|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 16:21:40 GMT -5
Tarpals manipulated? I was only in a PM with Tarpals for about 3 messages I asked him what his role was about and he said he just needs 2 jewels and he will leave. I am not trying to manipulate you. You came to me first in a PM asking about Tarpals. Maybe the scum would have thought I would have been protected after I revealed what I wanted to do yesterday with the jewels? I voted Savage because no one was siding with Lobot he didn't seem like scum to me where as about 4 people followed you and voted Lobot right after you voted on day 1. Savage was also a better vote than anyone else yesterday cause we had limited evidence and Tarpals was no threat to us. If Savage was my team mate I wouldn't push for him on day 1 I would only push for a team mate if it was CERTAIN he was going to be voted. Like last game I voted Star cause it was certain he would be voted and he was going against us before he was converted which further supported everything last game. And agreeing with what? I agreed with your suspect list cause I said almost the same thing in our PM before that. And When you and everyone else starting voting that evening I was gone I was not waiting for there to be a conviction. And when I'm scum you probably would be dead by now because who are the stronger members You and I? I wouldn't target weak inactive people as scum. And JSYK I didn't believe your trust me messages you been acting odd in that PM the entire time saying you trust Xen and everything even though you don't give reasons. I actually think the Inspector was replaced with two confirmed loyals those loyals maybe being you and Xen though you denied being a confirmed loyals in the message, I'm not saying I think your scum but I knew you would try and go against me eventually. But you agreed with Tarpals a lot and THOUGHT you had him manipulated. I came to you in the PM because I suspected you, and wanted to know what you had to say. You didn't push for Savage, you just voted him, knowing he wouldn't be convicted, but you did it just so just in case you'd have something to prove your loyalty in the future, like Savage coming up loyal. And yes you WOULD target inactives as a scum, because who else would? You thought you had me manipulated, but I will not fall for your trap this time. Sorry I went against you, but I don't side with scum. I know you're scum. You will be my vote, if I will be able to vote. I agreed with Tarpals alot under Roleplay standards as we are both gungans I never agreed with him after he came up Neutral. I voted Savage cause I didnt want to be another follower on the Lobot vote and like I said I don't see how you found Lobot that suspicious other than voting quick which is not something a scum would probably do a scum would stay back and wait for others to make the first moves on day 1. And I never came running in here saying " I'm a confirmed loyal I voted a scum lol". As what do you mean by I targeted inacitves cause no one else would? I only started talking to you on the night of day 1? Why would anyone target Yargus someone that didnt say anything on day 1. And no I was not trying to manipulate you I thought you wanted to be ally's. if I was trying to manipulate you I would have tried a little harder. Please tell me how you "know I'm scum"? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 3, 2013 16:31:12 GMT -5
But you agreed with Tarpals a lot and THOUGHT you had him manipulated. I came to you in the PM because I suspected you, and wanted to know what you had to say. You didn't push for Savage, you just voted him, knowing he wouldn't be convicted, but you did it just so just in case you'd have something to prove your loyalty in the future, like Savage coming up loyal. And yes you WOULD target inactives as a scum, because who else would? You thought you had me manipulated, but I will not fall for your trap this time. Sorry I went against you, but I don't side with scum. I know you're scum. You will be my vote, if I will be able to vote. I agreed with Tarpals alot under Roleplay standards as we are both gungans I never agreed with him after he came up Neutral. I voted Savage cause I didnt want to be another follower on the Lobot vote and like I said I don't see how you found Lobot that suspicious other than voting quick which is not something a scum would probably do a scum would stay back and wait for others to make the first moves on day 1. And I never came running in here saying " I'm a confirmed loyal I voted a scum lol". As what do you mean by I targeted inacitves cause no one else would? I only started talking to you on the night of day 1? Why would anyone target Yargus someone that didnt say anything on day 1. And no I was not trying to manipulate you I thought you wanted to be ally's. if I was trying to manipulate you I would have tried a little harder. Please tell me how you "know I'm scum"? I found Lobot the most suspicious on Day 1. And no you did not come in here shouting that nonsense as you don't want attention brought onto you. That's scum Jar-Jar. *You* would target inactives, but no one else would. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 3, 2013 16:32:09 GMT -5
OOC: I have to go now. IC: You can either let the gungan manipulate you or you could listen to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 16:35:55 GMT -5
I agreed with Tarpals alot under Roleplay standards as we are both gungans I never agreed with him after he came up Neutral. I voted Savage cause I didnt want to be another follower on the Lobot vote and like I said I don't see how you found Lobot that suspicious other than voting quick which is not something a scum would probably do a scum would stay back and wait for others to make the first moves on day 1. And I never came running in here saying " I'm a confirmed loyal I voted a scum lol". As what do you mean by I targeted inacitves cause no one else would? I only started talking to you on the night of day 1? Why would anyone target Yargus someone that didnt say anything on day 1. And no I was not trying to manipulate you I thought you wanted to be ally's. if I was trying to manipulate you I would have tried a little harder. Please tell me how you "know I'm scum"? I found Lobot the most suspicious on Day 1. And no you did not come in here shouting that nonsense as you don't want attention brought onto you. That's scum Jar-Jar. *You* would target inactives, but no one else would. Why would no one else target inactives? And why was Lobot the most suspicious I guess you where one of the first to vote but when about 4 other follow you after is what I found suspicious with the Lobot vote. Also I revealed I had a jewel to help us if I was scum I would have just kept it for my team we could have easily wasted a vote on Tarpals today instead of him walking out of here. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 16:36:21 GMT -5
OOC: I have to go now. IC: You can either let the gungan manipulate you or you could listen to me. Well the Gungan isn't manipulating you so cya.... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 3, 2013 16:46:32 GMT -5
I found Lobot the most suspicious on Day 1. And no you did not come in here shouting that nonsense as you don't want attention brought onto you. That's scum Jar-Jar. *You* would target inactives, but no one else would. Why would no one else target inactives? And why was Lobot the most suspicious I guess you where one of the first to vote but when about 4 other follow you after is what I found suspicious with the Lobot vote. Also I revealed I had a jewel to help us if I was scum I would have just kept it for my team we could have easily wasted a vote on Tarpals today instead of him walking out of here. But the jewels don't/didn't really help us... Do/did they...? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 16:49:57 GMT -5
Why would no one else target inactives? And why was Lobot the most suspicious I guess you where one of the first to vote but when about 4 other follow you after is what I found suspicious with the Lobot vote. Also I revealed I had a jewel to help us if I was scum I would have just kept it for my team we could have easily wasted a vote on Tarpals today instead of him walking out of here. But the jewels don't/didn't really help us... Do/did they...? They did not Directley help us or give us advantages but I revealed I had one to warn people that there a jewels in play and that fi someone has them we shouldn't give them to a 3rd party that was before Tarpals came and told us his goals. Now looking on it him having the jewels and leaving is a good thing as we don't need to have people wasting a vote on a harmless 3rd party. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Aug 3, 2013 16:57:12 GMT -5
Well, well, quite the fighting going on in here. *jumps on the sofa with a drink* What did i miss!? Hah!
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 3, 2013 17:02:14 GMT -5
But the jewels don't/didn't really help us... Do/did they...? They did not Directley help us or give us advantages but I revealed I had one to warn people that there a jewels in play and that fi someone has them we shouldn't give them to a 3rd party that was before Tarpals came and told us his goals. Now looking on it him having the jewels and leaving is a good thing as we don't need to have people wasting a vote on a harmless 3rd party. Yeah... Well still IDK if I think you're scum... |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 17:04:25 GMT -5
They did not Directley help us or give us advantages but I revealed I had one to warn people that there a jewels in play and that fi someone has them we shouldn't give them to a 3rd party that was before Tarpals came and told us his goals. Now looking on it him having the jewels and leaving is a good thing as we don't need to have people wasting a vote on a harmless 3rd party. Yeah... Well still IDK if I think you're scum... The witch seemed to speak very highly of your loyalty in our PM. I'm unsure of Ventress I think it's very possible where both loyal though she does not seem convinced that me and her can ever be on the same team in a game. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Aug 3, 2013 17:06:11 GMT -5
They did not Directley help us or give us advantages but I revealed I had one to warn people that there a jewels in play and that fi someone has them we shouldn't give them to a 3rd party that was before Tarpals came and told us his goals. Now looking on it him having the jewels and leaving is a good thing as we don't need to have people wasting a vote on a harmless 3rd party. Yeah... Well still IDK if I think you're scum... That makes two of us my alcoholic friend. This fish-face never truely felt Loyal to me, but now we have evidence and accusation that work against him. We should thank the bald witch. Aaha yes yes, we should thank her. I also find the fish's defense a little weak. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Aug 3, 2013 17:06:49 GMT -5
Yeah... Well still IDK if I think you're scum... The witch seemed to speak very highly of your loyalty in our PM. I'm unsure of Ventress I think it's very possible where both loyal though she does not seem convinced that me and her can ever be on the same team in a game. She's a dangerous woman. Haha! Yes! Dangerous! |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Aug 3, 2013 17:10:04 GMT -5
I think Jar-Jar is scum. I know it's sudden and everything, but here's why: -Who are the stronger members? Jar-Jar and I. Why didn't the scum target me? Normally they would've, but Jar-Jar and I have been in a PM together and I've been telling him that I trust him. He thinks he has me manipulated but no he does not. Same with Tarpals, why didn't the scum murder him? Jar Jar also thought he had Tarpals manipulated, they had agreed quite a lot as well. -His vote on Day 1 was quite late, and he voted Savage after we all voted Lobot. Normally a Jar Jar vote would be early and strong but this time it wasn't. He knew his teammate, Savage, would not be voted off on Day 1, so he voted him off after Lobot got the most votes, or at least when it was apparent that Lobot would be convicted. If Jar Jar voted off a scum, of course we would think he's loyal, but Jar Jar wouldn't risk voting off his teammate, and that's what he did on Day 1, knowing his teammate would be safe. -Jar Jar as a loyal would be talkative and loud. Now he's just agreeing. -Jar Jar is also strong. Why didn't the scum kill him? Because he's on the team. I've suspected him since Day 2, but I could not accuse him because my evidence was limited. Now it isn't. Listen to me on this one, I'm sure of it. That's actually pretty interesting. I'll think about that. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Aug 3, 2013 17:12:05 GMT -5
OOC: I have to go now. IC: You can either let the gungan manipulate you or you could listen to me. Well the Gungan isn't manipulating you so cya.... Perhaps he's not. But maybe he is! |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 17:12:09 GMT -5
Yeah... Well still IDK if I think you're scum... That makes two of us my alcoholic friend. This fish-face never truely felt Loyal to me, but now we have evidence and accusation that work against him. We should thank the bald witch. Aaha yes yes, we should thank her. I also find the fish's defense a little weak. What did you expect me to say. Most of her evidence is based on theories or speculations rather than solid evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Aug 3, 2013 17:14:14 GMT -5
That makes two of us my alcoholic friend. This fish-face never truely felt Loyal to me, but now we have evidence and accusation that work against him. We should thank the bald witch. Aaha yes yes, we should thank her. I also find the fish's defense a little weak. What did you expect me to say. Most of her evidence is based on theories or speculations rather than solid evidence. Still, it does ring a bell *shrugs* Sorry fish-face. *throws a credit on the counter of the bar and get a drinking glass shoved in his hand* Owhwii! That's cold haha yes! Just the way Ram Ohnaka like his blue milk. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 17:17:51 GMT -5
What did you expect me to say. Most of her evidence is based on theories or speculations rather than solid evidence. Still, it does ring a bell *shrugs* Sorry fish-face. *throws a credit on the counter of the bar and get a drinking glass shoved in his hand* Owhwii! That's cold haha yes! Just the way Ram Ohnaka like his blue milk. ?? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 3, 2013 17:28:14 GMT -5
But the jewels don't/didn't really help us... Do/did they...? They did not Directley help us or give us advantages but I revealed I had one to warn people that there a jewels in play and that fi someone has them we shouldn't give them to a 3rd party that was before Tarpals came and told us his goals. Now looking on it him having the jewels and leaving is a good thing as we don't need to have people wasting a vote on a harmless 3rd party. Yes, the jewels didn't directly help us. It changed voting, that's it. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 3, 2013 17:28:37 GMT -5
Let's do a prevote. PREVOTE: JAR JAR
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 17:32:02 GMT -5
They did not Directley help us or give us advantages but I revealed I had one to warn people that there a jewels in play and that fi someone has them we shouldn't give them to a 3rd party that was before Tarpals came and told us his goals. Now looking on it him having the jewels and leaving is a good thing as we don't need to have people wasting a vote on a harmless 3rd party. Yes, the jewels didn't directly help us. It changed voting, that's it. And the point is? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Aug 3, 2013 17:33:55 GMT -5
Yes, the jewels didn't directly help us. It changed voting, that's it. And the point is? You said if you were scum you wouldn't have revealed it, but that doesn't matter. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Aug 3, 2013 17:36:06 GMT -5
PREVOTE: JAR JAR BINKS *holds up shot glass and start blasting in the air with a blaster*
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Aug 3, 2013 18:09:59 GMT -5
OOC: I just noticed this isn't the first time Nam has been against Jar Jar in a game
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 18:10:53 GMT -5
OOC: I just noticed this isn't the first time Nam has been against Jar Jar in a game OOC: ? |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Aug 3, 2013 18:12:07 GMT -5
OOC: I just noticed this isn't the first time Nam has been against Jar Jar in a game OOC: ? OOC: Servants of Destruction |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 18:13:20 GMT -5
OOC: Servants of Destruction OOC: Oh was that Tater? |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Aug 3, 2013 18:15:19 GMT -5
OOC: Servants of Destruction OOC: Oh was that Tater? OOC: Yah, they both died. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 18:16:10 GMT -5
OOC: Yah, they both died. OOC: How did they die? Didnt they kill each other in the final fight? |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Aug 3, 2013 18:23:52 GMT -5
OOC: Yah, they both died. OOC: How did they die? Didnt they kill each other in the final fight? OOC: Yep. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Aug 3, 2013 18:24:58 GMT -5
OOC: How did they die? Didnt they kill each other in the final fight? OOC: Yep. OOC: Classic Tater and Nam  |
|
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself? 