|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 15:01:00 GMT -5
I see some people have really jumped the gun.... Are you referring to Da'lak and myself because you obviously never saw the one minded people yesterday that the only explanation was to vote Baxter. I was talking about the fact that you and him voted when voting wasn't open. Not the reasons why you voted for who you did. Don't get all defensive.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 18, 2013 15:01:29 GMT -5
So Baxter: if you really are a 3rd party, why'd you back up Varg so much? I think your a 3rd party, but I still think you have a hit list, and that Si's on it. What would be the point of a 3rd party if your no different from the Nami?
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 15:01:46 GMT -5
"You also keep telling me to accuse other people because you don't want to be accused." I did not want them voted because I do not believe they are scum. But if you took your reasons for wanting me dead to heart(Which you don't), then logically you would vote them off. No, you're only using part of my argument for that. You're still ignoring Varg making you look loyal, other major suspects siding with you, you having no defense, you always ignoring evidence, you acting like you led the vote on Varg when he was already doomed, and how you keep changing your opinion on my affiliation just to better fit your argument. Literally everything you said can be disproved by my defense except the last one. I do not know what your affiliation is. All I know is that you are trying to kill me.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 15:02:22 GMT -5
That's very convenient of you. And I still have no proof you are Jedi. You have no proof I'm a jedi yet you called me one earlier. Hmm. I said I thought you were a Jedi. But I can't be sure.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 18, 2013 15:03:19 GMT -5
So Baxter: if you really are a 3rd party, why'd you back up Varg so much? I think your a 3rd party, but I still think you have a hit list, and that Si's on it. What would be the point of a 3rd party if your no different from the Nami? Anyway, there's no way to prove you're a 3rd party, so why should we believe you?
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 15:03:22 GMT -5
"You're still ignoring Varg making you look loyal"
He tried to make you look loyal, Baxter.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 15:04:30 GMT -5
So Baxter: if you really are a 3rd party, why'd you back up Varg so much? I think your a 3rd party, but I still think you have a hit list, and that Si's on it. What would be the point of a 3rd party if your no different from the Nami? I backed up Varg because I did truly think he was loyal. Hopefully you can see that now that you know I'm not with. I do not have a hit list, but either way I want Si dead because I think he's a sith. And my role was actually altered a few times, but I still was able to get my two protections. Here's some more proof: I originally had to find two Dark Nami. Every night I'd investigate people to see if they were the Dark Nami. When they were both found by me I'd win. That was changed to my new role though.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 18, 2013 15:04:38 GMT -5
Are you referring to Da'lak and myself because you obviously never saw the one minded people yesterday that the only explanation was to vote Baxter. I was talking about the fact that you and him voted when voting wasn't open. Not the reasons why you voted for who you did. Don't get all defensive. I didnt vote for him to tater voting was open.....
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 15:05:34 GMT -5
"You're still ignoring Varg making you look loyal" He tried to make you look loyal, Baxter. How would I look loyal when he dies and comes up scum? That would make me look like scum. He did it to make me look like scum. He was saying he was suspicious of other people to make them look loyal, and that includes you.
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 15:05:53 GMT -5
I was talking about the fact that you and him voted when voting wasn't open. Not the reasons why you voted for who you did. Don't get all defensive. I didnt vote for him to tater voting was open..... Oh sorry.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 15:05:57 GMT -5
You have no proof I'm a jedi yet you called me one earlier. Hmm. I said I thought you were a Jedi. But I can't be sure. You thought I was a jedi yet you continued to call me sith.
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 18, 2013 15:06:06 GMT -5
So Baxter: if you really are a 3rd party, why'd you back up Varg so much? I think your a 3rd party, but I still think you have a hit list, and that Si's on it. What would be the point of a 3rd party if your no different from the Nami? I backed up Varg because I did truly think he was loyal. Hopefully you can see that now that you know I'm not with. I do not have a hit list, but either way I want Si dead because I think he's a sith. And my role was actually altered a few times, but I still was able to get my two protections. Here's some more proof: I originally had to find two Dark Nami. Every night I'd investigate people to see if they were the Dark Nami. When they were both found by me I'd win. That was changed to my new role though. How is that relevant...?
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 15:07:20 GMT -5
"You're still ignoring Varg making you look loyal" He tried to make you look loyal, Baxter. How would I look loyal when he dies and comes up scum? That would make me look like scum. He did it to make me look like scum. He was saying he was suspicious of other people to make them look loyal, and that includes you. I don't think Varg was planning on dying. So if he successfully made you look loyal, you could save him and he'd survive.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 15:07:58 GMT -5
I backed up Varg because I did truly think he was loyal. Hopefully you can see that now that you know I'm not with. I do not have a hit list, but either way I want Si dead because I think he's a sith. And my role was actually altered a few times, but I still was able to get my two protections. Here's some more proof: I originally had to find two Dark Nami. Every night I'd investigate people to see if they were the Dark Nami. When they were both found by me I'd win. That was changed to my new role though. How is that relevant...? You asked how I was third party so I'm giving you a little history of my role.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 15:08:38 GMT -5
How would I look loyal when he dies and comes up scum? That would make me look like scum. He did it to make me look like scum. He was saying he was suspicious of other people to make them look loyal, and that includes you. I don't think Varg was planning on dying. So if he successfully made you look loyal, you could save him and he'd survive. And how would he successfully make me look loyal? Huh? By voting you off and having you come up as scum? There was no way I'd look loyal in that situation.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 15:10:17 GMT -5
"You're still ignoring Varg making you look loyal" He tried to make you look loyal, Baxter. How would I look loyal when he dies and comes up scum? That would make me look like scum. He did it to make me look like scum. He was saying he was suspicious of other people to make them look loyal, and that includes you. Before he died. He suddenly started accusing you. But never mind. I've made up my mind. I may not trust Baxter but I don't gain anything from voting him off. I'd rather vote for another very suspicious person who doesn't contribute to discussion at all and randomly accuses people. VOTE: KARSHII (BOBA).
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 15:11:06 GMT -5
I don't think Varg was planning on dying. So if he successfully made you look loyal, you could save him and he'd survive. And how would he successfully make me look loyal? Huh? By voting you off and having you come up as scum? There was no way I'd look loyal in that situation. If everyone was an idiot and believed you (like right now) then you could save him.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 15:11:15 GMT -5
How would I look loyal when he dies and comes up scum? That would make me look like scum. He did it to make me look like scum. He was saying he was suspicious of other people to make them look loyal, and that includes you. Before he died. He suddenly started accusing you. But never mind. I've made up my mind. I may not trust Baxter but I don't gain anything from voting him off. I'd rather vote for another very suspicious person who doesn't contribute to discussion at all and randomly accuses people. VOTE: KARSHII (BOBA). According to Si you can't use that argument against anyone.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 15:11:38 GMT -5
How would I look loyal when he dies and comes up scum? That would make me look like scum. He did it to make me look like scum. He was saying he was suspicious of other people to make them look loyal, and that includes you. Before he died. He suddenly started accusing you. But never mind. I've made up my mind. I may not trust Baxter but I don't gain anything from voting him off. I'd rather vote for another very suspicious person who doesn't contribute to discussion at all and randomly accuses people. VOTE: KARSHII (BOBA). That isn't helping anything...
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 18, 2013 15:12:09 GMT -5
I participate in discussion. But when I try to discuss no one joins in. It's tough luck for them
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 15:12:21 GMT -5
And how would he successfully make me look loyal? Huh? By voting you off and having you come up as scum? There was no way I'd look loyal in that situation. If everyone was an idiot and believed you (like right now) then you could save him. He was beyond the point of saving. Why are you saying I would save him if I was third party? Again, you keep changing the story around to fit your argument better. And you're worried that you'll be convicted.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 15:12:31 GMT -5
Before he died. He suddenly started accusing you. But never mind. I've made up my mind. I may not trust Baxter but I don't gain anything from voting him off. I'd rather vote for another very suspicious person who doesn't contribute to discussion at all and randomly accuses people. VOTE: KARSHII (BOBA). According to Si you can't use that argument against anyone. Not true, I use randomly accusing against you all the time.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 15:13:39 GMT -5
According to Si you can't use that argument against anyone. Not true, I use randomly accusing against you all the time. So you can say I randomly accuse people when I've just been accusing you for reasons I've stated dozens of times, yet I can't say you aren't adding anything to the conversation?
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 15:13:50 GMT -5
If everyone was an idiot and believed you (like right now) then you could save him. He was beyond the point of saving. Why are you saying I would save him if I was third party? Again, you keep changing the story around to fit your argument better. And you're worried that you'll be convicted. I don't understand your role. All I know is you are try to kill Loyals which hurts the team.
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 15:13:53 GMT -5
Before he died. He suddenly started accusing you. But never mind. I've made up my mind. I may not trust Baxter but I don't gain anything from voting him off. I'd rather vote for another very suspicious person who doesn't contribute to discussion at all and randomly accuses people. VOTE: KARSHII (BOBA). According to Si you can't use that argument against anyone. Well I don't think Si makes the rules...
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 15:14:42 GMT -5
Not true, I use randomly accusing against you all the time. So you can say I randomly accuse people when I've just been accusing you for reasons I've stated dozens of times, yet I can't say you aren't adding anything to the conversation? You didn't have any evidence before you were willing to vote me off. You just made up more afterwards.
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 18, 2013 15:15:10 GMT -5
I accuse people at the first sign of scumminess. Even the tiniest hint that they may be scum makes me accuse them. It's quite a good tactic, you can see who sides with them when I accuse the person.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 15:15:35 GMT -5
Hang on, Wait! Who did Baxter NOT contact?
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 18, 2013 15:16:45 GMT -5
VOTE: BAXTER (POTATO) 1. Sides with a scum. 2. Inatially Accuses Si for inactivity when countless players had contributed less than him. 3. Seems to be accusing Si relentlessly 4. When he's about to be voted off, claims 3rd party. Why then, and not a the beginning of the day? 5. Claims 3rd party's intention is to do exactly what the Nami do. If this is true, the. Why is there a 3rd party? 6. Bulla subtly defends him. If you're 3rd party, Bulla, then why not speak up like Baxter?
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 15:17:09 GMT -5
So you can say I randomly accuse people when I've just been accusing you for reasons I've stated dozens of times, yet I can't say you aren't adding anything to the conversation? You didn't have any evidence before you were willing to vote me off. You just made up more afterwards. I brought up lots of evidence. Your reaction to me saying I'll vote for you isn't an actual vote, but you acted like it was along with much more. You can't deny the other evidence I brought up against you was also good, because both Jet and Soraz said it was there and made sense.
|
|