|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 31, 2013 14:26:20 GMT -5
People are saying Lobot was too quick to vote Savage. But he had pretty good reasons for doing so and It's easy to understand why he did it. I'm not certain of anyone yet at the moment though. But I can't deny Lobot almost seemed he wanted to get rid of Savage.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 31, 2013 14:28:40 GMT -5
OOC: My signature speaks the truth
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 31, 2013 14:30:17 GMT -5
Jar Jar, what do you think of all of this? You're quiet. OOC: Sorry I been doing some things and been AFK. IC: I think Savage was suspicious yesterday with his roleplay though I don't see anything that screams scum from him I admit he's a bit more suspicious than others. Lobot on the other hand was quick to vote and his reasons don't seem to be the greatest but I guess Savages defense was not the best as well. Im not sure who I would vote but I may not vote at all. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 31, 2013 14:31:11 GMT -5
Jar Jar, what do you think of all of this? You're quiet. OOC: Sorry I been doing some things and been AFK. IC: I think Savage was suspicious yesterday with his roleplay though I don't see anything that screams scum from him I admit he's a bit more suspicious than others. Lobot on the other hand was quick to vote and his reasons don't seem to be the greatest but I guess Savages defense was not the best as well. Im not sure who I would vote but I may not vote at all. Hmm.. My thoughts exactly. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 31, 2013 14:32:05 GMT -5
Jar Jar, what do you think of all of this? You're quiet. OOC: Sorry I been doing some things and been AFK. IC: I think Savage was suspicious yesterday with his roleplay though I don't see anything that screams scum from him I admit he's a bit more suspicious than others. Lobot on the other hand was quick to vote and his reasons don't seem to be the greatest but I guess Savages defense was not the best as well. Im not sure who I would vote but I may not vote at all. OOC:You need to add Gungan language  Howsa are yousa doing? |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 31, 2013 14:34:49 GMT -5
OOC: Sorry I been doing some things and been AFK. IC: I think Savage was suspicious yesterday with his roleplay though I don't see anything that screams scum from him I admit he's a bit more suspicious than others. Lobot on the other hand was quick to vote and his reasons don't seem to be the greatest but I guess Savages defense was not the best as well. Im not sure who I would vote but I may not vote at all. OOC:You need to add Gungan language Howsa are yousa doing? OOC: I know I will do that on the Ipad Im not a very good typer but I can type fast on Ipad. I actually only came on this site a handful of times on the computer I always use Ipad. If I was using gungan language I would be super slow responding here. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 31, 2013 14:36:17 GMT -5
OOC:You need to add Gungan language Howsa are yousa doing? OOC: I know I will do that on the Ipad Im not a very good typer but I can type fast on Ipad. I actually only came on this site a handful of times on the computer I always use Ipad. If I was using gungan language I would be super slow responding here. OOC: I use Iphone a lot of the time and it's really hard typing. So I can kind of understand where you're coming from |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 31, 2013 14:41:08 GMT -5
If no one else v... votes today, the b.. be... beasty will be voted off anywa...
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 14:53:36 GMT -5
My main reason was that he seemed very panicky. In his defense, (which was mostly in caps) he spazzed out at everyone, claiming we were ignorant, and that it's "not fair." I don't know about anyone else, but I thought this was panicking, and scummy panicking at that. In addition, before he just burst in, and started accusing people left and right without evidence. But that doesn't mean you vote for him in 30 seconds which could also seem like panicky. And also as OOC: reasons, Dark has sometimes done stuff like this a couple times in the past Well that's sort of his problem, don't you think? If he would have given a calm and concise defence that didn't include him thinking we're ignorant, I probably wouldnt have voted for him. As this is not the case... I thought I had brought evidence to vote. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 31, 2013 14:56:17 GMT -5
But that doesn't mean you vote for him in 30 seconds which could also seem like panicky. And also as OOC: reasons, Dark has sometimes done stuff like this a couple times in the past Well that's sort of his problem, don't you think? If he would have given a calm and concise defence that didn't include him thinking we're ignorant, I probably wouldnt have voted for him. As this is not the case... I thought I had brought evidence to vote. IMO, you provided sufficient evidence to vote. |
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jul 31, 2013 14:56:19 GMT -5
If no one else v... votes today, the b.. be... beasty will be voted off anywa... No, there is a required number of votes. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 31, 2013 14:57:07 GMT -5
If no one else v... votes today, the b.. be... beasty will be voted off anywa... No, there is a required number of votes. He means if 24 hrs elapse and no one else has voted. Then you will be convicted. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 31, 2013 14:57:25 GMT -5
If no one else v... votes today, the b.. be... beasty will be voted off anywa... No, there is a required number of votes. PPre said whoever haz the most votes gets.... |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 15:00:29 GMT -5
So other than me apparently voting to early, does anyone have any other evidence against me? And is anyone else going to vote?
|
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jul 31, 2013 15:00:48 GMT -5
No, there is a required number of votes. PPre said whoever haz the most votes gets.... OOC: But in Potato's first game people had to have a required number of votes. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 31, 2013 15:01:39 GMT -5
I'm not taking part in the vote for Savage, but I don't think I'll vote Lobot either. What strikes me as odd is how Sebulba seems to so strongly agree with him. These are strange times.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 15:02:02 GMT -5
PPre said whoever haz the most votes gets.... OOC: But in Potato's first game people had to have a required number of votes. But as this isn't his fist game... |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 15:04:09 GMT -5
I'm not taking part in the vote for Savage, but I don't think I'll vote Lobot either. What strikes me as odd is how Sebulba seems to so strongly agree with him. These are strange times. It's a little odd, but could've just be agreeing with me? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 31, 2013 15:05:21 GMT -5
I'm not taking part in the vote for Savage, but I don't think I'll vote Lobot either. What strikes me as odd is how Sebulba seems to so strongly agree with him. These are strange times. It's a little odd, but could've just be agreeing with me? If he agrees with you, why doesn't he vote? |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 15:07:31 GMT -5
It's a little odd, but could've just be agreeing with me? If he agrees with you, why doesn't he vote? To tell you the truth I think a lot of people are scared to vote. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 31, 2013 15:08:06 GMT -5
If he agrees with you, why doesn't he vote? To tell you the truth I think a lot of people are scared to vote. I'm not, I'm just confused. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jul 31, 2013 15:09:08 GMT -5
So Lobot voted Savage. That's something I didn't expect. You'd think everyone would think their vote through carefully and at a reasonably steady pace. Clearly this is not the case with Lobot. You could say he was a loyal acting out on instinct, but you could say he was a traitor seizing an opportunity as quick as he could. Those two ideas should prove the most likely. So for now, I might vote Lobot, but for now I'll say neutral for the moment. OOC: Just so you all know, I'm going to bed now, so if voting ends while I'm asleep, just put me down as VOTE: LOBOT, if you can that is.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 15:09:10 GMT -5
To tell you the truth I think a lot of people are scared to vote. I'm not, I'm just confused. Okay. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 15:11:23 GMT -5
So Lobot voted Savage. That's something I didn't expect. You'd think everyone would think their vote through carefully and at a reasonably steady pace. Clearly this is not the case with Lobot. You could say he was a loyal acting out on instinct, but you could say he was a traitor seizing an opportunity as quick as he could. Those two ideas should prove the most likely. So for now, I might vote Lobot, but for now I'll say neutral for the moment. OOC: Just so you all know, I'm going to bed now, so if voting ends while I'm asleep, just put me down as VOTE: LOBOT, if you can that is. I understand that I might have jumped the gun in some people's eyes, but consider this: why would a scum be so bold on day one? That's exactly what they wouldn't do. At least for now, I think the Scum would be going with the flow. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 31, 2013 15:16:54 GMT -5
You know, perhaps we should just leave it at this? Savage and Lobot would both have equal votes and no one will be convicted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 31, 2013 15:17:43 GMT -5
Messa has good feeling that either Lobot or Savage could be scum. Messa will probably vote sometime today.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 31, 2013 15:18:29 GMT -5
You know, perhaps we should just leave it at this? Savage and Lobot would both have equal votes and no one will be convicted. Or we would both be convicted... but it's your choice. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 31, 2013 15:18:42 GMT -5
You know, perhaps we should just leave it at this? Savage and Lobot would both have equal votes and no one will be convicted. OOC: Tater said someone WILL be convicted everyday so either it will be someone random or they both get voted if its tied. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 31, 2013 15:19:17 GMT -5
I have decided that the only scenario where no one's convicted is when there is a tie in the votes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 31, 2013 15:21:09 GMT -5
I have decided that the only scenario where no one's convicted is when there is a tie in the votes. Exactly. |
|
Howsa are yousa doing?
Wars Story
