|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 20, 2013 17:44:19 GMT -5
And unfortunately, I don't have very useful results... Cola appears to be loyal Ah, good. Doesn't prove me loyal, but it helps me seem loyaler. And now we must vote Baxter off. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 20, 2013 18:12:06 GMT -5
So it takes the death of two loyals to galvanize you into action? So be it. As I've before: I am right, and you are wrong. Baxter was lying about his role, and affliction. Deal with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 20, 2013 18:12:52 GMT -5
I think Baxter was telling the truth about him being a 3rd party, but not all of it. 3rd parties have hit lists, and Si was probably on his. OOC: Do 3rd parties get to know people's affiliations? IDK.  |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 20, 2013 18:22:32 GMT -5
I think Baxter was telling the truth about him being a 3rd party, but not all of it. 3rd parties have hit lists, and Si was probably on his. OOC: Do 3rd parties get to know people's affiliations? IDK. Can we please get off the 3rd party thing? All we have is Baxter's word for it; there is absolutely no proof. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 20, 2013 18:30:01 GMT -5
I think Baxter was telling the truth about him being a 3rd party, but not all of it. 3rd parties have hit lists, and Si was probably on his. OOC: Do 3rd parties get to know people's affiliations? IDK. Can we please get off the 3rd party thing? All we have is Baxter's word for it; there is absolutely no proof. If he were loyal, I think he would have backed off after he defended a scum. If he was scum, he would have known not to push to get a loyal voted off. He's a 3rd party I think. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 20, 2013 18:30:52 GMT -5
I still think Baxter is indeed third party, just with different goals than the ones he claimed. But I don't rule out the option of him being a lying scum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 20, 2013 18:32:24 GMT -5
I think Baxter was telling the truth about him being a 3rd party, but not all of it. 3rd parties have hit lists, and Si was probably on his. OOC: Do 3rd parties get to know people's affiliations? IDK. They don't always kill people. And usually they don't know people's affiliations, I don't think. It probably depends on their job I think Baxter was telling the truth about him being a 3rd party, but not all of it. 3rd parties have hit lists, and Si was probably on his. OOC: Do 3rd parties get to know people's affiliations? IDK. Can we please get off the 3rd party thing? All we have is Baxter's word for it; there is absolutely no proof. Why? It could be true. But no matter, I just want to know what Baxter has to say about this |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 20, 2013 18:33:13 GMT -5
There's one thing we can be certain about: Baxter is not loyal, so we shouldn't trust him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 20, 2013 18:33:35 GMT -5
I agree with Whitaker I would like to see what Baxter says. But at the moment I still believe him to be 3rd party,
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 20, 2013 18:37:52 GMT -5
Why don't we just... vote him off.  I don't really care what he has to say. Day one: Sides with a scum. Day two: leads the vote on a loyal. This in itself should definitely be enough evidence to vote him off. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 20, 2013 18:42:23 GMT -5
Why don't we just... vote him off. I don't really care what he has to say. Day one: Sides with a scum. Day two: leads the vote on a loyal. This in itself should definitely be enough evidence to vote him off. Well I'm not sure if we should waste a vote on him but I don't trust him... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 20, 2013 18:42:59 GMT -5
Why don't we just... vote him off. I don't really care what he has to say. Day one: Sides with a scum. Day two: leads the vote on a loyal. This in itself should definitely be enough evidence to vote him off. Don't be so hasty. He's also claimed a 3rd party with a role that could be useful. And he said he would surrender himself if Si came up loyal which he did so Baxter probably will end up being voted off (unless he's already won...) |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 20, 2013 18:44:59 GMT -5
Also the things he's said in PM make me believe him to some extent.
Baxter said his role was changed a bunch due to balancing issues, which there were. If he was scum, saying all those other roles would just make it harder for him later on
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 20, 2013 18:51:46 GMT -5
Why don't we just... vote him off. I don't really care what he has to say. Day one: Sides with a scum. Day two: leads the vote on a loyal. This in itself should definitely be enough evidence to vote him off. Don't be so hasty. He's also claimed a 3rd party with a role that could be useful. And he said he would surrender himself if Si came up loyal which he did so Baxter probably will end up being voted off (unless he's already won...) If he won we wouldn't be at day 3 would we? |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 20, 2013 18:52:32 GMT -5
Also the things he's said in PM make me believe him to some extent. Baxter said his role was changed a bunch due to balancing issues, which there were. If he was scum, saying all those other roles would just make it harder for him later on Still, he might have lied about his goals. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 20, 2013 18:54:57 GMT -5
Don't be so hasty. He's also claimed a 3rd party with a role that could be useful. And he said he would surrender himself if Si came up loyal which he did so Baxter probably will end up being voted off (unless he's already won...) If he won we wouldn't be at day 3 would we? Yes we still would if he accomplished his goal Also the things he's said in PM make me believe him to some extent. Baxter said his role was changed a bunch due to balancing issues, which there were. If he was scum, saying all those other roles would just make it harder for him later on Still, he might have lied about his goals. Yes, I think I'm thinking that you were right when you said he has other goals. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 20, 2013 19:17:02 GMT -5
I hope to see Baxter's reaction tomorrow OOC: I'm off for today, goodnight!
|
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jul 20, 2013 19:43:58 GMT -5
Should we give Baxter a chance to defend himself? I mean, voting of Si-Donn, a loyal, would mean he is a scum and lying about the third party thing... I just want to see his reaction. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 20, 2013 19:46:36 GMT -5
Should we give Baxter a chance to defend himself? I mean, voting of Si-Donn, a loyal, would mean he is a scum and lying about the third party thing... I just want to see his reaction. He didn't vote him off by himself and we don't know if he's lying. And anyone who has some sense will listen to Baxter's reaction first |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 20, 2013 19:48:26 GMT -5
Should we give Baxter a chance to defend himself? I mean, voting of Si-Donn, a loyal, would mean he is a scum and lying about the third party thing... I just want to see his reaction. He didn't vote him off by himself and we don't know if he's lying. And anyone who has some sense will listen to Baxter's reaction first I don't really care about his defence, but I'll listen to it. |
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jul 20, 2013 19:53:09 GMT -5
Who would hate Nalian and Zalian?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 20, 2013 19:59:11 GMT -5
Who would hate Nalian and Zalian? The Sith |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 20, 2013 20:13:47 GMT -5
Who would hate Nalian and Zalian? I think it was mainly because they suspected Baxter... |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 20, 2013 20:23:04 GMT -5
Who would hate Nalian and Zalian? I think it was mainly because they suspected Baxter... Did they? They voted for Korshii |
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jul 20, 2013 20:24:12 GMT -5
Who would hate Nalian and Zalian? The Sith ...... I meant a player. We all know it's the Sith but who? |
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jul 20, 2013 20:25:43 GMT -5
I think it was mainly because they suspected Baxter... Did they? They voted for Korshii Maybe Korshii is a scum and wanted revenge? It's a bold accusation but it's a possibility. |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 20, 2013 20:26:38 GMT -5
...... I meant a player. We all know it's the Sith but who? People aren't necessarily killed because the scum hate them... There is usually reason behind it |
|
|
|
Post by Kenbo on Jul 20, 2013 20:27:52 GMT -5
Did they? They voted for Korshii Maybe Korshii is a scum and wanted revenge? It's a bold accusation but it's a possibility, Revenge? No. And he only had a couple votes against him. |
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 20, 2013 20:29:43 GMT -5
Maybe Korshii is a scum and wanted revenge? It's a bold accusation but it's a possibility, Revenge? No. And he only had a couple votes against him. Mine was on e of them. I'm still convinced he's scum even though he seems to have decided it's time to ditch Baxter... |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 20, 2013 20:32:09 GMT -5
Did they? They voted for Korshii Maybe Korshii is a scum and wanted revenge? It's a bold accusation but it's a possibility, Extremely unlikely to my mind. I think it was because there was next to no chance they would be protected, due to them not being anywhere near the spotlight. |
|
Wars Story
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5