|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 31, 2013 20:04:17 GMT -5
VOTE TALLY:
Savage Opress- 1
Lobot- 1
About 16 hours remain in the day.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 31, 2013 20:09:53 GMT -5
Why couldn't it be role play? As you say if you were scum you wouldn't be bold enough to lead a vote but if Savage was scum he wouldn't be bold enough to accuse everyone here. And a good loyal wouldn't randomly vote for someone like that. They would think things out and converse with others I did think things out. And even if it's role play, I don't think he can get away with that. What else could it be? And I mean think things out with others too I did think things out. And even if it's role play, I don't think he can get away with that. Well if he can really get away with that: Lobot is not used to conversing with others, and makes decisions on his own. "Lobot is not used to conversing with others" That can count as roleplay. So you're being a hypocrite |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 20:11:24 GMT -5
I did think things out. And even if it's role play, I don't think he can get away with that. What else could it be? And I mean think things out with others too Well if he can really get away with that: Lobot is not used to conversing with others, and makes decisions on his own. "Lobot is not used to conversing with others" That can count as roleplay. So you're being a hypocrite If he can use that level of role play, then so can I. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 31, 2013 20:12:58 GMT -5
What else could it be? And I mean think things out with others too "Lobot is not used to conversing with others" That can count as roleplay. So you're being a hypocrite If he can use that level of role play, then so can I. You were saying he can't but now you've changed your mind so it's beneficial to you... |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 31, 2013 20:13:35 GMT -5
Lobot is starting to get more suspicious to me...
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 20:13:58 GMT -5
If he can use that level of role play, then so can I. You were saying he can't but now you've changed your mind so it's beneficial to you... I don't think either of us should, but if that's really how this game is going to work... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 31, 2013 20:17:17 GMT -5
You were saying he can't but now you've changed your mind so it's beneficial to you... I don't think either of us should, but if that's really how this game is going to work... It's not how the game is going to work. It is what it is, role play, how can you change that or say it's something else |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 20:18:28 GMT -5
I don't think either of us should, but if that's really how this game is going to work... It's not how the game is going to work. It is what it is, role play, how can you change that or say it's something else Okay, I'll stop. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 31, 2013 20:24:12 GMT -5
It's not how the game is going to work. It is what it is, role play, how can you change that or say it's something else Okay, I'll stop. Sure, you can stop but now you don't really have a defense... |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 31, 2013 20:45:11 GMT -5
This is what I think. SAVAGE: Started to accuse others without reason. Said it was his RP style. I have to agree with him on this because of last game withe even if it is OOC. That's all there really is to him. LOBOT: When he came on he stated that no one is suspicious. Ventress said that he was being hasty but Lobot then said that Ventress was trying to get others to discuss too much. Then Ventress said she was trying to because as he had said: "they haven't progressed much". Then when Savage came on Lobot accused him of attacking Jar Jar. Savage tried to say that he was verbally saying that he was saying he didn't like his stupidity (  ) which meant he didn't mean he thought Jar Jar was scum. Yet Lobot continued to say that where did he get these accusations from when Savage said he wasn't accusing Jar Jar. Savage then said it was his RP making him suspicious, as his defense. Then not even a minute later, Lobot voted for him, being hasty yet again. It almost seems like he didn't even consider what Savage had to say. And since a lot of others were thinking about voting Savage then, Lobot could be a scum who thought he's lead a vote against Savage an others would follow. None did. And I don't think a loyal would vote for someone so quickly without considering the options first and for awhile. And I don't even want to hear that a scum wouldn't do it either.  So all in all I think that Lobot was a traitor that tried to seize the opportunity to vote off a loyal instead off think it through like a real loyal would. I would vote for him now by I want to see what he has to say to change my mind and so I don't get accused of being hasty. Also can someone tell me the general pages of where Sebulba seemed to be siding with Lobot? I think I missed it.  |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 31, 2013 20:48:51 GMT -5
This is what I think. SAVAGE: Started to accuse others without reason. Said it was his RP style. I have to agree with him on this because of last game withe even if it is OOC. That's all there really is to him. LOBOT: When he came on he stated that no one is suspicious. Ventress said that he was being hasty but Lobot then said that Ventress was trying to get others to discuss too much. Then Ventress said she was trying to because as he had said: "they haven't progressed much". Then when Savage came on Lobot accused him of attacking Jar Jar. Savage tried to say that he was verbally saying that he was saying he didn't like his stupidity ( ) which meant he didn't mean he thought Jar Jar was scum. Yet Lobot continued to say that where did he get these accusations from when Savage said he wasn't accusing Jar Jar. Savage then said it was his RP making him suspicious, as his defense. Then not even a minute later, Lobot voted for him, being hasty yet again. It almost seems like he didn't even consider what Savage had to say. And since a lot of others were thinking about voting Savage then, Lobot could be a scum who thought he's lead a vote against Savage an others would follow. None did. And I don't think a loyal would vote for someone so quickly without considering the options first and for awhile. And I don't even want to hear that a scum wouldn't do it either. So all in all I think that Lobot was a traitor that tried to seize the opportunity to vote off a loyal instead off think it through like a real loyal would. I would vote for him now by I want to see what he has to say to change my mind and so I don't get accused of being hasty. Also can someone tell me the general pages of where Sebulba seemed to be siding with Lobot? I think I missed it. I think I can agree with this. Also what could've happened is, if Lobot is scum, his allies decided to vote Savage but Lobot did it too quickly and either the others didn't to avoid the spolight or they simply weren't on. And sorry, IDK.. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 31, 2013 20:51:33 GMT -5
This is what I think. SAVAGE: Started to accuse others without reason. Said it was his RP style. I have to agree with him on this because of last game withe even if it is OOC. That's all there really is to him. LOBOT: When he came on he stated that no one is suspicious. Ventress said that he was being hasty but Lobot then said that Ventress was trying to get others to discuss too much. Then Ventress said she was trying to because as he had said: "they haven't progressed much". Then when Savage came on Lobot accused him of attacking Jar Jar. Savage tried to say that he was verbally saying that he was saying he didn't like his stupidity ( ) which meant he didn't mean he thought Jar Jar was scum. Yet Lobot continued to say that where did he get these accusations from when Savage said he wasn't accusing Jar Jar. Savage then said it was his RP making him suspicious, as his defense. Then not even a minute later, Lobot voted for him, being hasty yet again. It almost seems like he didn't even consider what Savage had to say. And since a lot of others were thinking about voting Savage then, Lobot could be a scum who thought he's lead a vote against Savage an others would follow. None did. And I don't think a loyal would vote for someone so quickly without considering the options first and for awhile. And I don't even want to hear that a scum wouldn't do it either. So all in all I think that Lobot was a traitor that tried to seize the opportunity to vote off a loyal instead off think it through like a real loyal would. I would vote for him now by I want to see what he has to say to change my mind and so I don't get accused of being hasty. Also can someone tell me the general pages of where Sebulba seemed to be siding with Lobot? I think I missed it. I think I can agree with this. Also what could've happened is, if Lobot is scum, his allies decided to vote Savage but Lobot did it too quickly and either the others didn't to avoid the spolight or they simply weren't on. And sorry, IDK.. I agree. They might have a plan where a scum member does this and then another votes him off to look very loyal and seem to be untouchable for the rest of the game. Or your ideas may be right. And okay. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 31, 2013 20:51:54 GMT -5
Perhaps Lobot voted off Savage so quickly because he thought others would follow?
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 31, 2013 21:00:26 GMT -5
Perhaps Lobot voted off Savage so quickly because he thought others would follow? Messa thinks this is most Likley. Lobot probably thought others would follow him maybe hesa thought for certain Lobot would be voted off? |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 31, 2013 21:00:32 GMT -5
Perhaps Lobot voted off Savage so quickly because he thought others would follow? That's what I thought and stated above. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2013 21:01:42 GMT -5
Perhaps Lobot voted off Savage so quickly because he thought others would follow? They both could maybe be scum. Lobot wanted to make sure that he was not associated to savage or something. It is unlikely though. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 31, 2013 21:02:22 GMT -5
Right now, Lobot and Sebulba stand out to me the most. Since we're wasting time, I'm going to step up and make a decision. Lobot might be loyal, and I might be making a mistake, but the evidence points against the droid and it's merely Day 1. VOTE: LOBOT (BANE)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2013 21:03:21 GMT -5
Well after further reveiw it comes down to two choices. Savage and Lobot. I made my choice VOTE: LOBOT. He voted very quickly. May have had good reasoning, yes. But if he was certain as to why he was going to vote him then why not discuss first or at least consider otherwise before making a final choice so quickly. As well as that he seems to be talking things out and really hasn't given a defense as to why he voted with such haste. Other than i had good reasoning and he was weird.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2013 21:04:14 GMT -5
Right now, Lobot and Sebulba stand out to me the most. Since we're wasting time, I'm going to step up and make a decision. Lobot might be loyal, and I might be making a mistake, but the evidence points against the droid and it's merely Day 1. VOTE: LOBOT (BANE) Lobot stands out to me and someone else but I am monitoring them. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 21:04:48 GMT -5
So if I'm so, so, suspicious, why don't you all just vote for me?
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 31, 2013 21:05:12 GMT -5
So if I'm so, so, suspicious, why don't you all just vote for me? They stand in fear. I don't. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2013 21:06:00 GMT -5
So if I'm so, so, suspicious, why don't you all just vote for me? VOTE: LOBOT |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 31, 2013 21:06:39 GMT -5
So if I'm so, so, suspicious, why don't you all just vote for me? This doesn't help you... |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 31, 2013 21:07:18 GMT -5
So if I'm so, so, suspicious, why don't you all just vote for me? I give you the chance to defend yourself and you don't?! How stupid! VOTE: LOBOT (BANE) |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 21:08:25 GMT -5
So if I'm so, so, suspicious, why don't you all just vote for me? This doesn't help you... I'm giving up. |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 31, 2013 21:08:35 GMT -5
So if I'm so, so, suspicious, why don't you all just vote for me? They stand in fear. I don't. FYI I'm the one who made a very long post of evidence against him. That's almost the same as a vote and if anything helped you and (Squiggy) vote quicker. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 31, 2013 21:09:26 GMT -5
They stand in fear. I don't. FYI I'm the one who made a very long post of evidence against him. That's almost the same as a vote and if anything helped you and (Squiggy) vote quicker. Oh dear Bossk, there's no need for an argument between us. Not now. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 31, 2013 21:09:44 GMT -5
VOTE TALLY:
Savage Opress- 1
Lobot- 5
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 31, 2013 21:09:59 GMT -5
Well... IDK if I'll vote or not... It won't make a difference if I don't unless someone votes for Savage |
|
|
|
Post by Star on Jul 31, 2013 21:10:05 GMT -5
You barely even did anything to give up! How can you say you give up and hardly do anything before? |
|
Wars Story
) which meant he didn't mean he thought Jar Jar was scum.
So all in all I think that Lobot was a traitor that tried to seize the opportunity to vote off a loyal instead off think it through like a real loyal would. 
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5