|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 4:03:40 GMT -5
Voting is open now, isn't it? My thoughts about the player: Scruffy: Well I found it strange that Scruffy took off and avoided a confrontation with Wicket, after making a very bold accusation. Also said that anyone who defended Wicket was equally suspicious, his first suspicion was made on his THIRD post. In addition he has "his eyes on" several people. Which is a different way of saying "I want to accuse everyone!" B2-78: The droid shared his trait to a lesser extent and was completely fine with Scruffy's quick accusations. Haldir: The elf rushed to Wicket's aid and defended strongly Eowyn: Argues with Wicket a lot, the two of them seem like enemies, could be a scum tactic so everyone THINKS that... Also got annoyed by my jokes. However like Scruffy and Spider on Birthday Game, they might be both loyals that don't like each other. Wicket: Somewhat hypocritical and getting annoyed over people who go around hating scum. Don't trust him. Captain America: I'm not sure what to think of this one. Inactives: Come online!!! You obviously do not know how scum work. On Day 1, normally, they lay back and let turmoil happen within the loyals. What you said about Wicket and I, although it may make some sense, is untrue. To try such scum tactics on Day 1 is extremely foolish. Well I did say "could". Maybe you two are like Scruffy and Spider on Day 1 of Birthday Game, they seemed weird arguing but they were in reality both loyals and the scum were inactive for the first day. |
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jul 6, 2013 4:25:23 GMT -5
Waki boshto koobaas Scruffy bo B2 kowami pom hagu chut chut. Waki mallya kuna chu chu? (What interests me, is that Scruffy and B2 seemed to agree with each other on who to vote for very quickly. What would make them so friendly?) I have studied your language for this occasion and from i got is that you think it is weird Scruffy and B2 agreed so fast. Well my blubly friend i can honestly say that i think it's pretty odd as well. Goodde da lodia niuta, be cotma alay an. Kavi hunka be jee-jee kava kobu puta. (There's something funny about them, but of course I could be wrong. However, I can't help but get the weirdest suspicion) |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 4:34:12 GMT -5
Voting is open now I think. And I think we ought to come to a decision for who to vote for soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jul 6, 2013 5:31:43 GMT -5
I have studied your language for this occasion and from i got is that you think it is weird Scruffy and B2 agreed so fast. Well my blubly friend i can honestly say that i think it's pretty odd as well. Goodde da lodia niuta, be cotma alay an. Kavi hunka be jee-jee kava kobu puta. (There's something funny about them, but of course I could be wrong. However, I can't help but get the weirdest suspicion) We seem to be on the same line here. I'm still suspicious of this Windu person though. I just can't shake that feeling off at all. |
|
|
|
Post by Pinda on Jul 6, 2013 6:38:18 GMT -5
Sorry I'm late. Did I miss something?
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 7:20:58 GMT -5
Sorry I'm late. Did I miss something? Scruffy started accusing Wicket strongly on his third post at random. And suspicions are all over the place. |
|
|
|
Post by Ivar-Jedi on Jul 6, 2013 8:49:27 GMT -5
OOC: I will probably be inactive today because i won't be home in the evening.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 6, 2013 9:00:14 GMT -5
Voting is open now, isn't it? My thoughts about the player: Scruffy: Well I found it strange that Scruffy took off and avoided a confrontation with Wicket, after making a very bold accusation. Also said that anyone who defended Wicket was equally suspicious, his first suspicion was made on his THIRD post. In addition he has "his eyes on" several people. Which is a different way of saying "I want to accuse everyone!" B2-78: The droid shared his trait to a lesser extent and was completely fine with Scruffy's quick accusations. Haldir: The elf rushed to Wicket's aid and defended strongly Eowyn: Argues with Wicket a lot, the two of them seem like enemies, could be a scum tactic so everyone THINKS that... Also got annoyed by my jokes. However like Scruffy and Spider on Birthday Game, they might be both loyals that don't like each other. Wicket: Somewhat hypocritical and getting annoyed over people who go around hating scum. Don't trust him. Captain America: I'm not sure what to think of this one. Inactives: Come online!!! Not Really. I just made that up to get people discussing. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 9:01:43 GMT -5
Voting is open now, isn't it? My thoughts about the player: Scruffy: Well I found it strange that Scruffy took off and avoided a confrontation with Wicket, after making a very bold accusation. Also said that anyone who defended Wicket was equally suspicious, his first suspicion was made on his THIRD post. In addition he has "his eyes on" several people. Which is a different way of saying "I want to accuse everyone!" B2-78: The droid shared his trait to a lesser extent and was completely fine with Scruffy's quick accusations. Haldir: The elf rushed to Wicket's aid and defended strongly Eowyn: Argues with Wicket a lot, the two of them seem like enemies, could be a scum tactic so everyone THINKS that... Also got annoyed by my jokes. However like Scruffy and Spider on Birthday Game, they might be both loyals that don't like each other. Wicket: Somewhat hypocritical and getting annoyed over people who go around hating scum. Don't trust him. Captain America: I'm not sure what to think of this one. Inactives: Come online!!! Not Really. I just made that up to get people discussing. *gasp* How insidiously deceitful!! |
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 6, 2013 9:57:34 GMT -5
Is voting open yet? So we are looking to vote Scruffy possibly? I'm still neutral on him yes he could be scum trying to get rid of a strong loyal or he could be just a foolish loyal.
OOC: Also I won't be able to get on much today.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 10:17:21 GMT -5
Is voting open yet? So we are looking to vote Scruffy possibly? I'm still neutral on him yes he could be scum trying to get rid of a strong loyal or he could be just a foolish loyal. OOC: Also I won't be able to get on much today. Yes I think voting is open. Also there's Haldir who was defending the hostile Wicket. |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 6, 2013 10:21:31 GMT -5
I would really like to have Scruffy come on and say something before we vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 10:22:29 GMT -5
I would really like to have Scruffy come on and say something before we vote. Yeah, he avoided confrontation with you. |
|
|
|
Post by Spidyyr on Jul 6, 2013 10:26:42 GMT -5
It's been 24 hours, so yeah, you can vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 6, 2013 10:36:59 GMT -5
Alright, I say we wait a few hours first before voting. Scruffy, please speak up soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maverick-Jedi-Valen on Jul 6, 2013 10:41:36 GMT -5
Alright, I say we wait a few hours first before voting. Scruffy, please speak up soon. Jee sie jee batha ne beechee. dee chess ko inkabunga Scruffy killee mah bukee. (I concur, I don't want to waste my vote for a loyal. However, I doubt Scruffy can say much that will save himself) |
|
|
|
Post by Potato on Jul 6, 2013 10:47:38 GMT -5
Alright, I say we wait a few hours first before voting. Scruffy, please speak up soon. Jee sie jee batha ne beechee. dee chess ko inkabunga Scruffy killee mah bukee. (I concur, I don't want to waste my vote for a loyal. However, I doubt Scruffy can say much that will save himself) I at least want to hear what he says before a vote starts. OOC: I have to go now and won't be back until later today. Maybe I'll be able to get on a couple times throughout the day, but don't count on me showing up much. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 10:47:53 GMT -5
Alright, I say we wait a few hours first before voting. Scruffy, please speak up soon. Jee sie jee batha ne beechee. dee chess ko inkabunga Scruffy killee mah bukee. (I concur, I don't want to waste my vote for a loyal. However, I doubt Scruffy can say much that will save himself) Maybe that is the right way forward. We are waiting on an inactive. I apologise for my impatience but time is not a luxury we have, in addition, if Scruffy is scum then the droid (who sided with him) might be scum as well. : VOTE: SCRUFFY THE CLONE (Scruffy) |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 10:50:43 GMT -5
Enter Scruffy the Clone. (He's online)
|
|
|
|
Post by Newan on Jul 6, 2013 10:57:40 GMT -5
Ill probably vote for him he seems like the best option as of now but something about Windu also strikes me wrong. I want to wait for him to say something first though.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 11:01:08 GMT -5
Ill probably vote for him he seems like the best option as of now but something about Windu also strikes me wrong. I want to wait for him to say something first though. Everyone is saying I'm odd because of my Jokes like... Knock Knock Who's there? Doctor Doctor Who? You just said it  Sometimes I crack myself up. There is my OOC/JK jokes as well. I partly told the jokes to get people talking, because no one was (Lighten the mood). |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 11:08:57 GMT -5
Scruffy once again avoided a confrontation despite being online for quite some time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 6, 2013 11:17:22 GMT -5
Scruffy just went on and off?
|
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 6, 2013 11:18:40 GMT -5
Interesting... perhaps he was a scum logging in to speak at their base? Hmm.. But I am still not sure of voting for him. I feel as if we have limited evidence, but then again, 'tis only Day 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 11:24:01 GMT -5
Interesting... perhaps he was a scum logging in to speak at their base? Hmm.. But I am still not sure of voting for him. I feel as if we have limited evidence, but then again, 'tis only Day 1. I voted for him because he was quick to accuse, avoided confrontations and the fact he said he would vote and he didn't despite the time ( about 15 mins) he was online. Little evidence is better than nothing. He could be just a loyal who was too hasty because Scruffy said he had secured his vote and that was his third post. It was very weird behaviour... |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 6, 2013 11:25:14 GMT -5
Interesting... perhaps he was a scum logging in to speak at their base? Hmm.. But I am still not sure of voting for him. I feel as if we have limited evidence, but then again, 'tis only Day 1. I voted for him because he was quick to accuse, avoided confrontations and the fact he said he would vote and he didn't despite the time ( about 15 mins) he was online. Little evidence is better than nothing. He could be just a loyal who was too hasty because Scruffy said he had secured his vote and that was his third post. It was very weird behaviour... Do you not think your vote was also quite hasty? |
|
|
|
Post by Namialus on Jul 6, 2013 11:25:57 GMT -5
Oh, Scruffy is here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Jul 6, 2013 11:32:01 GMT -5
Alright. Here's the deal: I read the previous posts before doing anything. It wasn't like I completely accused Wicket out of the blue. I'm sorry that I wasn't aware of the required number of posts for accusing. He never actually attempted to find the scum. If I'm correct, he went so far as to accuse other people, simply for not following up on nonexistent leads. What were we supposed to be doing? What? What could we do that could possibly find the scum, until someone did something scummy. That someone was you, Wicket. Guys, please trust me on this. If he's loyal, you can vote me off tomorrow. I'm certain that he's scum. Nothing else has come up, and he's only acted more scummy. At the very least, he gave me a chance. I'll give him that. But I know he's scum.
VOTE: WICKET (Tater)
Scum, you know I'm on to you. I dare you to kill me tonight. Go on. Do it. It'll just make you more painfully obvious for the loyals.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scruffy the Clone (Scruffy) on Jul 6, 2013 11:33:35 GMT -5
Interesting... perhaps he was a scum logging in to speak at their base? Hmm.. But I am still not sure of voting for him. I feel as if we have limited evidence, but then again, 'tis only Day 1. I voted for him because he was quick to accuse, avoided confrontations and the fact he said he would vote and he didn't despite the time ( about 15 mins) he was online. Little evidence is better than nothing. He could be just a loyal who was too hasty because Scruffy said he had secured his vote and that was his third post. It was very weird behaviour... Maybe it was a little quick. But voting wasn't open then. How could I vote before voting? I thought about my decision, and I'm sticking to it. EDIT: Wait, you were talking about earlier today. I was typing my defense, but I had to go before I could post it. |
|
|
|
Post by bobafett590 on Jul 6, 2013 11:34:16 GMT -5
I voted for him because he was quick to accuse, avoided confrontations and the fact he said he would vote and he didn't despite the time ( about 15 mins) he was online. Little evidence is better than nothing. He could be just a loyal who was too hasty because Scruffy said he had secured his vote and that was his third post. It was very weird behaviour... Do you not think your vote was also quite hasty? No, voting began hours ago and I thought about it. I was going to wait for what Scruffy was going to say, he had plenty of time to when he came online not too long ago but he didn't, he had his chance to defend himself and he wasted it. Scruffy is also inactive, (this is not an inactive vote, but being inactive mounts suspicion towards him) |
|
