26 GMT -5
I'd like to believe that Nam is the inspector. But he doesn't state any proof for his vote. And it's a fact he did vote off some loyalists. He didn't claim his role until day 4 or 5, which I find very odd. I found Selbulba's proof more convincing than yours. And I don't want to risk being manipulated by you once again. OOC: I doubt you'd ever just claim a role because you hated it so much when I did that. So I think there's something odd about your claim. IC: For those reason I'm going to vote for you. I'm not at all certain about this. But then again, I don't want to risk being manipulated by a fake protector, I know it's quite easy to fake a role if the person that actually had it died. VOTE: VENTRESS (NAM). I'm very uncertain about this vote but I hope I'm right. ...I think I need one last drink before I get killed... |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Aug 8, 2013 16:23:47 GMT -5
FINAL VOTE TALLY:
Sebulba- 2
Asajj Ventress- 3
Jodo said he'd be inactive the next couple days and Mav obviously can't vote, so with the most votes, 3, Asajj Ventress (Nam) will be convicted. YOU MAY NOW SEND IN YOUR NIGHT ACTIONS! As usual, the day will remain up until pictures come later.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Aug 8, 2013 16:35:26 GMT -5
Nope, i haven't refused anything *waves finger infront of you* Nonono. I even trusted you this whole game until the Bossk accident, when you, without reason, evidence or proof, called me his Scum ally. Why did you say i defended him while i clearly never did? That move was so odd, just like you witches. You DID defend him. You began to accuse me as I accused him. I accused Bossk. Then you randomly accused me for defending, wich i never did, you've gotta learn to listen (OOC: read) my bald dearie. I only accused you after your random claim. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Aug 8, 2013 16:38:23 GMT -5
What I find strange is that Ventress is pretty much accusing everyone. She just voted for me with no evidence. I accuse everyone I don't trust. And no, not "everyone", only you and Ram right now. I'm leading and you're voting me off for that. You're voting me off for doing what other loyals can't. I took the risks, and I guess I'll die for them. She's right, not everyone. Just us. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Aug 8, 2013 16:45:35 GMT -5
Well, the witch has been convicted. I'm still not sure what to do if she might come up Loyal. But if she gets janitored them i'm sure she is Scum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Aug 8, 2013 18:03:43 GMT -5
|
|
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5