|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 13:59:21 GMT -5
Yes cause only scum are allowed to contact people...... Baxter is not a threat to the Nami. Baxter why don't you just claim your role here I mean almost everyone has seen it form the PM. Sure, why not. I'm a jedi third party and I win when all of the sith die. That's why I'm pushing for Si, I think he's sith and I'll be closer to winning when he's dead. I also have two protections to use in the night (both of which I didn't use last night because I thought if I was killed I deserved to die) so I've still got those. I'm aligned with the Nami. So what you're saying us that you're a Nami with a different name? I think you're lying about your win conditions. I think your real goal is to kill me and some other loyals.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 13:59:55 GMT -5
Sure, why not. I'm a jedi third party and I win when all of the sith die. That's why I'm pushing for Si, I think he's sith and I'll be closer to winning when he's dead. I also have two protections to use in the night (both of which I didn't use last night because I thought if I was killed I deserved to die) so I've still got those. I'm aligned with the Nami. Third parties are Dangerous... and they cannot be trusted.. Actually, both loyalists and scum get nothing out of convicting me, especially the Nami in this case because I basically am one. The scum only want me gone because it prolongs their stay here. Don't forget I still have two protections to use in the night, too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2013 14:01:04 GMT -5
OOC: Can someone give me a summary of what is going on please.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 18, 2013 14:01:51 GMT -5
Sure, why not. I'm a jedi third party and I win when all of the sith die. That's why I'm pushing for Si, I think he's sith and I'll be closer to winning when he's dead. I also have two protections to use in the night (both of which I didn't use last night because I thought if I was killed I deserved to die) so I've still got those. I'm aligned with the Nami. Third parties are Dangerous... and they cannot be trusted.. WTF? he helps the Nami win he wins with the Nami and he has protections.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:02:07 GMT -5
OOC: Can someone give me a summary of what is going on please. It's probably best that you don't get a summary from either me or Si because we'll be biased on our opinions.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 14:02:17 GMT -5
Sure, why not. I'm a jedi third party and I win when all of the sith die. That's why I'm pushing for Si, I think he's sith and I'll be closer to winning when he's dead. I also have two protections to use in the night (both of which I didn't use last night because I thought if I was killed I deserved to die) so I've still got those. I'm aligned with the Nami. Now he's going to say you made it up to save yourself ...... Even though alot of people saw this already. No I'm not. I think you're lying about your win conditions. You're claiming that you're exactly the same as Nami but with a different name. I call BS. Your goal is to kill ME, and probably a few other loyals.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 18, 2013 14:03:09 GMT -5
And also look at it this way why would a Jedi be killing the Nami? The Jedi are peaceful to the Nami. The Nami's enemy is the sith.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 14:09:39 GMT -5
Look people, we have no confirmation about if Baxter is telling the truth about his intentions, or if he is really a Jedi. But let's look at what we do know. Baxter sided unexplainably with a scum and pushed for a loyal with no evidence that couldn't be applied to others. Even if he's Jedi(And I think he is) you have to look at the fact that he tried to kill a random Nami. Conclusion: He's got a hit list against the Nami.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:11:45 GMT -5
Look people, we have no confirmation about if Baxter is telling the truth about his intentions, or if he is really a Jedi. But let's look at what we do know. Baxter sided unexplainably with a scum and pushed for a loyal with no evidence that couldn't be applied to others. Even if he's Jedi(And I think he is) you have to look at the fact that he tried to kill a random Nami. Conclusion: He's got a hit list against the Nami. I have no hit list, but if I did why would it be against the Nami? Some would be bound to be with. I'm only accusing you because I think you're scummy and a with. We also have no confirmation that you're a loyal and that I pursued voting a "loyal" off.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:12:38 GMT -5
Branching off of that, your only defense so far has been you just saying you're loyal, Si. With all the commotion around me some people seem to forget about you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2013 14:13:20 GMT -5
OOC: Well nothing is better then reading thru 9 pages of comments. I already read the earlier comments.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 14:14:09 GMT -5
You did pursue not voting off some one a lot more suspicious than me. And what am I supposed to defend myself against?
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jul 18, 2013 14:14:27 GMT -5
Third parties are Dangerous... and they cannot be trusted.. WTF? he helps the Nami win he wins with the Nami and he has protections. He could be lying.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 18, 2013 14:16:09 GMT -5
WTF? he helps the Nami win he wins with the Nami and he has protections. He could be lying. He would have no reason to lie about a role like that and claim it to only me like he did last night if he wanted to make a fake role he would above claimed to everyone probably. Though he claimed it to me alone last night first to keep his role secure.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:16:16 GMT -5
You did pursue not voting off some one a lot more suspicious than me. And what am I supposed to defend myself against? All my evidence. Don't act like it's not there like you've been doing all day. Now you're just making up excuses so you don't have to prepare the defense which you don't have.
|
|
|
Post by Cad Bane (Dark) on Jul 18, 2013 14:17:19 GMT -5
And also look at it this way why would a Jedi be killing the Nami? The Jedi are peaceful to the Nami. The Nami's enemy is the sith. That does make sense. They are the Jedi's enemy as well. We have A common enemy
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:18:18 GMT -5
And also look at it this way why would a Jedi be killing the Nami? The Jedi are peaceful to the Nami. The Nami's enemy is the sith. That does make sense. They are the Jedi's enemy as well. We have A common enemy The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 14:18:43 GMT -5
You did pursue not voting off some one a lot more suspicious than me. And what am I supposed to defend myself against? All my evidence. Don't act like it's not there like you've been doing all day. Now you're just making up excuses so you don't have to prepare the defense which you don't have. State it! I've been repeating my evidence all day!
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 18, 2013 14:18:56 GMT -5
I just thought of something what if Baxter is the only protector we have with his 2 protections?
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:19:58 GMT -5
I just thought of something what if Baxter is the only protector we have with his 2 protections? There's another alright. I almost didn't get to keep my role because of balancing issues, which is why I only get two protections instead of one per night.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 14:19:59 GMT -5
That does make sense. They are the Jedi's enemy as well. We have A common enemy The enemy of my enemy is my friend. That's right. This guy is all of our enemies, but you're all too blind to see it.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:20:54 GMT -5
All my evidence. Don't act like it's not there like you've been doing all day. Now you're just making up excuses so you don't have to prepare the defense which you don't have. State it! I've been repeating my evidence all day! You'll ignore it again though. Go to page 22 of the day 1 thread. Go back a few pages of this thread. Or, just skim through the days and you'll find some for sure.
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 18, 2013 14:21:46 GMT -5
I just thought of something what if Baxter is the only protector we have with his 2 protections? There's another alright. I almost didn't get to keep my role because of balancing issues, which is why I only get two protections instead of one per night. That makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:22:04 GMT -5
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. That's right. This guy is all of our enemies, but you're all too blind to see it. The way you say that sounds like you're sith and you want me gone because you know I'm a threat. It sounds like you're talking to the loyals as a sith.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 14:23:10 GMT -5
State it! I've been repeating my evidence all day! You'll ignore it again though. Go to page 22 of the day 1 thread. Go back a few pages of this thread. Or, just skim through the days and you'll find some for sure. Stop ignoring everything I say. You obviously have TONS of evidence against me so why don't you just tell us?
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 14:24:44 GMT -5
That's right. This guy is all of our enemies, but you're all too blind to see it. The way you say that sounds like you're sith and you want me gone because you know I'm a threat. It sounds like you're talking to the loyals as a sith. Everything I say sounds like Sith to you. And I'm not trying to convince you I'm loyal because you'll go for me no matter what.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:25:05 GMT -5
This is the fourth time I've had to repost my evidence now. Some people will just never listen. You accuse me because you say I don't contribute. I'm contributing. And you fail to notice the people who actually don't contribute. Why don't you accuse Groznacca or Da'lak? It's not just because of that. I've stated many other reasons that you keep ignoring, like Varg being sketchy on how to make you look loyal, you accusing me only because I accused you, you having other major suspects of mine side with you, and you acting like your loyal because Varg was voted off despite you not even accusing Varg until just about everyone already said they'd vote for him. My initial suspicions towards you were about lack of contribution, but my deeper suspicions were for many other reasons which led to me voting for you. You also keep telling me to accuse other people because you don't want to be accused. Here's a quick summary. If you don't have the strength to go back to page 22 of day 1 to see more evidence, then that's not my problem. I'd quote it if I could but I can't. So just go back and look.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:26:04 GMT -5
The way you say that sounds like you're sith and you want me gone because you know I'm a threat. It sounds like you're talking to the loyals as a sith. Everything I say sounds like Sith to you. And I'm not trying to convince you I'm loyal because you'll go for me no matter what. But even you have to admit that sounds a lot like a scum slip-up. You're addressing the Nami and sith as one even though they're not. We're enemies, and you're trying to turn your enemy against their ally.
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 14:26:53 GMT -5
This is the fourth time I've had to repost my evidence now. Some people will just never listen. It's not just because of that. I've stated many other reasons that you keep ignoring, like Varg being sketchy on how to make you look loyal, you accusing me only because I accused you, you having other major suspects of mine side with you, and you acting like your loyal because Varg was voted off despite you not even accusing Varg until just about everyone already said they'd vote for him. My initial suspicions towards you were about lack of contribution, but my deeper suspicions were for many other reasons which led to me voting for you. You also keep telling me to accuse other people because you don't want to be accused. Here's a quick summary. If you don't have the strength to go back to page 22 of day 1 to see more evidence, then that's not my problem. I'd quote it if I could but I can't. So just go back and look. Welcome to my life. I bring up evidence against you FOURTY times and people still are oblivious.
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 14:27:50 GMT -5
This is the fourth time I've had to repost my evidence now. Some people will just never listen. Here's a quick summary. If you don't have the strength to go back to page 22 of day 1 to see more evidence, then that's not my problem. I'd quote it if I could but I can't. So just go back and look. Welcome to my life. I bring up evidence against you FOURTY times and people still are oblivious. Oh no, we acknowledge your evidence alright. We all just point out the flaws in it.
|
|