|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 11:20:52 GMT -5
And now you're using OOC to your advantage again.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 18, 2013 11:21:52 GMT -5
Yeah, he's cocky and scummy. That's two scum traits, he thinks he will win but I will oppose him every step of the way. If you attempt to hinder my quest in voting off Jet, I will unleash the full power of the Bink upon you, I will not allow the Sith to get Namaru. Nami rule! Sith suck! You'll be my vote one of theses days,but you'll have to get in line. OOC: Of course, I know Boba is never one to back down, wait... who's Boba?   |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 11:22:16 GMT -5
Baxter, I'm suspicious of you because you accuse me with weak evidence that applies to lot of people you ignore and has been disproved several times. And people siding with you for no reason makes sense if you are scum. Weak evidence? How? Do you really want me to pull up that post with all the suspicion towards you from yesterday? Are you forgetting the multiple times I've accuse you? You, Jet, and Soraz's excuses for voting me is that I have weak evidence. That in itself is weak evidence. You accuse me because you say I don't contribute. I'm contributing. And you fail to notice the people who actually don't contribute. Why don't you accuse Groznacca or Da'lak? |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 11:25:00 GMT -5
Weak evidence? How? Do you really want me to pull up that post with all the suspicion towards you from yesterday? Are you forgetting the multiple times I've accuse you? You, Jet, and Soraz's excuses for voting me is that I have weak evidence. That in itself is weak evidence. You accuse me because you say I don't contribute. I'm contributing. And you fail to notice the people who actually don't contribute. Why don't you accuse Groznacca or Da'lak? It's not just because of that. I've stated many other reasons that you keep ignoring, like Varg being sketchy on how to make you look loyal, you accusing me only because I accused you, you having other major suspects of mine side with you, and you acting like your loyal because Varg was voted off despite you not even accusing Varg until just about everyone already said they'd vote for him. My initial suspicions towards you were about lack of contribution, but my deeper suspicions were for many other reasons which led to me voting for you. You also keep telling me to accuse other people because you don't want to be accused. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 18, 2013 11:26:22 GMT -5
Weak evidence? How? Do you really want me to pull up that post with all the suspicion towards you from yesterday? Are you forgetting the multiple times I've accuse you? You, Jet, and Soraz's excuses for voting me is that I have weak evidence. That in itself is weak evidence. You accuse me because you say I don't contribute. I'm contributing. And you fail to notice the people who actually don't contribute. Why don't you accuse Groznacca or Da'lak? OOC: Wampa's new! Why would he go after a new player! Oh... my bad. I was using OOC evidence!  Can't have that! So why not one of the other inactive? Is Ivar getting a new laptop? Well, how is Jet Nebula supposed to know or care? |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jul 18, 2013 11:26:26 GMT -5
Right, I think I've got my vote chosen. VOTE: SI-DONN (SPIDER). The evidence Baxter listed about him is viable to me and I'm starting to see that he's starting to implicate me as scum (just as I suspected). Call me scum, call me a crazy loyal, I really don't care. I agree, I haven't contributed much, if not at all, but this time I hope I am. So go ahead Jet and Si-Donn. Call me scum and accuse me, vote me off if you want. But hopefully there'll be some people who actually see sense around here and agree with me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 11:26:26 GMT -5
By the way, he was talking about how it is. I know just about everyone would vote for you right now, right? Nope. There are actually a few people who are either not voting for me or are neutral. Right now I'm neutral, but I'm leaning towards voting for you. |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 18, 2013 11:28:14 GMT -5
Wait it voting open yet? I will be voting Si-Donn when it's time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 11:28:45 GMT -5
You accuse me because you say I don't contribute. I'm contributing. And you fail to notice the people who actually don't contribute. Why don't you accuse Groznacca or Da'lak? OOC: Wampa's new! Why would he go after a new player! Oh... my bad. I was using OOC evidence! Can't have that! So why not one of the other inactive? Is Ivar getting a new laptop? Well, how is Jet Nebula supposed to know or care? Why do you keep saying I should be suspicions of him? Why do you always say it in OOC? Like I've said dozens of times yet you still ignore it, Si's not getting my vote for inactivity or lack of contribution. See my post a few posts up if you're still confused. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 18, 2013 11:29:47 GMT -5
Voting will begin in an hour.
|
|
|
|
Post by Malgus on Jul 18, 2013 11:31:32 GMT -5
Voting will begin in an hour. I see some people have really jumped the gun.... |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jul 18, 2013 11:32:31 GMT -5
Voting will begin in an hour. OOC: Oh, I thought it'd already begun  |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 18, 2013 11:34:08 GMT -5
Voting will begin in an hour. I see some people have really jumped the gun.... Are you referring to Da'lak and myself because you obviously never saw the one minded people yesterday that the only explanation was to vote Baxter. |
|
|
|
Post by bane on Jul 18, 2013 11:34:11 GMT -5
OOC: Wampa's new! Why would he go after a new player! Oh... my bad. I was using OOC evidence! Can't have that! So why not one of the other inactive? Is Ivar getting a new laptop? Well, how is Jet Nebula supposed to know or care? Why do you keep saying I should be suspicions of him? Why do you always say it in OOC? Like I've said dozens of times yet you still ignore it, Si's not getting my vote for inactivity or lack of contribution. See my post a few posts up if you're still confused. Yes, I'm quite sure there's PLENTY of reasons he suspicious now... but you initially accused him,like you say, for ..."inactivity or lack of contributation." At that point in the game, there were like 5 people guilty of that... |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 11:36:15 GMT -5
Why do you keep saying I should be suspicions of him? Why do you always say it in OOC? Like I've said dozens of times yet you still ignore it, Si's not getting my vote for inactivity or lack of contribution. See my post a few posts up if you're still confused. Yes, I'm quite sure there's PLENTY of reasons he suspicious now... but you initially accused him,like you say, for ..."inactivity or lack of contributation." At that point in the game, there were like 5 people guilty of that... But does it matter? I expanded on it and found him suspicious for many other reasons that you're still ignoring. Your just acting like he only got accused because of that first reason in the first half of day 1. Times have changed since then. You even just said now that you can see the other reasons he's suspicious, but you're still ignoring them. |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 18, 2013 11:46:49 GMT -5
Voting will begin in an hour. OOC: Oh, I thought it'd already begun It's fine, I'll count it.  |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 11:48:13 GMT -5
You accuse me because you say I don't contribute. I'm contributing. And you fail to notice the people who actually don't contribute. Why don't you accuse Groznacca or Da'lak? It's not just because of that. I've stated many other reasons that you keep ignoring, like Varg being sketchy on how to make you look loyal, you accusing me only because I accused you, you having other major suspects of mine side with you, and you acting like your loyal because Varg was voted off despite you not even accusing Varg until just about everyone already said they'd vote for him. My initial suspicions towards you were about lack of contribution, but my deeper suspicions were for many other reasons which led to me voting for you. You also keep telling me to accuse other people because you don't want to be accused. I wasn't telling you to accuse them becaus I don't think they are scum. But with what you find suspicious of me, it would only make sense for you to accuse them. I act loyal because I am loyal, not because of Varg thank you very much. And I found you suspicious when you first started defending Varg. While it is true that I only accused you once you accused me, it was because of how you accused, to put suspicion off Varg, that made me suspicious. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 18, 2013 11:50:17 GMT -5
Guys, trust me on this. Vote Baxter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 11:59:31 GMT -5
It's not just because of that. I've stated many other reasons that you keep ignoring, like Varg being sketchy on how to make you look loyal, you accusing me only because I accused you, you having other major suspects of mine side with you, and you acting like your loyal because Varg was voted off despite you not even accusing Varg until just about everyone already said they'd vote for him. My initial suspicions towards you were about lack of contribution, but my deeper suspicions were for many other reasons which led to me voting for you. You also keep telling me to accuse other people because you don't want to be accused. I wasn't telling you to accuse them becaus I don't think they are scum. But with what you find suspicious of me, it would only make sense for you to accuse them. I act loyal because I am loyal, not because of Varg thank you very much. And I found you suspicious when you first started defending Varg. While it is true that I only accused you once you accused me, it was because of how you accused, to put suspicion off Varg, that made me suspicious. That wasn't your reason yesterday. Yesterday you were saying I was scum because I only accused you because you accused me, which is a lie. When I called you out for that, because I accused you first, your excuse was that I strengthened my attack on you because you accused me back. And now today you're admitting that you only accused me because I accused you. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 12:02:45 GMT -5
On top of that throw on that you wanted voting to open early today because you wanted me gone fast with no questions asked. You were afraid to face me, and you didn't want to. You knew that even though I was practically done for, I still could gather others to my side. And that scared you, because it could ruin your plans of getting rid of me. You knew Varg would come up as scum, that's why you kept pairing us up day 1. You knew you could do this now, but what you weren't expecting was for me to get allies. Now you know that this whole vote for me may not work.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 12:08:39 GMT -5
Baxter, the reason why many people suspected you is because you sided with a confirmed scum and tried to keep him alive at all costs. Only scum would do that, or someone determined to destroy a certain person...
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 12:11:05 GMT -5
Baxter, the reason why many people suspected you is because you sided with a confirmed scum and tried to keep him alive at all costs. Only scum would do that, or someone determined to destroy a certain person... Why would only scum do that? I defend people who I think are loyal. How do you expect scum to win if they don't have any allies other than their own? Some people are bound to be on their side at one point or another. And I've already told you multiple times that that's not my role. My win condition is to catch all of the sith. |
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 18, 2013 12:12:38 GMT -5
OOC: Why do the scum always go after me? |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 12:14:03 GMT -5
Baxter, the reason why many people suspected you is because you sided with a confirmed scum and tried to keep him alive at all costs. Only scum would do that, or someone determined to destroy a certain person... Why would only scum do that? I defend people who I think are loyal. How do you expect scum to win if they don't have any allies other than their own? Some people are bound to be on their side at one point or another. And I've already told you multiple times that that's not my role. My win condition is to catch all of the sith. Every other person that voted voted for Varg and there was a lot of proof against him. Yet you decided to vote for Si-donn without giving him the chance to defence himself, it looked like you hoped people would join you in your rushed voting. You were too determined to vote of Si-donn and too certain Varg wasn't scum. Something isn't right there. And if your win condition hadn't been to get rid of the Sith you'd have said the same thing. Once Si-donn is voted off you'll win, or continue with your next target. It's the only way to explain why you want(ed) to vote for Si-donn so desperately. |
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 18, 2013 12:15:16 GMT -5
Weak evidence? How? Do you really want me to pull up that post with all the suspicion towards you from yesterday? Are you forgetting the multiple times I've accuse you? You, Jet, and Soraz's excuses for voting me is that I have weak evidence. That in itself is weak evidence. You accuse me because you say I don't contribute. I'm contributing. And you fail to notice the people who actually don't contribute. Why don't you accuse Groznacca or Da'lak? Ummmm its Grozbecca. |
|
|
|
Post by red on Jul 18, 2013 12:15:46 GMT -5
Guys, trust me on this. Vote Baxter. U got it, bro. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 12:15:53 GMT -5
Why would only scum do that? I defend people who I think are loyal. How do you expect scum to win if they don't have any allies other than their own? Some people are bound to be on their side at one point or another. And I've already told you multiple times that that's not my role. My win condition is to catch all of the sith. Every other person that voted voted for Varg and there was a lot of proof against him. Yet you decided to vote for Si-donn without giving him the chance to defence himself, it looked like you hoped people would join you in your rushed voting. You were too determined to vote of Si-donn and too certain Varg wasn't scum. Something isn't right there. And if your win condition hadn't been to get rid of the Sith you'd have said the same thing. Once Si-donn is voted off you'll win, or continue with your next target. It's the only way to explain why you want(ed) to vote for Si-donn so desperately. I'll still be here after he's dead. And I've explained dozens of times that I don't care what Si had to say yesterday, I found him more suspicious of Varg so I put my vote in for him. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 12:19:07 GMT -5
Every other person that voted voted for Varg and there was a lot of proof against him. Yet you decided to vote for Si-donn without giving him the chance to defence himself, it looked like you hoped people would join you in your rushed voting. You were too determined to vote of Si-donn and too certain Varg wasn't scum. Something isn't right there. And if your win condition hadn't been to get rid of the Sith you'd have said the same thing. Once Si-donn is voted off you'll win, or continue with your next target. It's the only way to explain why you want(ed) to vote for Si-donn so desperately. I'll still be here after he's dead. And I've explained dozens of times that I don't care what Si had to say yesterday, I found him more suspicious of Varg so I put my vote in for him. I still don't believe you. All Si-donn did what made him suspicious to you on day 1 was agreeing with everyone. Da'lak for example did the exact same thing and when people pointed that out you ignored it. And there are so many more that didn't eve discuss anything and just voted, or didn't show up at all. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 18, 2013 12:22:31 GMT -5
I'll still be here after he's dead. And I've explained dozens of times that I don't care what Si had to say yesterday, I found him more suspicious of Varg so I put my vote in for him. I still don't believe you. All Si-donn did what made him suspicious to you on day 1 was agreeing with everyone. Da'lak for example did the exact same thing and when people pointed that out you ignored it. And there are so many more that didn't eve discuss anything and just voted, or didn't show up at all. Are we still going on about this? I accused Si for many other reasons, some that even Jet admitted he can see. Now you're just ignoring them because you know they're true. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 18, 2013 12:24:06 GMT -5
I still don't believe you. All Si-donn did what made him suspicious to you on day 1 was agreeing with everyone. Da'lak for example did the exact same thing and when people pointed that out you ignored it. And there are so many more that didn't eve discuss anything and just voted, or didn't show up at all. Are we still going on about this? I accused Si for many other reasons, some that even Jet admitted he can see. Now you're just ignoring them because you know they're true. I was talking about yesterday. I don't recall seeing any other proof then: He's inactive and agrees too much with others. |
|
Wars Story
Can't have that! So why not one of the other inactive? Is Ivar getting a new laptop? Well, how is Jet Nebula supposed to know or care?
it’s been quite a while. I’ve been pretty good, how about yourself?
Sept 30, 2024 21:29:31 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5
Nov 11, 2024 16:43:58 GMT -5