Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:10:00 GMT -5
True, but you didn't use real defense. I don't think your scum as of now. I used OOC because I could come up with an IC defense. Nope. You freaked out on lobot and said it was your roleplay and said it isn't fair. Your defense was fully OOC.
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Aug 1, 2013 20:11:15 GMT -5
Lobot accused me of RP, because that's all he had to accuse with. But I didn't like that because you have to come up with REAL evidence. He didn't accused you of RP he accused you of attacking many people and not having a good defense for it. I was picking on Jar Jar because I didn't like him. I didn't accuse him of scum. If I accused him of scum, that wouldn't be roleplay. That would be disscusssing
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 1, 2013 20:12:08 GMT -5
How are you using IC evidence? And I'm his partner now? Hardly. Truthfully, I don't fully trust him. All I'm trying to say is that you guys are calling the only defense that could possibly be used bad. My evidence is IC. It states the actions of other. You may be confused, I am using IC evidence against him that is using OOC evidence. You are teaming up with him and protecting him a little too much. It's not that IC. You're saying his "OOC" evidence is bad. And you say you don't find him suspicious anyway so why call me out for trying to say that his defense was the only thing he coudld've said
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Aug 1, 2013 20:12:11 GMT -5
Wait, didn't you use roleplay as your defense evidence, I don't think bane mentioned your roleplay just your attitude. He did mention RP. Then he used RP as his defense when I questioned him, making him a hypocrite When did you question me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:12:14 GMT -5
I'm Loyal but I guess the scum knew that. You better watch out, you better not cry, you better not pout I'm telling you why, Saaaaanta clause is coming to town. Anyways Yargus is dead but...but.......I got nothing. OOC: Wish I could have lasted longer in the game but had fun for the time being .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:12:49 GMT -5
He didn't accused you of RP he accused you of attacking many people and not having a good defense for it. I was picking on Jar Jar because I didn't like him. I didn't accuse him of scum. If I accused him of scum, that wouldn't be roleplay. That would be disscusssing You make no sense. You picked on jar jar for no reason. Your all over the place you horn headed maniac.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Aug 1, 2013 20:13:54 GMT -5
I used OOC because I could come up with an IC defense. Nope. You freaked out on lobot and said it was your roleplay and said it isn't fair. Your defense was fully OOC. Exactly. And Xen: have you thought about the fact that there might not be anything Savage can say? Like if the inspector inspects a scum and they come up Scum?
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 1, 2013 20:14:03 GMT -5
Then what are you expecting? You choose not to believe the only possible thing. OOC: Oh well hope you get better Well I'm expecting something that is not OOC. OOC: Thanks. You're expecting something that won't happen. He did mention RP. Then he used RP as his defense when I questioned him, making him a hypocrite When did you question me. I'm talking about Bane
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:14:56 GMT -5
My evidence is IC. It states the actions of other. You may be confused, I am using IC evidence against him that is using OOC evidence. You are teaming up with him and protecting him a little too much. It's not that IC. You're saying his "OOC" evidence is bad. And you say you don't find him suspicious anyway so why call me out for trying to say that his defense was the only thing he coudld've said I am calling you out because you keep protecting him. Why protect him? Why not let him speak for himself at first.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 1, 2013 20:15:58 GMT -5
Nope. You freaked out on lobot and said it was your roleplay and said it isn't fair. Your defense was fully OOC. Exactly. And Xen: have you thought about the fact that there might not be anything Savage can say? Like if the inspector inspects a scum and they come up Scum? The "scum" could say he was polarized. Nothing Savage can say? You want a better defense but there's apparently nothing he can say so why not just vote him off right now?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:17:09 GMT -5
Exactly. And Xen: have you thought about the fact that there might not be anything Savage can say? Like if the inspector inspects a scum and they come up Scum? The "scum" could say he was polarized. Nothing Savage can say? You want a better defense but there's apparently nothing he can say so why not just vote him off right now? Voting's not open. If I had to vote I probably would vote for you.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Aug 1, 2013 20:17:51 GMT -5
It's not that IC. You're saying his "OOC" evidence is bad. And you say you don't find him suspicious anyway so why call me out for trying to say that his defense was the only thing he coudld've said I am calling you out because you keep protecting him. Why protect him? Why not let him speak for himself at first. Perhaps because there really isn't a defense for Savage and Xen is just trying to save him?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:18:56 GMT -5
I am calling you out because you keep protecting him. Why protect him? Why not let him speak for himself at first. Perhaps because there really isn't a defense for Savage and Xen is just trying to save him? Maybe. He just all of a sudden protected him out of the blue.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Aug 1, 2013 20:19:34 GMT -5
The "scum" could say he was polarized. Nothing Savage can say? You want a better defense but there's apparently nothing he can say so why not just vote him off right now? Voting's not open. If I had to vote I probably would vote for you. Why not Savage? The person who Xen is protecting so foolishly?
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Aug 1, 2013 20:20:27 GMT -5
Perhaps because there really isn't a defense for Savage and Xen is just trying to save him? Maybe. He just all of a sudden protected him out of the blue. True.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 1, 2013 20:20:34 GMT -5
It's not that IC. You're saying his "OOC" evidence is bad. And you say you don't find him suspicious anyway so why call me out for trying to say that his defense was the only thing he coudld've said I am calling you out because you keep protecting him. Why protect him? Why not let him speak for himself at first. I'm protecting Savage's defense. Not savage. You want a good defense. Savage gave the best defense possible. You think that defense is not good enough. I try to say there is no other defense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:20:39 GMT -5
Voting's not open. If I had to vote I probably would vote for you. Why not Savage? The person who Xen is protecting so foolishly? Xen is protecting savage for foolish reasons.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 1, 2013 20:21:39 GMT -5
Out of the blue? I've been saying this from the start. And you would vote me because I make sense? Okay
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:22:06 GMT -5
I am calling you out because you keep protecting him. Why protect him? Why not let him speak for himself at first. I'm protecting Savage's defense. Not savage. You want a good defense. Savage gave the best defense possible. You think that defense is not good enough. I try to say there is no other defense. When you protect savages defense you also protect him, because it is his defense.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Aug 1, 2013 20:22:49 GMT -5
Why not Savage? The person who Xen is protecting so foolishly? Xen is protecting savage for foolish reasons. Yes. So Xen may just be a foolish loyal protecting a scum.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Aug 1, 2013 20:24:20 GMT -5
Out of the blue? I've been saying this from the start. And you would vote me because I make sense? Okay I'm not going to vote you. But that does not mean that you are making sense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:24:22 GMT -5
Out of the blue? I've been saying this from the start. And you would vote me because I make sense? Okay You weren't even in the conversation about how savage freaked out over bane the other day, and today you just protect him, when you had nothing to do with the conversation, you were drunk the whole other day.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 1, 2013 20:24:37 GMT -5
Xen is protecting savage for foolish reasons. Yes. So Xen may just be a foolish loyal protecting a scum. How would you KNOW Savage is scum? You're only going on his bad defense which isn't that bad
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:26:45 GMT -5
I am done for the day. This conversation keeps going in circles. I don't find savage scummy but I do think xen is strange. And I haven't forgotten you rick.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 1, 2013 20:26:51 GMT -5
Out of the blue? I've been saying this from the start. And you would vote me because I make sense? Okay I'm not going to vote you. But that does not mean that you are making sense. I was talking to Aurra. And so far, I'm not making sense to the two of you Out of the blue? I've been saying this from the start. And you would vote me because I make sense? Okay You weren't even in the conversation about how savage freaked out over bane the other day, and today you just protect him, when you had nothing to do with the conversation, you were drunk the whole other day. Yes I was. I can understand my roleplay can make things a little confusing but you can still understand most of it. If you completely ignored what I said because you thought I was speaking jibberish, then you wouldn't know
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Aug 1, 2013 20:27:02 GMT -5
Yes. So Xen may just be a foolish loyal protecting a scum. How would you KNOW Savage is scum? You're only going on his bad defense which isn't that bad I don't know he is scum I just think that he is and that you are loyal because he is just sitting back and letting you fall on a knife.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:27:56 GMT -5
I'm not going to vote you. But that does not mean that you are making sense. I was talking to Aurra. And so far, I'm not making sense to the two of you You weren't even in the conversation about how savage freaked out over bane the other day, and today you just protect him, when you had nothing to do with the conversation, you were drunk the whole other day. Yes I was. I can understand my roleplay can make things a little confusing but you can still understand most of it. If you completely ignored what I said because you thought I was speaking jibberish, then you wouldn't know I didn't ignore you. All you said was random stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Aug 1, 2013 20:28:25 GMT -5
I am done for the day. This conversation keeps going in circles. I don't find savage scummy but I do think xen is strange. And I haven't forgotten you rick. I think I am to. But why still me? We agree don't we?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2013 20:30:44 GMT -5
I am done for the day. This conversation keeps going in circles. I don't find savage scummy but I do think xen is strange. And I haven't forgotten you rick. I think I am to. But why still me? We agree don't we? Yes we do but I still have an eye on you.
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Aug 1, 2013 20:31:14 GMT -5
How would you KNOW Savage is scum? You're only going on his bad defense which isn't that bad I don't know he is scum I just think that he is and that you are loyal because he is just sitting back and letting you fall on a knife. Your evidence is weak to call him scum. He could be but your evidence is still weak. And to me, I'm defending his defense. If you take it as defending Savage then okay but truthfully, I am neutral about him. He could be scum, he could be loyal but like I said, there isn't enough evidence to call him either
|
|