|
Post by Namialus on Aug 5, 2013 23:40:42 GMT -5
I'm not even going to waste my time defending myself against a fool like you, lizard scum. Those "fellow" loyals are merely scum. I know you're scum, and I'm not going to waste my time fighting you. A poor excuse. Honey, have you even read your defense?
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:40:48 GMT -5
Well I think I will vote bossk or ventress. Yes as much as I figured.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 23:41:24 GMT -5
Well I think I will vote bossk or ventress. Vote Ventress, the protector, why not! If you honestly think Bossk is loyal you're either REALLY stupid or scum. I am neither, just an inactive. And how do we know you the protector?
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:42:40 GMT -5
Well I think I will vote bossk or ventress. Vote Ventress, the protector, why not! If you honestly think Bossk is loyal you're either REALLY stupid or scum. It's not confirmed your the protector you know. You could know the protectors dead, claimed it before the real one did so the real one would look like a liar when they did, or be acting as a figurehead for the real protector who you have manipulated into thinking you're loyal.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:43:19 GMT -5
Honey, have you even read your defense? Have you even put a defense?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 23:44:40 GMT -5
Well I think I will vote bossk or ventress. Vote Ventress, the protector, why not! If you honestly think Bossk is loyal you're either REALLY stupid or scum. Wait if you think bossk is scum then why would a scum try to vote him off.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 5, 2013 23:45:42 GMT -5
Honey, have you even read your defense? Have you even put a defense? I don't need to put up a defense against evidence such as yours. Your ONLY evidence is that you had a jewel, but jewels are said to be able to give advantages to both scum and loyals. I have MUCH evidence against you, I put it up earlier, and you stand in cowardice against it babbling about how you had a jewel. You're easy to see through. And everyone else: You don't have to believe I'm the protector, just believe in my evidence. Hmph.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 5, 2013 23:46:00 GMT -5
Vote Ventress, the protector, why not! If you honestly think Bossk is loyal you're either REALLY stupid or scum. Wait if you think bossk is scum then why would a scum try to vote him off. What..?
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:46:35 GMT -5
Vote Ventress, the protector, why not! If you honestly think Bossk is loyal you're either REALLY stupid or scum. Wait if you think bossk is scum then why would a scum try to vote him off. To look loyal if I were to come up scum or the obvious fact that because I'm a loyal.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:47:51 GMT -5
Have you even put a defense? I don't need to put up a defense against evidence such as yours. Your ONLY evidence is that you had a jewel, but jewels are said to be able to give advantages to both scum and loyals. I have MUCH evidence against you, I put it up earlier, and you stand in cowardice against it babbling about how you had a jewel. You're easy to see through. And everyone else: You don't have to believe I'm the protector, just believe in my evidence. Hmph. Have you even seen my other posts beside that one? If not you might need to get our eyes checked because they were much better. And a jewel is not my main defense. It's just a part of it.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 5, 2013 23:48:01 GMT -5
I'm just going to wait for people like Xen and Rick to come here because they're not fools.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 23:48:17 GMT -5
Well I am confused and am playfully winging this. Nat was loyal I think you all know. We are both knights.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 5, 2013 23:48:54 GMT -5
I don't need to put up a defense against evidence such as yours. Your ONLY evidence is that you had a jewel, but jewels are said to be able to give advantages to both scum and loyals. I have MUCH evidence against you, I put it up earlier, and you stand in cowardice against it babbling about how you had a jewel. You're easy to see through. And everyone else: You don't have to believe I'm the protector, just believe in my evidence. Hmph. Have you even seen my other posts beside that one? If not you might need to get our eyes checked because they were much better. And a jewel is not my main defense. It's just a part of it. If you read your own defense, you would understand that most of it surrounds the jewel you carried.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 23:49:16 GMT -5
I have been too inactive to seriously play the rest of this.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 5, 2013 23:49:35 GMT -5
Well I am confused and am playfully winging this. Nat was loyal I think you all know. We are both knights. Nat dropped out.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:51:49 GMT -5
I know who the scum is. Why? Jar-Jar was LOYAL. I specifically said that if Jar-Jar comes up loyal, I would vote off Bossk without hesitation. And then what happened? He was janitored, and who was targeted in the night? ME, but I was protected. Do you see now? Bossk tried to have me killed because he knew I would vote him off. Very illogical. You are so gullible to believe this that you have to be scum. You're pushing for me to go because you know that you and our scum pals are getting close to winning. I know I was protected from a reliable source. This backs up my theory about you manipulating the protector in those PMs of yours. Why? Bossk is obviously scum. He's been trying to get me voted off, he's throwing random accusations everywhere (OOC: Star did that in The Nami too, and he was scum), he's trying so hard to be glorified, and he defended Savage, an IMPERIAL. No I'm not. I've only accused you mostly. OOC: And do you really think I'd repeat that mistake? Do these ring a bell Ventress?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 23:52:58 GMT -5
Very illogical. You are so gullible to believe this that you have to be scum. You're pushing for me to go because you know that you and our scum pals are getting close to winning. This backs up my theory about you manipulating the protector in those PMs of yours. No I'm not. I've only accused you mostly. OOC: And do you really think I'd repeat that mistake? Do these ring a bell Ventress? Interesting
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:53:23 GMT -5
OOC: Woah, I didn't even know the Day was up and I'm the prime suspect! Also I loved the story Tater! IC: well well well. I must say that Ventress is very gullible. Obviously the scum framed me because they knew I was being to get suspicious of her. So they targeted her. This could mean that Ventress is scum and fooled the protector in these PMs she constantly mentions or she just happened to be protected and attacked on the same night. I'm thinking the first. And she's really pushing for me without even considering anything. Any other possibilities. And do you wonder who the second person that had the jewel was? It was me. I had it on night 1 as a one time use. I'm aligned with the loyalists. I passed it off to Savage on Night 1 because he seemed loyal to me and I'm sure he did to others of you as we'll. If I was a teammate of Savage who was scum, I don't think that would be a good move. Pointless. And no one else has cloned this. I was going to last night but then the thread locked. If anything, Ventress is scum and the janitor on her team thought up this plan to frame me and think everyone else would be mindless enough to follow. But I am hoping you guys aren't. Vote Ventress. She is scum along with two others that I have no idea who they could be. Yes this does revolve around the jewel but open your eyes! It also talks just as much about me being framed.
|
|
|
Post by Whitespine on Aug 5, 2013 23:53:48 GMT -5
I'm the Loyal King known as King Arthur. I'll just let that set in for a moment.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:54:12 GMT -5
Do these ring a bell Ventress? Interesting I know you've been inactive Aurra but what do you think? Or have you no thoughts yet?
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 5, 2013 23:54:50 GMT -5
Very illogical. You are so gullible to believe this that you have to be scum. You're pushing for me to go because you know that you and our scum pals are getting close to winning. This backs up my theory about you manipulating the protector in those PMs of yours. No I'm not. I've only accused you mostly. OOC: And do you really think I'd repeat that mistake? Do these ring a bell Ventress? -It's only illogical to you. It makes much sense to a LOYAL. -How does one manipulate oneself? -You accuse me because you want me gone for my evidence against you. And once more you contradict yourself, you just accused Galen Marek not long ago.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:55:01 GMT -5
I'm the Loyal King known as King Arthur. I'll just let that set in for a moment. Het outta here! Alive players and the host only!
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 5, 2013 23:55:33 GMT -5
OOC: Woah, I didn't even know the Day was up and I'm the prime suspect! Also I loved the story Tater! IC: well well well. I must say that Ventress is very gullible. Obviously the scum framed me because they knew I was being to get suspicious of her. So they targeted her. This could mean that Ventress is scum and fooled the protector in these PMs she constantly mentions or she just happened to be protected and attacked on the same night. I'm thinking the first. And she's really pushing for me without even considering anything. Any other possibilities. And do you wonder who the second person that had the jewel was? It was me. I had it on night 1 as a one time use. I'm aligned with the loyalists. I passed it off to Savage on Night 1 because he seemed loyal to me and I'm sure he did to others of you as we'll. If I was a teammate of Savage who was scum, I don't think that would be a good move. Pointless. And no one else has cloned this. I was going to last night but then the thread locked. If anything, Ventress is scum and the janitor on her team thought up this plan to frame me and think everyone else would be mindless enough to follow. But I am hoping you guys aren't. Vote Ventress. She is scum along with two others that I have no idea who they could be. Yes this does revolve around the jewel but open your eyes! It also talks just as much about me being framed. 3 lines are nonsense about you being framed. 5 lines are nonsense about the jewels.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 23:56:13 GMT -5
I know you've been inactive Aurra but what do you think? Or have you no thoughts yet? Well I was active day 1 and 2 but these past few days I have been inactive. So I know one of you has to be scum. I am leaning towards one of you that I will reveal in a little bit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 23:57:19 GMT -5
Do these ring a bell Ventress? -It's only illogical to you. It makes much sense to a LOYAL. -How does one manipulate oneself? -You accuse me because you want me gone for my evidence against you. And once more you contradict yourself, you just accused Galen Marek not long ago. I don't like people that contradict themselves it sets off a bell in my head.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:57:50 GMT -5
Do these ring a bell Ventress? -It's only illogical to you. It makes much sense to a LOYAL. -How does one manipulate oneself? -You accuse me because you want me gone for my evidence against you. And once more you contradict yourself, you just accused Galen Marek not long ago. -Ram and Xen aren't so sure. Same with Sebulba and Ric. They can't all be scum or loyal. -That's all based on if you're the protector. -I accuse you because you act like scum. And I only pointed out a fact about Galen Marek. Hardly an accusation. I don't find it to contradict myself at all.
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 5, 2013 23:57:59 GMT -5
-It's only illogical to you. It makes much sense to a LOYAL. -How does one manipulate oneself? -You accuse me because you want me gone for my evidence against you. And once more you contradict yourself, you just accused Galen Marek not long ago. I don't like people that contradict themselves it sets off a bell in my head. Bossk just did it.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:58:41 GMT -5
Yes this does revolve around the jewel but open your eyes! It also talks just as much about me being framed. 3 lines are nonsense about you being framed. 5 lines are nonsense about the jewels. Don't get technical. It's basically equal.
|
|
|
Post by Star on Aug 5, 2013 23:59:13 GMT -5
-It's only illogical to you. It makes much sense to a LOYAL. -How does one manipulate oneself? -You accuse me because you want me gone for my evidence against you. And once more you contradict yourself, you just accused Galen Marek not long ago. I don't like people that contradict themselves it sets off a bell in my head. I didn't contradict myself I get the post to prove it. Just a sec.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 23:59:28 GMT -5
I don't like people that contradict themselves it sets off a bell in my head. Bossk just did it. Thanks dr obvious. I just read your past post that's why I said I didn't like how he contradicts himself.
|
|